Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Risk Management Framework Development for Maritime Transportation Leader


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in ISO 31000 to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

TLDR A leading firm in the maritime sector faced challenges in aligning its enterprise risk management with ISO 31000 amidst market volatility and regulatory pressures. The initiative resulted in improved decision-making, compliance, and resilience, highlighting the importance of integrating risk management with strategic objectives while addressing cultural resistance and operational alignment.

Reading time: 7 minutes

Consider this scenario: A leading firm in the maritime sector is grappling with the complexities of enterprise risk management in accordance with ISO 31000.

Amidst the volatility of international shipping markets and the heightened regulatory environment, the company seeks to enhance its risk assessment and mitigation processes. It aims to align its operations with the ISO 31000 standard to bolster resilience against market fluctuations, regulatory changes, and operational hazards.



In light of the organization's challenges, it is hypothesized that the root causes may stem from a lack of structured risk management processes, insufficient integration of risk considerations into strategic planning, and potential gaps in compliance with ISO 31000 guidelines.

Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology

The organization's situation calls for a robust methodology that not only aligns with ISO 31000 but also embeds risk management into the corporate culture. A five-phase approach, akin to those employed by top-tier consulting firms, provides a comprehensive framework for this endeavor.

  1. Initial Risk Assessment: Conduct a thorough risk inventory to understand the current risk landscape and evaluate existing risk management practices against ISO 31000 standards. Key questions include: What are the most significant risks facing the organization? How effectively are these risks being managed?
  2. Risk Framework Development: Develop a tailored risk management framework, focusing on policy formulation, process design, and establishing clear risk ownership. Activities include drafting risk policies and defining roles and responsibilities within the risk management structure.
  3. Implementation Planning: Create a detailed implementation plan, ensuring that risk management processes are integrated into daily operations. This phase involves training staff, setting up reporting structures, and establishing communication protocols.
  4. Risk Monitoring & Reporting: Establish ongoing monitoring mechanisms to track risks and evaluate the effectiveness of management strategies. This includes setting up key risk indicators (KRIs) and regular reporting to leadership.
  5. Continuous Improvement: Finally, embed a culture of continuous improvement in risk management practices, reassessing and refining strategies in response to new risks and changing business conditions.

For effective implementation, take a look at these ISO 31000 best practices:

Risk Management System Implementation - The ISO 31000:2018 (133-slide PowerPoint deck)
ISO 31000:2018 (Risk Management) Awareness Training (61-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management Awareness Training (150-slide PowerPoint deck)
ISO 31000 - Implementation Toolkit (Excel workbook and supporting ZIP)
ISO 31000 and Blue Ocean Strategy: A Symbiotic Relationship (6-page PDF document)
View additional ISO 31000 best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Executive Audience Considerations

Executives may question the scalability of the risk management framework. It is designed to be flexible, allowing for expansion and contraction in response to the organization's growth and the dynamic nature of maritime risks. By establishing a scalable framework, the organization can ensure its risk management capabilities evolve in tandem with its operational needs.

Another query may revolve around the alignment of risk management efforts with broader strategic objectives. The framework ensures that risk management is not siloed but integrated into strategic planning, thus enabling the organization to make informed decisions that balance risk and opportunity.

Executives may also be concerned about the measurement of the framework's effectiveness. This is addressed by incorporating a robust set of KPIs that track both the adherence to the ISO 31000 standard and the impact of risk management on operational performance.

Expected Business Outcomes

  • Enhanced decision-making capabilities with a risk-informed approach.
  • Improved compliance with international standards and regulations.
  • Increased resilience to market and operational uncertainties.

Potential Implementation Challenges

  • Resistance to change within the organization's culture.
  • Aligning diverse international operations with a centralized risk management framework.
  • Ensuring the adaptability of the risk framework to emerging risks.

ISO 31000 KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


What gets measured gets done, what gets measured and fed back gets done well, what gets rewarded gets repeated.
     – John E. Jones

  • Percentage of compliance with ISO 31000 requirements.
  • Frequency of risk assessments and reviews.
  • Reduction in incidents related to identified risks.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Implementation Insights

During the implementation of the risk management framework, insights were gained regarding the criticality of leadership buy-in. A study by McKinsey highlighted that projects with proactive C-suite sponsorship have a 70% chance of success. Hence, active engagement from the top is imperative for effective risk management.

ISO 31000 Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in ISO 31000. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and ISO 31000 subject matter experts.

ISO 31000 Deliverables

  • Risk Management Policy (PDF)
  • Risk Assessment Report (Excel)
  • Risk Framework Implementation Plan (MS Word)
  • Risk Monitoring Dashboard (PowerPoint)
  • Continuous Improvement Guidelines (PDF)

Explore more ISO 31000 deliverables

ISO 31000 Case Studies

A global shipping conglomerate successfully implemented a similar risk management framework, resulting in a 30% reduction in operational disruptions and a significant decrease in compliance-related costs.

Another case involved a maritime logistics firm that, by adopting ISO 31000 standards, improved its risk-adjusted return on capital and enhanced its market reputation for safety and reliability.

Explore additional related case studies

Integration of ISO 31000 With Existing Systems

Implementing an ISO 31000 framework often raises the concern of how it will integrate with existing systems and processes. The key is to conduct a gap analysis to identify overlaps and areas of divergence. The framework should be positioned not as a replacement but as an enhancement that plugs into and improves current processes. This alignment ensures that risk management becomes a natural extension of business operations rather than an additional layer.

Furthermore, an Accenture study indicates that 76% of executives report that achieving an enterprise-wide approach to risk management is increasingly important. This suggests that integrating ISO 31000 can be a strategic move to consolidate risk management efforts across the organization, thereby enhancing overall governance and control.

Customization of the Framework for Different Market Niches

The maritime industry encompasses a variety of market niches, each with its unique risk profile. Customizing the ISO 31000 framework to address specific niche requirements is essential. The framework's flexibility allows for tailoring to the distinct aspects of container shipping, bulk cargo, or oil and gas transportation, for example. Customization involves calibrating risk assessment tools and mitigation strategies to the peculiarities of each niche, ensuring that risk management is both relevant and effective.

A study by BCG found that companies that customize their risk management approaches to their specific industry context can see a 20% improvement in risk mitigation effectiveness. This highlights the value of a bespoke approach to risk management within the diverse contexts of the maritime industry.

Ensuring Employee Engagement and Adoption

For a risk management framework to be successful, employee engagement and adoption are crucial. It is important to foster a risk-aware culture where every employee understands their role in managing risk. This can be achieved through comprehensive training programs, clear communication of the benefits of ISO 31000, and by empowering employees to take ownership of risk management in their respective functions.

According to Deloitte's Global Risk Management Survey, companies with strong risk cultures tend to outperform peers on a range of financial metrics, including revenue growth and return on equity. This underscores the importance of embedding a risk-aware mindset throughout the organization as part of the ISO 31000 implementation.

Measuring the Impact of ISO 31000 on Organizational Performance

Measuring the impact of ISO 31000 on organizational performance is critical to validate the investment in the framework. Key performance indicators should be established to track improvements in risk management effectiveness, reduction in losses due to risk events, and enhancements in compliance and governance. These metrics provide tangible evidence of the framework's contribution to the organization's objectives.

PwC's 2020 Global Risk Study reveals that 55% of top-performing companies extensively use risk management tools to drive strategic decision-making. This indicates that robust risk management practices, underpinned by frameworks like ISO 31000, are integral to enhancing overall organizational performance and strategic outcomes.

Additional Resources Relevant to ISO 31000

Here are additional best practices relevant to ISO 31000 from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Enhanced decision-making capabilities with a risk-informed approach.
  • Improved compliance with international standards and regulations.
  • Increased resilience to market and operational uncertainties.
  • Established a scalable risk management framework to accommodate organizational growth and maritime risks.
  • Successfully integrated risk management efforts with broader strategic objectives, ensuring informed decision-making.
  • Implemented a robust set of KPIs tracking adherence to ISO 31000 standards and the impact of risk management on operational performance.

The initiative has been successful in achieving its primary objectives, as evidenced by the quantifiable outcomes. The enhanced decision-making capabilities and improved compliance demonstrate the effectiveness of the ISO 31000 framework in addressing the complexities of enterprise risk management in the maritime sector. However, challenges such as resistance to change and aligning diverse international operations highlight areas for further improvement. Alternative strategies could have involved more targeted change management efforts to address cultural resistance and a phased approach to aligning diverse operations with the centralized risk management framework. Moving forward, it is recommended to focus on enhancing employee engagement and adoption, customizing the framework for different market niches, and measuring the ongoing impact of ISO 31000 on organizational performance. These actions will further strengthen the resilience of the organization against market fluctuations, regulatory changes, and operational hazards.

Source: Risk Management Framework Implementation for Life Sciences, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Risk Management Framework Enhancement for Telecom Operator

Scenario: The organization is a leading telecom operator in North America that is facing challenges in aligning its risk management processes with ISO 31000 standards.

Read Full Case Study

Analyzing and Improving Organizational Risk Management via ISO 31000

Scenario: A multinational corporation specialized in the energy sector is striving to improve its risk management process.

Read Full Case Study

Risk Management Framework for Luxury Retail Chain

Scenario: The organization is a high-end luxury retail chain specializing in designer apparel and accessories, facing challenges in aligning its risk management practices with ISO 31000 standards.

Read Full Case Study

Risk Management Framework for Media Organization in Digital Broadcasting

Scenario: A leading media firm in the digital broadcasting sector is facing challenges aligning its risk management practices with ISO 31000 standards.

Read Full Case Study

Risk Management Framework for Cosmetic Firm in Luxury Segment

Scenario: A multinational cosmetic company specializing in luxury products is grappling with the complexities of risk management in accordance with ISO 31000.

Read Full Case Study

Direct-to-Consumer Growth Strategy for Boutique Coffee Brand

Scenario: A boutique coffee brand specializing in direct-to-consumer (D2C) sales faces significant organizational change as it seeks to scale operations nationally.

Read Full Case Study

Organizational Alignment Improvement for a Global Tech Firm

Scenario: A multinational technology firm with a recently expanded workforce from key acquisitions is struggling to maintain its operational efficiency.

Read Full Case Study

Porter's 5 Forces Analysis for Education Technology Firm

Scenario: The organization is a provider of education technology solutions in North America, facing increased competition and market pressure.

Read Full Case Study

Operational Efficiency Enhancement in Aerospace

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized aerospace components supplier grappling with escalating production costs amidst a competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Sustainable Fishing Strategy for Aquaculture Enterprises in Asia-Pacific

Scenario: A leading aquaculture enterprise in the Asia-Pacific region is at a crucial juncture, needing to navigate through a comprehensive change management process.

Read Full Case Study

Balanced Scorecard Implementation for Professional Services Firm

Scenario: A professional services firm specializing in financial advisory has noted misalignment between its strategic objectives and performance management systems.

Read Full Case Study

Organizational Change Initiative in Luxury Retail

Scenario: A luxury retail firm is grappling with the challenges of digital transformation and the evolving demands of a global customer base.

Read Full Case Study

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.