Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Operational Efficiency Strategy for Ambulatory Health Care Services in the Southwest
     Joseph Robinson    |    Cost Containment


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Cost Containment to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

TLDR A top ambulatory care provider experienced a 20% rise in OpEx and a 5% drop in market share due to outdated tech and rising telehealth demand. By adopting advanced digital health solutions and Lean Six Sigma, they cut OpEx by 15% and boosted patient satisfaction, underscoring the value of Innovation and Operational Excellence in overcoming market challenges.

Reading time: 10 minutes

Consider this scenario: A leading ambulatory health care provider in the Southwest is grappling with escalating costs amidst a competitive market.

The organization is facing a 20% increase in operational expenses over the past two years, exacerbated by an aging technology infrastructure and a surge in demand for telehealth services. External challenges include regulatory changes and an increasingly price-sensitive customer base, which have contributed to a 5% dip in market share. Internally, the company struggles with inefficient processes and outdated technology. The primary strategic objective of the organization is to streamline operations and incorporate innovative technology solutions to achieve cost containment and enhance service delivery.



The ambulatory health care sector is at a critical juncture, driven by technological advancements and evolving patient expectations. As the demand for outpatient services grows, providers are under mounting pressure to deliver quality care efficiently.

Strategic Planning Analysis

  • Internal Rivalry: The sector is marked by a high level of competition among providers, pushing margins lower and accelerating the adoption of new technologies to gain competitive advantage.
  • Supplier Power: Supplier power is moderate but increasing, as the number of suppliers for specialized medical equipment and software is limited, giving them leverage over pricing.
  • Buyer Power: With more information and options available, patients have become more discerning, significantly increasing buyer power.
  • Threat of New Entrants: Barriers to entry are high due to stringent regulatory requirements and the significant capital investment needed, limiting the threat of new entrants.
  • Threat of Substitutes: The threat of substitutes is moderate, with alternative treatments and home care options gaining popularity among patients.

Emerging trends include the rapid adoption of telehealth, a shift towards patient-centric care, and increasing integration of artificial intelligence in diagnostics and patient management. These trends signal major changes in industry dynamics, presenting both opportunities and risks:

  • Increased telehealth adoption creates opportunities for service expansion and cost reduction, but requires significant upfront investment in technology infrastructure.
  • A shift towards patient-centric care necessitates investments in technology and processes that improve patient experience but could strain operational budgets.
  • The integration of artificial intelligence offers the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency but poses challenges related to data security and patient privacy.

A STEEPLE analysis reveals that technological and legal factors are the most impactful on the sector. Advances in technology offer opportunities for innovation in service delivery, while regulatory changes continue to pose significant compliance challenges.

For effective implementation, take a look at these Cost Containment best practices:

Cost Reduction Opportunities (across Value Chain) (24-slide PowerPoint deck)
Cost Reduction Methodologies (33-slide PowerPoint deck)
Reducing the Cost of Quality (COQ) (131-slide PowerPoint deck)
Strategic Cost Reduction Training (97-slide PowerPoint deck)
Capital Optimization Guide (123-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
View additional Cost Containment best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Internal Assessment

The organization is recognized for its commitment to patient care and has a broad service offering, but it struggles with high operational costs and outdated technology.

Benchmarking against peers reveals that the organization lags in adopting digital health technologies and utilizing analytics target=_blank>data analytics for operational decision-making, impacting its competitive positioning.

A core competencies analysis indicates that the organization's strengths lie in its experienced medical staff and strong brand reputation within the community. However, it needs to build competencies in digital health and operational efficiency to sustain its market position.

The Resource-Based View (RBV) analysis highlights that the organization's tangible resources, such as its facilities and equipment, are underutilized. Optimizing these resources could unlock significant value and improve cost efficiency.

Strategic Initiatives

  • Implementing Advanced Digital Health Solutions: This initiative aims to modernize patient care delivery through telehealth and mobile health applications. It is expected to improve patient access and satisfaction while reducing operational costs. The source of value creation lies in enhanced service delivery and operational efficiency, expected to result in a 15% reduction in operational expenses. This initiative requires investment in technology infrastructure and training for staff.
  • Process Optimization and Technology Upgrade: Focused on streamlining operational processes and upgrading outdated technology systems to reduce waste and improve efficiency. The intended impact is a more agile and cost-efficient operation, creating value through reduced operational costs and improved service quality. Resource requirements include investments in process improvement consultants and new technology systems.
  • Cost Containment through Strategic Sourcing: This initiative aims to renegotiate supplier contracts and explore group purchasing options to lower supply costs. The expected value is a direct reduction in operational expenses, contributing to overall cost containment. It requires resources for market analysis and negotiation expertise.

Cost Containment Implementation KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


Tell me how you measure me, and I will tell you how I will behave.
     – Eliyahu M. Goldratt

  • Operational Cost Reduction: This KPI will track the effectiveness of cost containment strategies and process optimization efforts.
  • Patient Satisfaction Scores: To measure the impact of digital health solutions and improved service delivery on patient satisfaction.

These KPIs offer insights into the financial and operational health of the organization, as well as the quality of patient care. Tracking these metrics closely will enable timely adjustments to strategies, ensuring the organization meets its strategic objectives.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Cost Containment Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Cost Containment. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Cost Containment subject matter experts.

Cost Containment Deliverables

These are a selection of deliverables across all the strategic initiatives.

  • Digital Health Implementation Plan (PPT)
  • Operational Efficiency Roadmap (PPT)
  • Strategic Sourcing Analysis (Excel)
  • Technology Upgrade Framework (PPT)

Explore more Cost Containment deliverables

Implementing Advanced Digital Health Solutions

The implementation team utilized the Diffusion of Innovations Theory and the Value Chain Analysis to guide the deployment of advanced digital health solutions. The Diffusion of Innovations Theory, developed by Everett Rogers, was instrumental in understanding how new technologies are adopted within organizations and by end users. It provided insights into the characteristics that influence the rate of adoption, such as relative advantage and compatibility with existing values and practices. The team applied this theory by:

  • Segmenting the organization's patient base and staff into categories based on their readiness and willingness to adopt telehealth and mobile health applications.
  • Developing targeted communication strategies that highlighted the benefits and compatibility of the new digital health solutions with existing workflows for each segment.
  • Monitoring adoption rates and soliciting feedback to make iterative improvements to the technology and its implementation process.

Additionally, the Value Chain Analysis, a framework introduced by Michael Porter, was utilized to identify and optimize the activities that create value in delivering digital health services. This analysis helped in pinpointing areas where digital solutions could significantly enhance operational efficiency and patient satisfaction. The team implemented this framework by:

  • Mapping out the organization's value chain from patient intake to post-visit follow-up.
  • Identifying key activities where digital solutions could streamline operations, such as electronic health records and online appointment scheduling.
  • Integrating telehealth services into the value chain to provide seamless, value-added services to patients.

The combination of the Diffusion of Innovations Theory and Value Chain Analysis led to a successful implementation of advanced digital health solutions. The organization experienced a marked increase in the adoption of telehealth services by both staff and patients, resulting in improved patient satisfaction scores and a 15% reduction in operational expenses. This strategic initiative not only enhanced the quality of patient care but also positioned the organization as a leader in digital health innovation within the ambulatory health care sector.

Process Optimization and Technology Upgrade

For the strategic initiative focused on process optimization and technology upgrade, the team employed the Lean Six Sigma methodology and the Technology Lifecycle framework. Lean Six Sigma, a methodology that combines the waste reduction principles of Lean with the process variation reduction techniques of Six Sigma, was chosen for its effectiveness in improving operational efficiency and quality. The team executed this methodology by:

  • Conducting a comprehensive review of current processes to identify waste and areas of variation that led to inefficiencies.
  • Implementing process improvements and technology upgrades that addressed these inefficiencies, such as automating patient records management and streamlining the billing process.
  • Establishing continuous improvement teams to sustain efficiency gains and adapt processes to evolving technology and patient needs.

The Technology Lifecycle framework was applied to assess the current state of the organization’s technology infrastructure and to guide the upgrade process. This framework allowed the team to evaluate technologies based on their maturity and adoption, ensuring that investments were made in solutions that offered long-term value. The team followed these steps:

  • Assessing the maturity of existing technology systems and identifying those that were in the decline phase of their lifecycle and due for replacement.
  • Selecting and implementing new technologies that were in the growth phase, ensuring they were scalable and could adapt to future healthcare innovations.
  • Training staff on the new technologies to ensure smooth transition and maximized benefits from the upgrades.

The application of Lean Six Sigma and the Technology Lifecycle framework led to significant improvements in operational efficiency and a reduction in technology-related issues. The organization saw a 20% improvement in process efficiency and a notable enhancement in the reliability and performance of its technology systems. These changes contributed to a better patient experience and set a solid foundation for future growth and innovation.

Cost Containment through Strategic Sourcing

In addressing the strategic initiative of cost containment through strategic sourcing, the team leveraged the Kraljic Portfolio Purchasing Model alongside the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis. The Kraljic Model was instrumental in transforming the organization's approach to sourcing and procurement. It helped in classifying supplies based on the risk and profitability impact, enabling more strategic relationships with suppliers. The process included:

  • Classifying supplies and services into categories of strategic, leverage, bottleneck, and non-critical items.
  • Developing tailored sourcing strategies for each category, focusing on partnership development for strategic items and cost reduction for leverage items.
  • Negotiating long-term contracts with key suppliers to ensure supply continuity and cost predictability.

Simultaneously, the Total Cost of Ownership analysis provided a comprehensive view of the costs associated with each procurement decision, beyond just the purchase price. This allowed the team to make more informed decisions by:

  • Calculating the TCO for major supplies and services, including acquisition, operation, maintenance, and disposal costs.
  • Identifying opportunities to reduce costs through more efficient procurement practices, such as bulk purchasing and selecting suppliers with lower TCO.
  • Implementing supplier performance monitoring to ensure continued cost efficiency and quality of service.

The strategic application of the Kraljic Portfolio Purchasing Model and Total Cost of Ownership analysis resulted in a more efficient and cost-effective procurement process. The organization achieved a 10% reduction in supply costs, contributing significantly to its overall cost containment efforts. This initiative not only improved the financial stability of the organization but also strengthened its relationships with key suppliers, ensuring the long-term sustainability of its supply chain.

Additional Resources Relevant to Cost Containment

Here are additional best practices relevant to Cost Containment from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Reduced operational expenses by 15% through the successful implementation of advanced digital health solutions.
  • Improved patient satisfaction scores, reflecting enhanced service delivery and patient care quality.
  • Achieved a 20% improvement in process efficiency by employing Lean Six Sigma and Technology Lifecycle frameworks.
  • Notably enhanced the reliability and performance of technology systems, reducing technology-related issues.
  • Achieved a 10% reduction in supply costs by leveraging the Kraljic Portfolio Purchasing Model and Total Cost of Ownership analysis.

The strategic initiatives undertaken by the organization have yielded significant improvements in operational efficiency, patient satisfaction, and cost containment. The 15% reduction in operational expenses and the 10% reduction in supply costs are particularly noteworthy, as they directly contribute to the organization's primary objective of cost containment amidst a competitive market. The successful implementation of advanced digital health solutions not only improved patient care but also positioned the organization as a leader in digital health innovation. However, the report does not provide specific data on the impact of these initiatives on market share recovery, which remains a critical area of concern given the initial 5% dip. While the improvement in process efficiency and technology reliability is commendable, the long-term sustainability of these improvements and their adaptability to future technological advancements and regulatory changes will be crucial. Alternative strategies, such as forming strategic alliances for technology development and exploring new business models for patient care delivery, could further enhance outcomes and competitive positioning.

Based on the analysis, the recommended next steps include a focused evaluation of market share recovery strategies to address the initial decline. This could involve enhancing marketing efforts around the new digital health services and exploring partnerships with technology firms to stay at the forefront of innovation. Additionally, continuous monitoring and adaptation of the technology infrastructure to anticipate and incorporate future advancements will be vital. Finally, considering the evolving regulatory landscape and patient expectations, investing in ongoing staff training and development to foster a culture of innovation and patient-centric care is recommended.

Source: Operational Efficiency Strategy for Ambulatory Health Care Services in the Southwest, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Inventory Rationalization for Telecom Retailer

Scenario: The organization is a leading telecom retailer grappling with escalating inventory costs and a complex product assortment that hinders optimal inventory turnover.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Reduction Initiative for Maritime Shipping Leader

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the maritime industry, specifically in the shipping sector, and has been grappling with escalating operational costs that are eroding profit margins.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Management Strategy for Telecom Provider in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: A leading telecom provider is facing escalating operational costs in a highly competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Cloud Integration Strategy for SMEs in the IT Sector

Scenario: A mid-sized cloud services provider specializing in solutions for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) faces significant "Cost Take-out" pressure amidst a rapidly saturating market.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Efficiency Initiative for a Retail Chain

Scenario: The retail company is facing a challenging market landscape with increased competition and rising operational costs.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Reduction Initiative for Agritech Firm in North America

Scenario: The organization operates in the competitive North American agritech sector, striving to maintain profitability amidst rising operational costs and fluctuating market demands.

Read Full Case Study

Operational Efficiency Initiative for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the highly competitive semiconductor industry, which is characterized by rapid technological advancements and thinning profit margins.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Containment Strategy for Maritime Logistics in North America

Scenario: A maritime logistics firm operating within North America faces significant challenges in maintaining profitability amidst rising operational costs and competitive pricing pressures.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Reduction Initiative for Defense Contractor in Competitive Sector

Scenario: The organization is a prominent defense contractor grappling with escalating operating costs amidst a highly competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Operational Efficiency Enhancement for Telecom Provider in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: A telecommunications firm operating in a highly competitive environment is grappling with escalating operational costs that are eroding profit margins.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Reduction Strategy for Semiconductor Manufacturer in High-Tech Sector

Scenario: A semiconductor manufacturer in the high-tech sector is grappling with escalating production costs amidst a competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Containment Strategy for E-commerce Platform

Scenario: The organization, a mid-sized e-commerce platform specializing in consumer electronics, is grappling with escalating operational costs that are eroding profit margins.

Read Full Case Study

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.