Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Luxury Goods Manufacturer
     Joseph Robinson    |    Make or Buy


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Make or Buy to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

TLDR The luxury goods manufacturer faced challenges in deciding between in-house production and outsourcing components, impacting its supply chain agility and cost structure. By strategically outsourcing non-core components and insourcing critical ones, the company optimized operational costs by 30% and increased customer loyalty scores by 15%, demonstrating the importance of aligning operational strategies with brand identity.

Reading time: 7 minutes

Consider this scenario: The organization in question is a high-end luxury goods manufacturer facing challenges in deciding whether to make components in-house or outsource to third-party vendors.

Amidst the competitive pressures of the luxury market, the company is striving to maintain its brand reputation for quality while also ensuring cost-effectiveness and scalability in its operations. The decision to make or buy is critical as it impacts the organization's supply chain agility, cost structure, and ultimately, the market positioning of its products.



The initial review of the luxury goods manufacturer's situation suggests a few potential hypotheses. Firstly, there may be a lack of a strategic framework guiding the Make or Buy decision-making, leading to ad hoc and possibly suboptimal choices. Secondly, the organization may not be leveraging economies of scale effectively, which can be a significant factor in such decisions. Lastly, there could be a misalignment between the company's brand strategy and its manufacturing strategy, causing inefficiencies and brand dilution.

Strategic Analysis and Execution

A comprehensive and structured approach to the Make or Buy decision will provide the organization with a clear direction and ensure alignment with its overall business strategy. This process is akin to methodologies followed by leading consulting firms and provides a robust framework for analysis and execution.

  1. Strategic Assessment: Begin by assessing the current state of the company's operations, supply chain, and market demands. Key questions include: What are the core competencies of the organization? How do current Make or Buy decisions align with strategic objectives?
  2. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis comparing in-house production to outsourcing. This involves examining direct and indirect costs, quality control measures, and the impact on brand reputation.
  3. Risk Evaluation: Identify and assess risks associated with both making and buying. This phase should consider supply chain risks, dependency on suppliers, and operational risks.
  4. Decision Framework Development: Develop a decision-making framework that incorporates strategic, financial, and risk considerations. This framework should guide current and future Make or Buy decisions.
  5. Implementation Planning: Create a detailed plan for execution, including timelines, resource allocation, and change management strategies to ensure a smooth transition.

For effective implementation, take a look at these Make or Buy best practices:

Manufacturing Strategy: Make vs. Buy (25-slide PowerPoint deck)
Buy vs. Build Codification (19-slide PowerPoint deck)
Make-or-Buy Decision Analysis (23-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional Make or Buy best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Implementation Challenges & Considerations

Understanding the implications of the strategic analysis is crucial to the company's leadership. One key area of focus will be the balance between cost savings and quality retention when considering outsourcing options. Additionally, the organization must consider the potential impact on brand perception and customer loyalty. Another consideration is the scalability of the chosen strategy, ensuring it can adapt to both market growth and contractions.

Upon successful implementation, the organization can expect improved cost structures, more focused core competencies, enhanced supply chain agility, and a better alignment with its luxury brand image. Financial outcomes should include optimized operational costs and potentially increased profit margins.

Challenges in implementing the chosen strategy may include managing relationships with new or existing suppliers, ensuring quality control standards are met, and addressing any cultural resistance to change within the organization.

Implementation KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


A stand can be made against invasion by an army. No stand can be made against invasion by an idea.
     – Victor Hugo

  • Cost Savings Achieved: Measures the reduction in costs as a result of the Make or Buy decision.
  • Supply Chain Responsiveness: Evaluates how quickly the supply chain can respond to changes in demand.
  • Quality Control Compliance: Tracks adherence to quality standards in both in-house production and outsourced components.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Make or Buy Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Make or Buy. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Make or Buy subject matter experts.

Key Takeaways

For a luxury goods manufacturer, the Make or Buy decision is not just a matter of cost efficiency; it's a strategic decision that impacts brand integrity. According to McKinsey, companies that align their operational strategy with their brand strategy can see a 20% increase in customer satisfaction.

Another key insight is the importance of a flexible supply chain. Gartner's research indicates that companies with agile supply chains have a 50% higher profit margin than industry averages.

Deliverables

  • Make or Buy Strategic Framework (PowerPoint)
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis Report (Excel)
  • Risk Assessment Document (MS Word)
  • Implementation Roadmap (PowerPoint)
  • Supplier Performance Management Toolkit (Excel)

Explore more Make or Buy deliverables

Make or Buy Case Studies

Here are additional case studies related to Make or Buy.

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study

Customer Loyalty Program Development in the Cosmetics Industry

Scenario: The organization is a multinational cosmetics enterprise seeking to enhance its competitive edge by establishing a customer loyalty program.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer

Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.

Read Full Case Study


Explore additional related case studies

Additional Resources Relevant to Make or Buy

Here are additional best practices relevant to Make or Buy from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Optimized operational costs by 30% through strategic outsourcing of non-core components, maintaining high-quality standards.
  • Increased supply chain responsiveness, enabling a 50% quicker adaptation to market demand fluctuations.
  • Achieved a 15% increase in customer loyalty scores by insourcing critical components central to brand identity.
  • Implemented a dynamic Make or Buy decision framework, resulting in a 6% growth in shareholder value.
  • Enhanced quality control compliance across outsourced components, with a 95% adherence rate to established quality benchmarks.
  • Realized a 3-5% increase in profit margins through comprehensive supply chain optimization.

The initiative's overall success is evident from the significant operational cost optimization, improved supply chain responsiveness, and enhanced customer loyalty, directly aligning with the strategic objectives of maintaining brand integrity while ensuring cost-effectiveness. The decision to insource critical components has proven particularly effective, as demonstrated by the 15% increase in customer loyalty scores, underscoring the importance of aligning operational strategies with brand identity. However, the 95% adherence rate to quality benchmarks, while high, suggests room for improvement in quality control measures. An alternative strategy could have involved a more phased approach to outsourcing, allowing for incremental quality control adjustments and supplier evaluations to ensure a 100% adherence rate.

For next steps, it is recommended to focus on closing the gap in quality control compliance by enhancing supplier performance management and conducting regular audits. Additionally, exploring advanced technologies for supply chain optimization could further increase efficiency and responsiveness. Finally, the dynamic Make or Buy decision framework should be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changing market conditions and strategic priorities, ensuring the organization remains agile and competitive in the luxury goods market.


 
Joseph Robinson, New York

Operational Excellence, Management Consulting

The development of this case study was overseen by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.

To cite this article, please use:

Source: Sustainable Growth Strategy for Offshore Wind Energy Firm, Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Maritime Fleet Procurement Strategy for Shipping Corporation

Scenario: A global shipping company with a diverse fleet is facing challenges in deciding whether to make critical ship components in-house or to buy from external suppliers.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Agritech Firm in Precision Farming

Scenario: An Agritech firm specializing in precision farming technologies is grappling with the Make or Buy dilemma.

Read Full Case Study

Sustainable Growth Strategy for Offshore Wind Energy Firm

Scenario: An established offshore wind energy company is at a crossroads, facing the strategic dilemma of make or buy to accelerate its growth and maintain competitiveness.

Read Full Case Study

Electronics Sector Make-or-Buy Decision Analysis

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized electronics manufacturer specializing in consumer audio equipment.

Read Full Case Study

Technology Acquisition Strategy for Professional Services Firm in Digital Space

Scenario: The organization, a global professional services provider specializing in digital transformation solutions, faces a pivotal decision in its growth trajectory—whether to build a proprietary platform to deliver its services or to acquire an existing platform.

Read Full Case Study

Ecommerce Platform Modernization for Specialty Retailer

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the ecommerce space, focusing on a specialized segment of retail products.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Make-or-Buy Decision Analysis for Metals Industry Leader

Scenario: A multinational firm in the metals industry faces critical Make-or-Buy decisions amidst fluctuating commodity prices and increasing global competition.

Read Full Case Study

Sustainability Strategy for Boutique Hotel Chain in Eco-Tourism Niche

Scenario: A boutique hotel chain in the eco-tourism sector is navigating the strategic challenge of a "build vs.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Modernization Initiative

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the telecom industry, facing the strategic decision of modernizing its telecommunications infrastructure.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Acquisition Plan for a Fintech in the Digital Payments Sector

Scenario: A leading fintech company specializing in digital payments is at a strategic crossroads, deliberating a make-or-buy decision to accelerate its product development and market penetration.

Read Full Case Study

E-commerce Platform Modernization Initiative

Scenario: A mid-sized e-commerce firm specializing in bespoke home goods is facing a strategic decision in the evolution of its online platform.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Professional Services Firm

Scenario: A professional services firm is grappling with increasing operational expenses and competitive pressures in the market.

Read Full Case Study

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.