The necessity to accelerate Innovation is not unique to a particular industry. Incumbent companies in numerous industries are thoroughly cognizant of the competitive risks presented by the inadequacies of their Innovation chains. They are also aware of the capabilities of startups in quickly utilizing technologies.
This realization has given birth to the concept of Open Corporate Accelerators (OCA), which involves less investment than the conventional Corporate Accelerator model.
Traditional Corporate Accelerators are usually started by a solitary company for its own gain. In contrast, OCAs accept several sponsors and can entice a wider collection of more developed startups.
OCAs may comprise of academia, corporate sponsors, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), suppliers, and companies from various industries.
An OCA differs from a traditional CA in 4 key aspects:
- Sponsors, individually, lose absolute control with regards to the program edifice and thematic focus of the platform, as is the case in Open Innovation programs.
- Brand prominence is lost in an OCA model by individual sponsors since sponsorships are not exclusive.
- OCAs are a way for sponsors to fill specific gaps in their product or processes rather than exploring generalized Innovation, the fit for which is unclear in the initial stages.
- Exclusivity of the innovative solution is lost in an OCA due to mass participation of sponsors as well as solution providers.
Sponsors can follow 3 best practices to capitalize on the Innovation prospects presented in the OCA model.
- Develop assurance internally for outside Innovation.
- Willingly take up cooperation with competing companies (co-opetition).
- Select areas to pursue.
OCA also diminishes the ambiguities associated with collaborations involving early-stage startups with unproven solutions; and it produces more successful implementations in less time.
Similar to conventional Corporate Accelerators, Open Corporate Accelerators also follow a 3-phase approach.
- Search and Selection
- Solution Conversion
- Solution Assimilation
Let us delve a little deeper into the phases.
Search and Selection
Pairing startup technologies to BU requirements is a significant challenge in phase 1 of the OCA process.
This can be accomplished by holding recurring events dedicated to certain technologies, during the course of which startups interact with relevant BUs.
Major challenge of the 2nd phase of OCA process is demonstrating that a startup’s solution can fulfil requirements of the sponsor precisely. Startups discover that fulfilling sponsors’ development conditions is a demanding issue, particularly with regard to quality and time expectancies.
Such hurdles can be overcome by making startups and BUs design and handle Proof of Concept (POC) projects conjointly.
Upscaling the solution is the defining challenge of the 3rd and final phase. Startups normally have many projects and are under great stress to marshal and schedule the resources needed to attain scale.
POC projects help quickly decide whether a solution is effective or not. Changeover from solution adaptation to assimilation is achieved effectively by ensuring that the startup’s solution and team are well entrenched within the sponsor organization.
Interested in learning more about Open Corporate Accelerator (OCA)? You can download an editable PowerPoint on Open Corporate Accelerator (OCA) here on the Flevy documents marketplace.
Do You Find Value in This Framework?
You can download in-depth presentations on this and hundreds of similar business frameworks from the FlevyPro Library. FlevyPro is trusted and utilized by 1000s of management consultants and corporate executives. Here’s what some have to say:
“My FlevyPro subscription provides me with the most popular frameworks and decks in demand in today’s market. They not only augment my existing consulting and coaching offerings and delivery, but also keep me abreast of the latest trends, inspire new products and service offerings for my practice, and educate me in a fraction of the time and money of other solutions. I strongly recommend FlevyPro to any consultant serious about success.”
– Bill Branson, Founder at Strategic Business Architects
“As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value.”
– David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
“FlevyPro has been a brilliant resource for me, as an independent growth consultant, to access a vast knowledge bank of presentations to support my work with clients. In terms of RoI, the value I received from the very first presentation I downloaded paid for my subscription many times over! The quality of the decks available allows me to punch way above my weight – it’s like having the resources of a Big 4 consultancy at your fingertips at a microscopic fraction of the overhead.”
– Roderick Cameron, Founding Partner at SGFE Ltd