Want FREE Templates on Strategy & Transformation? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How is the rise of artificial intelligence and automation shaping the make-or-buy decision landscape?


This article provides a detailed response to: How is the rise of artificial intelligence and automation shaping the make-or-buy decision landscape? For a comprehensive understanding of Make or Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Make or Buy best practice resources.

TLDR The rise of AI and automation is transforming the make-or-buy decision process, impacting Cost, Operational Excellence, Innovation, and Competitive Strategy, necessitating a nuanced Strategic Planning approach.

Reading time: 5 minutes


The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation is significantly reshaping the make-or-buy decision landscape, a critical aspect of Strategic Planning in organizations. This decision, which determines whether an organization should produce a component, service, or technology internally (make) or purchase it from an external supplier (buy), is becoming increasingly complex and nuanced due to the rapid advancement of AI and automation technologies. These technologies not only affect the cost and efficiency of production but also have broader implications for Operational Excellence, Innovation, and Competitive Strategy.

Impact on Cost and Efficiency

The advent of AI and automation technologies has fundamentally altered the cost structures associated with the make-or-buy decision. Automation can significantly reduce labor costs and increase efficiency in production processes, tipping the scales in favor of making. For instance, a report by McKinsey highlighted that in sectors with high automation potential, such as manufacturing and logistics, the cost savings from reduced labor and improved efficiency can make in-house production more attractive. However, the initial investment in AI and automation technologies can be substantial, leading some organizations to prefer buying, especially if suppliers have already achieved economies of scale in automated production.

Moreover, AI and automation enhance the quality and consistency of outputs, reducing waste and rework. This improvement in Operational Excellence can justify the upfront investment in technology for in-house production. However, it requires a strategic assessment of the organization's ability to absorb and implement these technologies effectively compared to the capabilities of external suppliers.

From a cost perspective, organizations must also consider the long-term implications of AI and automation on their industry's labor market. As automation technologies become more prevalent, the cost of skilled labor for maintaining and operating these systems might increase, affecting the cost-benefit analysis of the make-or-buy decision.

Explore related management topics: Operational Excellence

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Strategic Implications for Innovation and Competitive Advantage

AI and automation are not just operational tools; they are strategic assets that can drive Innovation and create Competitive Advantage. The decision to develop these capabilities in-house is often driven by the desire to control and customize these technologies to fit the organization's specific needs, fostering innovation. For example, Tesla's decision to develop its own AI chips for autonomous driving is a strategic move to differentiate its products and control its innovation pipeline.

However, the pace of technological change poses a challenge. Organizations choosing to make must continuously invest in upgrading their capabilities to stay ahead. This is where buying can offer an advantage, as it allows organizations to leverage the expertise and investments of specialized suppliers who are at the forefront of technological advancements. A partnership with AI and automation leaders can provide access to cutting-edge technology without the need for significant internal investment, as seen in the collaboration between healthcare companies and AI startups for drug discovery and diagnostics.

The strategic dimension of the make-or-buy decision also involves considering the risk of dependency on external suppliers for critical technology. In sectors where AI and automation capabilities are central to competitive positioning, relying on external sources can pose a significant risk to Operational Excellence and Strategic Flexibility. This risk must be balanced against the benefits of speed and access to advanced technology that buying provides.

Explore related management topics: Competitive Advantage

Real-World Examples and Market Trends

Leading organizations across various industries are navigating the make-or-buy decision in the context of AI and automation with varying strategies. Amazon's development of its own AI-powered logistics and delivery systems exemplifies a strategic decision to make, aiming to control key technologies that drive its Competitive Advantage. On the other hand, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often lean towards buying, as seen in the widespread adoption of cloud-based AI services offered by companies like Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. These services allow SMEs to leverage advanced AI capabilities without the need for substantial internal investment.

In the automotive industry, the trend is mixed. While companies like Tesla invest heavily in developing in-house AI capabilities for autonomous driving, others partner with tech companies to integrate existing AI technologies into their vehicles. This reflects a strategic assessment of the make-or-buy decision based on the company's core competencies, competitive strategy, and the strategic importance of AI and automation technologies in their value proposition.

Market research firms, including Gartner and Forrester, have noted an increasing trend towards hybrid strategies that combine making and buying. Organizations are developing core AI and automation capabilities in-house while partnering with external suppliers for complementary technologies. This approach allows organizations to maintain control over strategic assets while leveraging external innovation and scale advantages.

The landscape of the make-or-buy decision is evolving rapidly with the advancement of AI and automation technologies. Organizations must navigate this landscape by carefully considering the cost, operational, and strategic implications of these technologies, tailoring their approach to align with their broader Strategic Planning and Competitive Strategy goals.

Explore related management topics: Strategic Planning Core Competencies Value Proposition

Best Practices in Make or Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Make or Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Make or Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Make or Buy

Make or Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Make or Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Maritime Fleet Procurement Strategy for Shipping Corporation

Scenario: A global shipping company with a diverse fleet is facing challenges in deciding whether to make critical ship components in-house or to buy from external suppliers.

Read Full Case Study

Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor

Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.

Read Full Case Study

E-commerce Platform Modernization Initiative

Scenario: A mid-sized e-commerce firm specializing in bespoke home goods is facing a strategic decision in the evolution of its online platform.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Modernization Initiative

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the telecom industry, facing the strategic decision of modernizing its telecommunications infrastructure.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

What strategies should companies employ to ensure their Build vs. Buy decisions align with long-term growth objectives?
Organizations should align Build vs. Buy decisions with Strategic Planning, leveraging Core Competencies, conducting Financial Analysis and Risk Management, and ensuring Innovation and Market Responsiveness to drive long-term growth. [Read full explanation]
What are the environmental sustainability considerations in the Make vs. Buy decision-making process for manufacturers?
The Make vs. Buy decision in manufacturing involves analyzing economic and environmental impacts, assessing suppliers' sustainability practices, and investing in technology to align with sustainability goals and Operational Excellence. [Read full explanation]
How does geopolitical instability influence the Make vs. Buy decision for global businesses?
Geopolitical instability complicates the Make vs. Buy decision for global businesses by introducing supply chain disruptions, changing trade policies, and increasing risk, necessitating robust Supply Chain Management and Strategic Planning for Operational Excellence and sustainability. [Read full explanation]
How can companies effectively measure and compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options?
Organizations can evaluate the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options by conducting Skills and Capabilities Assessments, Financial Analyses, and Risk Assessments, employing Decision Matrices and Scenario Planning to align with Strategic Planning and Innovation Strategy. [Read full explanation]
How can manufacturers use Make vs. Buy decisions to better align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products?
Manufacturers can align with consumer demands for ethical and sustainable products through informed Make vs. Buy decisions, focusing on Strategic Sourcing, Supplier Partnerships, and investing in Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies. [Read full explanation]
What are the key indicators that suggest a company should pivot from a "Buy" to a "Build" strategy, or vice versa, in response to market changes?
Discover when to pivot from a Buy to a Build strategy (or vice versa) by evaluating Cost, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Fit for competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
How do emerging trends in consumer behavior impact Make vs. Buy decisions in product development and marketing?
Emerging consumer trends in sustainability, personalization, and digital/omnichannel experiences significantly impact Make vs. Buy decisions, influencing product development and marketing strategies to align with consumer expectations. [Read full explanation]
How are companies leveraging the Internet of Things (IoT) in their Build vs. Buy decisions to improve operational efficiency?
Organizations are leveraging IoT in Build vs. Buy decisions by aligning these choices with Strategic Planning, assessing internal capabilities and Risk Management, to significantly improve Operational Efficiency and customer satisfaction. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Make or Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.