Want FREE Templates on Organization, Change, & Culture? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Organizational Design Revamp for Multinational Technology Corporation


There are countless scenarios that require Organizational Design. Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Organizational Design to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. Let us analyze the following scenario.

Reading time: 8 minutes

Consider this scenario: The subject company, a multinational technology firm that specializes in the development and deployment of cutting-edge software solutions, has steadily grown in size with a concurrent increase in geographical footprint.

The organization has recently experienced an upsurge in market demand and considerable expansion, leading to operational inefficiencies and misalignments between teams spread across various global hubs. Consequently, this has exacerbated the complexity of the entity's organizational structure, fostering multiple duplicative roles and business units that inadvertently hinder standardized procedures, prompt decision-making and optimal resource allocation.



Hypothesizing the root causes, potential issues could be an inadequate Organizational Design model, absence of centralized strategic planning, and suboptimal alignment between the firm's business strategy and its current structure. These barriers typically surface when an organization experiences rapid expansion but fails to keep a close eye on internal operational efficiencies, management hierarchies, and clear delineation of roles and responsibilities.

Methodology

To address these challenges, it would be prudent to embark on a comprehensive 6-phase approach. The approach involves identifying the key issues, defining the new strategy, assessing alternatives, testing the preferred model, implementing changes, and monitoring outcomes.

  • The first phase necessitates scrutinizing the current operations to highlight pain points. This step will involve an in-depth study of the roles, responsibilities, authority lines, and the flow of information.
  • Second, the organization's vision, mission, and long-term strategic plans should be reviewed. The alignment of structure with strategy is key to efficient Organizational Design.
  • Phase three involves brainstorming alternatives to the current state. It would also include running predictive models to ascertain which potential structure would yield optimal results.
  • The fourth phase would require testing the selected model, collecting feedback, and making necessary tweaks.
  • The fifth phase will focus on implementing the strategic shift, applying change management principles to minimize employee resistance and ensuring smooth transitioning.
  • The sixth phase involves a post-implementation review to monitor the effectiveness of the organizational changes and making necessary adjustments.

Learn more about Organizational Design Change Management Organizational Change

For effective implementation, take a look at these Organizational Design best practices:

Organization Design Toolkit (103-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
Organizational Design Framework (70-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
Organizational Design and Capability Analysis (31-slide PowerPoint deck)
Smart Organizational Design (27-slide PowerPoint deck)
Organizational Design for High Performance (42-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional Organizational Design best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Potential Challenges

To address discomfort and potential rejection of the redesign, it is critical to communicate the logic behind the change transparently, openly, highlighting the benefits for both the organization and its employees. In case of concerns about operation disruptions, the implementation should be planned to reduce the impact on ongoing projects and clients. Employees might ask about the additional tasks or the possibilities of downsizing. Addressing these well in advance by providing them with upskilling opportunities can help them see the transformation positively.

Case Studies

Companies like GE and IBM have successfully implemented similar comprehensive models in the past. Following a significant change in the digital landscape, IBM remodeled its organizational structure from a product-centered model to service-oriented, resulting in increased revenues and improved customer satisfaction.

Explore additional related case studies

Sample Deliverables

  • Strategic Organizational Design Overview (PowerPoint)
  • Change Management Plan (MS Word)
  • Financial Impact Assessment (Excel)
  • Implementation Roadmap (PowerPoint)

Explore more Organizational Design deliverables

Role Clarity

Achieving role clarity is one of the crucial byproducts of successful Organizational Design. Each person should fully comprehend not only their roles and responsibilities but also understand how they contribute to the broader organizational context.

Data-Driven Design

Organizational Design should be well-thought and data-driven rather than being implemented on assumptions and perceptions. Predictive analytics and other data analysis tools can be used to test different model outcomes.

Learn more about Data Analysis

Organizational Design Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Organizational Design. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Organizational Design subject matter experts.

Aligning Structure with Corporate Strategy

As the company evolves, it's paramount to reassess and realign the organizational structure to support the strategic objectives effectively. A data-driven approach ensures that there's a logical connection between the strategic ambitions of the company and the way it is set up to execute on these ambitions. The lack of alignment can lead to a misdirection of resources and a dilution of strategic efforts across the organization. According to McKinsey, companies that realign their structure to support their strategy can achieve greater customer satisfaction, better operational efficiency, and stronger financial performance (Bazigos, Harter, & Rutherford, 2016). This approach should include an analysis of market trends, competitive landscape, and internal competencies that can support the intended strategic trajectory. By implementing a structure that is attuned with the strategic goals, the technology company can ensure that every business unit and employee is pulling in the same direction, towards a common set of goals. Prioritizing the activities that significantly contribute to strategic goals ensures that the organization remains lean and focused.

Learn more about Customer Satisfaction Organizational Structure Competitive Landscape

Minimizing Disruption during Reorganization

Digital transformation can often lead to uncertainty and disruptions which might impact productivity and morale. Minimizing disruptions is about maintaining operational continuity while the structural changes are being rolled out (Keller & Meaney, 2017). The technology company should use a phased approach for implementing the changes, starting with pilot programs and scaling up based on the success and feedback from these programs. This allows for the adjustment of processes and structures in a controlled manner prior to a company-wide rollout. Another way to mitigate disruption is by clearly and continuously communicating the reasons for change. Employees who understand the necessity for change are more likely to tolerate temporary inconveniences. Change management techniques will be indispensable during this process. These may include training programs, town hall meetings, and updated communication channels. Each channel should be used to clarify the purpose of the reorganization and the expected benefits for employees and the company as a whole.

Upskilling and Reskilling Initiatives

In response to digital transformation, the technology sector is witnessing a massive demand for new skill sets. A part of the change management plan should focus on comprehensive training initiatives to upskill and reskill the workforce to meet the future needs of the new organizational structure. McKinsey research shows that retraining and upskilling workers can generate economic benefits that outweigh the costs of such training initiatives (Bughin, Hazan, Lund, Dahlander, Wiesinger, & Subramaniam, 2018). The company can implement a combination of e-learning platforms, workshops, and mentorship programs that encourage continuous learning and development. These initiatives should be tied directly to career pathways within the new structure, highlighting how new skills can lead to new opportunities. This proactive approach not only equips employees with the necessary skills for the transition but also helps in retaining top talent who might otherwise seek opportunities elsewhere.

Learn more about Digital Transformation

Leveraging Predictive Analytics for Organizational Design

In the fast-evolving tech industry, data is critical for making informed decisions. When reshaping the organizational structure, using predictive analytics can uncover insights that lead to more effective configurations of teams and resources. Harnessing data can also identify hidden opportunities for efficiency gains within the organization. Predictive analytics allows the organization to test various scenarios and foresee the outcomes of different organizational designs before making any structural changes. Advanced analytics can also pinpoint capability gaps, thus guiding the upskilling initiatives. According to recent McKinsey research, companies that apply analytics to their decision-making process tend to have a 33% increase in decision speed and a 42% improvement in decision quality (Bryant, Court, & Elzinga, 2020). Utilizing this approach, the technology firm can anticipate market changes and adjust its structure accordingly, ensuring that it remains competitive and agile in an increasingly digital marketplace.

Learn more about Agile

Measuring Post-Implementation Success

Following the reorganization, it is crucial to measure the success of the changes. These measures should align with the strategic objectives set out at the beginning of the process and include both qualitative and quantitative metrics. Relevant financial performance indicators might include changes in revenue, operational costs, and profitability margins. Other success criteria could be employee engagement levels, customer satisfaction scores, and the speed of decision-making processes within the organization. Adapting and iterating based on these outcomes is vital. It's not uncommon for initial organizational redesigns to require further tweaks. Continuous improvement should be embedded within the company culture to respond dynamically to every insight gained from the post-implementation review process. Only through rigorous monitoring and willingness to refine processes can the company assure the long-term benefits of the recently implemented organizational changes.

Learn more about Continuous Improvement Employee Engagement

Additional Resources Relevant to Organizational Design

Here are additional best practices relevant to Organizational Design from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Streamlined organizational structure, resulting in a 15% increase in operational efficiency.
  • Enhanced role clarity among employees, leading to a 20% improvement in productivity metrics.
  • Implemented a comprehensive upskilling program, reducing skill gaps by 30% across the organization.
  • Utilized predictive analytics for organizational design, achieving a 25% faster decision-making process.
  • Post-implementation review showed a 10% increase in employee engagement levels.
  • Achieved a 5% increase in customer satisfaction scores post-reorganization.

The initiative to realign the organizational structure with the strategic objectives of the multinational technology firm has been largely successful. The quantifiable improvements in operational efficiency, productivity, skill gap reduction, decision-making speed, employee engagement, and customer satisfaction underscore the effectiveness of the comprehensive 6-phase approach adopted. The use of predictive analytics and a data-driven design played a crucial role in minimizing disruptions and ensuring a smooth transition. However, the modest increase in customer satisfaction suggests that there might have been opportunities to place a greater emphasis on external-facing improvements during the reorganization. Alternative strategies, such as a more aggressive customer-centric reorganization or a phased rollout prioritizing customer-facing units, could have potentially enhanced outcomes in customer satisfaction.

Based on the results and insights gained from the post-implementation review, the recommended next steps include a continuous improvement program to refine and adjust the organizational structure as market conditions and strategic objectives evolve. This should involve regular reviews of operational efficiency, employee engagement, and customer satisfaction metrics to identify areas for further improvement. Additionally, expanding the upskilling and reskilling initiatives to include emerging technologies and customer service excellence can further align the workforce capabilities with the strategic goals of the company, ensuring sustained growth and competitiveness in the digital marketplace.

Source: Organizational Design Revamp for Multinational Technology Corporation, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.