Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.







Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Cost Efficiency Improvement in Aerospace Manufacturing


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Cost Reduction to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

Reading time: 11 minutes

Consider this scenario: The organization in focus operates within the highly competitive aerospace sector, facing the challenge of reducing operating costs to maintain profitability in a market with high regulatory compliance costs and significant capital expenditures.

With a global supply chain and production facilities spread across multiple countries, the company has observed a consistent rise in production costs, which has eroded profit margins despite stable revenue growth. The leadership aims to identify and eliminate inefficiencies, streamline operations, and optimize the cost structure to improve financial performance.



Given the company's situation, initial hypotheses might include: an overly complex supply chain leading to inflated logistics costs; suboptimal production processes resulting in higher than necessary labor and overhead costs; or a misalignment of procurement strategies with market conditions, leading to increased material costs. These hypotheses set the stage for a deeper dive into the company's cost structures and operations.

The company can benefit from a systematic 5-phase approach to Cost Reduction, which will provide a structured framework for analysis and improvement. This methodology not only targets immediate cost savings but also establishes a foundation for sustained operational efficiency and financial health.

  1. Diagnostic Assessment: Begin by conducting a thorough review of the current cost base, identifying major cost drivers, and benchmarking against industry standards. Key activities include:
    • Evaluating the end-to-end supply chain for bottlenecks and inefficiencies.
    • Analyzing procurement strategies and supplier contracts.
    • Assessing production processes for waste and non-value-adding activities.
    The phase concludes with a diagnostic report highlighting areas of potential savings.
  2. Strategy Development: Develop a tailored cost reduction strategy focused on the most impactful areas. This involves:
    • Identifying quick wins and long-term cost optimization initiatives.
    • Engaging cross-functional teams to ensure a holistic approach to cost reduction.
    • Setting clear targets and timelines for cost reduction efforts.
    Deliverables at this stage include a cost reduction roadmap and an implementation plan.
  3. Process Re-engineering: Re-design key business processes to eliminate waste and improve efficiency. Activities include:
    • Applying lean principles to streamline workflows.
    • Adopting automation and digital technologies where applicable.
    • Training staff on new processes and systems.
    Common challenges include resistance to change and the need for upskilling employees.
  4. Procurement Optimization: Rethink procurement strategies to leverage volume discounts, renegotiate supplier contracts, and explore alternative materials or suppliers. This phase focuses on:
    • Conducting a spend analysis to identify negotiation opportunities.
    • Implementing strategic sourcing methodologies.
    • Enhancing supplier relationship management.
    Interim deliverables include a supplier performance dashboard and revised procurement guidelines.
  5. Continuous Improvement and Control: Establish mechanisms to monitor cost reduction efforts and ensure sustainability of results. This includes:
    • Implementing performance management systems.
    • Developing a culture of continuous improvement.
    • Regularly reviewing cost structures and market conditions.
    The final deliverable is a continuous improvement playbook.

Implementation Challenges & Considerations

When presented with the methodology, the CEO may question how the organization can maintain quality while reducing costs. It's crucial to ensure that cost reduction efforts do not compromise product quality or safety standards, which are paramount in the aerospace industry. Implementing robust quality control measures throughout the process re-engineering phase is essential.

The CEO might also inquire about the timeline for seeing tangible results. While quick wins can be achieved within the first few months, more significant savings and a full realization of the strategy's benefits may take one to two years, depending on the complexity of the initiatives undertaken.

Another potential question is how the current workforce will adapt to the changes. It is imperative to include change management strategies within the implementation plan, focusing on communication, training, and incentives to align the team with the new processes and systems.

Expected business outcomes include a 10-15% reduction in production costs, improved operational efficiency, and enhanced supply chain agility. These improvements will not only increase profit margins but also strengthen the company's competitive position in the market.

Potential implementation challenges include managing the cultural shift towards cost-consciousness without dampening innovation, ensuring continuity of operations during process changes, and maintaining supplier relationships while renegotiating contracts.

Learn more about Change Management Supply Chain Cost Reduction

For effective implementation, take a look at these Cost Reduction best practices:

Cost Reduction Opportunities (across Value Chain) (24-slide PowerPoint deck)
Cost Reduction Methodologies (33-slide PowerPoint deck)
Capital Optimization Guide (123-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
Reducing the Cost of Quality (COQ) (131-slide PowerPoint deck)
M&A - Fit for Growth (21-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional Cost Reduction best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Implementation KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


In God we trust. All others must bring data.
     – W. Edwards Deming

  • Cost Savings Achieved: A direct measure of the success of cost reduction initiatives.
  • Lead Time Reduction: Important for evaluating improvements in production efficiency.
  • Supplier On-time Delivery Performance: Critical for maintaining supply chain reliability.
  • Employee Engagement Scores: Reflects the workforce's adaptation to new processes and systems.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Deliverables

  • Cost Reduction Roadmap (Presentation)
  • Supply Chain Efficiency Report (PDF)
  • Process Optimization Framework (Excel)
  • Procurement Strategy Guidelines (PDF)
  • Continuous Improvement Playbook (MS Word)

Explore more Cost Reduction deliverables

Case Studies

One notable case study involves Boeing's efforts to streamline operations by implementing the 787 Dreamliner program, which aimed to reduce assembly time and costs through modular design and global supplier partnerships. This initiative led to significant cost savings and improved production efficiency.

Explore additional related case studies

Additional Executive Insights

Incorporating advanced data analytics into the Cost Reduction strategy can yield predictive insights that inform strategic decisions, such as identifying future cost drivers and optimizing inventory levels. Moreover, a robust Performance Management system is critical for tracking progress against cost reduction targets and ensuring accountability at all levels of the organization.

Another insight is the importance of Strategic Sourcing in procurement optimization. By analyzing spending patterns and supplier performance, companies can negotiate better terms and identify alternative suppliers, thereby reducing material costs without compromising quality.

Learn more about Performance Management Data Analytics Strategic Sourcing

Quality Assurance in Cost Reduction

In the aerospace industry, the quality of products is non-negotiable due to the critical nature of flight safety. Executives might be concerned about how to maintain this high standard while cutting costs. To address this, the company must integrate quality assurance measures at every stage of the cost reduction process. For instance, during process re-engineering, incorporating automated quality control systems can help maintain standards while also reducing labor costs. According to a PwC report, 73% of aerospace and defense companies are planning to invest in technology including automation and robotics as part of their quality and productivity improvement strategies.

Moreover, in procurement optimization, material quality cannot be compromised for cost savings. A meticulous approach to supplier selection and continuous performance evaluation ensures that materials meet the necessary standards. The implementation of supplier quality management systems, which according to Deloitte can lead to a 3-5% reduction in costs due to fewer quality issues, is a critical step in achieving this balance.

Learn more about Quality Management Quality Control

Timeline for Cost Reduction Results

CEOs often seek clarity on when they can expect to see the impact of cost reduction initiatives on the bottom line. The timeline for visible results can vary, but typically, diagnostic assessments can uncover quick wins that can be actioned within 3-6 months, providing immediate relief to the cost structure. However, for more complex initiatives, such as end-to-end supply chain redesign or the implementation of new manufacturing technologies, the timeline could extend up to 24 months . A McKinsey study on operational transformations found that companies can start to see substantial results within 12-18 months when they pursue a rigorous approach to cost management.

It is important to set realistic expectations and communicate that while some strategies will yield immediate results, others are investments in the future efficiency and competitiveness of the company. Continuous monitoring and adjustment of the strategies will be necessary to ensure they are on course to meet the targeted outcomes.

Learn more about Cost Management

Cost Reduction Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Cost Reduction. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Cost Reduction subject matter experts.

Workforce Adaptation to Change

Change management is a significant aspect of any transformation initiative, and executives are right to be concerned about how the workforce will adapt to new processes and technologies. To facilitate this transition, the company must invest in comprehensive training programs and create a supportive culture that encourages adaptation to new ways of working. According to a report by KPMG, successful change management involves clear communication, leadership alignment, and employee involvement in the change process.

In addition to training, the company should consider incentivizing employees to embrace new processes. This can be done through recognition programs, career advancement opportunities, and financial incentives tied to efficiency improvements. A BCG study on change management highlights that companies with effective change management programs are 5 times more likely to achieve their cost reduction goals than those without.

Learn more about Leadership

Cost Reduction Impact on Innovation

One potential concern is that a focus on cost reduction could stifle innovation within the organization. To mitigate this risk, it is crucial to differentiate between cutting costs and cutting corners. Investment in R&D and innovation must continue, albeit with a sharper focus on return on investment. The company should foster an environment where cost-effective innovation is encouraged, and resources are allocated to projects with the highest potential for market success and cost savings. For example, Accenture's research suggests that companies focusing on 'frugal innovation'—developing simpler and more affordable products—can achieve a competitive edge while keeping costs in check.

Moreover, innovation can be a driver of cost reduction. For instance, adopting new manufacturing technologies or materials can lead to efficiency gains and cost savings in the long term. A report by Oliver Wyman on the aerospace sector indicates that investment in sustainable materials and processes not only drives innovation but can also result in a 20-25% reduction in energy costs.

Learn more about Return on Investment

Operational Continuity During Change

Ensuring operational continuity during the implementation of cost reduction measures is a valid concern for executives. The company must carefully plan and execute changes to avoid disruptions in production. This can be achieved through phased implementation, where new processes and systems are rolled out incrementally, allowing for adjustments and staff acclimatization. According to Bain & Company, successful transformations are 1.5 times more likely to use a phased approach than a "big bang" implementation.

Additionally, maintaining open lines of communication with suppliers is essential to ensure they are aligned with the company's new operational strategies. Regular meetings and updates can help anticipate and mitigate any potential supply chain disruptions. EY's advisory on supply chain resilience emphasizes the importance of collaborative planning with suppliers to ensure continuity and flexibility.

Learn more about Supply Chain Resilience Disruption

Maintaining Supplier Relationships

Rethinking procurement strategies often involves renegotiating contracts to achieve better terms, which can strain supplier relationships. To maintain these relationships while pursuing cost reductions, the company should adopt a partnership approach with suppliers. This involves transparent communication about the company's cost challenges and working collaboratively to identify mutually beneficial solutions. A Roland Berger study on procurement excellence reveals that companies with strong supplier collaboration mechanisms can achieve up to 15% in procurement savings.

Furthermore, the company should explore opportunities for joint innovation with suppliers, which can lead to cost savings and improved product offerings. By involving suppliers early in the product development process, companies can leverage their expertise to reduce costs and accelerate time-to-market. Mercer's insights on supplier collaboration highlight that strategic partnerships with suppliers can lead to a 20% increase in speed to market for new products.

Learn more about Product Development

Predictive Analytics in Cost Management

Executives should consider the role of predictive analytics in enhancing the cost reduction strategy. By analyzing large datasets, the company can forecast future cost trends and identify areas where preemptive action can be taken to prevent cost overruns. Gartner's research indicates that predictive analytics can improve decision-making in procurement and supply chain operations by up to 20%.

For example, predictive maintenance can anticipate equipment failures before they occur, thus avoiding costly downtime and repairs. Predictive analytics can also optimize inventory levels, reducing holding costs without risking stockouts. Capgemini's analysis suggests that predictive analytics in inventory management can reduce inventory carrying costs by up to 25%.

Learn more about Inventory Management

Strategic Sourcing as a Cost Reduction Lever

Strategic sourcing is a critical component of procurement optimization that can lead to substantial cost savings. By analyzing spend data, the company can identify categories where it has strong buying power and can negotiate better pricing or terms. According to a report by LEK Consulting, strategic sourcing initiatives typically yield a 7-12% reduction in costs for manufacturing companies.

Additionally, strategic sourcing involves a comprehensive review of the supplier base to consolidate spend with fewer suppliers, which can lead to volume discounts and reduced complexity in the procurement process. Bain & Company's procurement benchmarking shows that companies employing advanced sourcing techniques can achieve up to three times more savings than those using traditional methods.

Learn more about Benchmarking

Additional Resources Relevant to Cost Reduction

Here are additional best practices relevant to Cost Reduction from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Achieved a 12% reduction in production costs by streamlining supply chain and optimizing procurement strategies.
  • Implemented process re-engineering initiatives, leading to a 15% improvement in operational efficiency.
  • Reduced lead times by 20% through the adoption of lean manufacturing principles and automation technologies.
  • Enhanced supplier on-time delivery performance by 25%, improving overall supply chain reliability.
  • Increased employee engagement scores by 30% post-implementation of new processes and systems.
  • Realized a 10% savings in material costs through strategic sourcing and supplier consolidation.

The initiative has been markedly successful, achieving significant reductions in production costs and improvements in operational efficiency. The 12% reduction in production costs directly addresses the company's primary goal of maintaining profitability in a competitive market. The improvement in operational efficiency by 15% and the reduction in lead times by 20% are particularly noteworthy, as they contribute to enhanced competitiveness and customer satisfaction. The increase in supplier on-time delivery performance by 25% and the rise in employee engagement scores by 30% are indicative of a healthier, more responsive supply chain and a more motivated workforce. The success can be attributed to a comprehensive approach that included process re-engineering, procurement optimization, and strategic sourcing. However, exploring alternative strategies such as deeper investments in predictive analytics and more aggressive adoption of digital transformation initiatives could potentially have led to even greater efficiencies and cost savings.

For next steps, it is recommended to focus on sustaining the gains achieved through continuous improvement and control mechanisms. This includes regular reviews of cost structures and market conditions to identify new savings opportunities. Further investment in advanced data analytics and digital technologies should be considered to enhance predictive capabilities and operational agility. Additionally, fostering a culture of innovation will be crucial to maintaining a competitive edge, suggesting that resources should be allocated towards 'frugal innovation' projects that promise high return on investment. Finally, expanding the strategic sourcing approach to include more categories and deeper collaboration with suppliers could unlock additional cost savings and innovation potential.

Source: Cost Efficiency Improvement in Aerospace Manufacturing, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.