This article provides a detailed response to: How is the rise of artificial intelligence and automation shaping the make-or-buy decision landscape? For a comprehensive understanding of Make or Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Make or Buy best practice resources.
TLDR The rise of AI and automation is transforming the make-or-buy decision process, impacting Cost, Operational Excellence, Innovation, and Competitive Strategy, necessitating a nuanced Strategic Planning approach.
Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation is significantly reshaping the make-or-buy decision landscape, a critical aspect of Strategic Planning in organizations. This decision, which determines whether an organization should produce a component, service, or technology internally (make) or purchase it from an external supplier (buy), is becoming increasingly complex and nuanced due to the rapid advancement of AI and automation technologies. These technologies not only affect the cost and efficiency of production but also have broader implications for Operational Excellence, Innovation, and Competitive Strategy.
Impact on Cost and Efficiency
The advent of AI and automation technologies has fundamentally altered the cost structures associated with the make-or-buy decision. Automation can significantly reduce labor costs and increase efficiency in production processes, tipping the scales in favor of making. For instance, a report by McKinsey highlighted that in sectors with high automation potential, such as manufacturing and logistics, the cost savings from reduced labor and improved efficiency can make in-house production more attractive. However, the initial investment in AI and automation technologies can be substantial, leading some organizations to prefer buying, especially if suppliers have already achieved economies of scale in automated production.
Moreover, AI and automation enhance the quality and consistency of outputs, reducing waste and rework. This improvement in Operational Excellence can justify the upfront investment in technology for in-house production. However, it requires a strategic assessment of the organization's ability to absorb and implement these technologies effectively compared to the capabilities of external suppliers.
From a cost perspective, organizations must also consider the long-term implications of AI and automation on their industry's labor market. As automation technologies become more prevalent, the cost of skilled labor for maintaining and operating these systems might increase, affecting the cost-benefit analysis of the make-or-buy decision.
Strategic Implications for Innovation and Competitive Advantage
AI and automation are not just operational tools; they are strategic assets that can drive Innovation and create Competitive Advantage. The decision to develop these capabilities in-house is often driven by the desire to control and customize these technologies to fit the organization's specific needs, fostering innovation. For example, Tesla's decision to develop its own AI chips for autonomous driving is a strategic move to differentiate its products and control its innovation pipeline.
However, the pace of technological change poses a challenge. Organizations choosing to make must continuously invest in upgrading their capabilities to stay ahead. This is where buying can offer an advantage, as it allows organizations to leverage the expertise and investments of specialized suppliers who are at the forefront of technological advancements. A partnership with AI and automation leaders can provide access to cutting-edge technology without the need for significant internal investment, as seen in the collaboration between healthcare companies and AI startups for drug discovery and diagnostics.
The strategic dimension of the make-or-buy decision also involves considering the risk of dependency on external suppliers for critical technology. In sectors where AI and automation capabilities are central to competitive positioning, relying on external sources can pose a significant risk to Operational Excellence and Strategic Flexibility. This risk must be balanced against the benefits of speed and access to advanced technology that buying provides.
Real-World Examples and Market Trends
Leading organizations across various industries are navigating the make-or-buy decision in the context of AI and automation with varying strategies. Amazon's development of its own AI-powered logistics and delivery systems exemplifies a strategic decision to make, aiming to control key technologies that drive its Competitive Advantage. On the other hand, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often lean towards buying, as seen in the widespread adoption of cloud-based AI services offered by companies like Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. These services allow SMEs to leverage advanced AI capabilities without the need for substantial internal investment.
In the automotive industry, the trend is mixed. While companies like Tesla invest heavily in developing in-house AI capabilities for autonomous driving, others partner with tech companies to integrate existing AI technologies into their vehicles. This reflects a strategic assessment of the make-or-buy decision based on the company's core competencies, competitive strategy, and the strategic importance of AI and automation technologies in their value proposition.
Market research firms, including Gartner and Forrester, have noted an increasing trend towards hybrid strategies that combine making and buying. Organizations are developing core AI and automation capabilities in-house while partnering with external suppliers for complementary technologies. This approach allows organizations to maintain control over strategic assets while leveraging external innovation and scale advantages.
The landscape of the make-or-buy decision is evolving rapidly with the advancement of AI and automation technologies. Organizations must navigate this landscape by carefully considering the cost, operational, and strategic implications of these technologies, tailoring their approach to align with their broader Strategic Planning and Competitive Strategy goals.
Best Practices in Make or Buy
Here are best practices relevant to Make or Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Make or Buy materials here.
Explore all of our best practices in: Make or Buy
Make or Buy Case Studies
For a practical understanding of Make or Buy, take a look at these case studies.
Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy
Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.
Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components
Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.
Customer Loyalty Program Development in the Cosmetics Industry
Scenario: The organization is a multinational cosmetics enterprise seeking to enhance its competitive edge by establishing a customer loyalty program.
Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision
Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.
Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer
Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.
Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor
Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.
Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies
Related Questions
Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.
Source: Executive Q&A: Make or Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024
Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.
Leverage the Experience of Experts.
Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.
Download Immediately and Use.
Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.
Save Time, Effort, and Money.
Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.
