|
flevyblog
The Flevy Blog covers Business Strategies, Business Theories, & Business Stories.
|
Editor's Note: Take a look at our featured best practice, Landed Cost Calculator for USA Imports (Excel workbook). This landed cost calculator is an advanced Microsoft Excel ? spreadsheet that can be used to calculate the total landed cost of importing goods into the USA No need to waste time reinventing the wheel this spreadsheet has evolved from many years of practical use and ongoing development by a [read more]
* * * *
Aluminum cans still package 78 percent of U.S. craft beer sold off-premise, according to the Brewers Association. But every uptick in the Midwest Premium, or a fresh round of tariff chatter, shaves margin. New digital printers now make short runs painless, leaving you with five suppliers, a dozen dielines, and pallets of slow-moving stock. Cash stalls in packaging instead of fueling the next brew. The quickest fix is to centralize specifications and eliminate duplicate components before you renegotiate contracts or freight. Do that, and you slash inventory and changeovers without sacrificing a single beer. Here’s the four-step playbook.
Packaging consolidation reduces hidden variety in your catalog so money and line time stop leaking. In practice, it unfolds across four layers that move at different speeds:
Know exactly which layer you are tackling. When steps blur, the savings disappear.
The quickest wins sit at the top of the list; slower, higher-risk moves drop toward the bottom.
| Rank | First big benefit | Works best when… | Watch-out |
| 1. Build a unified specification library | Instant visibility of duplicate parts | Specs live in email threads and shared drives | Needs one owner to stay current |
| 2. Standardize shared components | Smaller MOQs, faster changeovers | Multiple SKUs share can sizes or carriers | Retailers may lock case dimensions |
| 3. Centralize artwork in a digital hub | Fewer approval loops, fewer misprints | Several agencies touch files | Discipline slips without clear roles |
| 4. Give each vendor the right lane | Fewer POs, stronger service levels | Categories differ in volume and volatility | Over-consolidation increases supply risk |
| 5. Squeeze freight last, with eyes open | Lower landed cost per case | Demand is stable enough to fill loads | Mixed pallets can balloon inventory |
Picture every dieline, material spec, and artwork file living in a single, searchable home. McKinsey estimates that knowledge workers lose about 19 percent of their week just hunting for documents, time that disappears once a library turns searching into clicking.
Centralizing specs pays off. Duplicate 16-ounce can bodies or near-identical four-pack cartons surface in minutes, not at 2 a.m. during a change-over.
Zenpack calls this a unified packaging system: one architecture that governs structure, materials, and print rules across every SKU.
No tooling swaps. No supplier break-ups. Clean data powers every other consolidation step.
With the spec library live, the quickest cash win is to retire “near-miss” parts. Three 16-ounce can bodies become one, and two four-pack cartons that differ by 6 mm merge into a single dieline.
Fewer unique components deliver three immediate payoffs:
Fillers, seamers, and tooling stay the same. You change what you buy, not how you fill. Savings appear in the next inventory cycle: a tighter catalog, the same shelf variety, and less cash on the floor.
Files stop bouncing between designers and printers. Esko’s 2025 packaging trends research found that 89 percent of packaging artworks go through up to five review rounds, and only 17 percent of teams use dedicated artwork-management software; a cloud hub cuts the rounds to one or two. Compliance data, such as material weight and recycled content, travels with the file for easy EPR reporting.
What changes when the hub goes live?
No extra head count, just clarity. That clarity moves SKUs off the computer and onto the line.
Vendor rationalization means assigning the best-fit supplier to each packaging category without over-relying on one partner. After parts are standardized, overlap becomes obvious:
The gain comes from giving every partner a clear lane, not from funneling everything through one warehouse.
Score each candidate on five weighted factors: landed cost, MOQ flexibility, lead-time reliability, quality record, and contingency capacity. Award lanes accordingly. One vendor may lead on cartons yet place fourth on labels, and that is fine; you are building a balanced portfolio, not choosing exclusivity.
Result: fewer purchase orders, simpler freight planning, and stronger service agreements without creating a single-point failure.
Mixed pallets may look free, yet every load moves at the speed of the slowest SKU. When several suppliers feed one container, the slowest one sets the sailing date; without strict cutoffs, one late supplier drags the whole inventory plan with it. Run cube math only after demand, specs, and vendors align; otherwise, you trade freight savings for six extra weeks of inventory.
Get the order right, and freight becomes the cherry on top, not the anchor at the bottom of the tank.
A catalog audit is a two-day sprint that maps every packaging component to the beers that rely on it, then ranks the worst cash drains first.
Day 1: Freeze and Download
Pause any new cartons or sleeves until the data is clean. Export 12 months of purchase and production history for every can body, end, label roll, carton, and carrier. Tag each row with dimensions, supplier, annual volume, lead time, on-hand cases, unit cost, and any write-offs.
Day 2: Visualize and Score
Clean the sheet, then sketch a simple flow: forty saleable SKUs narrowing to a dozen shared parts. The picture sparks questions: Why does one saison need a unique four-pack? Why do two hazies use near-identical 16-ounce cans from different mills? End by flagging the highest-cost overlaps.
With those numbers on one page, leadership sees data, not anecdotes, and knows which parts to target first.
Forty-eight hours, one spreadsheet, and a clear path that can free six figures in working capital. That is speed worth toasting.
A best-seller can still bleed margin if its packaging burns time and space. A friction score makes that pain visible, component by component.
Step 1: Choose Six Drivers
| Factor | Why it hurts | Data point |
| Forecast error | Mispicks and write-offs | % variance vs. rolling 6-mo. forecast |
| MOQ vs. annual demand | Ties up cash | Order qty ÷ annual use |
| Warehouse cube | Rent and handling | Pallet positions × $/pallet-month |
| Change-over minutes | Lost beer | Avg. minutes/run |
| Artwork touches | Delay and plate fees | Review rounds/file |
| Defects/expedites | Direct cost | $ scrapped or rushed |
Step 2: Score 1–5 for each field (5 = worst), then add or weight as you prefer. L.E.K.’s 2023–24 packaging study shows companies gain 65–90 basis points of gross margin soon after reducing SKU count, as volume shifts to the core portfolio. A flagship printed can that runs daily may score 6, while a limited milk stout with a custom carrier could hit 20. Redesign the top three offenders and you usually free hours of line time and several pallet positions without touching the best-seller list.
Data, not debate, guides the next cuts.
Segmenting SKUs by annual volume and forecast volatility lets you match each beer to the lowest-cost, reliable packaging path.
| Quadrant | Typical SKU | Packaging play | Why it wins |
| High volume / Low volatility | Year-round IPA | Conventional printed cans + dedicated cartons | Tight forecast supports long print runs; pallet turns stay high |
| High volume / High volatility | Summer lager | Dual-source printed cans or brite + label backup | Keeps supply on shelf during heat-wave spikes |
| Low volume / Low volatility | Barrel-aged winter ale | Scheduled digital can batches, shared cases | One or two runs a year avoid storage cost |
| Low volume / High volatility | Pastry stout one-off | Brite cans + sleeves or labels | Decorate late, carry minimal inventory, avoid write-offs |
Define “high” and “low” in your own context. Many craft brewers treat more than 100,000 cans a year as high volume and above 30 percent forecast error as high volatility. Use your numbers, then choose the path that protects cash without curbing creativity.
A packaging catalog has three linked challenges: the can or bottle itself, the multipack that groups units, and the shipper that reaches the warehouse. Address each layer on its own timetable so the savings add up instead of collide.
Primary packaging: the can body, end, and decoration consumers see. Standardize essentials such as the 202 end on every 12-ounce can, then vary graphics with print, label, or sleeve.
Secondary packaging: four-pack carriers, six-pack cartons, trays, wrap. Aim for one carrier footprint that fits every 16-ounce SKU. A small dieline tweak costs pennies compared with a case-former changeover that steals minutes each run.
Tertiary packaging: the shipper, pallet pattern, and stretch film that protect margin. Refining pallet patterns and standardizing box sizes raises cube utilization, a metric where 22 to 27 percent counts as optimal for a typical warehouse once aisles and handling space are counted, according to pallet pooler iGPS.
Validate each change on the line. An ultra-light tray that scuffs labels at 300 cans per minute is not a win. When every layer clicks, seam parts drop, carrier swaps speed up, and freight costs fall without renegotiating a single can contract.
Centralizing packaging assets means storing every master dieline, artwork file, and regulatory panel in one governed system instead of scattered email threads.
Why it matters: Esko’s 2025 packaging trends research found that 89 percent of packaging artworks endure up to five approval rounds, and only 17 percent of teams use dedicated artwork-management software. Those delays fade when everyone works in the same hub.
What a single source delivers
Suppliers benefit, too. They download one package containing the dieline, color targets, and QC checklist, so deviations surface before a truck leaves the dock. This matters because about 35 to 40 percent of product recalls link back to label and artwork errors, many of them born in manual processes, according to Esko.
A few hours of upfront tagging save months of future firefighting and free creative energy.
Portfolio sourcing means quoting every can, carrier, and seasonal burst in the same RFQ so suppliers price the full year, not a single label.
Bundle core cans, seasonals, and variety-pack cartons into one bid. Plate charges on the flagship pale ale then offset low-MOQ digital cans for the pilot sour, and the vendor gains predictable throughput.
Build your RFQ around real life: total annual volume, release cadence, forecast flex, storage needs, and the mix of digital and conventional print. Then score vendors on landed cost, MOQ freedom, lead-time reliability, quality record, and contingency capacity. One printer may lead on conventional runs while trailing on digital; give each the lane they excel in and keep a backup for volatility.
Negotiate volume tiers that aggregate across SKUs (for example, 500 k, 1 million, 2 million units) rather than per design. Ask for inventory programs that release by forecast, not truckload lump sums, so cash stays in tanks instead of cartons.
Treat packaging like an investment portfolio: diversify where risk hides, consolidate where scale pays, and push every partner to price the life of the catalog, not a narrow slice of it.
Total cost of packaging = unit price + inbound freight + warehouse space + change-over labor + scrap + expedite fees. Once you tally every line, the four-cent “cheaper” can often costs more on the dock.
Commonly cited industry benchmarks put inventory carrying costs, including storage, insurance, and obsolescence, at 20 to 30 percent of total inventory value each year, pushing real packaging expense far above the invoice price. Capture the pennies you normally ignore:
Run the math. A universal carrier that is two cents costlier yet saves 10 minutes per run can bottle an extra 2,000 cases a month on a 250-cpm line, worth more than the price delta.
Storage tells the same story: standardizing to five corrugated box SKUs can improve slotting, cut dimensional weight, and accelerate pick-pack speed, freeing substantial warehousing and freight capacity.
When teams model full TCO, disputes over fractions of a cent fade, and suppliers sharpen quotes because they know you see every hidden fee. Total cost is the real scoreboard; keep your eye on it and the savings stay.
A pilot on the ten highest-friction SKUs provides meaningful data without risking the entire catalog.
At day 60, review the scorecard: pallets consumed, hours saved, cost delta, and any customer issues. If you meet the green-light targets, move to the next ten SKUs; if not, adjust specs or supplier mix and repeat.
A ten-SKU slice is large enough to reveal every pinch point yet small enough to correct without writing off cartons. Complete the pilot, and scaling becomes execution, not guesswork.
Consolidation fails whenever a cost cut creates new risk that outweighs the savings. Watch for three common traps:
Mitigate by stress-testing every spec: retailer needs, tariff exposure, line mechanics, and market labels. Keep at least one qualified second source for ends, lids, and printed cans. Consolidation should cut cost, not add risk.
Consolidation is a toolkit, not a single hammer. Pick the tool that solves today’s problem:
Start with the problem, not the label. The right lane delivers speed and savings; the wrong lane delivers meetings and excuses.
Savings stick only when you tackle knowledge, parts, partners, and freight in that exact sequence. Skip a step and the math falls apart.
Data ➜ parts ➜ partners ➜ pallets. Follow the rhythm and the savings stay on the P&L; scramble the order and they disappear.
Packaging consolidation is fastest when you put data first, then standardize parts, align suppliers, and finally optimize freight. Centralizing knowledge uncovers duplication, shared components slash MOQs and changeovers, and a balanced supplier mix prevents costly surprises. Execute the steps in order and the savings flow straight to the bottom line, without sacrificing a single beer.
You can download in-depth presentations on Logistics and 100s of management topics from the FlevyPro Library. FlevyPro is trusted and utilized by 1000s of management consultants and corporate executives.
For even more best practices available on Flevy, have a look at our top 100 lists:
These best practices are of the same as those leveraged by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, and Accenture. Improve the growth and efficiency of your organization by utilizing these best practice frameworks, templates, and tools. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with over 20+ years of experience.
