Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Cost Reduction Initiative for Cosmetic Firm in Competitive Market


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Cost Take-out to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

TLDR The organization faced escalating operational costs due to legacy processes and an inefficient supply chain, threatening its ability to invest in product development and marketing. By implementing strategic sourcing and lean management, it achieved a 15% reduction in operational costs and a 25% improvement in process efficiency, highlighting the importance of continuous improvement and technology investment in maintaining competitiveness.

Reading time: 8 minutes

Consider this scenario: The organization in question operates within the highly competitive cosmetics industry, where product innovation and market responsiveness are key to maintaining profitability.

However, despite a robust market presence, the organization has identified a critical need to reduce operational costs that have inflated due to legacy processes and an expansive, yet inefficient, supply chain. This escalation in costs is undermining the organization's ability to invest in new product development and marketing strategies—essential components for sustaining its market share.



Initial scrutiny of the organization’s financial statements and operations suggests that the cost structure is not aligned with industry benchmarks. There appears to be an over-reliance on outdated technology and a bloated workforce that has not been rightsized to match the organization's current strategic objectives. Additionally, procurement practices seem to lack the rigor and strategic sourcing techniques that could yield significant cost savings.

Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology

The organization can address these cost challenges by employing a comprehensive 5-phase Cost Take-out methodology which has been proven to deliver tangible results. This structured process not only identifies cost-saving opportunities but also streamlines operations to foster a culture of continuous improvement and efficiency.

  1. Cost Baseline Establishment: The initial phase involves developing a detailed understanding of the current cost structure, identifying major cost centers, and benchmarking against industry standards. Key activities include data collection, interviews with key personnel, and financial analysis to pinpoint areas of overspending.
  2. Process Optimization: This phase focuses on analyzing current processes to identify inefficiencies and redundancies. Techniques such as lean management and Six Sigma are employed to streamline workflows and reduce waste, with interim deliverables including process maps and optimization plans.
  3. Strategic Sourcing and Procurement: In this phase, the organization's procurement practices are scrutinized. Key questions revolve around supplier contracts, volume discounts, and the potential for strategic partnerships. The goal is to leverage buying power and reduce material costs without compromising quality.
  4. Organizational Restructuring: Here, the emphasis is on aligning the workforce with the optimized processes and future strategy of the organization. This may involve rightsizing, re-skilling of employees, or restructuring teams to better support the organization's strategic objectives.
  5. Technology and Automation: The final phase assesses current technology use and identifies opportunities for automation. This could lead to significant cost reductions by streamlining operations and reducing manual effort.

For effective implementation, take a look at these Cost Take-out best practices:

Cost Reduction Opportunities (across Value Chain) (24-slide PowerPoint deck)
Cost Reduction Methodologies (33-slide PowerPoint deck)
Reducing the Cost of Quality (COQ) (131-slide PowerPoint deck)
Strategic Cost Reduction Training (97-slide PowerPoint deck)
Capital Optimization Guide (123-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
View additional Cost Take-out best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Cost Take-out Implementation Challenges & Considerations

It is essential for the organization to maintain product quality and customer satisfaction levels while undertaking cost reduction initiatives. The strategic analysis must therefore be sensitive to potential impacts on these critical areas. Moreover, managing change effectively is paramount to ensure buy-in from stakeholders across the organization. The organization must also be prepared to invest in technology and employee development to realize long-term efficiencies.

Post-implementation, the organization can expect to see a reduction in operational costs, improved margins, and enhanced competitiveness. A leaner cost structure will free up capital for investment in growth areas such as product development and market expansion. However, it is crucial to monitor the market closely to ensure that cost reductions do not lead to a loss of competitive edge.

Implementation challenges may include resistance to change from employees, potential disruptions to operations during the transition, and the need for upfront investment in technology and training. Careful planning and communication are essential to navigate these hurdles successfully.

Cost Take-out KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


Efficiency is doing better what is already being done.
     – Peter Drucker

  • Cost Savings Achieved: Measures the direct financial impact of the cost take-out initiatives.
  • Process Efficiency Gains: Tracks improvements in process cycle times and reduction in process waste.
  • Employee Productivity: Monitors changes in output per employee, an indicator of the effectiveness of organizational restructuring and process optimization.
  • Supplier Performance: Assesses the quality, delivery, and cost improvements resulting from strategic sourcing efforts.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Implementation Insights

During the cost take-out process, it was observed that an incremental approach to implementing technology changes was more effective than a big-bang rollout. This allowed for continuous learning and adjustment, minimizing disruptions to operations. According to McKinsey, incremental digital transformations are 1.5 times more likely than others to meet or exceed their stated goals.

Another insight was the importance of developing a strong change management strategy. This included comprehensive communication plans, stakeholder engagement, and the establishment of a change network to facilitate the transition. Such strategies have been shown to significantly increase the likelihood of project success.

Cost Take-out Deliverables

  • Cost Reduction Strategy Report (PPT)
  • Optimized Process Maps (Visio)
  • Strategic Sourcing Plan (Word)
  • Organizational Redesign Proposal (PPT)
  • Technology Roadmap and ROI Analysis (Excel)

Explore more Cost Take-out deliverables

Cost Take-out Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Cost Take-out. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Cost Take-out subject matter experts.

Cost Take-out Case Studies

One notable case study involves a leading multinational cosmetics company that underwent a similar cost take-out exercise. By implementing a strategic sourcing initiative, the company was able to achieve a 12% reduction in material costs within the first year.

Another case study from the power and utilities sector showcases a company that embraced process optimization and workforce restructuring. As a result, they reported a 20% improvement in operational efficiency and a 15% reduction in labor costs over two years.

Explore additional related case studies

Ensuring Quality and Customer Satisfaction

Maintaining product quality and customer satisfaction while implementing cost take-out initiatives is a legitimate concern. A core tenet of any cost reduction strategy should be the principle of 'value over cost.' This means that while costs are being cut, the perceived value of the product or service to the customer must remain intact or even be enhanced. To ensure this, companies must apply a customer-centric lens to all cost take-out decisions, leveraging customer feedback and quality metrics to guide their approach.

For example, a Bain & Company survey revealed that companies that integrate customer feedback into their operations see a 4-8% higher revenue growth than those that do not. Therefore, it is crucial to continuously monitor customer feedback channels and quality control metrics throughout the cost take-out process. This not only safeguards against any negative impact on customer satisfaction but also aligns cost reduction efforts with customer value drivers.

Change Management and Employee Buy-In

Change management is often the linchpin of successful cost take-out initiatives. Employees are the executors of change, and their buy-in is critical. To achieve this, executive leadership must communicate the vision and rationale behind the cost take-out measures clearly and consistently. Employees need to understand not just the 'what' and the 'how,' but also the 'why.' Building a narrative around the necessity of cost reductions for the future success and stability of the company is essential.

According to McKinsey, effective change management programs can improve the odds of success by up to 33%. This involves creating a detailed change management plan that addresses potential employee concerns, provides clear timelines, and outlines the support available to employees throughout the transformation. Regular town halls, Q&A sessions, and transparent progress updates can help in demystifying the process and in securing the necessary organizational buy-in.

Technology Investment and Long-Term Payoffs

Investing in technology can sometimes be seen as counterintuitive in a cost take-out scenario. However, this investment is critical for long-term efficiency gains. The initial cost of technology adoption is often offset by the long-term savings and increased productivity it brings. Automation, for instance, can significantly reduce manual processing costs and errors, leading to a leaner, more efficient operation.

A study by Accenture indicates that companies that scale intelligent automation technologies can boost their revenue by up to 32%. It is essential to view technology investments not as expenses but as enablers of future profitability. The selection of technology must be strategic, focusing on solutions that offer scalability, integration capabilities, and a clear return on investment.

Quantifying Success and KPI Tracking

Quantifying the success of cost take-out initiatives is a complex but necessary task. It requires a clear set of KPIs that are aligned with the strategic objectives of the organization. These KPIs should not only track financial metrics such as cost savings but also operational metrics like process efficiency and employee productivity. By doing so, the organization can get a holistic view of the impact of the cost take-out measures.

According to PwC, companies that establish clear metrics and regularly track progress against them can improve their strategic success rate by 95%. Setting up a dashboard that provides real-time visibility into these KPIs is an effective way to monitor progress and make data-driven decisions. Additionally, it allows for timely course corrections if certain metrics are not trending in the desired direction.

Additional Resources Relevant to Cost Take-out

Here are additional best practices relevant to Cost Take-out from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Reduced operational costs by 15% through strategic sourcing and procurement optimization.
  • Improved process efficiency by 25% by implementing lean management and Six Sigma methodologies.
  • Increased employee productivity by 20% following organizational restructuring and rightsizing.
  • Enhanced supplier performance, achieving a 10% improvement in delivery times and a 5% improvement in cost savings.
  • Realized a 30% reduction in manual processing costs through incremental technology and automation investments.
  • Maintained product quality and customer satisfaction levels, leveraging customer feedback to guide cost take-out decisions.

The initiative has been notably successful, achieving significant reductions in operational costs and improvements in process efficiency, employee productivity, and supplier performance. These results are particularly impressive given the competitive and cost-sensitive nature of the cosmetics industry. The strategic approach to sourcing and procurement, coupled with a focus on lean management and technology investment, has paid dividends. The maintenance of product quality and customer satisfaction levels, despite extensive cost take-out measures, underscores the effectiveness of the initiative's customer-centric approach. However, the success could have been further enhanced by a more aggressive adoption of digital transformation technologies and a deeper focus on innovation in product development and marketing strategies to leverage the freed-up capital more effectively.

For next steps, it is recommended to continue monitoring and refining the implemented changes to ensure sustained benefits. Further investment in technology, particularly in areas that support remote collaboration and digital marketing, could yield additional cost savings and revenue opportunities. Additionally, exploring new market segments or geographies could be beneficial, leveraging the leaner cost structure to competitively price products. Finally, instituting a continuous improvement program that actively solicits employee feedback and customer insights will help in maintaining operational efficiencies and customer satisfaction over the long term.

Source: Telecom Network Rationalization for Cost Efficiency, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Inventory Rationalization for Telecom Retailer

Scenario: The organization is a leading telecom retailer grappling with escalating inventory costs and a complex product assortment that hinders optimal inventory turnover.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Management Strategy for Telecom Provider in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: A leading telecom provider is facing escalating operational costs in a highly competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Reduction Initiative for Maritime Shipping Leader

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the maritime industry, specifically in the shipping sector, and has been grappling with escalating operational costs that are eroding profit margins.

Read Full Case Study

Cloud Integration Strategy for SMEs in the IT Sector

Scenario: A mid-sized cloud services provider specializing in solutions for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) faces significant "Cost Take-out" pressure amidst a rapidly saturating market.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Reduction Initiative for Agritech Firm in North America

Scenario: The organization operates in the competitive North American agritech sector, striving to maintain profitability amidst rising operational costs and fluctuating market demands.

Read Full Case Study

Operational Efficiency Initiative for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the highly competitive semiconductor industry, which is characterized by rapid technological advancements and thinning profit margins.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Efficiency Initiative for a Retail Chain

Scenario: The retail company is facing a challenging market landscape with increased competition and rising operational costs.

Read Full Case Study

Operational Efficiency Enhancement for Telecom Provider in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: A telecommunications firm operating in a highly competitive environment is grappling with escalating operational costs that are eroding profit margins.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Reduction Initiative for Defense Contractor in Competitive Sector

Scenario: The organization is a prominent defense contractor grappling with escalating operating costs amidst a highly competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Containment Strategy for E-commerce Platform

Scenario: The organization, a mid-sized e-commerce platform specializing in consumer electronics, is grappling with escalating operational costs that are eroding profit margins.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Containment Strategy for Maritime Logistics in North America

Scenario: A maritime logistics firm operating within North America faces significant challenges in maintaining profitability amidst rising operational costs and competitive pricing pressures.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Reduction Initiative for Electronics Manufacturer in Competitive Market

Scenario: The organization in focus operates within the highly competitive electronics sector, continually pressed to innovate while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.