|
flevyblog
The Flevy Blog covers Business Strategies, Business Theories, & Business Stories.
|
Editor's Note: Take a look at our featured best practice, Capability Maturity Model (CMM) - Enterprise Architecture (24-slide PowerPoint presentation). The Capability Maturity Model (CMM) is an organizational model that describes 5 evolutionary stages (or levels), in which the business processes in an organization are managed. The term "maturity" relates to the degree of formality and optimization of processes, from ad hoc practices, to formally [read more]
* * * *
Enterprise Architecture (EA) is the structured discipline for mapping an organization’s functions, processes, systems, data, and infrastructure into a coherent operating model. Think of it as the organization’s x-ray, blueprint, and strategic GPS rolled into one. EA gives decision-makers a way to see not just what the organization does, but how all the moving parts interact—and how they must evolve to support where the organization is headed.
Why does that matter? Because modern enterprises are a spaghetti bowl of technologies, processes, and priorities. Without structure, change efforts descend into chaos. EA offers the scaffolding to align business goals with IT systems. It replaces reactive decisions with long-range thinking. Instead of solving isolated problems, EA helps leaders solve for the whole system.
When done right, EA delivers tangible value. It eliminates redundant systems, breaks down functional silos, and aligns IT investments with strategic priorities. For CIOs and CTOs, it becomes a management tool for Transformation. For the broader Leadership team, it’s a source of clarity amid competing initiatives.
But here’s the catch—most EA efforts stall. Not because EA is a bad idea, but because the tools and frameworks used to deliver it are outdated, abstract, or simply too dense for cross-functional teams.
Traditional EA frameworks like TOGAF, Zachman, and FEAF have been around for decades. They are robust, comprehensive, and often paralyzing. They lean on extensive documentation, technical diagrams, and a level of formality that makes even the most enthusiastic EA champion break out in hives.
These frameworks were designed for rigor, not speed. For control, not communication. They are great at enforcing standards—but terrible at creating shared understanding across business and IT.
That is the real problem. Not the frameworks themselves, but how they engage—or rather, don’t engage—the people tasked with execution. Strategy teams get lost in jargon. Agile teams roll their eyes. Executives see another IT initiative with no clear ROI.
The ArchiMate framework steps in where traditional frameworks tap out. It’s a modeling language created by The Open Group (the team behind TOGAF) that simplifies the visual representation of Enterprise Architecture. But it’s not just about diagrams—it’s about aligning people, systems, and Strategy in a format everyone can understand.
Where other frameworks bury insight in documents, ArchiMate draws it. It gives stakeholders—technical and non-technical alike—a way to see how the pieces fit together. It maps not just structure, but behavior. Not just IT systems, but the motivations behind change.
The framework is built around 6 layers and 4 aspects.
ArchiMate Layers (Horizontal Dimensions)
ArchiMate Aspects (Vertical Dimensions)
This structure enables multi-dimensional modeling without drowning in complexity. You are not just drawing boxes. You are making sense of dependencies, visualizing value streams, and exposing capability gaps.
ArchiMate earns its spot in the Transformation toolkit. Most EA efforts fail because Strategy and execution drift apart. One lives in PowerPoint. The other lives in Jira. ArchiMate lives in both. It creates a visual grammar that links high-level goals with on-the-ground systems. It is used to:
ArchiMate is flexible. Whether you use BiZZdesign, Sparx EA, or just a Visio diagram, ArchiMate works. It integrates with TOGAF, BPMN, and other established EA methods. It doesn’t demand abandoning existing tools—it just makes them work better together.
Let’s take a closer look at first two layers of ArchiMate that make or break any architecture effort.
This layer captures the “why.” It defines what the organization wants to become, the value streams it delivers, and the capabilities it must build. Most importantly, it links strategic goals to operational levers. No more vague statements about “Digital Transformation.” ArchiMate forces specificity. What capabilities must be improved? What resources need to be aligned? What courses of action will be taken?
The visual nature of the Strategy Layer means leadership can see, not just hear, how their ambitions translate into execution.
The Business Layer shows how work gets done—processes, roles, services, and interactions. It models the delivery of value to customers and partners. And it shows how internal actors collaborate to make that delivery happen.
With this layer, you can trace how a capability like “Customer Onboarding” flows through systems, processes, and departments. You can spot handoff issues, process delays, or misaligned services instantly. For transformation programs, this is pure gold.
A major telecom in Southeast Asia needed to consolidate operations across five countries. Each had its own CRM, billing system, and product catalog. It wasn’t just inefficient—it was a nightmare for customers and compliance.
Architects used ArchiMate to model the current state of business services, applications, and technical infrastructure across all regions. They built a unified Strategy Layer to define what a future-ready digital telecommunication looked like. Then layered in business and application views to identify overlaps, gaps, and systems to retire.
The result? A phased migration roadmap that saved millions, eliminated seven redundant platforms, and gave executives a dashboard they actually understood.
What’s the real difference between ArchiMate and TOGAF?
TOGAF is the methodology. ArchiMate is the modeling language. TOGAF tells you what to do. ArchiMate shows you what it looks like.
How hard is it to learn?
Moderate. It’s structured but not intuitive at first. Most architects ramp up within a few weeks. Non-technical stakeholders get value faster from the visuals than from the language itself.
Does it work in Agile settings?
Kind of. It wasn’t designed for Agile, but it can support Agile planning at the portfolio level. It struggles with sprint-level details.
Is it only for tech teams?
No. That’s the beauty. It brings Strategy, operations, and IT into the same visual model.
Because the old EA model—build a 300-page PDF, present it once, shelve it forever—doesn’t cut it anymore. Transformation is continuous. Organizations need a way to understand themselves at speed.
ArchiMate works because it creates a shared map. Not a set of instructions, but a live view of the enterprise and its moving parts. It clarifies roles. It reveals impact. It connects the dots between aspiration and execution.
And maybe most importantly—it respects everyone’s time. No one wants to dig through a binder to understand how IT supports the business. They want a model that shows them. ArchiMate does that.
If you are serious about aligning Transformation with architecture, start here. Not with another whitepaper. Not with a committee. With a clear view of how your organization actually works. Because clarity isn’t optional. It’s what makes strategy executable.
Interested in learning more about the other layers and aspects of the ArchiMate framework? You can download an editable PowerPoint presentation on ArchiMate here on the Flevy documents marketplace.
You can download in-depth presentations on this and hundreds of similar business frameworks from the FlevyPro Library. FlevyPro is trusted and utilized by 1000s of management consultants and corporate executives.
For even more best practices available on Flevy, have a look at our top 100 lists:
