Want FREE Templates on Organization, Change, & Culture? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
What implications does the shift towards a subscription-based economy have on the application of the Boston Matrix?


This article provides a detailed response to: What implications does the shift towards a subscription-based economy have on the application of the Boston Matrix? For a comprehensive understanding of Boston Matrix, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Boston Matrix best practice resources.

TLDR The shift to a subscription-based economy requires a reevaluation of the Boston Matrix, emphasizing Customer Lifetime Value, churn rate, and Monthly Recurring Revenue for product categorization, and prioritizing customer retention and innovation in Strategic Planning and resource allocation.

Reading time: 4 minutes


The shift towards a subscription-based economy has profound implications for traditional business tools and frameworks, including the Boston Matrix, a longstanding model used in Strategic Planning and portfolio analysis. This model, also known as the Growth-Share Matrix, categorizes an organization's business units or products into four quadrants—Cash Cows, Stars, Question Marks, and Dogs—based on their market growth rate and market share. However, the rise of subscription models, characterized by recurring revenue streams, fundamentally alters the dynamics of customer value and product lifecycle, necessitating a reevaluation of how organizations apply this classic framework.

Revisiting the Definitions of the Boston Matrix Quadrants

The subscription economy, driven by companies like Adobe, Netflix, and Salesforce, emphasizes long-term customer relationships over one-time sales. This shift impacts the traditional definitions of the Boston Matrix quadrants. For instance, a product that might have been classified as a 'Dog' in a transaction-based economy could be a 'Cash Cow' in a subscription model if it generates consistent, recurring revenue. Similarly, 'Stars' in the subscription world are not just products with high market growth and share but also those with high customer retention rates and the ability to upsell and cross-sell. This necessitates a nuanced approach to categorizing products and services, taking into account metrics such as Customer Lifetime Value (CLV), churn rate, and Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR).

Organizations must also reconsider how they view market growth in the context of subscription services. Traditional measures may not fully capture the potential of markets that are ripe for subscription models. For example, industries with historically low growth rates might present significant opportunities for subscription services that offer convenience, customization, or added value beyond the initial purchase. This reevaluation can lead organizations to identify new 'Star' opportunities in seemingly mature markets.

Moreover, the focus on customer retention and relationship management in the subscription economy influences the strategic importance of 'Question Marks'. These are products or services with high growth potential but uncertain returns. In a subscription context, investing in customer experience and engagement can transform 'Question Marks' into 'Stars' by enhancing their value proposition and fostering loyalty, thus securing a more predictable revenue stream.

Learn more about Customer Experience Value Proposition Boston Matrix Customer Retention

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Implications for Strategic Planning and Resource Allocation

The adoption of subscription models impacts Strategic Planning and resource allocation decisions within organizations. The Boston Matrix traditionally guides these decisions by suggesting investment in 'Stars' and 'Cash Cows' while divesting 'Dogs' and carefully considering the potential of 'Question Marks'. However, in a subscription-based economy, the emphasis shifts towards investing in customer success, product innovation, and service quality to enhance CLV and reduce churn. This may lead organizations to allocate resources differently, prioritizing initiatives that drive engagement and loyalty even in lower-growth or smaller-market-share segments.

For example, a 'Cash Cow' in a subscription model might require continuous investment in customer service and product updates to maintain its status, diverging from the traditional advice of milking such products with minimal investment. This reflects a broader shift in business strategy towards sustaining and growing recurring revenue streams as opposed to maximizing short-term profits.

Additionally, the dynamic nature of subscription services, where customer preferences and competitive landscapes can change rapidly, calls for a more agile and responsive approach to Strategic Planning. Organizations might need to revisit their portfolio analysis more frequently, adapting their strategies to retain relevance and competitiveness in fast-evolving markets.

Learn more about Customer Service Strategic Planning Agile Competitive Landscape

Real-World Examples and Market Trends

Adobe's transition from selling perpetual licenses to a subscription-based model with its Creative Cloud suite is a prime example of how the subscription economy transforms product categorization and strategic focus. Adobe's move not only increased its recurring revenue but also allowed it to continuously innovate and add value for its customers, turning what could have been 'Cash Cows' under the old model into 'Stars' that drive growth and customer engagement.

Similarly, companies like Microsoft and Autodesk have successfully shifted to subscription models, focusing on customer retention and lifetime value over one-time sales. This strategic pivot has required rethinking how they invest in product development, marketing, and customer service to ensure ongoing customer satisfaction and reduce churn.

Market research firms like Gartner and Forrester have highlighted the growing prevalence of the subscription economy across various industries, from software to automotive to entertainment. This trend underscores the need for organizations to adapt their strategic tools and frameworks, including the Boston Matrix, to remain competitive and capitalize on the opportunities presented by this paradigm shift.

In conclusion, the shift towards a subscription-based economy necessitates a reevaluation of the Boston Matrix and its application in today's business environment. Organizations must adapt their Strategic Planning and resource allocation approaches to prioritize customer retention, lifetime value, and recurring revenue. By doing so, they can navigate the challenges and leverage the opportunities presented by the subscription economy, ensuring sustained growth and competitiveness in the digital age.

Learn more about Customer Satisfaction Product Development

Best Practices in Boston Matrix

Here are best practices relevant to Boston Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Boston Matrix materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Boston Matrix

Boston Matrix Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Boston Matrix, take a look at these case studies.

E-commerce Portfolio Rationalization for Online Retailer

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the e-commerce sector, managing a diverse portfolio of products across multiple categories.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Analysis for Semiconductor Firm

Scenario: A semiconductor company operating globally is facing challenges in allocating resources efficiently across its diverse product portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Portfolio Analysis for Retail Chain in Competitive Sector

Scenario: The organization is a retail chain operating in a highly competitive consumer market, with a diverse portfolio of products ranging from high-turnover items to niche, specialty goods.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand Portfolio Optimization in the High-End Fashion Sector

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with portfolio optimization amidst shifting consumer trends and market volatility.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Growth-Share Matrix Analysis for a High-Tech Corporation

Scenario: A multinational technology firm is facing challenges interpreting its BCG Growth-Share Matrix.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Evaluation for Agritech Firm in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: An Agritech firm operating within a highly competitive sector is seeking to evaluate its product portfolio to better allocate resources and drive focused growth.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

Can the Boston Matrix be effectively applied in non-profit organizations, and if so, how?
The Boston Matrix can be adapted for non-profit organizations to evaluate programs based on potential impact and effectiveness, aiding in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, and Impact Maximization. [Read full explanation]
How can the Boston Matrix be adapted for service-oriented businesses where traditional product lifecycle metrics may not apply?
Adapting the Boston Matrix for service-oriented businesses involves redefining axes to "market potential" and "competitive advantage," and incorporating additional dimensions like Customer Satisfaction, Service Innovation, and Operational Excellence to assess future potential and strategic alignment for sustainable growth. [Read full explanation]
What role does customer feedback play in determining the placement of products or services in the BCG Matrix?
Customer feedback is essential in the BCG Matrix for categorizing products as Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, or Dogs, guiding Strategic Planning, resource allocation, and maintaining market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
What impact do sustainability and environmental considerations have on the strategic positioning of business units in the BCG Matrix?
Sustainability reshapes BCG Matrix strategic positioning, enhancing Cash Cows' efficiency, driving Stars' growth, and offering differentiation or divestment for Question Marks and Dogs. [Read full explanation]
How does the Growth-Share Matrix align with agile methodologies in product development and management?
The Growth-Share Matrix and Agile methodologies complement each other in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, Market Responsiveness, Innovation, Performance Management, and Operational Excellence, enhancing decision-making in product development and management. [Read full explanation]
How can the BCG Growth-Share Matrix be used to evaluate and prioritize investments in emerging technologies?
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix is a Strategic Planning tool that helps companies prioritize investments in emerging technologies by classifying them into Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, and Dogs based on market growth and share. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Boston Matrix Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.