The luxury automotive industry is characterized by high competition, technological advancements, and shifting consumer preferences towards sustainable and electric vehicles.

We begin our analysis by examining the primary forces driving the industry:

• Internal Rivalry: High, due to numerous global luxury brands and new entrants offering electric and autonomous vehicles.
• Supplier Power: Moderate, with a reliance on specialized, high-quality components and materials.
• Buyer Power: High, as luxury consumers demand quality, innovation, and exclusivity.
• Threat of New Entrants: Moderate, with high entry barriers but potential disruption from tech companies entering the automotive space.
• Threat of Substitutes: Increasing, with growing consumer interest in electric and autonomous vehicles as alternatives to traditional luxury cars.

Emergent trends include a shift towards electric vehicles, increasing consumer demand for customization, and the integration of advanced technologies. Major changes in industry dynamics include:

• Rising demand for electric vehicles: Opportunity to innovate and capture new market segments, with the risk of significant R&D costs.
• Technological advancements: Potential to enhance product offerings, but requires substantial investment in new technologies.
• Increasing customization: Opportunity to develop personalized luxury experiences, risking higher production costs and complexity.
• Regulatory changes: Presents opportunities for compliance-driven innovation, but risks associated with fluctuating regulations.

The STEEPLE analysis reveals that social trends favor sustainable luxury, technological advancements drive innovation, economic factors impact consumer spending, environmental regulations push for greener solutions, political stability influences market entry strategies, legal compliance is critical, and ethical considerations increasingly influence brand reputation.

The organization excels in brand reputation and customer loyalty but faces inefficiencies in manufacturing processes and supply chain management.

Benchmarking Analysis: The company lags behind industry leaders in production efficiency and innovation. Competitors have successfully integrated advanced manufacturing technologies and optimized supply chains, resulting in higher profitability. The organization must adopt similar strategies to remain competitive.

4 Actions Framework Analysis: The company should eliminate outdated manufacturing processes, reduce reliance on high-cost suppliers, raise investment in advanced manufacturing technologies, and create streamlined supply chain partnerships. These actions will enhance efficiency and reduce operational costs.

McKinsey 7-S Analysis: Strategy focuses on divestiture and process innovation. Structure requires decentralization to enhance agility. Systems need modernization for advanced manufacturing and supply chain management. Shared values emphasize quality and innovation. Style must shift towards collaborative leadership. Staff requires upskilling in new technologies. Skills must align with advanced manufacturing and supply chain optimization.

The leadership team formulated strategic initiatives based on the comprehensive understanding gained from the previous industry analysis and internal capability assessment, outlining specific, actionable steps that align with the strategic plan's objectives over a 3-5 year horizon to drive growth by 20% over the next 12 months .

• Divestiture of Non-Core Assets: This initiative aims to streamline operations by divesting non-core assets, focusing on core competencies. The goal is to free up capital and resources for reinvestment. Value creation comes from improved operational focus and reduced overhead costs. Resource requirements include financial advisors, legal teams, and change management expertise.
• Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies: Implementing state-of-the-art technologies to enhance production efficiency and quality. Strategic goals include reducing production time and costs while maintaining high quality standards. Value creation from increased operational efficiency and reduced waste. Requires investment in technology, training, and R&D.
• Supply Chain Optimization: Establishing strategic partnerships with suppliers to reduce costs and improve reliability. Goals include cost reduction and enhanced supply chain resilience. Value creation from lower procurement costs and improved supply chain stability. Requires procurement expertise and investment in supply chain management systems.
• Electric Vehicle (EV) Development: Accelerating the development and launch of luxury EVs to capture market share in a growing segment. Goals include expanding product offerings and meeting consumer demand for sustainability. Value creation from capturing new market segments and enhancing brand reputation. Requires investment in R&D, marketing, and production capabilities.

Divestiture Implementation KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.

• Production Efficiency Rate: Measures improvements in manufacturing processes and operational efficiency.
• Cost Savings from Divestiture: Tracks financial impact and effectiveness of divestiture strategy.
• Time-to-Market for New EV Models: Gauges the speed and efficiency of developing and launching new products.
• Supplier Cost Reduction: Monitors cost savings achieved through supply chain optimization.

Insights from these KPIs include identifying areas for further process improvements, evaluating the success of divestiture strategies, and ensuring that new product developments meet market demands efficiently.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Stakeholder Management

Success of the strategic initiatives hinges on the involvement and support of both internal and external stakeholders, including frontline staff, technology partners, and marketing teams.

• Operations Team: Critical for implementing new manufacturing technologies and processes.
• Supply Chain Partners: Essential for cost reduction and reliability improvements.
• R&D Department: Responsible for developing and launching new EV models.
• Finance Team: Key for managing divestiture processes and reallocating resources.
• Marketing Team: Crucial for promoting new products and enhancing brand reputation.
• Legal Advisors: Provide expertise in divestiture and regulatory compliance.
• Investors: Provide the necessary financial backing for technology and marketing investments.

Stakeholder Groups	R	A	C	I
Operations Team	⬤
Supply Chain Partners		⬤		⬤
R&D Department		⬤		⬤
Finance Team	⬤
Marketing Team		⬤		⬤
Legal Advisors	⬤
Investors			⬤

We've only identified the primary stakeholder groups above. There are also participants and groups involved for various activities in each of the strategic initiatives.

Divestiture Deliverables

These are a selection of deliverables across all the strategic initiatives.

• Divestiture Strategy Report (PPT)
• Advanced Manufacturing Technology Roadmap (PPT)
• Supply Chain Optimization Plan (PPT)
• EV Development Financial Model (Excel)
• Implementation KPI Dashboard (Excel)

The implementation team leveraged the BCG Growth-Share Matrix and the Value Chain Analysis frameworks to guide the divestiture of non-core assets. The BCG Growth-Share Matrix was particularly useful for identifying which business units or product lines were underperforming. By categorizing assets into "Stars," "Cash Cows," "Question Marks," and "Dogs," the organization could make informed decisions about where to allocate resources or divest. The team followed this process:

• Conducted a comprehensive financial performance review of all business units and product lines.
• Classified each unit into one of the four categories of the BCG Matrix based on market growth rate and relative market share.
• Identified "Dogs" and low-performing "Question Marks" as candidates for divestiture.

Value Chain Analysis was also deployed to identify non-core activities that did not add significant value to the customer. This framework helped the organization to focus on core activities that provided competitive advantages. The team followed this process:

• Mapped out the entire value chain from inbound logistics to after-sales service.
• Evaluated each activity based on its contribution to customer value and competitive advantage.
• Identified non-core activities that could be outsourced or divested to streamline operations.

The implementation of these frameworks led to a clear identification of non-core assets for divestiture. This resulted in a more focused and efficient operation, freeing up capital and resources for reinvestment in core activities.

The implementation team utilized the Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma frameworks to guide the adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Lean Manufacturing focuses on minimizing waste and maximizing productivity, which was essential for improving production efficiency. The team followed this process:

• Conducted a value stream mapping to identify and eliminate waste in the production process.
• Implemented Just-In-Time (JIT) inventory management to reduce holding costs and increase efficiency.
• Adopted cellular manufacturing to streamline workflow and reduce setup times.

Six Sigma was deployed to ensure high-quality outcomes and reduce variability in the manufacturing process. This framework was useful for maintaining consistent quality while integrating new technologies. The team followed this process:

• Defined critical quality attributes and performance metrics for the manufacturing process.
• Measured current process performance and identified areas for improvement.
• Implemented control measures to maintain consistent quality and reduce defects.

The implementation of these frameworks resulted in significant improvements in production efficiency and quality. Waste was minimized, and the integration of advanced technologies was smooth and effective, leading to substantial cost savings and enhanced product quality.

The implementation team utilized the SCOR (Supply Chain Operations Reference) Model and the Theory of Constraints (TOC) to optimize the supply chain. The SCOR Model provided a comprehensive framework for evaluating and improving supply chain performance. The team followed this process:

• Assessed current supply chain performance using SCOR metrics such as reliability, responsiveness, agility, cost, and asset management.
• Identified key areas for improvement and developed a roadmap for supply chain optimization.
• Implemented best practices in supply chain management to enhance performance.

The Theory of Constraints was used to identify and address bottlenecks in the supply chain. This framework was useful for improving overall supply chain efficiency. The team followed this process:

• Identified the primary bottlenecks in the supply chain that were limiting throughput.
• Developed strategies to elevate these constraints and improve flow.
• Continuously monitored and adjusted the supply chain to prevent new bottlenecks from arising.

The implementation of these frameworks led to enhanced supply chain performance, with improvements in reliability, responsiveness, and cost efficiency. This resulted in a more resilient and efficient supply chain, capable of meeting market demands effectively.

The implementation team leveraged the Stage-Gate Process and the Agile Development framework to accelerate the development and launch of luxury EVs. The Stage-Gate Process provided a structured approach for managing new product development projects, ensuring that all critical milestones were met. The team followed this process:

• Defined the project scope and objectives for the EV development.
• Created a detailed project plan with specific stages and gates, including concept development, design, testing, and launch.
• Conducted regular reviews at each gate to assess progress and make necessary adjustments.

Agile Development was used to enhance flexibility and responsiveness during the EV development process. This framework was particularly useful for managing complex projects with evolving requirements. The team followed this process:

• Formed cross-functional teams to work on different aspects of the EV development.
• Implemented iterative development cycles, with regular sprints and reviews.
• Adapted the project plan based on feedback and changing market conditions.

The implementation of these frameworks resulted in a faster and more efficient EV development process. The organization was able to bring new EV models to market quickly, meeting consumer demand for sustainable luxury vehicles and enhancing its competitive position.