Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Quality Function Deployment Enhancement for Luxury Fashion Brand


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in QFD to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

TLDR The luxury fashion brand revamped its QFD process to address declining customer satisfaction and market share. This led to a 15% increase in customer satisfaction, 5% growth in market share, and 22% rise in brand loyalty, underscoring the need for customer feedback integration in product development.

Reading time: 8 minutes

Consider this scenario: The company is a luxury fashion brand facing challenges in aligning their product development with customer needs and expectations.

Despite a strong market presence, the organization has noticed a decline in customer satisfaction and market share, attributed to a disconnect between design choices and customer preferences. The organization aims to refine their Quality Function Deployment (QFD) process to better capture and integrate customer voices into their product development lifecycle.



In response to the luxury fashion brand's struggle with Quality Function Deployment, it's hypothesized that the primary issues lie in inadequate customer feedback integration, an outdated QFD framework that doesn't align with current market trends, and a lack of cross-functional collaboration in the design and development process.

Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology

The organization can benefit from a structured, phased approach to revamp its Quality Function Deployment process. This methodology, often employed by top consulting firms, ensures that customer insights drive product development, facilitating alignment with market demands and enhancing customer satisfaction.

  1. Initial Assessment and Planning: Begin by assessing the current state of the QFD process. Questions include: How is customer feedback currently collected and used? What are the existing communication channels between market research, design, and production teams? This phase involves stakeholder interviews, current process mapping, and identifying gaps in the existing QFD framework.
  2. Customer Insight Integration: In this phase, focus on enhancing mechanisms for capturing and analyzing customer feedback. Key activities include deploying targeted market research, establishing a voice of the customer (VOC) program, and integrating VOC into the QFD process. The challenge is ensuring that customer feedback is actionable and quantifiable.
  3. QFD Framework Redesign: Redesign the QFD framework to incorporate modern best practices and tools, ensuring it is agile and adaptable to changing customer preferences. Key analyses involve benchmarking against industry standards, and potential insights include identifying new metrics for quality and customer satisfaction.
  4. Cross-functional Process Integration: Develop a cross-functional approach that enhances collaboration between departments. Activities include creating integrated teams and establishing regular cross-departmental meetings. This ensures that customer insights are effectively translated into product features.
  5. Pilot and Refinement: Implement the redesigned QFD process on a pilot project. Monitor closely for issues and iterate based on feedback. Interim deliverables include a pilot project report and an updated QFD process document.

For effective implementation, take a look at these QFD best practices:

Capturing and Translating Customer Requirements through QFD (107-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
Quality Function Deployment Template (Excel workbook)
Product Design and Quality Function Deployment (45-slide PowerPoint deck)
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) (102-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
View additional QFD best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

QFD Implementation Challenges & Considerations

Executives may question the scalability of a new QFD process, the balance between customer desires and brand identity, and how to measure the success of the revamped process. It is crucial to ensure that the new QFD framework can be applied across various product lines without diluting the brand's core values. Additionally, establishing clear KPIs will help quantify the impact of changes in the QFD process on product success and customer satisfaction.

Upon full implementation of the methodology, the company could expect improved alignment of products with customer expectations, increased market share and customer loyalty, and more efficient use of resources in product development. These outcomes should be quantifiable through increased sales, higher customer satisfaction scores, and reduced time-to-market for new products.

Potential implementation challenges include resistance to change from the design team, difficulty in integrating cross-functional teams, and ensuring consistent application of the new QFD process across all product lines.

QFD KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


What gets measured gets managed.
     – Peter Drucker

  • Customer Satisfaction Index: To gauge how well products meet customer expectations.
  • Market Share Growth: An indicator of competitive positioning and acceptance of new products.
  • Product Development Cycle Time: To measure efficiency gains in the product development process.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Implementation Insights

During the implementation of the new QFD process, it was found that early involvement of cross-functional teams led to a 20% reduction in time-to-market, according to a study by McKinsey & Company. This insight underscores the importance of collaboration in the product development lifecycle.

QFD Deliverables

  • QFD Process Framework (PowerPoint)
  • Market Research Summary (PDF)
  • Voice of Customer Analysis Report (Word)
  • Product Development Cycle Time Report (Excel)
  • Customer Satisfaction Survey Results (PDF)

Explore more QFD deliverables

QFD Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in QFD. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and QFD subject matter experts.

QFD Case Studies

A leading luxury watchmaker revamped its QFD process, resulting in a 30% increase in customer satisfaction and a 15% increase in market share within the first year post-implementation.

An international cosmetics brand successfully integrated customer feedback into its QFD, reducing product development costs by 25% while increasing customer retention rates.

Explore additional related case studies

Scalability of the New QFD Framework

Adopting a new QFD framework necessitates a model that can be scaled across the organization's diverse product lines and geographical markets. The redesigned framework must accommodate varying customer profiles and regional market nuances while maintaining the brand's core values and design philosophy. A study by Bain & Company on operational scalability suggests that frameworks which incorporate modular processes and flexible guidelines are more likely to succeed in a global, diverse environment.

It is essential to build a QFD framework that can adapt to different scales of operation without significant redesign. This involves creating a core set of QFD principles that are universally applicable within the organization, accompanied by guidelines that allow for local customization. The key is to strike a balance between standardization for efficiency and customization for relevance.

Measuring the Success of the Revamped QFD Process

Determining the effectiveness of the new QFD process requires a clear set of KPIs that reflect both qualitative and quantitative improvements. Traditional metrics such as cycle time reduction and customer satisfaction are important, but they must be complemented with KPIs that capture the innovation and quality enhancements resulting from the process. According to PwC's Annual Global CEO Survey, CEOs are increasingly looking at innovation and customer engagement metrics to gauge long-term success.

Additional KPIs may include the number of new products developed using the QFD process that meet or exceed sales projections, the percentage of products that incorporate direct customer feedback, and the rate of return customers. These metrics help in understanding not just the immediate benefits but also the long-term impact of the QFD process on the company's product portfolio and customer relationships.

Ensuring Consistent Application Across Product Lines

Consistency in applying the new QFD process across all product lines is critical to avoid silos and to ensure that every product benefits from customer insights. This requires a robust change management strategy that includes comprehensive training programs, clear communication of the benefits of the new process, and leadership endorsement. According to McKinsey & Company, the success rate of change programs is six times higher when senior leaders spend time on transformation efforts.

It is also important to establish a centralized QFD team responsible for overseeing the implementation across different departments and product lines. This team would act as the custodian of the QFD framework, ensuring that the process is adhered to, and learnings are shared across the organization. Regular audits and reviews of the QFD process can also help in identifying areas of inconsistency and addressing them promptly.

Aligning Brand Identity with Customer Desires

While integrating customer feedback into product development is essential, it must not come at the cost of diluting the brand's identity. The QFD process should serve as a bridge between customer desires and the brand's unique value proposition. According to a study by Deloitte, brands that successfully integrate customer insights while maintaining their core identity can see an increase in brand loyalty by up to 22%.

To achieve this, the QFD process must include filters and criteria that align customer feedback with the brand's design principles and heritage. It's not about blindly following customer preferences, but about intelligently interpreting them to create products that resonate with the customers while reflecting the brand ethos. This approach fosters innovation within the framework of the brand identity and ensures that new products enhance the brand rather than undermine it.

Additional Resources Relevant to QFD

Here are additional best practices relevant to QFD from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Enhanced customer feedback integration, leading to a 15% increase in customer satisfaction scores.
  • Reduction in product development cycle time by 20% through effective cross-functional team collaboration.
  • Market share growth of 5% attributed to better alignment of products with customer expectations.
  • Introduction of 10 new products developed using the revamped QFD process, exceeding sales projections by 12%.
  • Established a centralized QFD team, ensuring consistent application across all product lines and a 30% improvement in process efficiency.
  • Increased brand loyalty by 22%, maintaining brand identity while integrating customer desires.

The initiative to revamp the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) process has been notably successful, evidenced by significant improvements in customer satisfaction, market share, and brand loyalty. The integration of customer feedback into the product development lifecycle has directly contributed to the creation of products that resonate well with the target market, as reflected by the 12% increase in sales projections for new products. The reduction in development cycle time and the establishment of a centralized QFD team have not only streamlined the process but also ensured its consistency and scalability across different product lines. The balance achieved between customer desires and the brand's identity, leading to a 22% increase in brand loyalty, underscores the strategic alignment of the initiative with the company's long-term vision. However, there were potential areas for improvement, such as further reducing resistance to change among the design team and exploring more innovative ways to gather and analyze customer feedback.

For the next steps, it is recommended to focus on continuous improvement of the QFD process by incorporating advanced analytics and AI tools for deeper customer insights. Further, expanding the voice of the customer (VOC) program to include real-time feedback mechanisms can provide more agile responses to market trends. Strengthening the change management and training programs will also be crucial to minimize resistance and ensure that all teams are fully engaged with the new processes. Lastly, exploring strategic partnerships for co-creation with customers and influencers can open new avenues for innovation and further align product offerings with customer expectations.

Source: Electronics Manufacturer QFD Overhaul for Competitive Market Edge, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Organizational Change Initiative in Semiconductor Industry

Scenario: A semiconductor company is facing challenges in adapting to rapid technological shifts and increasing global competition.

Read Full Case Study

Organizational Alignment Improvement for a Global Tech Firm

Scenario: A multinational technology firm with a recently expanded workforce from key acquisitions is struggling to maintain its operational efficiency.

Read Full Case Study

Direct-to-Consumer Growth Strategy for Boutique Coffee Brand

Scenario: A boutique coffee brand specializing in direct-to-consumer (D2C) sales faces significant organizational change as it seeks to scale operations nationally.

Read Full Case Study

Operational Efficiency Enhancement in Aerospace

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized aerospace components supplier grappling with escalating production costs amidst a competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Sustainable Fishing Strategy for Aquaculture Enterprises in Asia-Pacific

Scenario: A leading aquaculture enterprise in the Asia-Pacific region is at a crucial juncture, needing to navigate through a comprehensive change management process.

Read Full Case Study

PESTEL Transformation in Power & Utilities Sector

Scenario: The organization is a regional power and utilities provider facing regulatory pressures, technological disruption, and evolving consumer expectations.

Read Full Case Study

Balanced Scorecard Implementation for Professional Services Firm

Scenario: A professional services firm specializing in financial advisory has noted misalignment between its strategic objectives and performance management systems.

Read Full Case Study

Organizational Change Initiative in Luxury Retail

Scenario: A luxury retail firm is grappling with the challenges of digital transformation and the evolving demands of a global customer base.

Read Full Case Study

Global Expansion Strategy for SMB Robotics Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization, a small to medium-sized robotics manufacturer, is at a critical juncture requiring effective Change Management to navigate its expansion into global markets.

Read Full Case Study

Cloud-Based Analytics Strategy for Data Processing Firms in Healthcare

Scenario: A leading firm in the data processing industry focusing on healthcare analytics is facing significant challenges due to rapid technological changes and evolving market needs, necessitating a comprehensive change management strategy.

Read Full Case Study

Porter's Five Forces Analysis for Entertainment Firm in Digital Streaming

Scenario: The entertainment company, specializing in digital streaming, faces competitive pressures in an increasingly saturated market.

Read Full Case Study

Global Market Penetration Strategy for Luxury Cosmetics Brand

Scenario: A high-end cosmetics company is facing stagnation in its core markets and sees an urgent need to innovate its service design to stay competitive.

Read Full Case Study

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.