Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How can Build vs. Buy strategies be optimized for enhancing customer experience in digital platforms?


This article provides a detailed response to: How can Build vs. Buy strategies be optimized for enhancing customer experience in digital platforms? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Optimize Build vs. Buy strategy by aligning with customer needs, market dynamics, organizational capabilities, and leveraging partnerships for long-term success in digital platforms.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Build vs. Buy Strategy mean?
What does Customer-Centric Approach mean?
What does Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) mean?
What does Strategic Partnerships and Ecosystems mean?


In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital platforms, organizations are continually faced with the critical decision of whether to build custom solutions or buy off-the-shelf software. This decision has far-reaching implications for customer experience, operational efficiency, and long-term strategic flexibility. Optimizing the Build vs. Buy strategy requires a nuanced understanding of the organization's unique needs, market dynamics, and the technological landscape.

Understanding Customer Needs and Market Dynamics

At the heart of any decision between building or buying digital solutions lies a deep understanding of customer needs and expectations. Organizations must leverage analytics target=_blank>data analytics and customer feedback mechanisms to gain insights into customer behavior, preferences, and pain points. This customer-centric approach ensures that the chosen strategy—whether build or buy—aligns with enhancing the customer experience. For instance, a study by McKinsey highlights the importance of personalization in digital platforms, with organizations that excel at personalization generating 40% more revenue than average players. This underscores the necessity of choosing a strategy that allows for the customization and flexibility needed to deliver personalized experiences.

Moreover, market dynamics play a crucial role in this decision-making process. Organizations must assess the competitive landscape and consider how a custom-built solution could provide a competitive advantage or how an off-the-shelf solution could speed up time-to-market. The choice between building or buying should also factor in the organization's capacity to innovate and adapt to market changes. A custom solution might offer differentiation, but it requires a significant investment in time and resources. Conversely, buying a solution can be quicker but might limit differentiation.

Organizations should conduct a thorough market analysis and competitive benchmarking to inform their strategy. This includes evaluating the scalability, security, and integration capabilities of available solutions against the organization's current and future needs. Strategic Planning must prioritize flexibility and adaptability, ensuring that the digital platform can evolve with changing customer expectations and market conditions.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Assessing Organizational Capabilities and Resources

Another critical factor in optimizing the Build vs. Buy decision is an honest assessment of the organization's internal capabilities and resources. This includes evaluating the skills and expertise of the current workforce, the availability of technical and financial resources, and the organization's overall capacity for managing a digital transformation project. For organizations lacking in-house expertise, buying may present a less risky path. However, for those with strong IT teams, building could leverage internal talents and align more closely with specific business requirements.

Financial considerations are paramount. A detailed cost-benefit analysis must compare the total cost of ownership (TCO) of building a custom solution versus buying and customizing an off-the-shelf product. This analysis should account for direct costs such as development or purchase prices, as well as indirect costs like training, maintenance, and future upgrades. According to Gartner, failing to accurately estimate the TCO is a common pitfall that can significantly impact the financial viability of digital platform projects.

Moreover, the decision should align with the organization's strategic objectives and long-term vision. A custom-built solution might offer more control and better alignment with specific business processes, enhancing Operational Excellence and strategic agility. On the other hand, purchasing a solution might allow the organization to quickly address immediate needs and focus resources on core competencies. Organizations must weigh these considerations carefully, ensuring that their decision supports both current and future strategic goals.

Leveraging Partnerships and Ecosystems

In today's interconnected digital economy, no organization operates in isolation. Partnerships and ecosystems play a crucial role in extending an organization's capabilities and offerings. When deciding to build or buy, organizations should consider the potential for partnerships that can enhance the customer experience. For example, integrating third-party solutions through APIs can combine the strengths of bought solutions with the customization of built systems, offering a best-of-both-worlds approach that maximizes value for customers.

Collaborating with technology vendors and service providers can also mitigate some of the risks associated with the Build vs. Buy decision. Vendors often provide support, training, and updates, which can reduce the total cost of ownership and ensure that the digital platform remains up-to-date with the latest technological advancements. Furthermore, being part of a broader ecosystem can open up new opportunities for innovation and co-creation, driving further enhancements in customer experience.

For instance, leveraging cloud-based platforms can offer scalability and flexibility, allowing organizations to adapt to changing customer demands more swiftly. Many leading organizations have successfully navigated the Build vs. Buy decision by adopting a hybrid approach, where core systems are custom-built to maintain competitive advantage, while complementary functions are sourced from external providers. This strategy allows organizations to focus on their core competencies while still benefiting from the innovation and scalability offered by external solutions.

Optimizing the Build vs. Buy strategy for enhancing customer experience in digital platforms requires a balanced approach that considers customer needs, market dynamics, organizational capabilities, and the potential for partnerships. By carefully evaluating these factors, organizations can make informed decisions that not only meet immediate needs but also position them for long-term success in a digital-first world.

Best Practices in Build vs. Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy

Build vs. Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Customer Loyalty Program Development in the Cosmetics Industry

Scenario: The organization is a multinational cosmetics enterprise seeking to enhance its competitive edge by establishing a customer loyalty program.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer

Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study

Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor

Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How should companies approach the make-or-buy decision in highly regulated industries differently?
In highly regulated industries, companies must adopt a comprehensive approach to the make-or-buy decision, considering Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, and long-term implications for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?
Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence influences the Build vs. Buy decision, enhancing brand reputation, sustainability, and market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
What are the key indicators that suggest a company should pivot from a "Buy" to a "Build" strategy, or vice versa, in response to market changes?
Discover when to pivot from a Buy to a Build strategy (or vice versa) by evaluating Cost, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Fit for competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
What is a make or buy analysis?
A make or buy analysis is a strategic framework for deciding whether to produce a product in-house or purchase it from an external supplier, considering cost, quality, and risk. [Read full explanation]
What impact do global supply chain disruptions have on the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Global supply chain disruptions significantly impact the make-or-buy decision-making process, emphasizing Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, Operational Excellence, and the need for agility, resilience, and innovation in sourcing strategies. [Read full explanation]
How is the rise of artificial intelligence and automation shaping the make-or-buy decision landscape?
The rise of AI and automation is transforming the make-or-buy decision process, impacting Cost, Operational Excellence, Innovation, and Competitive Strategy, necessitating a nuanced Strategic Planning approach. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Build vs. Buy Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.