Manufacturing Reshoring: Have You Included These 6 Key Considerations in Your Strategy?

Editor's Note: Take a look at our featured best practice, Cost Segregation Study: Multiple Property Class Analysis (Excel workbook). Accountants, accounting firms, and real estate property owners can all benefit from this cost segregation study (CSS) template. It makes the estimated benefit easy to figure out and has flexible assumptions for high level or detailed segregation analysis. You get a summary of cost [read more]

* * * *

Kearney’s 7th Annual Reshoring Index revealed a dramatic reversal of a five year trend, as domestic US manufacturing in 2019 commanded a significantly greater share versus the 14 Asian low-cost countries (LCCs), with manufacturing imports from China registering a particularly sharp decline.

In 2019, imports of manufactured goods from 14 Asian LCC offshore trading partners shrunk to $757 billion from $816 billion in 2018. That is a 7.2% decrease while US domestic gross output of manufactured goods reached $6,271 billion in 2019, virtually unchanged vs. 2018.

US manufacturing’s ability to hold its ground as imports sharply declined resulted in a Manufacturing Import Ratio (MIR) of 12.1%, meaning the US market imported 12.1% worth of offshore production from Asian LCCs for every $1 of domestic manufacturing gross output.

The 2018 MIR stood at 13.1%. This reduction in MIR is the first since 2011 and breaks a 5 year trend of consecutive MIR growth. The latest shift represents a 98 basis points decrease, making the 2019 US Reshoring Index an unprecedented positive 98

The Reshoring Index

The Reshoring Index compares US manufacturing gross output to import data from 14 Asian LCCs. To gauge the the US Reshoring Index, we look at

1. The import of manufactured goods from 14 traditional offshore trading partners: China, Taiwan, Malaysia, India, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Hong Kong, SriLanka and Cambodia
2. US domestic gross output of manufactured goods

We then calculate the manufacturing import ratio (MIR), which is simply the result of dividing the first number by the second. The US Reshoring Index is the year-over-year change in the MIR, expressed in basis points (1 percent change = 100 basis points)

A positive number indicates net reshoring-the degree by which gross domestic output exceeded imports from the 14 LCCs as compared to the preceding year. (Here is the calculation: 2018 MIR 13.058% – 2019 MIR 12.077% = 0.98 x 100 = 98)

Future Is Gravitating Towards Proximity Models, Driven By A Supplier Ecosystem

In 2020 the pandemic has highlighted how disruptions at suppliers and supply chain partners can cause production holdups and shortages for the purchasing business. Many U.S. companies were unable to obtain parts from suppliers when factories in China shut down earlier in 2020. Sixty-four percent of respondents in the Thomas survey said their company had been affected by the shutdown of a nonessential business

Now, Manufacturing Reshoring offers the promise of re-establishing the link between product design and manufacturing, between original equipment manufacturers and strategic supplier ecosystem.  Reshoring is also a political topic, as it presents the prospect of bringing overseas manufacturing jobs back to the company’s own country.   Reshoring also allows for risk mitigation in the case where there is a disruption to the global Supply Chain Management, as experienced by most companies with Offshore Manufacturing during the COVID-19 crisis.

The big picture is drifting away from the centrality of labor-cost-arbitrage as a driver of location decisions. Instead it is moving towards proximity models driven by a supplier ecosystem, with additional focus on people, skills and organizational capabilities.

While macroeconomic data on comparative labor and factor costs may be compelling, the actual process of Reshoring is a daunting task. Research reiterates that successful Reshoring of Manufacturing necessitates certain key considerations

Brief Outline

1. Work Force Stabilization – Establishing product-assembly operations means hiring people, often in large numbers. High worker turnover is a problem on the shop floor because it injects variability and unpredictability into production schedules.

2. Gaps in Skills – In countries like US, due to the low efforts in technical skill development, there is a shortage of automation engineers and other specialists to support the setup of extensive new assembly operations. The skill gaps in other areas like Metalworking and Metallurgy are also acute.

3. Capital-Labor Ratio – While the latest automation technologies often have reduced setup or changeover times, advisably managers should not assume that we should use more robots.

4. Supply Base Localization – Managers in certain industries, while moving production back to a country like US are often faced with a hollowed-out supply base.

5. Customer Partnerships – The key premise behind reshoring is that closeness to product design, reduced order cycles and lower costs of carrying inventory in the pipeline should offset higher absolute production costs.

6. Manufacturing Proximity – Re-establishing close links between R&D and production offers a significant opportunity to improve.  Having the work done in-house facilitates deeper understanding, learning and quick innovation.

Interested in gaining more understanding of these 6 key considerations for Manufacturing Reshoring?  You can learn more and download an editable PowerPoint about Manufacturing Reshoring here on the Flevy documents marketplace.

Are you a Management Consultant?

You can download this and hundreds of other consulting frameworks and consulting training guides from the FlevyPro library.

Do You Want to Implement Business Best Practices?

You can download in-depth presentations on 100s of management topics from the FlevyPro Library. FlevyPro is trusted and utilized by 1000s of management consultants and corporate executives.

For even more best practices available on Flevy, have a look at our top 100 lists:

• Top 100 in Strategy & Transformation
• Top 100 in Digital Transformation
• Top 100 in Operational Excellence
• Top 100 in Organization & Change
• Top 100 Management Consulting Frameworks

These best practices are of the same as those leveraged by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, and Accenture. Improve the growth and efficiency of your organization by utilizing these best practice frameworks, templates, and tools. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with over 20+ years of experience.