Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.







Flevy Management Insights Case Study
BCG Matrix Review and Optimization for Diversified FMCG Corporation


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in BCG Matrix to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

Reading time: 8 minutes

Consider this scenario: A global diversified FMCG corporation with a wide-ranging portfolio desires to restructure its business units through the use of better BCG Matrix application.

With recent shifts in market demands and competitive forces, several business units have demonstrated different growth rates and market shares. This situation has led to unclear investment decisions across the portfolio, affecting the strategic direction of the corporation and resulting in decreasing profit margins.



Given the scenario, the initial hypotheses may be:

  • The company might lack a properly structured and well-executed BCG Matrix, obscuring information about the businesses and their relative positions in the market.
  • There could be inadequate understanding or misinterpretation of the BCG Matrix, leading to inappropriate strategic decisions.
  • Potential market changes might have invalidated the past position of the portfolio on the BCG Matrix, requiring adjustments.

Methodology

Emphasis on a 5-phase approach to BCG Matrix will ensure a systematic chronology for the project.

  1. Phase 1 – Assessment: Evaluate the current situation of each business unit and their positions on the BCG Matrix. Examine the reliability of available data seeking answers to: What are our growth rates? What are our market shares?
  2. Phase 2 – Analysis: Analyze the data, noting variance in growth rates and market shares. A deeper look into competitive advantages, market trends, and customer needs is also crucial.
  3. Phase 3 – Strategy Formulation: Using the findings from phase two, develop strategic investment recommendations, addressing questions like: Which businesses should receive more investments? Which ones need divestment?
  4. Phase 4 – Implementation: Execute the plan, ensuring transparency and open communication to curtail potential pushbacks.
  5. Phase 5 – Monitoring: Track the progress, evaluating the performance of each business unit against benchmarks and adjusting tactics as necessary.

Learn more about Competitive Advantage BCG Matrix

For effective implementation, take a look at these BCG Matrix best practices:

Common Strategy Consulting Frameworks (19-slide PowerPoint deck)
BCG Growth-Share Matrix (9-slide PowerPoint deck)
Strategy Classics: BCG Growth-Share Matrix (24-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional BCG Matrix best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Addressing Potential Challenges

In addressing points of contention that the CEO might have, it is essential to clarify the relevance of the BCG Matrix in the current business climate despite its conceptual age. More than 60% of Fortune 500 companies still utilize this tool to make strategic decisions regarding their portfolios (Bain & Company, 2021).

Furthermore, a potential concern about the complexity and disruptive nature of the process is countered by the phased approach, ensuring flexibility, responsiveness, and adaptability throughout the implementation.

Lastly, the concern about accuracy of placing business units within the matrix can be addressed through rigorous data collection and verified market insights.

Case Studies

  • IBM: Once known for its hardware production, IBM successfully repositioned itself as IT services and cloud computing major by effectively employing BCG Matrix.
  • Unilever: Using BCG Matrix, Unilever was able to make strategic decisions regarding it's more than 400 brands , focusing efforts and investments on high growth potential units.

Explore additional related case studies

Sample Deliverables

  • Current BCG Matrix State Report (PowerPoint)
  • Market Analysis Document (PDF)
  • Strategic Plan for Portfolio Management (PowerPoint)
  • Implementation Roadmap (Excel)
  • Performance Monitoring Dashboard (Excel)

Explore more BCG Matrix deliverables

Additional Insights – Risk Tolerance

Understanding the risk tolerance level of the organization is essential in correctly allocating resources among businesses in the portfolio. A more aggressive attitude might suggest a bias towards 'Question Marks' and 'Stars', while a conservative approach might prefer 'Cash Cows'.

Additional Insights – Integration with Other Strategy Tools

The BCG Matrix does not provide all the answers. It's utility increases when used in conjunction with other strategic tools like SWOT analysis, PESTLE analysis, Porter's Five Forces, and Value Chain analysis. This integrative approach provides a comprehensive understanding of market dynamics shaping the portfolio's growth and profitability.

Learn more about Porter's Five Forces SWOT Analysis Value Chain Analysis

BCG Matrix Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in BCG Matrix. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and BCG Matrix subject matter experts.

Emerging Market Dynamics and Portfolio Realignment

With emerging markets shifting economic tides, executives may consider how current market dynamics impact the BCG Matrix application. As consumer preferences evolve and technology disrupts traditional business models, the corporation's portfolio must adapt to maintain its competitive edge. For instance, according to McKinsey, digital disruption is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, with about 80% of executives expecting their business model to be under strong digital pressure. This pressure necessitates a review of the 'Stars' and 'Question Marks' within the portfolio to ensure they align with technological advancements and changing consumer behaviors.

Additionally, evaluating the 'Cash Cows' for opportunities to innovate and defend against disruptive 'Question Marks' is crucial. The corporation must also consider geopolitical risks and economic fluctuations that could transform 'Dogs' into viable 'Question Marks' with proper investment and strategic positioning.

Learn more about Consumer Behavior Disruption

Strategic Investment Allocation

Given the nuances of strategic investment, executives might probe further into the rationale behind investment recommendations. The BCG Matrix serves as a starting point for these decisions, but a granular analysis of each business unit's potential is necessary. For example, Accenture's research indicates that high-performance businesses are adept at shifting investments quickly to respond to market changes. This agility often involves reallocating resources from 'Cash Cows' to promising 'Question Marks' or scaling up 'Stars' rapidly to capture market share.

It is important to highlight that strategic investment allocation should also account for the synergies between business units. Sometimes, maintaining a 'Dog' might be strategic if it supports a 'Star' or 'Cash Cow' through shared services or cross-promotional opportunities.

Divestiture and Exit Strategies

The tough decision of divestiture often accompanies the optimization of a company's portfolio. Executives might seek clarification on the criteria for divesting a business unit. According to a report by PwC, strategic divestitures, when executed effectively, can increase shareholder value by allowing companies to focus on their core competencies. Therefore, the criteria for divestiture may include sustained poor performance, lack of strategic fit within the broader portfolio, or an inability to generate synergies.

Exit strategies should be carefully crafted to minimize disruption and preserve value. This might involve identifying potential buyers who see a strategic fit or value in the 'Dog' business units, or considering a gradual phase-out to allow for the reallocation of resources and talent.

Learn more about Core Competencies Shareholder Value

Effectiveness of the Phased Approach

Executives might question the effectiveness of the phased approach in ensuring the smooth transition and implementation of the BCG Matrix optimization. The phased approach is designed to be iterative and responsive, allowing for adjustments based on real-time feedback and market changes. A study by Deloitte suggests that companies that adopt a flexible and phased strategy execution are more likely to achieve their strategic objectives than those that follow a rigid plan.

Transparency during the implementation phase is key to managing expectations and mitigating resistance. Regular communication with stakeholders about the progress and challenges encountered ensures that everyone remains aligned with the strategic vision.

Learn more about Strategy Execution

Integrating BCG Matrix with Financial Performance Metrics

While the BCG Matrix provides a strategic overview of the business units, executives might be interested in how it integrates with financial performance metrics. The BCG Matrix should be complemented with a thorough financial analysis to understand the profitability and cash flow contributions of each business unit. According to KPMG, integrating strategic tools with financial metrics provides a more holistic view of the business and aids in making informed investment decisions.

For example, a 'Star' with high market share and growth rate might require substantial investment, but if it also commands high profit margins and positive cash flow, it justifies the investment. Conversely, a 'Question Mark' might show potential, but if it is a drain on the company's finances without a clear path to profitability, it may be a candidate for divestiture or restructuring.

Learn more about Financial Analysis

Adapting to Future Market Changes

Finally, executives will be concerned about the adaptability of the BCG Matrix to future market changes. It is vital to establish a process for periodic review of the matrix, ensuring that it remains relevant and reflective of the current market conditions. Gartner's research emphasizes the importance of dynamic strategic planning that can accommodate rapid shifts in the business environment. The corporation should not only react to changes but also anticipate them through scenario planning and continuous market analysis.

Embedding flexibility in the company's strategic planning process allows for quick responses to market opportunities or threats. The BCG Matrix should be seen as a live tool, one that evolves with the company's strategic vision and the external market landscape.

Learn more about Strategic Planning Scenario Planning Market Analysis

Additional Resources Relevant to BCG Matrix

Here are additional best practices relevant to BCG Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Identified and realigned 20% of the portfolio, moving several units into more accurate categories within the BCG Matrix, enhancing strategic focus.
  • Increased overall corporate profitability by 8% within the first year post-implementation, attributed to better resource allocation.
  • Improved decision-making speed and efficiency by 30% due to clearer understanding of business units' market positions.
  • Divested two underperforming 'Dog' units, resulting in a 15% reduction in operational costs and refocusing on core areas.
  • Invested in three 'Question Marks', elevating two to 'Star' status, capturing a 5% increase in market share in key segments.
  • Boosted innovation and R&D investment by 25% in 'Star' and 'Question Mark' categories, aiming for long-term growth.

The initiative to restructure the business units using the BCG Matrix has been markedly successful. The realignment of the portfolio and strategic focus on core areas have directly contributed to an 8% increase in profitability and a significant reduction in operational costs. The decision to divest two 'Dog' units was particularly effective, demonstrating the importance of tough but strategic choices in portfolio management. The investment in 'Question Marks' that transitioned to 'Stars' showcases the potential for growth through strategic investment and innovation. However, the success could have been further enhanced by a more aggressive approach towards investing in 'Question Marks' and possibly reevaluating 'Cash Cows' for innovation opportunities, suggesting that a slightly more aggressive risk tolerance could yield even greater results.

For next steps, it is recommended to continue the dynamic application of the BCG Matrix, with periodic reviews to ensure the portfolio aligns with market changes and corporate strategy. Further investment in technology and innovation, especially within 'Star' and promising 'Question Mark' units, should be prioritized to secure future growth and market leadership. Additionally, exploring strategic partnerships or acquisitions to bolster 'Question Marks' or transform 'Dogs' could also be beneficial. Finally, enhancing the integration of financial performance metrics with the BCG Matrix will provide a more comprehensive view for decision-making.

Source: BCG Matrix Review and Optimization for Diversified FMCG Corporation, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.