Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.

Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Process Design Overhaul for a Global Logistics Company

Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Process Design to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

Reading time: 9 minutes

Consider this scenario: A multinational logistics firm is grappling with a convoluted process design that is leading to operational inefficiencies and escalating costs.

The organization's processes, developed organically over time, lack standardization and coherence, creating bottlenecks and preventing the organization from scaling effectively. The organization is now seeking to redesign its processes to improve productivity, reduce costs, and enhance customer satisfaction.

The organization's situation suggests two hypotheses. Firstly, the process inefficiencies might be stemming from outdated or poorly designed processes that hinder smooth operations. Secondly, the lack of standardization across the organization's global operations could be leading to inconsistencies and inefficiencies.


A 4-phase approach to Process Design could be employed to address the organization's challenges:

  1. Diagnostic Phase: This involves a thorough assessment of the current process design to identify inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and redundancies. Key questions include: How are current processes structured? Where do bottlenecks occur? What are the root causes of these inefficiencies?
  2. Design Phase: This phase entails developing a new process design that eliminates identified inefficiencies and aligns with the organization's strategic objectives. Key considerations include: What should the new processes look like? How can they be standardized across the organization?
  3. Implementation Phase: The new process design is rolled out across the organization. Key challenges often include managing change and ensuring employee buy-in.
  4. Evaluation Phase: The effectiveness of the new process design is assessed and adjustments are made as necessary. Key questions include: Are the new processes delivering the expected benefits? What adjustments are needed?

Learn more about Process Design

For effective implementation, take a look at these Process Design best practices:

Business Process Master List (BPML) Template (Excel workbook)
Business Process Improvement (BPI 7) (139-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Word)
Business Process Reengineering (BPR) (157-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting PDF)
Strategic System Design Toolkit (348-slide PowerPoint deck)
Process (2) - Analysis and Design (39-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional Process Design best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Key Considerations

One potential question from the CEO might be about the potential disruption caused by the process redesign. To mitigate this, a phased implementation approach can be used, starting with less critical processes to minimize business disruption and allow for lessons to be learned before more critical processes are redesigned.

Another concern might be about the cost of the process redesign. While there will be upfront costs associated with the redesign, the long-term benefits in terms of improved efficiency and reduced operational costs should outweigh these initial expenses.

A third question might be about how to ensure employee buy-in. Effective change management, communication, and training are crucial to ensuring employees understand and support the new processes.

Learn more about Change Management Disruption

Expected Outcomes

  • Improved efficiency: Streamlined and standardized processes should lead to improved operational efficiency.
  • Cost reduction: By eliminating inefficiencies and redundancies, the organization should be able to significantly reduce operational costs.
  • Enhanced customer satisfaction: More efficient processes will enable faster, more reliable service, leading to increased customer satisfaction.

Learn more about Customer Satisfaction

Potential Challenges

  • Resistance to change: Employees may resist the new processes, particularly if they feel their jobs are threatened.
  • Implementation difficulties: Rolling out new processes across a global organization can be complex and challenging.
  • Costs: The process redesign will require significant upfront investment.

Key Performance Indicators

  • Process efficiency: This can be measured by metrics such as process cycle time, error rates, and productivity levels.
  • Cost savings: The reduction in operational costs is a key indicator of the success of the process redesign.
  • Customer satisfaction: Metrics such as customer satisfaction scores and customer retention rates can indicate the impact of the new processes on customer service.

Learn more about Customer Service Customer Retention Key Performance Indicators

Sample Deliverables

  • Process Audit Report (Word)
  • Process Redesign Plan (PowerPoint)
  • Change Management Plan (Word)
  • Training Materials (PowerPoint)
  • Implementation Roadmap (Excel)

Explore more Process Design deliverables

Case Studies

Several leading organizations have successfully undertaken process redesign initiatives. For instance, Toyota's implementation of lean manufacturing processes led to significant improvements in efficiency and quality. Similarly, General Electric's Six Sigma initiative helped the company reduce errors and improve processes.

Explore additional related case studies

Process Design Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Process Design. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Process Design subject matter experts.

Additional Insights

It's important to remember that process redesign is not a one-time exercise but a continuous improvement effort. Regular reviews and adjustments are necessary to ensure the processes remain effective and aligned with the organization's evolving needs.

Furthermore, technology can play a key role in process redesign. Digital tools can help automate routine tasks, provide real-time visibility into processes, and facilitate communication and collaboration.

Lastly, a successful process redesign requires strong leadership. Leaders need to champion the initiative, communicate its benefits, and drive the change management efforts.

Learn more about Continuous Improvement Leadership

Global Standardization versus Local Customization

Executives may question how the process redesign will balance the need for global standardization with local customization. The key is to establish a core set of standardized processes that ensures consistency and efficiency while allowing for local adaptations where necessary. This dual approach can be achieved by identifying and separating core processes from those that can be adapted to meet local market needs or comply with local regulations.

For instance, a McKinsey report on global operations highlights the importance of finding the right balance between standardization and customization. By distinguishing between processes that are critical for maintaining a competitive edge and those that can be localized, the organization can maintain operational excellence without sacrificing responsiveness to local nuances. Implementing a modular process design can provide the flexibility needed to adapt to regional differences without compromising the integrity of the overall process architecture.

Learn more about Operational Excellence

Technology Integration in Process Redesign

Another area of executive interest is likely to be the role of technology in the redesigned processes. The use of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotic process automation can significantly enhance process efficiency by automating routine tasks and providing predictive analytics for better decision-making. A report by Gartner estimates that by 2024, organizations will lower operational costs by 30% by combining hyperautomation technologies with redesigned operational processes.

However, technology should not be seen as a panacea but rather as an enabler of process improvement. The organization must ensure that technology solutions are integrated thoughtfully to support the redesigned processes and not as an afterthought. This requires a clear understanding of the technology's capabilities and limitations, as well as a strategic approach to its deployment. The organization should consider partnering with technology providers who have a proven track record in delivering solutions that align with process redesign objectives.

Learn more about Artificial Intelligence Process Improvement Machine Learning

Measuring the Impact of Process Redesign

Measuring the impact of process redesign is crucial for evaluating success and guiding continuous improvement efforts. Executives will want to know what metrics are being used to assess the effectiveness of the new processes. Beyond the key performance indicators mentioned, such as process efficiency, cost savings, and customer satisfaction, additional metrics such as employee engagement and compliance rates can provide a more comprehensive view of the redesign's impact.

A study by Deloitte on process innovation emphasizes the value of adopting a balanced scorecard approach that incorporates financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth metrics. This approach enables the organization to monitor the impact of process redesign from multiple perspectives and ensures that the benefits are sustainable and aligned with the organization's strategic goals. Regular reporting against these metrics will help the organization identify areas for further improvement and demonstrate the return on investment to stakeholders.

Learn more about Balanced Scorecard Employee Engagement Key Performance Indicators

Change Management Strategies

The success of a process redesign often hinges on effective change management. Executives will be keen to understand the strategies in place to manage the human side of the change. It is essential to communicate the rationale behind the redesign, the expected benefits, and how it will affect individual roles. A study by Prosci, a leading change management research firm, found that projects with excellent change management were six times more likely to meet or exceed their objectives.

Creating a network of change champions across the organization can facilitate a smoother transition by providing peer support and promoting positive attitudes towards the change. Training and development programs should be tailored to address the specific needs of different employee groups and should be designed to not only educate but also to engage and empower employees. Regular feedback mechanisms should be established to address concerns and gather insights from employees at all levels.

Alignment with Strategic Objectives

Executives will also be concerned with how the process redesign aligns with the organization's strategic objectives. The redesign must support the company's long-term goals, whether that's market expansion, customer experience enhancement, or innovation acceleration. According to BCG, a failure to align process improvements with strategy can result in a 70% chance that the effort will not be fully successful.

To ensure alignment, the process redesign should be developed in close collaboration with the strategic planning team. This will ensure that the redesigned processes not only improve operational efficiency but also enable the organization to better execute its strategic initiatives. For example, if the organization's strategy includes entering new markets, the process redesign should include scalable processes that can be easily adapted to new regulatory environments and customer needs.

Learn more about Customer Experience Strategic Planning

Long-Term Sustainability

Lastly, executives are likely to be interested in the long-term sustainability of the redesigned processes. It's important to recognize that the business environment is constantly evolving, and processes that are efficient today may become obsolete tomorrow. Accenture's research on process agility emphasizes the need for processes to be adaptable and responsive to change in order to sustain improvements over time.

The organization should establish a process governance framework that includes regular reviews and updates to the process design. This framework should involve cross-functional teams that can provide diverse perspectives on process performance and emerging trends that may impact process effectiveness. Additionally, building a culture of continuous improvement, where employees are encouraged to identify and suggest process enhancements, can help ensure that the organization remains agile and responsive to change.

To close this discussion, addressing these questions and considerations is critical for the successful redesign and implementation of new processes. By taking a strategic, balanced, and technology-enabled approach to process redesign, and by focusing on change management and alignment with strategic objectives, the organization can expect to achieve sustainable improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and customer satisfaction.

Learn more about Agile

Additional Resources Relevant to Process Design

Here are additional best practices relevant to Process Design from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Streamlined operational processes resulting in a 15% increase in overall efficiency.
  • Achieved a 20% reduction in operational costs within the first year post-implementation.
  • Enhanced customer satisfaction scores by 25% due to faster and more reliable service delivery.
  • Successfully implemented a modular process design allowing for effective global standardization with local customization.
  • Integrated advanced technologies such as AI and machine learning, automating routine tasks and improving decision-making.
  • Established a process governance framework ensuring long-term sustainability of the redesigned processes.

The initiative to redesign the multinational logistics firm's processes has been markedly successful, evidenced by significant improvements in efficiency, cost reduction, and customer satisfaction. The integration of advanced technologies and the adoption of a modular process design have been pivotal in achieving these results. The strategic approach to balance global standardization with local customization has enabled the firm to maintain operational excellence while being responsive to local market needs. However, the initiative faced challenges such as resistance to change and the complexity of implementing new processes globally. Alternative strategies, such as more targeted change management programs tailored to different regions or departments, might have mitigated some of these challenges and enhanced outcomes further.

For next steps, it is recommended to focus on continuous improvement and agility in process management. This includes regular reviews of process effectiveness, leveraging feedback mechanisms to identify areas for further enhancement, and staying adaptable to technological advancements and market changes. Additionally, enhancing employee engagement and training on new technologies and processes will be crucial to sustaining improvements and fostering a culture of innovation and efficiency. Strengthening partnerships with technology providers will also ensure that the firm remains at the forefront of process automation and efficiency.

Source: Process Design Overhaul for a Global Logistics Company, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.

Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.

Read Customer Testimonials

Additional Flevy Management Insights

Receive our FREE presentation on Operational Excellence

This 50-slide presentation provides a high-level introduction to the 4 Building Blocks of Operational Excellence. Achieving OpEx requires the implementation of a Business Execution System that integrates these 4 building blocks.