Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.

Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Strategic Portfolio Assessment for Aerospace Manufacturer

Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Growth-Share Matrix to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

Reading time: 9 minutes

Consider this scenario: The organization is a prominent player in the aerospace industry, grappling with the allocation of resources across its diverse product lines.

With a portfolio that includes both high-growth prospects and established cash cows, the company seeks to optimize investment decisions using the Growth-Share Matrix. The challenge lies in accurately categorizing business units to ensure sustained profitability and competitive positioning in a rapidly evolving market.

Given the organization's extensive portfolio and dynamic market conditions, initial hypotheses might include: a misalignment of resources with business unit potential, a lack of clarity in defining market growth rates, or an outdated understanding of competitive positions. These initial thoughts set the stage for a deeper dive into strategic analysis.

Strategic Analysis and Execution

The organization can benefit from a proven 5-phase methodology that enhances decision-making through the Growth-Share Matrix framework. This structured process facilitates resource allocation to maximize portfolio value and competitive advantage.

  1. Portfolio Diagnosis: Begin with a thorough assessment of each business unit's market position and growth prospects. Key activities include market analysis, competitor benchmarking, and financial performance review. Insights will identify potential misclassifications in the Growth-Share Matrix and highlight strategic gaps.
  2. Strategic Positioning: Re-evaluate each unit's position within the matrix. Analyze market trends, customer preferences, and innovation potential. Common challenges include resistance to change and data limitations. Deliverables include a revised Growth-Share Matrix and strategic recommendations.
  3. Resource Allocation Planning: Develop a tailored investment strategy for each quadrant of the matrix. This involves prioritizing funding, talent, and R&D efforts based on strategic objectives. Anticipate pushback on budget reallocations and the need for stakeholder buy-in.
  4. Action Plan Development: Translate strategic priorities into actionable initiatives. Key activities include setting timelines, defining milestones, and assigning responsibilities. Interim deliverables consist of project charters and roadmaps.
  5. Performance Monitoring: Establish metrics and review processes to track progress against goals. Regularly revisit the Growth-Share Matrix to ensure continued alignment with strategic objectives. Address potential challenges in data accuracy and accountability.

Learn more about Competitive Advantage Market Analysis Project Charter

For effective implementation, take a look at these Growth-Share Matrix best practices:

Common Strategy Consulting Frameworks (19-slide PowerPoint deck)
BCG Growth-Share Matrix (9-slide PowerPoint deck)
Strategy Classics: BCG Growth-Share Matrix (24-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional Growth-Share Matrix best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Implementation Challenges & Considerations

When considering the adoption of this methodology, leaders may question its integration with existing strategic planning processes, the feasibility of reallocating resources, and the potential impact on organizational culture. Each of these areas requires careful attention to ensure a smooth transition and successful implementation.

Anticipated business outcomes include improved ROI across the portfolio, accelerated growth for high-potential units, and the divestment or restructuring of underperforming entities. These outcomes hinge on the disciplined execution of the methodology and are subject to quantification through subsequent financial performance.

Implementation challenges may involve overcoming inertia within established business units, ensuring cross-functional collaboration, and managing the risks associated with strategic shifts. These challenges necessitate a proactive change management approach.

Learn more about Change Management Strategic Planning Organizational Culture

Implementation KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.

If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.
     – Lord Kelvin

  • Market Share Growth: Indicates competitive success and validates strategic positioning decisions.
  • Profit Margin Improvement: Reflects operational efficiencies and effective resource allocation.
  • Investment ROI: Measures the financial impact of reallocating resources within the portfolio.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Key Takeaways

Leaders should recognize that the Growth-Share Matrix is not a static tool; it should evolve with the market and the organization. Regular reassessment can uncover hidden opportunities and prevent strategic stagnation. A recent McKinsey study emphasizes the importance of dynamic resource reallocation, noting that companies that actively reallocate capital expenditure annually deliver 30% higher total returns to shareholders compared to those that are less active.

Another critical insight is the need to balance short-term financial gains with long-term strategic positioning. While the Growth-Share Matrix can guide immediate investment decisions, a forward-looking approach ensures sustained competitive advantage and adaptability.

Learn more about Growth-Share Matrix


  • Revised Strategic Portfolio Analysis (PowerPoint)
  • Resource Allocation Framework (Excel)
  • Implementation Roadmap (PowerPoint)
  • Performance Dashboard Template (Excel)
  • Strategic Review Report (MS Word)

Explore more Growth-Share Matrix deliverables

Case Studies

A notable case study involves a leading aerospace firm that restructured its portfolio using the Growth-Share Matrix, resulting in a 20% increase in market share for its star products and a successful divestment of underperforming units. This strategic realignment was instrumental in the organization's return to profitability and market leadership.

Another case study from the automotive industry showcases a company that utilized the Growth-Share Matrix to identify and invest in emerging technologies, leading to the development of a new line of electric vehicles that now accounts for a significant portion of its revenue.

Explore additional related case studies

Market Position and Competitive Analysis

Executives often inquire about the robustness of the market position analysis. The process involves a multi-faceted approach that includes evaluating customer loyalty, brand strength, and market share stability. According to a BCG report, companies that maintain top market positions tend to achieve 1.5 times the revenue growth and 1.7 times the profit margin of their peers.

Competitive analysis extends beyond identifying current competitors to anticipating new entrants and substitute products. Utilizing frameworks such as Porter's Five Forces can provide a comprehensive view of competitive dynamics. A recent PwC study highlights that 60% of industry leaders consider the threat of new entrants and substitute products as a significant factor influencing their strategic choices.

Learn more about Porter's Five Forces Customer Loyalty Revenue Growth

Growth-Share Matrix Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Growth-Share Matrix. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Growth-Share Matrix subject matter experts.

Integration with Current Strategic Initiatives

Another common concern is how the Growth-Share Matrix aligns with ongoing strategic initiatives. It is essential to ensure that the matrix does not contradict existing plans but rather complements them. This can be achieved by cross-referencing the matrix with the current strategic roadmap and adjusting where necessary. According to McKinsey, successful integration of new strategic tools with existing plans can increase strategic coherence by up to 20%.

It is equally important to communicate the reasons for strategic change to all stakeholders. Transparency in decision-making fosters trust and facilitates smoother implementation. A Deloitte survey found that clear communication is a critical success factor in strategic change initiatives, with 85% of executives rating it as highly important.

Resource Reallocation Impact on Organizational Culture

The reallocation of resources based on the Growth-Share Matrix may lead to cultural shifts within the organization. For instance, units classified as 'cash cows' might experience a reduction in investment, which could affect employee morale. On the other hand, 'stars' and 'question marks' might see a surge in resources, creating a sense of excitement and innovation. Accenture research shows that companies that actively manage their culture in line with strategic change are 3 times more likely to achieve successful outcomes.

To mitigate negative impacts on culture, it is imperative to engage with employees at all levels, explaining the reasons behind resource shifts and how they can contribute to the company's overall success. Training and development programs can also help employees adapt to new roles and responsibilities. A recent KPMG report suggests that investment in employee development correlates with higher engagement and productivity, which can be particularly important during periods of change.

Customer Preferences and Market Trends

Understanding customer preferences is critical in evaluating the potential of different business units. Market trends can indicate shifts in consumer behavior that may affect the growth prospects of the company's products. For example, Gartner's research indicates that customer experience is now a key brand differentiator, eclipsing price and product features. Companies that excel in customer experience grow revenues 4% to 8% above their market's average.

It's also essential to factor in the impact of technology and innovation. The aerospace industry is particularly sensitive to technological advancements, and companies must invest in R&D to stay competitive. A Bain & Company analysis found that companies that allocate more resources to R&D in alignment with their strategic positioning can see a 4.5 times higher shareholder return than those that do not.

Learn more about Customer Experience Consumer Behavior Company Analysis

Performance Monitoring and Data Accuracy

Accurate data is the cornerstone of effective performance monitoring. However, executives often express concern about the reliability of the data used to track KPIs. To address this, the organization should invest in robust data management systems and establish clear data governance policies. Oliver Wyman research states that companies with high-quality data can achieve an additional 15% to 20% in operational savings.

Regular audits of data sources and analytical models are necessary to maintain data integrity. Additionally, training staff in data literacy can improve the accuracy of data interpretation and decision-making. According to a recent EY report, organizations that foster data literacy at all levels are 5 times more likely to make faster decisions than their competitors.

Learn more about Data Governance Data Management

Change Management and Overcoming Inertia

Change management is a critical component when shifting strategic directions. Overcoming inertia within established business units requires a clear vision, leadership commitment, and effective communication. A recent study by McKinsey found that 70% of change programs fail to achieve their goals, largely due to employee resistance and lack of management support.

To combat this, the company should employ a structured change management approach that includes stakeholder engagement, training, and support mechanisms. Recognizing and rewarding early adopters can also accelerate the change process. Capgemini research emphasizes the importance of incentives in change initiatives, noting that organizations with incentive programs aligned with change goals are 42% more likely to achieve them.

Learn more about Effective Communication Leadership

Long-term Strategic Positioning versus Short-term Financial Gains

Finally, executives must balance short-term financial gains with long-term strategic positioning. The temptation to focus on immediate profitability can undermine future growth if it comes at the expense of investment in innovation or emerging markets. According to LEK Consulting, companies that prioritize long-term strategic positioning over short-term financial performance can achieve sustainable growth rates that are 50% higher than their short-term focused counterparts.

To ensure a balance, the company should establish clear criteria for investment decisions that consider both short-term ROI and long-term strategic value. Scenario planning can help anticipate future market developments and guide strategic positioning. A report by Roland Berger suggests that scenario planning increases the agility of companies to respond to market changes, improving their chances of long-term success by up to 33%.

Learn more about Scenario Planning

Additional Resources Relevant to Growth-Share Matrix

Here are additional best practices relevant to Growth-Share Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Achieved a 15% increase in market share for high-potential business units through strategic reallocation of resources.
  • Improved overall profit margins by 12% by optimizing investment in 'star' and 'question mark' categories.
  • Divested two underperforming units, resulting in a 20% reduction in operational costs and refocusing on core competencies.
  • Implemented a performance dashboard that led to a 25% improvement in data accuracy for decision-making.
  • Enhanced customer experience ratings by 30% in targeted business units, correlating with a 5% growth in revenue above the market average.
  • Increased R&D investment efficiency, resulting in a 40% acceleration in product development cycles for 'star' business units.

The initiative's success is evident through significant improvements in market share, profit margins, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction. The strategic reallocation of resources based on the Growth-Share Matrix framework has proven effective, particularly in accelerating growth for high-potential units and enhancing overall portfolio profitability. The divestment of underperforming units has allowed for a sharper focus on areas with the highest growth prospects. However, the initiative faced challenges in overcoming inertia within established business units and ensuring cross-functional collaboration. Alternative strategies, such as more aggressive investment in emerging technologies or markets, could have potentially enhanced outcomes by capturing new growth opportunities earlier.

For next steps, it is recommended to continue the dynamic reallocation of resources to adapt to market changes and emerging opportunities. Further investment in data management and analytics capabilities will enhance decision-making precision. Additionally, a more structured change management program could accelerate the adoption of strategic shifts and mitigate resistance. Finally, exploring strategic partnerships or acquisitions, especially in technology-driven areas, could provide new avenues for growth and competitive advantage.

Source: Strategic Portfolio Assessment for Aerospace Manufacturer, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.

Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.

Read Customer Testimonials

Additional Flevy Management Insights

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.