Want FREE Templates on Strategy & Transformation? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How can companies effectively measure and compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options?


This article provides a detailed response to: How can companies effectively measure and compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Organizations can evaluate the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options by conducting Skills and Capabilities Assessments, Financial Analyses, and Risk Assessments, employing Decision Matrices and Scenario Planning to align with Strategic Planning and Innovation Strategy.

Reading time: 4 minutes


In the rapidly evolving business landscape, organizations are constantly faced with the decision of whether to build new capabilities in-house or to buy them through acquisitions, licensing, or partnerships. This decision is crucial for maintaining competitive advantage and requires a thorough analysis of the innovation potential of each option. Understanding how to effectively measure and compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options is essential for strategic planning and successful execution.

Evaluating the Innovation Potential of Build Options

When considering the Build option, organizations must assess their internal capabilities, resources, and the time required to develop the innovation in-house. The first step is to conduct a Skills and Capabilities Assessment to identify whether the organization has the necessary talent, technology, and infrastructure to support the development of the new product, service, or technology. This includes evaluating the current workforce's expertise and the potential need for training or hiring additional talent.

Another critical aspect is the Financial Analysis, which involves calculating the total cost of development, including research and development (R&D) expenses, capital investments, and any opportunity costs associated with diverting resources from other projects. Organizations should also consider the time to market, as developing innovations in-house can be time-consuming. A longer time to market can result in lost opportunities, especially in fast-moving industries. Therefore, a detailed timeline and project management plan are essential components of the Build option evaluation.

Risk Assessment is also a vital part of analyzing the Build option. This includes the risk of project failure, technology obsolescence, and the potential inability to scale the innovation. Organizations must have a clear risk management strategy, including contingency plans and exit strategies. Real-world examples include tech giants like Google and Amazon, which invest heavily in R&D for developing new products and technologies in-house, leveraging their extensive resources and capabilities to innovate and maintain a competitive edge.

Explore related management topics: Risk Management Project Management Financial Analysis

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Evaluating the Innovation Potential of Buy Options

When exploring the Buy option, organizations must assess the strategic fit of potential acquisitions, partnerships, or licensing opportunities. This involves a thorough Market and Competitive Analysis to identify external innovations that align with the organization's strategic goals and offer a competitive advantage. The analysis should consider the market position, strengths, and weaknesses of potential targets, as well as the synergies that could be achieved through integration.

Financial Analysis, in the context of the Buy option, includes evaluating the cost of acquisition, partnership, or licensing fees, along with the integration costs. It is crucial to conduct a detailed valuation of the target to ensure that the investment is justified by the expected returns. This includes analyzing the target's financial health, growth potential, and the impact on the organization's financial performance. Organizations should also consider the potential for cost savings and revenue synergies that could be realized through the integration of the acquired innovation.

Risk Assessment for the Buy option involves evaluating the risks associated with integration, cultural mismatches, and the potential loss of key personnel from the target organization. Due diligence is critical to uncover any hidden liabilities or issues that could affect the success of the acquisition. An example of a successful Buy strategy is Facebook's acquisition of Instagram, which allowed Facebook to quickly expand its presence in the mobile photo-sharing market and leverage Instagram's innovative features and user base to enhance its overall platform.

Explore related management topics: Competitive Advantage Due Diligence Competitive Analysis

Comparative Analysis and Decision-Making

To effectively compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options, organizations should employ a Decision Matrix that weighs the factors of strategic fit, financial impact, time to market, and risk. This tool helps decision-makers visualize the trade-offs and make an informed choice based on a comprehensive evaluation of both options. The Decision Matrix should be customized to reflect the organization's priorities and the specific context of the decision at hand.

Scenario Planning is another valuable technique for comparing Build and Buy options. By developing detailed scenarios for each option, organizations can better understand the potential outcomes, challenges, and opportunities associated with each path. This includes considering the best-case, worst-case, and most likely scenarios, which can provide insights into the resilience and flexibility of each option under different market conditions.

Ultimately, the decision to Build or Buy should be aligned with the organization's overall Strategic Planning and Innovation Strategy. This requires a holistic view of the organization's goals, market dynamics, and the competitive landscape. Continuous monitoring and evaluation of the innovation ecosystem are essential to adapt and refine the strategy over time. By employing a structured and rigorous approach to evaluating the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options, organizations can make strategic decisions that drive growth, competitiveness, and long-term success.

Explore related management topics: Strategic Planning Build vs. Buy Competitive Landscape

Best Practices in Build vs. Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy

Build vs. Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Biotech Firm in Specialty Pharmaceuticals

Scenario: A biotech firm specializing in specialty pharmaceuticals faces challenges in optimizing its Make or Buy strategy.

Read Full Case Study

Customer Loyalty Program Development in the Cosmetics Industry

Scenario: The organization is a multinational cosmetics enterprise seeking to enhance its competitive edge by establishing a customer loyalty program.

Read Full Case Study

Electronics Sector Make-or-Buy Decision Analysis

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized electronics manufacturer specializing in consumer audio equipment.

Read Full Case Study

E-commerce Platform Modernization Initiative

Scenario: A mid-sized e-commerce firm specializing in bespoke home goods is facing a strategic decision in the evolution of its online platform.

Read Full Case Study

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor

Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How can manufacturers use Make vs. Buy decisions to better align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products?
Manufacturers can align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products through informed Make vs. Buy decisions, focusing on Strategic Sourcing, Supplier Partnerships, and investing in Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies. [Read full explanation]
How is the shift towards more sustainable and ethical supply chains affecting Make vs. Buy decisions in the fashion industry?
The shift towards sustainable and ethical supply chains is transforming Make vs. Buy decisions in the fashion industry, necessitating a holistic approach that integrates sustainability and ethics into Strategic Planning, Operational Excellence, Risk Management, Performance Management, and Strategy Development. [Read full explanation]
How is the rise of artificial intelligence and automation shaping the make-or-buy decision landscape?
The rise of AI and automation is transforming the make-or-buy decision process, impacting Cost, Operational Excellence, Innovation, and Competitive Strategy, necessitating a nuanced Strategic Planning approach. [Read full explanation]
What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?
Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence influences the Build vs. Buy decision, enhancing brand reputation, sustainability, and market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
How does the integration of cloud computing influence the Build vs. Buy decision in IT infrastructure?
Cloud computing shifts the Build vs. Buy decision in IT infrastructure towards considerations of cost, scalability, and innovation, impacting Strategic Planning and Digital Transformation. [Read full explanation]
How do Make vs. Buy decisions affect the innovation cycle in the manufacturing sector?
Make vs. Buy decisions in the manufacturing sector significantly impact innovation, affecting Core Competencies, speed, flexibility, and investment, with strategic management of these decisions being crucial for fostering innovation and maintaining market leadership. [Read full explanation]
What role do customer expectations play in shaping the Build vs. Buy strategy in today's market?
Customer expectations significantly influence the Build vs. Buy strategy, guiding organizations in Strategic Planning and Innovation to meet market demands and technological advancements. [Read full explanation]
What are the key considerations for Build vs. Buy in the context of adopting sustainable manufacturing practices?
The Build vs. Buy decision in sustainable manufacturing hinges on analyzing Cost Implications, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Alignment to align with sustainability goals and strategic objectives. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Build vs. Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.