Rumelt’s Strategy Evaluation Framework

Editor's Note: Take a look at our featured best practice, Strategic Planning: Hoshin Kanri (Hoshin Planning) (153-slide PowerPoint presentation). [NOTE: Our Hoshin Kanri presentation has been trusted by an array of prestigious organizations, including industry leaders such as Apple, Boeing, Shell, Cummins, Johnson Controls, Telefónica, Discover, Stryker, Thales, Saint-Gobain, AGCO, [read more]

Also, if you are interested in becoming an expert on Strategy Development, take a look at Flevy's Strategy Development Frameworks offering here. This is a curated collection of best practice frameworks based on the thought leadership of leading consulting firms, academics, and recognized subject matter experts. By learning and applying these concepts, you can you stay ahead of the curve. Full details here.

* * * *

Organizations too often fail at strategy, because they focus on buzzwords and lofty ambitions rather than applying practical frameworks. Richard Rumelt’s Strategy Evaluation Framework is a pragmatic tool for assessing whether an organization’s strategy is viable, realistic, and adaptable. Rumelt’s Strategy Evaluation Framework shines because it forces businesses to face real challenges: is this strategy aligned internally, externally, is it realistic, and will it keep us ahead of the pack? Asking these tough questions upfront saves time, money, and heartache down the road.

As the world becomes more complex, with constant disruptions from AI to shifting regulations, smart organizations will adapt. This framework is their guidepost, showing that a winning strategy is one that’s rooted in reality yet adaptable enough to grow with the future.

Breakdown of Rumelt’s Four Criteria

1. Consistency: Strategy should be free of internal contradictions. It’s about ensuring that all organizational activities are aligned, from resource allocation to decision-making processes.
2. Consonance: Strategy must adapt to external factors such as market trends, competition, and technological shifts. The focus is on aligning internal efforts with the external environment.
3. Feasibility: The resources—financial, human, and operational—must match what the strategy requires. Overambitious strategies often falter here, as they lack a solid foundation in available assets.
4. Advantage: This examines whether the organization can sustain an edge over competitors through differentiation, cost leadership, or unique resources that are hard to replicate.

Why This Framework Is a Game-Changer

Most organizations think of strategy as a grand vision, but without aligning it to real-world constraints and opportunities, these plans often end up being ineffective. Rumelt’s framework forces decision-makers to confront the brutal realities of execution.  The Consistency criterion ensures that the strategy doesn’t contradict itself by pulling the organization in opposing directions.

The Consonance criterion keeps a company grounded in reality, reminding leaders to stay attuned to external changes. This framework makes it clear that strategies should evolve with the times instead of remaining static.

Feasibility matters more than executives often admit. It’s easy to dream big, but without the right resources or operational capacity, grand ideas become dreams. Whether it’s cash, manpower, or supply chain capabilities, leaders need to assess if the strategy is grounded in practical execution. Advantage, finally, isn’t just about being different. It’s about staying different in a way that competitors can’t easily copy.

Let’s look at the first 2 criteria of the model more deeply.

Consistency

Consistency is crucial because conflicting policies or mixed resource allocation can destroy a strategy’s credibility. If an automotive company is all-in on electric vehicles, but continues investing in gasoline-powered cars, it sends a message of confusion to investors and employees. A lack of internal alignment fractures progress and wastes valuable resources. Leaders must ensure that departments—whether it’s marketing, R&D, or finance—are marching toward the same goals. Clarity is king.

Consonance

Consonance asks whether the strategy makes sense in light of external trends. Take Netflix: They didn’t just build a streaming platform; they understood the broader societal trend of on-demand media consumption and declining cable subscriptions. Netflix’s consonance with emerging digital and consumer trends cemented its place as a market leader. The moment an organization ignores such shifts, it risks irrelevance. Companies that fail to align with broader forces end up blindsided, scrambling to catch up rather than leading the charge.

Case Study: Apple’s Strategic Mastery

Apple serves as a premier example of the Rumelt Strategy Evaluation Framework’s application. For Consistency, Apple’s entire ecosystem—iPhones, MacBooks, services—works together in a harmonious loop. Its strategy is internally consistent with its goals of creating a seamless user experience across devices, continuously reinforcing its core brand value of premium quality and design.

With Consonance, Apple continually evolves in line with external market forces. From recognizing the rise of streaming services with Apple TV+ to capitalizing on cloud storage with iCloud, Apple remains in step with global digital trends. It doesn’t just respond to market forces; it anticipates them. Apple’s ability to launch services like Apple Music and Apple Pay aligned perfectly with the growing demand for integrated digital ecosystems.

FAQs

What if my strategy is only partially feasible?

Adapt the strategy to match your current resources or find ways to acquire what you need. Often, that means scaling down or securing external partnerships.

How can I tell if my strategy is consonant with the market?

Regularly monitor industry trends, emerging technologies, and regulatory changes. It’s vital to match strategic priorities with what’s happening beyond the organization.

What happens if internal consistency is lacking?

It creates chaos. Mixed signals from leadership will confuse teams, misalign resource allocation, and lead to subpar results across the board.

Why is advantage so hard to sustain?

Markets evolve fast. Competitors can imitate innovations, and technologies quickly become obsolete. Continuous investment and innovation are critical to maintaining an edge.

Interested in learning more about the other criteria of the Rumelt’s Strategy Evaluation model? You can download an editable PowerPoint presentation on Rumelt Strategy Evaluation here on the Flevy documents marketplace.

Do You Find Value in This Framework?

You can download in-depth presentations on this and hundreds of similar business frameworks from the FlevyPro Library. FlevyPro is trusted and utilized by 1000s of management consultants and corporate executives.

For even more best practices available on Flevy, have a look at our top 100 lists:

• Top 100 in Strategy & Transformation
• Top 100 in Organization & Change
• Top 100 Consulting Frameworks
• Top 100 in Digital Transformation
• Top 100 in Operational Excellence

Want to Achieve Excellence in Strategy Development?

Gain the knowledge and develop the expertise to become an expert in Strategy Development. Our frameworks are based on the thought leadership of leading consulting firms, academics, and recognized subject matter experts. Click here for full details.

"Strategy without Tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without Strategy is the noise before defeat." - Sun Tzu

For effective Strategy Development and Strategic Planning, we must master both Strategy and Tactics. Our frameworks cover all phases of Strategy, from Strategy Design and Formulation to Strategy Deployment and Execution; as well as all levels of Strategy, from Corporate Strategy to Business Strategy to "Tactical" Strategy. Many of these methodologies are authored by global strategy consulting firms and have been successfully implemented at their Fortune 100 client organizations.

These frameworks include Porter's Five Forces, BCG Growth-Share Matrix, Greiner's Growth Model, Capabilities-driven Strategy (CDS), Business Model Innovation (BMI), Value Chain Analysis (VCA), Endgame Niche Strategies, Value Patterns, Integrated Strategy Model for Value Creation, Scenario Planning, to name a few.

Learn about our Strategy Development Best Practice Frameworks here.