|
flevyblog
The Flevy Blog covers Business Strategies, Business Theories, & Business Stories.
|
Editor's Note: Take a look at our featured best practice, CX Improvement Program: Delivering Service Excellence (136-slide PowerPoint presentation). Enhance your organization's CX with our Delivering Service Excellence PPT. Equip your staff with the skills to create quality customer experiences, differentiate from the competition, and build trust and long-term relationships. Learn to manage emotions, deliver personalized service, and apply the [read more]
* * * *
If you’ve ever sat in a weekly ops meeting and heard “support volume is up again,” you know the conversation usually goes in circles: hire more agents, add another helpdesk rule, rewrite the FAQ. None of those are wrong, but they treat the symptom, not the system.
The more useful framing is simpler: customer support is a workflow problem. Requests arrive in different formats, they vary in urgency, and they often require context scattered across tools. The teams that improve service without ballooning headcount tend to design better workflows—then use automation to keep those workflows consistent.
Most support environments still behave like ticket factories: intake, assign, respond, close. That model breaks down when customers expect real-time answers, when product complexity rises, or when issues need multiple handoffs (billing, technical, success).
A “customer connection” approach starts with the idea that every interaction should land in the right place quickly, with the right context. It’s less about deflecting tickets and more about building reliable paths for common needs.
Platforms like Lorka AI sit in this layer: connecting customer questions to answers, workflows, and human support when needed. The interesting part isn’t “AI in support” as a headline—it’s the operational discipline it can enforce when implemented thoughtfully.
Not every support task should be automated. But there’s a clear pattern in what drains teams: repeatable issues that still require a lot of context gathering, tool switching, and careful wording.
These are less controversial than fully autonomous support because they keep humans in control while reducing the grind. They also align well with how service teams actually work: standardize the routine, reserve human time for the messy and sensitive.
AI support workflows succeed or fail based on governance. Without guardrails, teams get inconsistent answers, risky promises, or automation that frustrates customers. The fix is not “turn it off,” but define what the system is allowed to do.
On measurement, it’s tempting to fixate on deflection rate. It’s not useless, but it can push teams toward the wrong behavior. Better metrics tend to balance efficiency with customer outcomes.
For teams formalizing service standards, ITIL’s guidance on incident management remains a helpful baseline, even outside classic IT service desks: https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/itil.
Most leaders are not worried that AI can’t answer questions. They’re worried it will answer confidently when it shouldn’t. That’s a trust problem, and it’s solvable with transparent design.
It’s also worth aligning internal expectations with emerging guidance on safe AI deployment. NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework is a practical reference for thinking through risk, accountability, and controls without turning the project into a research effort.
The fastest way to create resistance is to “roll out AI” as a blanket initiative. The better approach is to pick a narrow lane where outcomes are measurable and risk is manageable, then use the results to guide expansion.
One simple technique: treat your AI workflow like a product feature with an owner, backlog, and release notes. That keeps it from becoming a “set-and-forget” widget that slowly drifts away from reality.
“Support quality improves when we design the path to resolution—automation just makes that path easier to follow at scale.”
If you take one thing from this: don’t start by asking, “How do we add AI to support?” Start by asking, “Where do customers get stuck, and what does a clean path look like?” Once the workflow is clear, automation becomes a practical tool instead of a risky bet.
A good next step is to document your escalation rules and your sources of truth, then pilot AI-assisted intake or agent drafting for a single high-volume issue type. You’ll learn quickly what needs tightening—and you’ll be improving the system, not just adding another layer to it.
You can download in-depth presentations on Customer Service and 100s of management topics from the FlevyPro Library. FlevyPro is trusted and utilized by 1000s of management consultants and corporate executives.
For even more best practices available on Flevy, have a look at our top 100 lists:
These best practices are of the same as those leveraged by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, and Accenture. Improve the growth and efficiency of your organization by utilizing these best practice frameworks, templates, and tools. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with over 20+ years of experience.
