Flevy Management Insights Case Study

Market Positioning Analysis for Infrastructure Firm in Sustainable Development

     David Tang    |    Competitive Assessment


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Competitive Assessment to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

TLDR A leading firm in the infrastructure sector faced challenges in positioning itself within the sustainable development niche amid rising global demand for eco-friendly projects. The organization achieved a 15% increase in market share and a 20% improvement in customer satisfaction by implementing a strategic focus on sustainability, demonstrating the importance of aligning offerings with customer values and operational efficiencies.

Reading time: 9 minutes

Consider this scenario: A leading firm in the infrastructure sector is grappling with the challenge of positioning itself effectively in the highly competitive sustainable development niche.

With an increase in global demand for eco-friendly infrastructure projects, the organization is seeking to understand the competitive landscape to refine its market strategy. The company faces pressure to innovate and deliver sustainable solutions while maintaining cost efficiency and market share amidst a backdrop of evolving regulations and emerging technologies.



Upon reviewing the situation, it appears that the organization may be facing challenges due to a lack of clear differentiation in the sustainable development space and insufficient competitive intelligence. Another hypothesis might be that the organization's current market strategy is not aligned with the evolving customer preferences towards sustainability. Finally, the organization could be experiencing operational inefficiencies that are affecting its ability to compete effectively.

Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology

The Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology is a comprehensive 5-phase process designed to enhance Competitive Assessment and guide firms towards better market positioning. This established process enables organizations to systematically analyze their competitive environment and develop actionable strategies, resulting in improved decision-making and market performance.

  1. Market Landscape Mapping: The first phase involves an in-depth analysis of the market landscape. Key activities include benchmarking competitors, analyzing market trends, and identifying regulatory impacts. The aim is to answer questions such as "What are the key success factors in the sustainable development sector?" and "How are competitors differentiating themselves?" Potential insights could include identification of niche markets and emerging trends. Common challenges include data availability and ensuring a comprehensive market view. Interim deliverables typically consist of a market landscape report.
  2. Competitive Positioning Analysis: In this phase, the organization's current positioning is scrutinized. Activities include customer perception surveys and SWOT analysis. The focus is on understanding "What is our firm's competitive advantage?" and "Where are the gaps in our current strategy?" Insights from this phase can lead to redefining the value proposition. Challenges often arise in obtaining candid customer feedback. Deliverables include a competitive positioning map and a gap analysis report.
  3. Strategic Option Development: The next phase centers on generating strategic options. Workshops with leadership and cross-functional teams help to brainstorm and prioritize options. Key questions include "What new market segments should we consider?" and "How can we leverage technology for differentiation?" Insights often involve innovative approaches to sustainability. A challenge is ensuring alignment across the organization. Deliverables typically comprise a list of prioritized strategic options.
  4. Financial Modeling and Scenario Analysis: This phase involves assessing the financial viability of each strategic option. Key activities include creating financial models and conducting scenario analyses. Questions to answer include "What are the financial implications of each option?" and "How resilient are these options against market fluctuations?" Insights may reveal the most cost-effective paths to sustainability. Challenges include modeling uncertainties and assumptions. A financial model and scenario analysis report are common deliverables.
  5. Implementation Roadmap Development: The final phase is focused on creating a detailed implementation plan. This involves setting timelines, milestones, and assigning responsibilities. The key question is "How do we operationalize the chosen strategy effectively?" Insights often relate to change management and resource allocation. Challenges can include securing buy-in and managing transition risks. Deliverables often include an implementation roadmap and a change management plan.

For effective implementation, take a look at these Competitive Assessment best practices:

Strategic Analysis Model (Excel workbook)
Industry & Competitive Analysis Handbook (600+ KPIs) (945-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Word)
Analyzing the Competitive Landscape (33-slide PowerPoint deck)
Competitive Comparison Analysis (26-slide PowerPoint deck)
Guide to Competitive Assessment (122-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional Competitive Assessment best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Competitive Assessment Implementation Challenges & Considerations

When considering the Competitive Assessment methodology, executives might question the integration of sustainability considerations into the competitive strategy. Our approach ensures that sustainability is treated as a core strategic dimension, rather than a peripheral concern, aligning with both market demands and regulatory expectations.

Another consideration is the time frame for realizing the benefits of the methodology. Typically, firms can expect to see improved market positioning and increased competitive advantage within 6-12 months post-implementation, depending on the scale and scope of the strategic changes.

Executives may also be concerned about the alignment of the competitive strategy with long-term organizational goals. This methodology emphasizes the creation of a strategy that is agile and adaptable, ensuring that it remains relevant as the organization evolves and market conditions change.

Upon full implementation of the methodology, organizations can anticipate outcomes such as a clearer differentiation in the market, improved cost efficiency, and a stronger alignment with customer values regarding sustainability. These outcomes often translate into increased market share and enhanced brand reputation.

Potential implementation challenges include resistance to change within the organization, difficulties in aligning cross-functional teams, and the complexity of integrating new technologies or processes. Each challenge requires careful management to ensure successful implementation.

Competitive Assessment KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


Tell me how you measure me, and I will tell you how I will behave.
     – Eliyahu M. Goldratt

  • Market Share Growth: Indicates the organization's competitive positioning and success in capturing a larger portion of the market.
  • Customer Satisfaction Index: Reflects how well the organization's sustainability initiatives meet customer expectations.
  • Cost Savings: Measures the efficiency gains achieved through the implementation of the competitive strategy.
  • Innovation Rate: Tracks the organization's ability to introduce new sustainable products or services.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Implementation Insights

In the implementation of the Competitive Assessment methodology, one key insight is the importance of leadership commitment. Leadership must champion the strategy and drive the cultural shift towards sustainability as a competitive advantage. According to McKinsey, firms with strong top-level commitment to sustainability were 3 times more likely than their peers to succeed in achieving their sustainability goals.

Another insight is the value of cross-functional collaboration. Engaging diverse teams in the strategy development process fosters innovation and ensures a holistic approach to competitive positioning. Research from Forrester indicates that companies that promote cross-functional collaboration are 1.5 times more likely to report revenue growth above 10%.

Competitive Assessment Deliverables

  • Market Analysis Framework (PowerPoint)
  • Competitive Strategy Plan (PowerPoint)
  • Financial Impact Model (Excel)
  • Sustainability Innovation Playbook (PDF)
  • Change Management Guidelines (Word)

Explore more Competitive Assessment deliverables

Competitive Assessment Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Competitive Assessment. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Competitive Assessment subject matter experts.

Integrating Sustainability into Core Business Strategy

Integrating sustainability into the core business strategy is not just about compliance or corporate social responsibility; it's about creating value and competitive advantage. A Bain & Company survey found that companies with a clearly articulated and understood sustainability strategy perform better in terms of growth, profitability, and company value. To effectively integrate sustainability, it requires a shift in mindset from viewing it as a cost to seeing it as a source of innovation and growth.

Leadership must drive this integration by embedding sustainability in the organization's vision and operations. This might involve rethinking product lines, supply chains, and even business models to align with sustainable practices. By leveraging sustainability as a driver for innovation, companies can unlock new markets and reduce costs, while also building resilience against environmental and regulatory risks.

Measuring the Impact of Competitive Strategy Changes

Measuring the impact of changes in competitive strategy is crucial to understand the return on investment and to guide continuous improvement. According to PwC, 79% of business leaders believe that an organization’s ability to understand and measure its environmental impact is vital to its success. To this end, it’s essential to establish clear KPIs before implementing any strategic changes. These KPIs should be tied directly to business outcomes, such as revenue growth, cost reduction, and customer acquisition and retention.

Furthermore, these measures should be reviewed regularly to assess progress and adapt the strategy as necessary. A continuous feedback loop, informed by data analytics, can help organizations fine-tune their approach and ensure that the strategy remains aligned with business goals and market demands. This dynamic approach to strategy measurement and adjustment can help organizations stay agile in a rapidly evolving competitive landscape.

Ensuring Cross-Functional Alignment and Collaboration

Ensuring cross-functional alignment and collaboration is a critical factor for the successful implementation of any competitive strategy. According to McKinsey, companies that break down silos to create agile, cross-functional teams can respond to market changes 5 to 10 times faster than those with traditional structures. Cross-functional collaboration brings together diverse perspectives and expertise, which is particularly important when tackling complex challenges like sustainability.

To foster this collaboration, it's important to establish clear communication channels and shared objectives across departments. Leaders should encourage a culture of innovation and openness, where teams are empowered to work together towards common goals. By doing so, organizations can harness the full potential of their collective expertise to drive a competitive strategy that is both effective and sustainable.

Adapting to Technological Changes and Innovations

Adapting to technological changes and innovations is a constant challenge for organizations aiming to maintain a competitive edge. As Gartner reports, 89% of businesses are planning to compete primarily on the basis of customer experience, which is increasingly driven by digital innovation. Embracing new technologies can lead to more efficient operations, improved customer experiences, and the development of new, sustainable business models.

However, it’s not just about adopting technology; it’s about integrating it in a way that aligns with the organization's strategic goals. Leaders must ensure that technology investments are driven by clear business objectives and that the organization has the capabilities to implement and leverage these technologies effectively. This might involve upskilling the workforce, investing in data analytics, and fostering a culture of digital literacy and agility.

Competitive Assessment Case Studies

Here are additional case studies related to Competitive Assessment.

Competitive Analysis Framework for Telecom Industry in 5G Evolution

Scenario: The organization is a mid-size telecom operator grappling with the rapid shift towards 5G technology.

Read Full Case Study

Competitive Analysis Enhancement for a Global Tech Firm

Scenario: A global technology firm has been steadily losing ground to its key competitors in an ever-evolving and fast-paced industry.

Read Full Case Study

Customer-Centric Strategy for SMB Retailer in Sustainable Fashion

Scenario: A boutique retailer specializing in sustainable fashion is facing declining sales and customer engagement, driven by an intensifying competitive analysis.

Read Full Case Study

Personal and Laundry Services Firm Tackles Market Threats with Competitive Strategy

Scenario: A mid-size personal and laundry services company undertook a Competitive Analysis strategy framework to counter emerging market threats and internal inefficiencies.

Read Full Case Study

Competitive Analysis Enhancement for Agritech Firm

Scenario: An Agritech company specializing in precision farming solutions is struggling to maintain its market position against rapidly emerging competitors.

Read Full Case Study

Competitive Landscape Assessment for Luxury Brand in European Market

Scenario: The organization in question is a European luxury goods manufacturer struggling to position itself against aggressive competitors in the market.

Read Full Case Study


Explore additional related case studies

Additional Resources Relevant to Competitive Assessment

Here are additional best practices relevant to Competitive Assessment from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Increased market share by 15% within the first year post-implementation, indicating successful market positioning in the sustainable development niche.
  • Customer Satisfaction Index improved by 20%, reflecting enhanced alignment with customer values regarding sustainability.
  • Achieved cost savings of 12% through operational efficiencies and the integration of sustainable practices.
  • Introduced 5 new sustainable products or services, marking a significant boost in the organization's innovation rate.
  • Secured leadership commitment, resulting in a 3x likelihood of achieving sustainability goals compared to industry peers.
  • Reported revenue growth above 10% due to effective cross-functional collaboration and strategy implementation.

The initiative is deemed highly successful, evidenced by significant improvements in market share, customer satisfaction, cost efficiency, and innovation. The achievement of a 15% increase in market share within a highly competitive niche underscores the effectiveness of the competitive strategy and its alignment with evolving market demands. The 20% improvement in the Customer Satisfaction Index and the introduction of 5 new sustainable offerings highlight the organization's commitment to meeting customer expectations for sustainability. These results, coupled with the reported cost savings and revenue growth, validate the strategic focus on sustainability as a source of competitive advantage. However, the journey could have been further enriched by exploring additional technological innovations and deeper market segmentation to tailor offerings more closely to customer needs.

For next steps, it is recommended to continue refining the competitive strategy with a focus on technological innovation and market segmentation. Investing in advanced data analytics could provide deeper insights into customer preferences and emerging trends, enabling more targeted and innovative sustainable solutions. Additionally, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and agility will ensure the organization remains responsive to market changes and sustains its competitive edge. Expanding partnerships with technology firms and sustainability experts could also enhance the organization's capabilities and offerings in the sustainable development sector.


 
David Tang, New York

Strategy & Operations, Digital Transformation, Management Consulting

The development of this case study was overseen by David Tang. David is the CEO and Founder of Flevy. Prior to Flevy, David worked as a management consultant for 8 years, where he served clients in North America, EMEA, and APAC. He graduated from Cornell with a BS in Electrical Engineering and MEng in Management.

To cite this article, please use:

Source: Competitive Analysis for Anonymized B2C Tech Company, Flevy Management Insights, David Tang, 2025


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"FlevyPro provides business frameworks from many of the global giants in management consulting that allow you to provide best in class solutions for your clients."

– David Harris, Managing Director at Futures Strategy
 
"Flevy.com has proven to be an invaluable resource library to our Independent Management Consultancy, supporting and enabling us to better serve our enterprise clients.

The value derived from our [FlevyPro] subscription in terms of the business it has helped to gain far exceeds the investment made, making a subscription a no-brainer for any growing consultancy – or in-house strategy team."

– Dean Carlton, Chief Transformation Officer, Global Village Transformations Pty Ltd.
 
"FlevyPro has been a brilliant resource for me, as an independent growth consultant, to access a vast knowledge bank of presentations to support my work with clients. In terms of RoI, the value I received from the very first presentation I downloaded paid for my subscription many times over! The "

– Roderick Cameron, Founding Partner at SGFE Ltd
 
"[Flevy] produces some great work that has been/continues to be of immense help not only to myself, but as I seek to provide professional services to my clients, it gives me a large "tool box" of resources that are critical to provide them with the quality of service and outcomes they are expecting."

– Royston Knowles, Executive with 50+ Years of Board Level Experience
 
"As a consultant requiring up to date and professional material that will be of value and use to my clients, I find Flevy a very reliable resource.

The variety and quality of material available through Flevy offers a very useful and commanding source for information. Using Flevy saves me time, enhances my expertise and ends up being a good decision."

– Dennis Gershowitz, Principal at DG Associates
 
"I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact "

– Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality
 
"I have used FlevyPro for several business applications. It is a great complement to working with expensive consultants. The quality and effectiveness of the tools are of the highest standards."

– Moritz Bernhoerster, Global Sourcing Director at Fortune 500
 
"As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."

– Michael Evans, Managing Director at Newport LLC




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Renewable Energy Market Positioning for Solar Power Firm

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized solar power company in North America that has seen robust growth in demand for renewable energy solutions.

Read Full Case Study

Maritime Fleet Competitive Positioning for Global Shipping

Scenario: The organization in question operates a fleet of cargo ships and is struggling to maintain its market share in the face of aggressive competition.

Read Full Case Study

Competitive Analysis for Anonymized B2C Tech Company

Scenario: A B2C technology firm, currently leading its domestic market, is facing increasing competition due to the entrance of international tech giants.

Read Full Case Study

Competitive Analysis for Sustainable Building Materials Firm

Scenario: A firm specializing in sustainable building materials in North America is facing increased competition from both established and emerging players in the green construction sector.

Read Full Case Study

Market Positioning Strategy for Specialty Semiconductors

Scenario: The organization is a specialty semiconductor manufacturer facing intensified competition from global players.

Read Full Case Study

Market Positioning Analysis for Agritech Start-up

Scenario: The organization is an emerging player in the agritech space, specializing in precision farming solutions.

Read Full Case Study

Direct-to-Consumer Strategy for Artisanal Cheese Brand in the US Market

Scenario: A leading artisanal cheese producer in the United States is facing a challenging competitive assessment as it seeks to expand its Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) sales.

Read Full Case Study

Competitive Assessment Project for a Leading Technology Firm

Scenario: A significant technology firm is experiencing increased pressure from emerging competitors in the fast-paced sector.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Growth Plan for SMB in Support Activities for Mining

Scenario: A small-to-medium business in the support activities for mining sector is facing significant challenges in maintaining its competitive edge due to a thorough Competitive Assessment.

Read Full Case Study

Competitive Strategy Reinforcement Plan for Crop Production Agribusiness

Scenario: A leading agribusiness specializing in crop production is facing significant challenges in maintaining its market share and profitability due to increased competition and fluctuating commodity prices.

Read Full Case Study

Digital Transformation Strategy for Boutique Furniture Retailer

Scenario: A boutique furniture retailer, recognized for its unique and high-quality offerings, is facing a 20% decline in sales over the past 2 years, underscored by a competitive assessment revealing significant market share encroachment by online giants and emerging direct-to-consumer brands.

Read Full Case Study

Market Positioning Strategy for Media Firm in Digital Transition

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized media company transitioning from traditional to digital platforms.

Read Full Case Study

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.