Want FREE Templates on Strategy & Transformation? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How can the Boston Matrix be adapted for service-oriented businesses where traditional product lifecycle metrics may not apply?


This article provides a detailed response to: How can the Boston Matrix be adapted for service-oriented businesses where traditional product lifecycle metrics may not apply? For a comprehensive understanding of Boston Matrix, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Boston Matrix best practice resources.

TLDR Adapting the Boston Matrix for service-oriented businesses involves redefining axes to "market potential" and "competitive advantage," and incorporating additional dimensions like Customer Satisfaction, Service Innovation, and Operational Excellence to assess future potential and strategic alignment for sustainable growth.

Reading time: 4 minutes


The Boston Matrix, also known as the Growth-Share Matrix, was developed by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in the 1970s. It has been a staple tool for Strategic Planning, helping businesses to categorize their products or business units into four quadrants—Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, and Dogs—based on market growth and market share. However, its application to service-oriented businesses can be challenging due to the intangible nature of services, the difficulty in measuring market share accurately, and the dynamic nature of service markets. Adapting the Boston Matrix for service-oriented businesses involves redefining the axes and considering additional dimensions relevant to services.

Adapting the Axes for Service-Oriented Businesses

The traditional Boston Matrix uses market growth rate and relative market share as its axes. For service-oriented businesses, these axes can be adapted to better reflect the performance and potential of services. Instead of market growth rate, consider using "market potential" or "service demand growth." This reflects not just the current growth rate but the anticipated demand for the service in the future. For the relative market share axis, "competitive advantage" can be a more relevant measure. This could include factors such as brand strength, customer loyalty, or unique value propositions that are critical in service industries.

For instance, a consulting firm like McKinsey might evaluate its services based on the potential for digital transformation consulting, considering the rapid growth in demand for digitalization across industries. The firm's competitive advantage could be assessed in terms of its proprietary methodologies, the depth of expertise, and its global network, which provide a unique value that competitors may not match.

Moreover, incorporating customer satisfaction or net promoter scores (NPS) as a supplementary dimension can provide insights into service quality and customer loyalty, which are crucial for the sustainability of service businesses. These measures can help in identifying services that, while they may not currently have a high market share or growth, have the potential to become "Stars" or "Cash Cows" due to their strong customer base.

Explore related management topics: Digital Transformation Competitive Advantage Value Proposition Customer Loyalty Customer Satisfaction Boston Matrix Net Promoter Score

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Incorporating Additional Dimensions

Service-oriented businesses thrive on customer relationships and the quality of service delivery, which are not directly captured by the traditional Boston Matrix. Therefore, adding dimensions such as "Service Innovation" and "Customer Relationship Strength" can offer a more nuanced view. Service Innovation reflects the business's ability to continuously improve and adapt its service offerings to meet changing market needs. Customer Relationship Strength assesses the depth and quality of the business's relationships with its customers, which can be a significant competitive advantage.

For example, a technology services company like Accenture might assess its offerings not just on traditional metrics but also on its ability to innovate in areas like artificial intelligence and cloud services. Accenture's longstanding relationships with key clients and its reputation for delivering high-quality, innovative solutions could be evaluated as part of its Customer Relationship Strength, highlighting services that may be poised for growth.

Another dimension that can be particularly relevant for service-oriented businesses is "Operational Excellence." This reflects the efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery, which can significantly impact profitability and customer satisfaction. Operational Excellence can be a critical factor in moving a service from a "Question Mark" to a "Star" or "Cash Cow" by improving margins and customer experiences.

Explore related management topics: Operational Excellence Customer Experience Artificial Intelligence

Real-World Examples and Application

Consider the case of a global financial services firm evaluating its portfolio of services. The firm might adapt the Boston Matrix by assessing services like wealth management and investment banking not just on market growth and share but also on competitive advantage, which in this context could include regulatory compliance, expertise in specific markets, and the strength of client relationships. By adding dimensions like Service Innovation, the firm can identify areas where investing in technology or new service models could transform a "Question Mark" into a "Star."

Another example is a healthcare service provider analyzing its range of services. Traditional metrics might show certain services as "Dogs" due to low market growth. However, by assessing these services on dimensions like Customer Relationship Strength and Operational Excellence, the provider might uncover opportunities to reposition or innovate these services, turning them into niche offerings that serve specific patient needs exceptionally well.

In conclusion, while the Boston Matrix provides a valuable framework for portfolio analysis, its adaptation for service-oriented businesses requires a rethinking of its axes and the inclusion of additional dimensions. By doing so, businesses can gain a more comprehensive understanding of their service offerings, identifying not just current performance but also future potential based on factors like innovation, customer relationships, and operational efficiency. This adapted approach enables service-oriented businesses to make more informed strategic decisions, aligning their resources with the services that offer the greatest potential for sustainable growth and profitability.

Explore related management topics: Wealth Management Investment Banking

Best Practices in Boston Matrix

Here are best practices relevant to Boston Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Boston Matrix materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Boston Matrix

Boston Matrix Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Boston Matrix, take a look at these case studies.

Maritime Security Portfolio Analysis for Coastal Defense Firm

Scenario: The organization operates in the high-stakes maritime security sector and is facing strategic decision-making challenges in resource allocation across its diverse portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Portfolio Optimization for Electronics Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized electronics manufacturer specializing in consumer audio equipment.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Portfolio Analysis for Environmental Services in Renewable Energy

Scenario: An environmental services firm specializing in renewable energy is facing challenges in portfolio management.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Portfolio Management for D2C Lifestyle Brands

Scenario: A direct-to-consumer lifestyle brand in the competitive wellness space is facing challenges in allocating its resources effectively across its diverse product portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Portfolio Strategy Enhancement for Electronics Manufacturer in High-Tech Sector

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized electronics manufacturer specializing in consumer gadgets, facing strategic challenges in portfolio management.

Read Full Case Study

Growth-Share Matrix Analysis for D2C Cosmetics Brand in Competitive Market

Scenario: A cosmetics firm operating in the direct-to-consumer (D2C) space is struggling to effectively allocate resources across its diverse product portfolio.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

What strategies can be derived from the Growth-Share Matrix to capitalize on the shift towards a subscription-based economy?
Organizations can use the Growth-Share Matrix to transition to a subscription-based economy by focusing on technology investment, customer value, and efficiency in Stars and Cash Cows, while reevaluating or divesting Question Marks and Dogs. [Read full explanation]
What insights can be gained by applying SWOT analysis to each category within the BCG Growth-Share Matrix for a more nuanced strategy?
Applying SWOT analysis to the BCG Growth-Share Matrix categories enables a detailed strategic assessment, guiding targeted Strategy Development, resource allocation, and improved market positioning for Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, and Dogs. [Read full explanation]
How can companies leverage the BCG Matrix to identify potential areas for innovation and disruption within their industry?
The BCG Matrix aids in Strategic Planning by categorizing business units to guide Innovation and Disruption strategies, focusing on enhancing Stars, transforming Question Marks with disruptive innovation, revitalizing Cash Cows through Digital Transformation, and redefining Dogs with radical innovation. [Read full explanation]
How can the Growth-Share Matrix be adapted for digital businesses, especially those operating on platform models?
Adapting the Growth-Share Matrix for digital platforms involves incorporating Network Effects, Data Monetization Potential, and Scalability, with examples like Spotify and Netflix illustrating the transition through quadrants via data utilization and customer-centric innovation. [Read full explanation]
How does the BCG Growth-Share Matrix guide strategic decisions in the face of increasing consumer demand for sustainable products?
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix aids in aligning Strategic Planning with sustainability goals by guiding investment in sustainable innovations for Stars and Question Marks, and leveraging Cash Cows for funding, ensuring long-term profitability in a market increasingly demanding sustainable products. [Read full explanation]
How can the BCG Matrix be used to navigate regulatory changes in highly regulated industries like healthcare and finance?
The BCG Matrix aids organizations in highly regulated industries like healthcare and finance to strategically navigate regulatory changes by guiding investment, divestment, and innovation decisions based on business unit categorization. [Read full explanation]
How is the Growth-Share Matrix evolving to accommodate the rise of sustainability and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors in strategic planning?
The Growth-Share Matrix is evolving to integrate ESG factors, reflecting a shift towards sustainability in Strategic Planning, with firms like McKinsey and BCG leading in overlaying ESG metrics onto traditional financial analyses for more holistic portfolio management. [Read full explanation]
What are the implications of using the Growth-Share Matrix in highly volatile markets, such as technology or cryptocurrencies?
Applying the Growth-Share Matrix in volatile markets like technology and cryptocurrencies demands significant adaptation, including broader assessment criteria, dynamic Strategic Planning, and a focus on Risk Management and Strategic Flexibility to navigate rapid market changes effectively. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Boston Matrix Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.