Flevy Management Insights Q&A

What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?

     Joseph Robinson    |    Build vs. Buy


This article provides a detailed response to: What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence influences the Build vs. Buy decision, enhancing brand reputation, sustainability, and market competitiveness.

Reading time: 4 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they relate to this question.

What does Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) mean?
What does Strategic Alignment mean?
What does Operational Excellence mean?


Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has increasingly become a critical factor in the strategic decision-making process of companies, particularly when it comes to the Build vs. Buy dilemma. This decision, at its core, involves choosing between developing a new business capability in-house (Build) or acquiring it through the purchase of, or partnership with, an external entity (Buy). The role of CSR in this context is multifaceted, influencing not only the financial and operational considerations but also the long-term sustainability and ethical positioning of the company.

Strategic Alignment and CSR Considerations

When companies face the Build vs. Buy decision, CSR considerations must align with the broader Strategic Planning objectives of the organization. This alignment is crucial for ensuring that the decision supports the company’s mission, values, and commitment to social and environmental responsibility. For instance, a company committed to reducing its carbon footprint might prefer building a solution that utilizes renewable energy sources over buying from a vendor whose operations are carbon-intensive. This strategic alignment with CSR objectives can also enhance the company's brand reputation, employee satisfaction, and customer loyalty, which are increasingly important in today's market.

According to a report by McKinsey, companies that integrate CSR principles into their business strategies can achieve a competitive advantage, particularly in industries where customers and clients are sensitive to social and environmental issues. This integration can influence the Build vs. Buy decision by prioritizing options that are not only financially viable but also socially and environmentally responsible.

Moreover, the strategic alignment involves assessing the long-term impacts of the Build vs. Buy decision on the company’s CSR goals. For example, building a new facility might offer more control over environmental standards and labor practices, whereas buying might present challenges in ensuring that the acquired company or product meets the acquiring company's CSR standards.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Operational Excellence and CSR in the Build vs. Buy Decision

Operational Excellence is another critical area where CSR plays a significant role in the Build vs. Buy decision. When considering the operational aspects, companies must evaluate how their choice will affect their ability to operate in an environmentally sustainable and socially responsible manner. For instance, building a new operation from the ground up can be designed to minimize waste, reduce energy consumption, and ensure fair labor practices. However, it may require a significant upfront investment in sustainable technologies and processes.

On the other hand, buying an existing operation or product might offer quicker market access but can pose challenges in integrating CSR practices, especially if the target company's operations do not align with the acquiring company's CSR standards. According to a study by Deloitte, due diligence processes now increasingly include evaluations of the target company’s CSR policies and practices, reflecting the growing importance of CSR in M&A decisions.

Operational considerations also extend to the supply chain, where the Build vs. Buy decision can have significant implications for CSR. Building in-house capabilities may offer more control over the supply chain, allowing companies to ensure that their suppliers adhere to ethical labor practices and environmental standards. Conversely, buying may require thorough vetting of the supply chain to avoid association with suppliers that could tarnish the company's CSR reputation.

Real-World Examples and Market Trends

Real-world examples underscore the importance of CSR in the Build vs. Buy decision. For instance, Google's commitment to sustainability has influenced its Build vs. Buy decisions, leading to the development of custom, energy-efficient data centers and the acquisition of companies that specialize in renewable energy technologies. This approach not only supports Google's CSR objectives but also contributes to Operational Excellence by reducing energy costs and enhancing the company's reputation as a leader in sustainability.

Another example is Unilever, a company known for its commitment to sustainability and ethical business practices. Unilever’s acquisitions, such as the purchase of Seventh Generation, a company known for its eco-friendly products, reflect a strategic approach to buying that aligns with Unilever’s CSR goals. These acquisitions allow Unilever to expand its product line and market reach while maintaining its commitment to sustainability and social responsibility.

In conclusion, CSR considerations are integral to the Build vs. Buy decision-making process, influencing strategic alignment, operational excellence, and ultimately, the company’s reputation and success in the market. As consumers, employees, and investors increasingly prioritize CSR, companies must integrate these considerations into their strategic decision-making processes to remain competitive and achieve long-term sustainability.

Best Practices in Build vs. Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy

Build vs. Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Luxury Goods Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question is a high-end luxury goods manufacturer facing challenges in deciding whether to make components in-house or outsource to third-party vendors.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Sustainability Strategy for Boutique Hotel Chain in Eco-Tourism Niche

Scenario: A boutique hotel chain in the eco-tourism sector is navigating the strategic challenge of a "build vs.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How should companies approach the make-or-buy decision in highly regulated industries differently?
In highly regulated industries, companies must adopt a comprehensive approach to the make-or-buy decision, considering Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, and long-term implications for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
What is a make or buy analysis?
A make or buy analysis is a strategic framework for deciding whether to produce a product in-house or purchase it from an external supplier, considering cost, quality, and risk. [Read full explanation]
What are the key indicators that suggest a company should pivot from a "Buy" to a "Build" strategy, or vice versa, in response to market changes?
Discover when to pivot from a Buy to a Build strategy (or vice versa) by evaluating Cost, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Fit for competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
What role does digital transformation play in influencing the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Digital Transformation significantly alters the make-or-buy decision-making process by adding considerations of digital capabilities, innovation potential, and market agility into Strategic Planning, Operational Excellence, and Risk Management. [Read full explanation]
How can companies effectively measure and compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options?
Organizations can evaluate the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options by conducting Skills and Capabilities Assessments, Financial Analyses, and Risk Assessments, employing Decision Matrices and Scenario Planning to align with Strategic Planning and Innovation Strategy. [Read full explanation]
What impact do global supply chain disruptions have on the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Global supply chain disruptions significantly impact the make-or-buy decision-making process, emphasizing Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, Operational Excellence, and the need for agility, resilience, and innovation in sourcing strategies. [Read full explanation]

 
Joseph Robinson, New York

Operational Excellence, Management Consulting

This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.

To cite this article, please use:

Source: "What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2025




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"Flevy.com has proven to be an invaluable resource library to our Independent Management Consultancy, supporting and enabling us to better serve our enterprise clients.

The value derived from our [FlevyPro] subscription in terms of the business it has helped to gain far exceeds the investment made, making a subscription a no-brainer for any growing consultancy – or in-house strategy team."

– Dean Carlton, Chief Transformation Officer, Global Village Transformations Pty Ltd.
 
"As an Independent Management Consultant, I find Flevy to add great value as a source of best practices, templates and information on new trends. Flevy has matured and the quality and quantity of the library is excellent. Lastly the price charged is reasonable, creating a win-win value for "

– Jim Schoen, Principal at FRC Group
 
"I have used FlevyPro for several business applications. It is a great complement to working with expensive consultants. The quality and effectiveness of the tools are of the highest standards."

– Moritz Bernhoerster, Global Sourcing Director at Fortune 500
 
"I am extremely grateful for the proactiveness and eagerness to help and I would gladly recommend the Flevy team if you are looking for data and toolkits to help you work through business solutions."

– Trevor Booth, Partner, Fast Forward Consulting
 
"My FlevyPro subscription provides me with the most popular frameworks and decks in demand in today’s market. They not only augment my existing consulting and coaching offerings and delivery, but also keep me abreast of the latest trends, inspire new products and service offerings for my practice, and educate me "

– Bill Branson, Founder at Strategic Business Architects
 
"I have found Flevy to be an amazing resource and library of useful presentations for lean sigma, change management and so many other topics. This has reduced the time I need to spend on preparing for my performance consultation. The library is easily accessible and updates are regularly provided. A wealth of great information."

– Cynthia Howard RN, PhD, Executive Coach at Ei Leadership
 
"[Flevy] produces some great work that has been/continues to be of immense help not only to myself, but as I seek to provide professional services to my clients, it gives me a large "tool box" of resources that are critical to provide them with the quality of service and outcomes they are expecting."

– Royston Knowles, Executive with 50+ Years of Board Level Experience
 
"FlevyPro has been a brilliant resource for me, as an independent growth consultant, to access a vast knowledge bank of presentations to support my work with clients. In terms of RoI, the value I received from the very first presentation I downloaded paid for my subscription many times over! The "

– Roderick Cameron, Founding Partner at SGFE Ltd



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.