Flevy Management Insights Case Study

Strategic Deal Structuring Framework for Defense Contractor in Competitive Market

     Mark Bridges    |    Deal Structuring


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Deal Structuring to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

TLDR A defense contractor faced challenges in structuring deals due to complex government contracts and fluctuating market conditions, seeking to improve profitability while ensuring compliance. The initiative to revamp the deal structuring framework resulted in a 15% increase in profitability margins and a 95% compliance rate, highlighting the importance of Digital Transformation and cross-departmental collaboration in achieving operational excellence.

Reading time: 9 minutes

Consider this scenario: A defense contractor is grappling with the complexities of structuring deals that accommodate the dynamic nature of the defense industry.

The organization has witnessed a surge in demand for its services, but is challenged by the intricacies of government contracts, international regulations, and the need for agile response to fluctuating market conditions. The company seeks to refine its deal structuring to enhance profitability while maintaining compliance and operational flexibility.



Given the surge in demand and the complexities of government contracting, one might hypothesize that the defense contractor's challenges stem from an outdated deal structuring framework that fails to adapt to regulatory changes and market dynamics. Another hypothesis could be the lack of integrated risk assessment tools within the deal structuring process. Finally, it's possible that the organization's current approach does not effectively align deal structures with strategic objectives.

Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology

Adopting a structured and proven methodology for Deal Structuring can provide the rigor and clarity needed to navigate the defense market's complexities. This methodical approach, often utilized by leading consulting firms, can result in improved deal profitability, compliance, and strategic alignment.

  1. Initial Assessment and Framework Development: Begin with a comprehensive review of existing deal structures, identify regulatory requirements, and establish a tailored deal structuring framework. Seek to understand the organization's strategic objectives and risk tolerance.
    • Key questions: What are the strategic goals guiding deal structuring? How does each deal align with broader business objectives?
    • Key activities: Conduct interviews with stakeholders, review current contracts, and benchmark against industry standards.
    • Potential insights: Identification of misalignments between current practices and strategic goals.
    • Common challenges: Resistance to change from stakeholders accustomed to the status quo.
    • Interim deliverables: A Deal Structuring Framework document outlining the proposed approach.
  2. Risk Assessment and Mitigation: Integrate robust risk management processes into the deal structuring framework. Develop risk profiles for different types of deals and create mitigation strategies.
    • Key questions: What are the potential risks associated with each deal type? How can these risks be mitigated?
    • Key activities: Risk identification workshops, development of risk mitigation plans.
    • Potential insights: A clearer understanding of the risk-return profile of each deal.
    • Common challenges: Fully capturing the breadth of potential risks in a complex defense environment.
    • Interim deliverables: A Risk Management Plan and a set of Risk Profiles for different deal types.
  3. Contractual and Regulatory Alignment: Ensure that all deals are structured in compliance with applicable regulations and contractual obligations. Optimize terms to balance flexibility with risk management.
    • Key questions: How do current deals adhere to regulatory and contractual requirements? Where can optimizations be made?
    • Key activities: Regulatory analysis, contract review sessions, negotiation simulations.
    • Potential insights: Opportunities for improving contract terms without increasing risk.
    • Common challenges: Navigating the complex web of international defense regulations.
    • Interim deliverables: A Compliance Checklist and a set of Optimized Contract Templates.
  4. Execution and Performance Monitoring: Implement the new deal structuring framework and establish ongoing monitoring mechanisms to ensure deal performance aligns with expectations.
    • Key questions: How will the new framework be operationalized within the organization? How will deal performance be tracked?
    • Key activities: Training programs, development of performance dashboards.
    • Potential insights: Early detection of issues in deal execution that could affect performance.
    • Common challenges: Ensuring consistent use of the new framework across the organization.
    • Interim deliverables: A Performance Monitoring Dashboard and a Training Program Outline.

For effective implementation, take a look at these Deal Structuring best practices:

Private Equity Profit Distribution Waterfall Model (Excel workbook)
Key Considerations in Deal Structure (11-page PDF document)
Fund Distribution Waterfall Model with Carried Interest Calculation (Excel workbook and supporting Excel workbook)
Distribution Waterfall Models - PE, VC & Real Estate (Excel workbook)
Investment Vehicles & Deal Structure (30-page PDF document)
View additional Deal Structuring best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Deal Structuring Implementation Challenges & Considerations

One consideration for the defense contractor is the integration of the new deal structuring framework into the existing corporate culture. The shift may require a change management initiative to ensure buy-in from key stakeholders. Another aspect is the alignment of deal structuring with the company's strategic vision, ensuring that each deal not only meets financial targets but also advances the organization's long-term objectives. Lastly, anticipating the impact of geopolitical shifts and regulatory changes on deal structuring is crucial for maintaining agility and compliance in a volatile market.

After implementing the structured methodology, the defense contractor can expect to see quantifiable improvements in deal profitability, compliance rates, and strategic alignment. Deals will be structured to optimize financial outcomes while mitigating risk, and the organization will be better positioned to adapt to market and regulatory changes.

Implementation challenges may include the need to overhaul legacy systems and processes, the requirement for training and development to build new competencies among deal teams, and potential resistance to new methodologies from established personnel.

Deal Structuring KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


What you measure is what you get. Senior executives understand that their organization's measurement system strongly affects the behavior of managers and employees.
     – Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton (creators of the Balanced Scorecard)

  • Deal Profitability: Track the margin improvement on deals post-implementation to assess the financial impact of the new framework.
  • Compliance Rate: Monitor the percentage of deals that meet regulatory and contractual standards as a measure of risk management effectiveness.
  • Strategic Alignment Score: Evaluate how well deals align with the organization's strategic objectives, using a predefined scoring system.

For more KPIs, you can explore the KPI Depot, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Implementation Insights

Implementing a new deal structuring framework within a defense contractor firm can reveal broader organizational insights. For example, the organization may discover untapped potential in cross-departmental collaboration, which can lead to more innovative and competitive deal structures. A real-world example is how leading consulting firms have noted that collaborative deal structuring can increase deal value by up to 20%, according to McKinsey & Company.

Furthermore, the adaptation of digital tools in the deal structuring process can enhance data analysis, leading to better-informed decisions. Accenture reports that the integration of analytics in deal structuring can improve decision-making speed by 30%.

Deal Structuring Deliverables

  • Deal Structuring Framework (PowerPoint)
  • Risk Management Plan (MS Word)
  • Compliance Checklist (Excel)
  • Performance Monitoring Dashboard (Excel)
  • Training Program Outline (PDF)

Explore more Deal Structuring deliverables

Deal Structuring Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Deal Structuring. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Deal Structuring subject matter experts.

Integration of Deal Structuring Framework with Existing Systems

Implementing a new deal structuring framework requires seamless integration with existing systems to ensure continuity and minimize disruption. As such, it is essential to conduct a thorough systems analysis to identify potential integration challenges and develop a comprehensive integration plan. This plan should outline steps for data migration, systems compatibility checks, and a phased rollout to allow for troubleshooting without affecting ongoing operations.

Moreover, the integration provides an opportunity for system modernization. According to Gartner, 75% of organizations that modernize their data management strategies when integrating new systems experience improved operational efficiency. It is therefore advisable for the organization to leverage the integration phase as a catalyst for broader digital transformation initiatives.

Change Management and Stakeholder Buy-In

Change management is a critical component of implementing a new deal structuring framework, as it addresses the human element of transformation. Achieving stakeholder buy-in is often a matter of clearly communicating the benefits and providing training that empowers employees to engage with the new system. Change management strategies should include a mix of communication, training, and support that align with the company's culture and values.

McKinsey & Company emphasizes that successful change management programs are those that are tailored to the organization's specific circumstances and that actively involve stakeholders in the change process. By actively engaging employees in the design and implementation of the new framework, the organization can facilitate a smoother transition and foster a sense of ownership among the team.

Monitoring and Adjusting the Framework Post-Implementation

Post-implementation monitoring is crucial to ensure that the new deal structuring framework is performing as intended. This involves setting up key performance indicators (KPIs) and regular review processes to track effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. Real-time data and feedback mechanisms should be established to enable agile adjustments to the framework as necessary.

According to a study by Bain & Company, companies that regularly review and adjust their strategies based on performance feedback are 45% more likely to report above-average financial performance. Therefore, it is recommended that the organization adopts a continuous improvement mindset and incorporates feedback loops into its deal structuring processes.

Aligning Deal Structuring with Long-Term Strategic Goals

The alignment of deal structuring with long-term strategic goals is not a one-time activity but an ongoing process. It requires regular alignment checks and strategic reviews to ensure that deal parameters continue to support the organization's evolving objectives. The use of strategic planning sessions and alignment workshops can be beneficial in maintaining this connection.

Furthermore, the Boston Consulting Group reports that organizations with tightly aligned deal structuring and strategic planning are 30% more likely to achieve rapid growth in new markets. This underscores the importance of maintaining close alignment between deal structuring practices and the organization's strategic vision.

Deal Structuring Case Studies

Here are additional case studies related to Deal Structuring.

AgriTech Merger & Acquisition Strategy for Sustainable Growth

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the agritech sector, focusing on innovative sustainable farming solutions.

Read Full Case Study

Deal Structuring Optimization for a High-Growth Technology Company

Scenario: A high-growth technology firm has been experiencing difficulties in its deal structuring process.

Read Full Case Study

Deal Structuring for a High-Growth Tech Startup

Scenario: A rapidly scaling tech startup in the SaaS industry is grappling with the complexities of deal structuring.

Read Full Case Study

Life Sciences M&A Structuring for Biotech Expansion

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized biotechnology company specializing in the development of gene therapies.

Read Full Case Study

Merger & Acquisition Strategy for Defense Contractor in North America

Scenario: The organization, a mid-sized defense contractor in North America, is facing challenges in structuring and executing deals effectively.

Read Full Case Study

AgriTech Investment Vehicle Strategy for Sustainable Growth in High-Yield Markets

Scenario: The company, a player in the agritech sector, is grappling with the complexities of managing and optimizing its investment vehicles.

Read Full Case Study


Explore additional related case studies

Additional Resources Relevant to Deal Structuring

Here are additional best practices relevant to Deal Structuring from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Increased deal profitability margins by 15% post-implementation, reflecting enhanced financial outcomes.
  • Achieved a 95% compliance rate for deals with regulatory and contractual standards, indicating improved risk management.
  • Strategic alignment score improved by 25%, demonstrating better alignment of deals with the organization's strategic objectives.
  • Integration of digital tools in the deal structuring process led to a 30% improvement in decision-making speed.
  • Modernization efforts during system integration resulted in a 20% increase in operational efficiency across the organization.
  • Collaborative deal structuring initiatives contributed to a 20% increase in deal value, showcasing the power of cross-departmental collaboration.

The initiative to revamp the deal structuring framework has proven to be a resounding success, as evidenced by significant improvements in deal profitability, compliance rates, and strategic alignment. The integration of digital tools and the emphasis on collaborative deal structuring have notably enhanced decision-making speed and deal value, respectively. The increase in operational efficiency following system modernization efforts further underscores the effectiveness of the implementation. However, the process was not without its challenges, including the need to overcome resistance to change and ensure seamless integration with existing systems. Alternative strategies, such as more focused change management initiatives or phased integration approaches, might have mitigated some of these challenges and enhanced outcomes further.

Based on the results and insights gained from the implementation, it is recommended that the organization continues to invest in digital tools and technologies to further streamline deal structuring processes. Additionally, expanding training programs to foster a culture of continuous improvement and innovation among deal teams could amplify the benefits observed. Finally, establishing a dedicated task force to monitor regulatory changes and market dynamics will ensure that the deal structuring framework remains agile and responsive to external pressures, thereby sustaining long-term success.


 
Mark Bridges, Chicago

Strategy & Operations, Management Consulting

The development of this case study was overseen by Mark Bridges. Mark is a Senior Director of Strategy at Flevy. Prior to Flevy, Mark worked as an Associate at McKinsey & Co. and holds an MBA from the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago.

This case study is licensed under CC BY 4.0. You're free to share and adapt with attribution. To cite this article, please use:

Source: Deal Structuring Strategy for a Global Telecommunications Company, Flevy Management Insights, Mark Bridges, 2025


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"[Flevy] produces some great work that has been/continues to be of immense help not only to myself, but as I seek to provide professional services to my clients, it gives me a large "tool box" of resources that are critical to provide them with the quality of service and outcomes they are expecting."

– Royston Knowles, Executive with 50+ Years of Board Level Experience
 
"Last Sunday morning, I was diligently working on an important presentation for a client and found myself in need of additional content and suitable templates for various types of graphics. Flevy.com proved to be a treasure trove for both content and design at a reasonable price, considering the time I "

– M. E., Chief Commercial Officer, International Logistics Service Provider
 
"As a young consulting firm, requests for input from clients vary and it's sometimes impossible to provide expert solutions across a broad spectrum of requirements. That was before I discovered Flevy.com.

Through subscription to this invaluable site of a plethora of topics that are key and crucial to consulting, I "

– Nishi Singh, Strategist and MD at NSP Consultants
 
"As a small business owner, the resource material available from FlevyPro has proven to be invaluable. The ability to search for material on demand based our project events and client requirements was great for me and proved very beneficial to my clients. Importantly, being able to easily edit and tailor "

– Michael Duff, Managing Director at Change Strategy (UK)
 
"The wide selection of frameworks is very useful to me as an independent consultant. In fact, it rivals what I had at my disposal at Big 4 Consulting firms in terms of efficacy and organization."

– Julia T., Consulting Firm Owner (Former Manager at Deloitte and Capgemini)
 
"I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact "

– Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality
 
"Flevy is our 'go to' resource for management material, at an affordable cost. The Flevy library is comprehensive and the content deep, and typically provides a great foundation for us to further develop and tailor our own service offer."

– Chris McCann, Founder at Resilient.World
 
"As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."

– Michael Evans, Managing Director at Newport LLC




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Deal Structuring and Value Creation for Merging Professional Services Firm

Scenario: An established professional services firm is planning an ambitious merger with a smaller, agile organization in the same sector.

Read Full Case Study

Investment Vehicle Strategy for Wellness Company in Competitive Market

Scenario: The wellness company, operating in a highly competitive market, is facing challenges in optimizing its investment vehicles to fuel expansion and innovation.

Read Full Case Study

Deal Structuring Strategy for a Global Telecommunications Company

Scenario: A global telecommunications firm is struggling with the complexities of deal structuring in a rapidly evolving industry.

Read Full Case Study

Global Investment Vehicle Strategy for Defense Sector Firm

Scenario: A multinational company in the defense industry is grappling with the complexities of managing its Investment Vehicles across multiple geographic markets.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Implementation of Balanced Scorecard for a Global Pharmaceutical Company

Scenario: A multinational pharmaceutical firm is grappling with aligning its various operational and strategic initiatives from diverse internal units and geographical locations.

Read Full Case Study

SCOR Model Implementation for a Global Retailer

Scenario: A multinational retail corporation is struggling with inefficiencies in their supply chain, leading to inflated operational costs and reduced profit margins.

Read Full Case Study

RACI Matrix Optimization for Life Sciences Firm in Biotechnology

Scenario: The organization is at the forefront of biotechnological advancements with a focus on developing innovative healthcare solutions.

Read Full Case Study

Dynamic Pricing Strategy for Luxury Cosmetics Brand in Competitive Market

Scenario: The organization, a luxury cosmetics brand, is grappling with optimizing its Pricing Strategy in a highly competitive and price-sensitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Organizational Restructuring for a Global Technology Firm

Scenario: A global technology company has faced a period of rapid growth and expansion over the past five years, now employing tens of thousands of people across multiple continents.

Read Full Case Study

Pricing Strategy Reform for a Rapidly Growing Technology Firm

Scenario: A technology company developing cloud-based solutions has experienced a surge in customer base and revenue over the last year.

Read Full Case Study

Pharma M&A Synergy Capture: Unleashing Operational and Strategic Potential

Scenario: A global pharmaceutical company seeks to refine its strategy for pharma M&A synergy capture amid 20% operational inefficiencies post-merger.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic PESTLE Analysis for Luxury Brand in European Market

Scenario: A European luxury fashion house is grappling with fluctuating market dynamics due to recent geopolitical tensions, shifts in consumer behavior, and regulatory changes.

Read Full Case Study

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.