Want FREE Templates on Organization, Change, & Culture? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.

Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Growth-Share Matrix Optimization for a Consumer Electronics Firm

Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Growth-Share Matrix to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

Reading time: 10 minutes

Consider this scenario: The organization, a well-known consumer electronics firm, is struggling to extract meaningful benefits from the implementation of the Growth-Share Matrix.

It's unable to prioritize investments and allocate resources efficiently among various business units, resulting in suboptimal performance. Given the dynamic and competitive industry environment, the organization is keen on utilizing the Growth-Share Matrix more effectively to gain a competitive edge.

The initial analysis suggests a couple of hypotheses. First, there may be a lack of understanding or misinterpretation of the Growth-Share Matrix within the organization. Secondly, the firm may not be incorporating the appropriate data into the matrix, which might be causing inaccurate or incomplete decision-making inputs.


Adopting a 5-phase approach to address the organization's issues, we would start with an in-depth review of the company's current Growth Share Matrix implementation. Key questions to answer would include: what data is incorporated, how it's used, and who has access to it. Following this, the second phase would involve recalibrating the matrix, using pertinent data and industry best practices. The remaining phases include refining the company's associated decision-making process, implementing the changes, and creating a feedback mechanism for continuous improvement.

Learn more about Continuous Improvement Best Practices

For effective implementation, take a look at these Growth-Share Matrix best practices:

Common Strategy Consulting Frameworks (19-slide PowerPoint deck)
BCG Growth-Share Matrix (9-slide PowerPoint deck)
Strategy Classics: BCG Growth-Share Matrix (24-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional Growth-Share Matrix best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Potential Challenges

One crucial aspect that may raise questions is the validity of data used in the matrix. To address this, it is vital to include multiple data points that give a holistic view of the business unit’s market growth rate and relative market share. Also, resistance to change is an age-old problem that many organizations encounter. We advise on the urgent need for a top-down change management strategy to win buy-in from all stakeholders. Finally, to address potential concerns about the bottom-line impact of the changes, we must establish the procedural and financial benefits of effectively utilizing the Growth-Share Matrix, citing statistics like an Accenture Report stating that "62% of high performing companies use data-driven strategies to gain a competitive advantage".

Learn more about Change Management Competitive Advantage Growth-Share Matrix

Case Studies

Consumer goods giant Unilever, for instance, credits its effective application of the Growth-Share Matrix to efficiently allocate resources among its brand portfolio. Similarly, General Electric utilized the matrix to divest non-performing businesses and back the potential winners.

Explore additional related case studies

Sample Deliverables

  • Growth-Share Matrix Assessment Report (PDF)
  • Resource Allocation plan (Powerpoint)
  • Growth-Share Matrix recalibration (Excel)
  • Change Management Strategy (MS Word)
  • Growth-Share Matrix Training Toolkit (PPT)

Explore more Growth-Share Matrix deliverables

C-suite Engagement

Engaging top-level executives for their input and securing their commitment to change is paramount. We recommend the formation of an 'Executive Steering Committee' to champion these efforts.

Building Internal Capabilities

In addition to resolving immediate concerns, building internal capabilities for continuous improvement of the Growth-Share Matrix application should be prioritized. A thorough training program could be set up for key individuals.

Embedding into Strategic Planning

To maximize the impact of the Growth-Share Matrix, it must be closely linked with the strategy planning process. This integration ensures efficient resource allocation correlated with strategic goals.

Data Accuracy and Integrity

Inaccurate data inputs can dramatically skew the Growth-Share Matrix, leading to flawed strategic decisions. To ensure data accuracy and integrity, a robust data governance framework is essential. The structure should include standardized data collection methods, regular audits, and cross-referencing with external market intelligence. The accuracy of the Growth-Share Matrix depends heavily upon the reliability of the market growth rate and the calculation of relative market share—which are both prone to dynamic changes and may require agile adjustments in the model's inputs.

Learn more about Agile Data Governance Market Intelligence

Inclusive Approach to Decision Making

The optimal use of the Growth-Share Matrix requires an inclusive approach to decision-making. It involves various departments, including market analysis, finance, and strategic planning, to contribute their insights. By fostering a culture of collaboration, each business unit can understand its role and contribution to the matrix’s effectiveness. This inclusivity minimizes resistance to change, as stakeholders across the organization see their input reflected in the strategic outcomes.

Learn more about Strategic Planning Market Analysis

Long-Term Strategic Outcome Measurement

While the Growth-Share Matrix is designed to assist in short-term resource allocation, it is crucial to analyze how these allocations affect the long-term strategic outcomes. By establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) that measure long-term success, the organization can adjust their use of the matrix to better support enduring growth and competitiveness. A McKinsey Quarterly article on strategy suggests establishing both leading and lagging KPIs to keep track of immediate results and understand their impact on long-term strategies (McKinsey Quarterly, 2019).

Learn more about Key Performance Indicators

Growth-Share Matrix Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Growth-Share Matrix. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Growth-Share Matrix subject matter experts.

Aligning Growth-Share Matrix with Corporate Vision

To integrate the Growth-Share Matrix into broader corporate strategy, it's essential to align the matrix's framework with the organizational vision and long-term goals. This alignment ensures that resource allocation and investment decisions are not just focused on market position, but also on maintaining coherence with the organization's purpose and desired direction. The matrix should help guide resources to areas not only where the company currently competes effectively, but where it also wishes to be dominant in the future. This strategic approach ensures a blend of immediate performance improvement and visionary foresight.

Learn more about Corporate Strategy

Enhanced Technological Incorporation

Embracing technology to analyze and utilize the Growth-Share Matrix can add an advanced dimension to the decision-making process. Incorporating machine learning and advanced analytics can help in predicting market trends and providing real-time insights for data input into the matrix. For instance, a Boston Consulting Group report highlights the significance of predictive analytics in making more informed strategic decisions (Boston Consulting Group, 2018). By leveraging technology, the organization can not only enhance the quality of its analysis but also forecast the future market potential more accurately.

Learn more about Machine Learning

Refinement of Market Growth Rate Metrics

Executives might question the accuracy of the market growth rates used within the Growth-Share Matrix. It's crucial to refine these metrics to reflect current and projected market conditions. This can be achieved through a comprehensive market analysis that includes industry reports, competitive analysis, consumer trends, and economic forecasts. For example, Gartner's research often provides detailed insights into market growth trends that can be used to validate the Growth-Share Matrix's market growth rate inputs.

Furthermore, it's important to regularly update these growth rates to keep pace with the rapidly evolving market. This may involve establishing a dedicated team or utilizing a market intelligence platform that continuously gathers and analyzes data, ensuring that the matrix reflects the most current market dynamics.

Learn more about Competitive Analysis

Optimizing Resource Allocation for Question Marks

Another area of executive concern may revolve around the 'Question Marks'—business units with high market growth but low market share. The strategic dilemma is whether to invest in these units to turn them into 'Stars' or to divest. Optimizing resource allocation requires a nuanced understanding of each unit's potential and the competitive landscape. Executives should consider not only the market growth potential but also factors such as the ability to differentiate, the strength of the competition, and the strategic fit within the overall portfolio.

To aid in this complex decision-making process, the use of scenario planning and sensitivity analysis can be beneficial. By modeling different investment levels and projecting potential outcomes, the organization can better understand the risks and rewards associated with each 'Question Mark.' This strategic analysis can be supported by data from PwC or KPMG, which often includes industry-specific investment insights and outcomes.

Learn more about Strategic Analysis Scenario Planning Competitive Landscape

Strategic Divestment and Cash Cows

For 'Cash Cows'—units with high market share in slow-growing markets—the strategy typically involves maintaining or harvesting these units to fund other segments of the business. However, in certain cases, strategic divestment might be the best course of action. Executives should consider whether these 'Cash Cows' are vulnerable to disruptive trends or if they could be better managed by companies with a more suitable strategic focus. Divestment decisions should be data-driven, taking into account the lifecycle of the product, market saturation, and the potential for innovation within the segment.

According to a Deloitte report on divestiture strategy, companies that regularly review their portfolios and divest non-core assets can achieve a more agile and focused organization (Deloitte, 2020). This proactive approach to portfolio management can help in reallocating resources to areas with higher growth potential, aligning with the overarching corporate strategy.

Learn more about Portfolio Management

Integration of Global Market Considerations

Global market considerations are critical in today's interconnected economy. Executives need to ensure that the Growth-Share Matrix takes into account the different stages of market development across regions. This involves adjusting the matrix to reflect regional market growth rates and competitive dynamics. For global businesses, it is not enough to look at aggregate data; the matrix should enable a granular view that informs decisions at the regional level.

Capgemini's insights on global market dynamics can provide valuable benchmarks for adjusting the Growth-Share Matrix to different geographic markets. By incorporating global considerations, the company can better identify international opportunities and tailor its strategy to leverage regional strengths and mitigate risks associated with geopolitical factors and local market fluctuations.

Alignment with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria

Today's executives are increasingly focused on aligning business strategies with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria. The Growth-Share Matrix should incorporate ESG factors as part of the strategic evaluation process. This includes assessing the sustainability of 'Stars' and 'Cash Cows,' the environmental impact of 'Question Marks,' and the social implications of 'Dogs.'

An EY report on sustainable investing highlights the importance of integrating ESG considerations into business unit analysis to ensure long-term value creation (EY, 2021). By doing so, the company not only aligns with investor and consumer expectations but also positions itself to mitigate risks and capitalize on opportunities arising from the growing emphasis on sustainability.

Learn more about Value Creation Environmental, Social, and Governance

Competitive Response Strategies

Executives must also consider how competitors might react to changes in the organization's strategic approach based on the Growth-Share Matrix. It's essential to anticipate and prepare for potential competitive moves in response to the organization's resource allocation and investment decisions. This requires a thorough analysis of competitors' strategies, strengths, and weaknesses, as well as an understanding of the likely implications of the organization's strategic choices on the competitive landscape.

Oliver Wyman's expertise in competitive strategy can provide frameworks for predicting competitor behavior and crafting effective response strategies. By considering competitive dynamics in the utilization of the Growth-Share Matrix, the organization can stay one step ahead and make informed decisions that not only improve its own position but also influence the market in its favor.

Measuring the Impact of Strategic Shifts

Finally, executives will need to measure the impact of strategic shifts resulting from the optimized Growth-Share Matrix. This involves setting up metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) to track the performance of strategic initiatives. It is important to assess both the financial outcomes, such as ROI and market share changes, as well as non-financial outcomes like customer satisfaction and brand strength.

According to a BCG analysis on performance measurement, companies that effectively track the outcomes of their strategic decisions are more likely to make timely adjustments and achieve sustained improvements (BCG, 2019). By establishing a comprehensive performance measurement system, the organization can validate the effectiveness of its Growth-Share Matrix optimizations and continuously refine its strategic approach.

Learn more about Performance Measurement Customer Satisfaction

Additional Resources Relevant to Growth-Share Matrix

Here are additional best practices relevant to Growth-Share Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Implemented a refined Growth-Share Matrix, leading to a 15% improvement in resource allocation efficiency across business units.
  • Introduced a comprehensive data governance framework, enhancing the accuracy of market growth and share data by 20%.
  • Executed a change management strategy that achieved 90% stakeholder buy-in within the first six months of implementation.
  • Developed and deployed a Growth-Share Matrix training program, resulting in a 25% increase in strategic decision-making competency among key personnel.
  • Established key performance indicators (KPIs) for long-term strategic outcomes, aligning resource allocation with corporate vision and goals.
  • Leveraged advanced analytics and machine learning, providing real-time market insights that informed dynamic adjustments to the matrix.
  • Integrated ESG criteria into the Growth-Share Matrix evaluation process, aligning business units with sustainable and socially responsible investment strategies.

The initiative to optimize the Growth-Share Matrix within the organization has been markedly successful, evidenced by significant improvements in resource allocation efficiency, data accuracy, and strategic decision-making capabilities. The introduction of a robust data governance framework and the use of advanced analytics have been pivotal in enhancing the matrix's reliability and responsiveness to market dynamics. The high level of stakeholder buy-in achieved through effective change management has been critical in embedding these changes into the organization's culture. However, while these results are promising, exploring alternative strategies such as more aggressive investment in 'Question Marks' or faster divestment from non-core 'Cash Cows' could potentially have accelerated growth and optimized resource allocation further.

Based on the outcomes and insights gained from this initiative, the recommended next steps include a continuous review and adjustment of the Growth-Share Matrix to reflect evolving market conditions and organizational priorities. Further investment in training and development programs will ensure that the organization's personnel remain adept at utilizing the matrix effectively. Additionally, expanding the use of predictive analytics and scenario planning tools will enhance the organization's ability to anticipate market trends and make informed strategic decisions. Finally, a regular assessment of the matrix's alignment with ESG criteria will ensure that the organization's growth strategies remain sustainable and socially responsible.

Source: Growth-Share Matrix Optimization for a Consumer Electronics Firm, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.

Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.

Read Customer Testimonials

Additional Flevy Management Insights

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.