This article provides a detailed response to: How Can Build vs Buy Strategy Be Optimized for Digital Platforms? [Complete Guide] For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy templates.
TLDR Optimize Build vs Buy strategy by focusing on (1) customer needs, (2) market trends, and (3) organizational capabilities. Use proven frameworks to enhance digital platform customer experience.
Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they relate to this question.
Optimizing the Build vs Buy strategy in digital platforms means making informed decisions that directly improve customer experience. Build vs Buy refers to choosing between creating custom solutions internally or purchasing off-the-shelf software. According to McKinsey, companies that align this strategy with customer needs and market dynamics see up to 30% higher satisfaction rates. This approach requires understanding your organization's capabilities and the evolving technology landscape to ensure long-term success.
In today’s fast-paced digital economy, the Build vs Buy decision impacts operational efficiency and strategic flexibility. Secondary factors include vendor partnerships and integration complexity. Leading consulting firms like BCG and Deloitte emphasize a structured framework involving cost-benefit analysis, risk assessment, and scalability considerations. These frameworks help executives balance innovation speed with quality, ensuring the chosen solution supports evolving customer expectations and competitive pressures.
The first step in optimizing Build vs Buy is assessing customer-centric requirements. For example, companies often build custom features to differentiate their platforms, while buying standard modules to accelerate time-to-market. Research shows 65% of firms use hybrid approaches, combining build and buy to maximize value. Applying a 3-step framework—(1) define customer needs, (2) evaluate market options, (3) assess internal capabilities—provides clarity and drives better outcomes, as recommended by PwC and Bain experts.
At the heart of any decision between building or buying digital solutions lies a deep understanding of customer needs and expectations. Organizations must leverage data analytics and customer feedback mechanisms to gain insights into customer behavior, preferences, and pain points. This customer-centric approach ensures that the chosen strategy—whether build or buy—aligns with enhancing the customer experience. For instance, a study by McKinsey highlights the importance of personalization in digital platforms, with organizations that excel at personalization generating 40% more revenue than average players. This underscores the necessity of choosing a strategy that allows for the customization and flexibility needed to deliver personalized experiences.
Moreover, market dynamics play a crucial role in this decision-making process. Organizations must assess the competitive landscape and consider how a custom-built solution could provide a competitive advantage or how an off-the-shelf solution could speed up time-to-market. The choice between building or buying should also factor in the organization's capacity to innovate and adapt to market changes. A custom solution might offer differentiation, but it requires a significant investment in time and resources. Conversely, buying a solution can be quicker but might limit differentiation.
Organizations should conduct a thorough market analysis and competitive benchmarking to inform their strategy. This includes evaluating the scalability, security, and integration capabilities of available solutions against the organization's current and future needs. Strategic Planning must prioritize flexibility and adaptability, ensuring that the digital platform can evolve with changing customer expectations and market conditions.
Another critical factor in optimizing the Build vs. Buy decision is an honest assessment of the organization's internal capabilities and resources. This includes evaluating the skills and expertise of the current workforce, the availability of technical and financial resources, and the organization's overall capacity for managing a digital transformation project. For organizations lacking in-house expertise, buying may present a less risky path. However, for those with strong IT teams, building could leverage internal talents and align more closely with specific business requirements.
Financial considerations are paramount. A detailed cost-benefit analysis must compare the total cost of ownership (TCO) of building a custom solution versus buying and customizing an off-the-shelf product. This analysis should account for direct costs such as development or purchase prices, as well as indirect costs like training, maintenance, and future upgrades. According to Gartner, failing to accurately estimate the TCO is a common pitfall that can significantly impact the financial viability of digital platform projects.
Moreover, the decision should align with the organization's strategic objectives and long-term vision. A custom-built solution might offer more control and better alignment with specific business processes, enhancing Operational Excellence and strategic agility. On the other hand, purchasing a solution might allow the organization to quickly address immediate needs and focus resources on core competencies. Organizations must weigh these considerations carefully, ensuring that their decision supports both current and future strategic goals.
In today's interconnected digital economy, no organization operates in isolation. Partnerships and ecosystems play a crucial role in extending an organization's capabilities and offerings. When deciding to build or buy, organizations should consider the potential for partnerships that can enhance the customer experience. For example, integrating third-party solutions through APIs can combine the strengths of bought solutions with the customization of built systems, offering a best-of-both-worlds approach that maximizes value for customers.
Collaborating with technology vendors and service providers can also mitigate some of the risks associated with the Build vs. Buy decision. Vendors often provide support, training, and updates, which can reduce the total cost of ownership and ensure that the digital platform remains up-to-date with the latest technological advancements. Furthermore, being part of a broader ecosystem can open up new opportunities for innovation and co-creation, driving further enhancements in customer experience.
For instance, leveraging cloud-based platforms can offer scalability and flexibility, allowing organizations to adapt to changing customer demands more swiftly. Many leading organizations have successfully navigated the Build vs. Buy decision by adopting a hybrid approach, where core systems are custom-built to maintain competitive advantage, while complementary functions are sourced from external providers. This strategy allows organizations to focus on their core competencies while still benefiting from the innovation and scalability offered by external solutions.
Optimizing the Build vs. Buy strategy for enhancing customer experience in digital platforms requires a balanced approach that considers customer needs, market dynamics, organizational capabilities, and the potential for partnerships. By carefully evaluating these factors, organizations can make informed decisions that not only meet immediate needs but also position them for long-term success in a digital-first world.
Here are templates, frameworks, and toolkits relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy templates here.
Explore all of our templates in: Build vs. Buy
For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.
Make or Buy Decision Case Study: Luxury Goods Manufacturer
Scenario:
The luxury goods manufacturer faced a critical make or buy decision impacting its supply chain agility, cost structure, and brand reputation.
Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components
Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.
Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy
Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.
Sustainability Strategy for Boutique Hotel Chain in Eco-Tourism Niche
Scenario: A boutique hotel chain in the eco-tourism sector is navigating the strategic challenge of a "build vs.
Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision
Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.
Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor
Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.
Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies
Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.
This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.
It is licensed under CC BY 4.0. You're free to share and adapt with attribution. To cite this article, please use:
Source: "How Can Build vs Buy Strategy Be Optimized for Digital Platforms? [Complete Guide]," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2026
Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.
Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.
Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.
|
Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more. |