Want FREE Templates on Organization, Change, & Culture? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
What role do customer expectations play in shaping the Build vs. Buy strategy in today's market?


This article provides a detailed response to: What role do customer expectations play in shaping the Build vs. Buy strategy in today's market? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Customer expectations significantly influence the Build vs. Buy strategy, guiding organizations in Strategic Planning and Innovation to meet market demands and technological advancements.

Reading time: 5 minutes


Customer expectations have become a pivotal factor in shaping the Build vs. Buy strategy within organizations. In today's fast-paced market, where customer preferences and technological advancements evolve at an unprecedented rate, companies are often at a crossroads in deciding whether to develop their solutions in-house (Build) or to purchase them from external vendors (Buy). This decision-making process is heavily influenced by the need to meet and exceed customer expectations, which can significantly impact an organization's competitive advantage, operational efficiency, and overall market positioning.

Impact of Customer Expectations on Strategic Decision Making

Customer expectations are at the heart of Strategic Planning and Innovation in organizations. They dictate the pace and direction of product development, service enhancements, and overall market offerings. In the context of the Build vs. Buy decision, understanding customer needs can determine whether an organization chooses to invest in developing proprietary technology or solutions, or to procure them from external sources. According to a report by Gartner, organizations are increasingly leaning towards buying solutions rather than building them, primarily due to the speed of deployment and the ability to meet customer demands more rapidly. This trend is further fueled by the growing complexity of technologies and the specialized skills required to develop them, which are often outside the core competencies of the organization.

The decision to Build or Buy is also influenced by the organization's desire to provide a unique customer experience, which is a key differentiator in today's competitive landscape. For instance, a company may decide to build a custom solution if it believes that such an investment will significantly enhance the customer experience, offering something unique that cannot be achieved through off-the-shelf solutions. On the other hand, if speed to market is critical to meet customer expectations, buying a ready-made solution that can be quickly customized might be the preferred strategy.

Moreover, the alignment of IT strategy with business objectives is crucial in this decision-making process. Organizations must evaluate whether building a custom solution aligns with their long-term strategic goals and whether it offers the flexibility to adapt to changing customer expectations. This involves a thorough analysis of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and Return on Investment (ROI) of both options, considering not only the initial investment but also the long-term maintenance, support, and scalability costs.

Explore related management topics: Customer Experience Strategic Planning Core Competencies IT Strategy Return on Investment Build vs. Buy Competitive Landscape

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Case Studies and Real-World Examples

A notable example of a company that opted to build its solution is Netflix. The streaming giant developed its content delivery network, Open Connect, to ensure high-quality streaming experiences for its customers worldwide. This strategic decision was driven by the unique needs of its customer base and the desire to control the entire streaming process, from server to screen. By building its CDN, Netflix could customize and optimize the streaming experience to meet and exceed customer expectations, something that might not have been possible with a third-party solution.

Conversely, many organizations choose to buy solutions to leverage the expertise of vendors who specialize in specific technologies. For example, Salesforce has become a popular choice for Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems across various industries. By choosing Salesforce, companies can quickly implement a comprehensive CRM system that meets their needs, without the time and resource investment required to build a similar system from scratch. This approach allows organizations to focus on their core competencies while still meeting customer expectations for efficient and effective CRM capabilities.

Another example is the strategic partnership between IBM and Red Hat. IBM's acquisition of Red Hat was a significant move towards strengthening its position in the cloud market. This decision was influenced by the growing customer demand for flexible, open-source cloud solutions. By buying Red Hat, IBM could quickly meet these expectations, leveraging Red Hat's expertise and established customer base in the open-source community.

Explore related management topics: Customer Relationship Management

Strategic Considerations and Best Practices

When navigating the Build vs. Buy decision, organizations must consider several strategic factors. First and foremost is the alignment with customer expectations and market demands. This requires a deep understanding of the customer's needs, preferences, and pain points. Organizations should conduct thorough market research and customer feedback analysis to inform their strategy.

Secondly, the decision should be guided by a clear assessment of the organization's core competencies and strategic priorities. If building a solution would divert resources away from core business areas or if the required capabilities are not a strategic fit, buying may be the more prudent option. Conversely, if a custom solution could provide a significant competitive advantage and align with long-term strategic goals, building might be the preferred route.

Finally, organizations must consider the financial implications of both options. This includes not only the upfront costs but also the long-term implications for maintenance, support, and scalability. A comprehensive TCO and ROI analysis can provide valuable insights into the most cost-effective and strategically aligned option.

In conclusion, customer expectations play a critical role in shaping the Build vs. Buy strategy in today's market. By carefully considering these expectations, along with strategic priorities and financial implications, organizations can make informed decisions that support their goals and enhance their competitive position.

Explore related management topics: Competitive Advantage Market Research

Best Practices in Build vs. Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy

Build vs. Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Strategic Make-or-Buy Decision Analysis for Metals Industry Leader

Scenario: A multinational firm in the metals industry faces critical Make-or-Buy decisions amidst fluctuating commodity prices and increasing global competition.

Read Full Case Study

Agile Procurement Strategy for Healthcare Equipment Distributor

Scenario: A leading healthcare equipment distributor is at a crossroads, facing the strategic challenge of deciding on a make or buy decision for their logistics operations.

Read Full Case Study

Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor

Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer

Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Professional Services Firm

Scenario: A professional services firm is grappling with increasing operational expenses and competitive pressures in the market.

Read Full Case Study

Resilience in Retail Expansion for Boutique Fashion Chain in Urban Markets

Scenario: A boutique fashion retail chain is at a crossroads, facing the strategic challenge of deciding whether to build vs.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How does the integration of cloud computing influence the Build vs. Buy decision in IT infrastructure?
Cloud computing shifts the Build vs. Buy decision in IT infrastructure towards considerations of cost, scalability, and innovation, impacting Strategic Planning and Digital Transformation. [Read full explanation]
How can manufacturers use Make vs. Buy decisions to better align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products?
Manufacturers can align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products through informed Make vs. Buy decisions, focusing on Strategic Sourcing, Supplier Partnerships, and investing in Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies. [Read full explanation]
What are the cost implications of Build vs. Buy for IT security solutions in the face of increasing cyber threats?
The Build vs. Buy decision for IT security solutions involves analyzing initial and long-term costs, Operational Excellence, and Strategic Impact, with custom solutions offering tailored security but higher costs and operational burdens. [Read full explanation]
How are advancements in 3D printing technology affecting the Build vs. Buy decisions in manufacturing?
3D printing technology is reshaping manufacturing by promoting in-house production due to its benefits in customization, speed, cost savings, and supply chain resilience, necessitating strategic integration for innovation and market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
How can companies effectively measure and compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options?
Organizations can evaluate the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options by conducting Skills and Capabilities Assessments, Financial Analyses, and Risk Assessments, employing Decision Matrices and Scenario Planning to align with Strategic Planning and Innovation Strategy. [Read full explanation]
What role does the increasing focus on mental health and well-being in the workplace play in Make vs. Buy decisions for HR technologies?
The focus on mental health in the workplace is crucial for Make vs. Buy HR technology decisions, balancing cost, customization, and scalability with impacts on culture and engagement. [Read full explanation]
What are the environmental sustainability considerations in the Make vs. Buy decision-making process for manufacturers?
The Make vs. Buy decision in manufacturing involves analyzing economic and environmental impacts, assessing suppliers' sustainability practices, and investing in technology to align with sustainability goals and Operational Excellence. [Read full explanation]
How can companies effectively measure the performance and impact of their make-or-buy decisions over time?
Effectively measuring make-or-buy decisions involves analyzing Financial Performance Metrics, Strategic Alignment, and Operational Excellence, ensuring decisions support long-term success. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Build vs. Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.