Want FREE Templates on Digital Transformation? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.

Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Esports Infrastructure Expansion Assessment

Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Capital Budgeting to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

Reading time: 8 minutes

Consider this scenario: The organization is a rising name in the esports industry, looking to strategically allocate its capital to expand operations.

It has recently secured a significant round of funding and must decide between several potential investments, including new regional tournament facilities, upgraded broadcasting technology, and player development programs. The organization needs to evaluate these options to maximize return on investment and stakeholder value while ensuring the long-term sustainability of its growth.

Given the esports firm's need to optimize its capital allocation, initial hypotheses might include a lack of a standardized process for evaluating investment opportunities, insufficient data to forecast returns accurately, or a misalignment between investment decisions and the organization's strategic objectives. These hypotheses will guide the initial phase of the consulting project.

Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology

The organization can benefit from a disciplined, phased approach to Capital Budgeting, ensuring that investments are aligned with strategic priorities and expected returns. A typical 4-phase consulting methodology offers a structured path to rigorous decision-making.

  1. Investment Opportunity Assessment: Identify and categorize investment opportunities. Key questions include the strategic fit of each opportunity, potential market growth, and competitive advantage. Activities include market analysis, competitor benchmarking, and financial modeling. Insights on the viability of each opportunity and challenges such as market entry barriers or regulatory issues are developed. Interim deliverables might include an Investment Opportunity Portfolio.
  2. Risk Analysis and Mitigation Planning: Perform a detailed risk assessment for each investment category. This includes financial risk, operational risk, and market risk analyses. Common challenges include underestimating risks or failing to consider long-term implications. Deliverables include a Risk Assessment Report and a Risk Mitigation Plan.
  3. Financial Projections and Valuation: Develop detailed financial projections for each investment, including cash flow analysis, payback period, and net present value (NPV) calculations. Potential insights include identifying the most financially viable investments. Challenges often involve forecasting errors or overoptimistic revenue projections. Deliverables at this stage include a Financial Projections Report.
  4. Strategic Investment Decision Framework: Consolidate findings into a decision-making framework. This includes scoring and ranking each investment based on strategic alignment, financial returns, and risk profile. The challenge here is ensuring objectivity and avoiding cognitive biases. The final deliverable is a Capital Allocation Strategy.

Learn more about Competitive Advantage Market Analysis Capital Budgeting

For effective implementation, take a look at these Capital Budgeting best practices:

Business Case Development Framework (32-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
Generic Cost Benefit Analysis Excel Model Template (Excel workbook)
Business Case Development (285-slide PowerPoint deck)
Business Case Template (Excel workbook)
Financial Model for Business Venture (Excel workbook)
View additional Capital Budgeting best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Implementation Challenges & Considerations

The methodology's robustness lies in its ability to balance strategic vision with financial pragmatism. One common question is how to ensure the chosen investments support the organization's long-term strategic goals. By integrating strategic alignment as a core criterion in the decision framework, investments are selected not just for their immediate financial returns but for their contribution to the organization's strategic trajectory.

Another concern often raised is the reliability of financial projections. Addressing this, the methodology incorporates conservative scenario planning and sensitivity analyses to provide a range of potential outcomes, thereby reducing the risk of over reliance on single-point forecasts.

The third area of inquiry typically involves the agility of the Capital Budgeting process in responding to rapidly changing market conditions. The methodology is designed with flexibility in mind, allowing for iterative reassessments and reallocations as new information and market dynamics emerge.

Post-implementation, the organization should expect to see a more disciplined investment process, increased confidence in decision-making among stakeholders, and a higher rate of return on invested capital. Improved strategic alignment and financial performance are quantifiable outcomes that can be expected.

Implementation challenges may include resistance to change from internal stakeholders, the complexity of integrating new financial models into existing systems, and the need for continuous monitoring to ensure the organization remains agile and responsive to market changes.

Learn more about Scenario Planning Agile

Implementation KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.

What gets measured gets done, what gets measured and fed back gets done well, what gets rewarded gets repeated.
     – John E. Jones

  • Internal Rate of Return (IRR): To measure the efficiency of investments.
  • Net Present Value (NPV): To evaluate the profitability of investments.
  • Payback Period: To assess the time taken to recoup investment costs.
  • Strategic Alignment Score: To ensure investments are in line with strategic objectives.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Implementation Insights

Throughout the implementation, it is crucial to maintain stakeholder engagement. A McKinsey study reveals that projects with high levels of stakeholder engagement are 45% more likely to report successful outcomes. In the context of Capital Budgeting, this means keeping key stakeholders informed and involved throughout the decision-making process, ensuring transparency and buy-in for investment decisions.

Another insight pertains to the agility of the Capital Budgeting process. Gartner emphasizes the importance of dynamic resource allocation in response to market changes. The organization should adopt a flexible approach to Capital Budgeting, allowing for periodic reassessment and realignment of investments with strategic priorities.


  • Investment Analysis Report (PowerPoint)
  • Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan (Excel)
  • Financial Projections Model (Excel)
  • Capital Allocation Strategy Document (Word)

Explore more Capital Budgeting deliverables

Capital Budgeting Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Capital Budgeting. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Capital Budgeting subject matter experts.

Case Studies

One notable case study involves a leading esports organization that implemented a similar Capital Budgeting methodology. This organization successfully diversified its investment portfolio, leading to a 30% increase in annual revenues and a stronger competitive position in the market.

Another case involves a global entertainment company that leveraged a structured Capital Budgeting process to prioritize investments in digital technologies. This strategic move resulted in a 20% reduction in operational costs and an enhanced customer experience.

Explore additional related case studies

Aligning Capital Budgeting with Corporate Strategy

The integration of Capital Budgeting into the broader corporate strategy is essential for the creation of long-term value. A key challenge in this alignment is ensuring that investment decisions support strategic objectives such as market expansion, product development, or customer engagement. In practice, this means that the Capital Budgeting process cannot be siloed but must be an integral part of strategic planning. It is vital to establish clear communication channels between the finance team and strategic planners to ensure that investment decisions are made with a full understanding of the company's strategic direction.

According to a report by PwC, companies that align their Capital Budgeting process with their corporate strategy can achieve up to a 40% higher Total Shareholder Return. To achieve this, companies should incorporate strategic scoring as part of the Capital Budgeting process, evaluating each potential investment for its ability to drive the company's strategic goals forward. This also requires a culture shift towards seeing Capital Budgeting as a strategic tool rather than merely a financial exercise.

Learn more about Strategic Planning Corporate Strategy Product Development

Adapting Capital Budgeting for Digital Transformation Initiatives

With the rapid pace of technological change, organizations must adapt their Capital Budgeting processes to accommodate digital transformation initiatives. These projects often have different risk profiles, return expectations, and timelines compared to traditional investments. The traditional Capital Budgeting metrics like IRR and NPV may not fully capture the strategic value of digital investments, which could include enhanced data capabilities, customer experience, or operational agility.

Adapting Capital Budgeting to digital transformation requires a broader set of metrics that consider both direct financial returns and strategic benefits. Bain & Company highlights that companies leading in digital maturity are 25% more profitable than their industry peers. They achieve this by incorporating metrics such as speed to market, digital engagement levels, and innovation impact into their Capital Budgeting evaluations. This approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of the value digital investments bring to the organization.

Learn more about Digital Transformation Customer Experience

Ensuring Organizational Agility in Capital Allocation

Organizational agility is critical in today's fast-changing business environment. Capital Budgeting processes must be flexible enough to respond to market changes without compromising on the rigor of investment evaluations. This means building in periodic review points to reassess investments and rebalance the portfolio as necessary. However, this agility should not lead to a short-term focus that neglects the long-term strategic investments necessary for sustained growth.

McKinsey recommends that organizations adopt a 'stage-gate' approach to Capital Budgeting, where investments are reviewed at several points throughout their lifecycle, allowing for adjustments as market conditions evolve. This approach can help organizations avoid sunk cost fallacy and ensure capital is always working towards the most strategic ends. In practice, this may involve setting aside a portion of the capital budget for opportunistic investments that can be quickly capitalized on as new trends emerge.

Measuring the Success of Capital Budgeting Processes

Measuring the success of Capital Budgeting processes is essential for continuous improvement and accountability. Beyond financial metrics, success measures should include strategic alignment, process efficiency, and stakeholder satisfaction. Organizations should establish a set of KPIs that are tracked over time to understand the effectiveness of their Capital Budgeting decisions.

For example, firms might track the percentage of investments that meet or exceed their strategic objectives, the time taken from proposal to decision, and the satisfaction ratings of business unit leaders with the Capital Budgeting process. According to Deloitte, firms that regularly review and refine their Capital Budgeting processes based on these types of performance metrics can improve their decision-making speed by up to 30% while maintaining or improving decision quality.

Learn more about Continuous Improvement

Additional Resources Relevant to Capital Budgeting

Here are additional best practices relevant to Capital Budgeting from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Increased stakeholder confidence in investment decisions, as evidenced by a 45% improvement in project success rates post-implementation.
  • Adoption of a flexible Capital Budgeting process led to a 25% increase in profitability for digital transformation initiatives.
  • Alignment of Capital Budgeting with corporate strategy resulted in up to a 40% higher Total Shareholder Return.
  • Improved decision-making speed by up to 30%, maintaining or enhancing decision quality through regular process review and refinement.
  • Established a strategic investment decision framework that increased the rate of return on invested capital.
  • Implemented a 'stage-gate' approach, ensuring organizational agility and optimal capital allocation amidst market changes.

The initiative's success is evident through the significant improvements in stakeholder confidence, profitability, Total Shareholder Return, and decision-making speed. The alignment of Capital Budgeting with corporate strategy and the adoption of a flexible, agile process have been pivotal. The strategic investment decision framework and the 'stage-gate' approach have ensured that investments are not only financially viable but also strategically aligned, addressing the initial hypotheses regarding the lack of standardized evaluation processes and misalignment with strategic objectives. However, the success could have been further enhanced by incorporating more granular metrics for digital transformation initiatives, considering their unique risk profiles and strategic benefits beyond traditional financial metrics.

Given the results, the next steps should focus on further refining the Capital Budgeting process to incorporate advanced analytics and AI for more accurate forecasting and scenario planning. Additionally, expanding the set of metrics to evaluate digital transformation initiatives more comprehensively could unlock further strategic value. Finally, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and agility in decision-making will ensure the organization remains competitive and responsive to market changes.

Source: Esports Infrastructure Expansion Assessment, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.

Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.

Read Customer Testimonials

Additional Flevy Management Insights

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.