Want FREE Templates on Strategy & Transformation? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.







Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Portfolio Management in Esports Industry


There are countless scenarios that require Boston Matrix. Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Boston Matrix to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

Reading time: 8 minutes

Consider this scenario: The organization is an emerging player in the esports industry, struggling to effectively allocate investments across various game titles and teams.

With a diverse portfolio of assets including players, intellectual properties, and sponsorships, the company needs to assess each asset's market position and financial performance. The aim is to identify which segments offer the best opportunities for growth and profitability, and which should be divested or restructured, using the Boston Matrix as a strategic framework.



Given the esports firm's current challenges, the initial hypotheses might focus on a lack of strategic segmentation within their portfolio, resulting in suboptimal allocation of resources. Another hypothesis could be that the company has over-invested in certain game titles with declining popularity or profitability. Lastly, there might be an imbalance between cash cows that fund the business and star assets that are essential for future growth.

Strategic Analysis and Execution

The esports firm can benefit from a structured, multi-phase approach to applying the Boston Matrix to its portfolio management. This established process can provide clarity on strategic positioning and guide resource allocation decisions.

  1. Assessment of Current Portfolio: Review the organization’s current asset mix, categorizing each according to the Boston Matrix quadrants. This phase includes financial performance analysis, market trend assessment, and competitive positioning.
  2. Strategic Segmentation: Further segment the portfolio to identify nuances within each quadrant. This involves market research, player performance metrics, and sponsorship deal evaluations.
  3. Resource Allocation Strategy: Develop a tailored resource allocation plan based on the strategic segmentation. Key activities include budgeting, talent acquisition, and marketing investment decisions.
  4. Action Plan Development: Create specific action plans for each quadrant, detailing steps to enhance, maintain, divest, or develop assets, with timelines and responsible parties.
  5. Execution Roadmap: Finalize an implementation roadmap, including monitoring mechanisms to track progress and adjust strategies as needed.

This methodology is akin to those followed by leading consulting firms when addressing portfolio management challenges.

Learn more about Market Research Boston Matrix Portfolio Management

For effective implementation, take a look at these Boston Matrix best practices:

Common Strategy Consulting Frameworks (19-slide PowerPoint deck)
BCG Growth-Share Matrix (9-slide PowerPoint deck)
Strategy Classics: BCG Growth-Share Matrix (24-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional Boston Matrix best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Implementation Challenges & Considerations

Executives may question the adaptability of the Boston Matrix in the rapidly evolving esports industry. It is crucial to customize the framework to reflect the unique dynamics of esports, including the volatility of game popularity and the impact of digital trends.

The expected business outcomes include a more focused investment strategy, improved financial performance, and a portfolio that is aligned with market opportunities. By implementing this methodology, the organization can expect to see a shift in resource allocation that promotes sustainable growth.

Potential implementation challenges include resistance to change within the organization, especially if divestiture or restructuring of beloved assets is recommended. Ensuring buy-in from key stakeholders is essential for successful implementation.

Implementation KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


Tell me how you measure me, and I will tell you how I will behave.
     – Eliyahu M. Goldratt

  • Return on Investment (ROI): Critical for measuring the financial impact of portfolio restructuring.
  • Market Share Growth: Indicates success in capitalizing on star assets and opportunities.
  • Cost Savings from Divestitures: Reflects the financial benefit of shedding underperforming assets.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Key Takeaways

Applying the Boston Matrix in the esports industry requires an understanding of digital engagement metrics and fan base growth trends. It is not solely about financial performance but also the potential for market influence and brand value.

Another insight is the need for agility in decision-making. The esports landscape can change rapidly with new game releases and shifts in player popularity, necessitating a dynamic approach to portfolio management.

Deliverables

  • Portfolio Analysis Report (PowerPoint)
  • Strategic Resource Allocation Plan (Excel)
  • Investment Prioritization Framework (PowerPoint)
  • Market Trend Analysis (PDF)
  • Implementation Roadmap (MS Word)

Explore more Boston Matrix deliverables

Boston Matrix Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Boston Matrix. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Boston Matrix subject matter experts.

Case Studies

Case studies from leading esports organizations, such as Team Liquid or Cloud9, may reveal how they have successfully navigated portfolio management using frameworks similar to the Boston Matrix to maintain competitive advantage and profitability.

Explore additional related case studies

Customization of the Boston Matrix for Esports Industry Dynamics

In the context of the esports industry, the application of the Boston Matrix must be adapted to account for the sector's unique characteristics. Traditional market analysis may underestimate the value of community engagement and brand loyalty which are pivotal in esports. The Boston Matrix can be customized by incorporating metrics such as viewer engagement rates, social media sentiment, and streaming hours alongside financial data. For example, a game that may appear as a 'Dog' in terms of current profitability could be a 'Question Mark' or even a 'Star' when considering its growing viewer base and social media buzz. According to Newzoo's Global Esports Market Report, global esports revenues were expected to grow to $1.1 billion in 2020, a year-on-year growth of +15.7%, illustrating the industry's rapid expansion and the potential for high returns on strategically allocated investments.

Moreover, the Boston Matrix must be dynamic, allowing for frequent reassessments to reflect the fast-paced changes in the industry. Game popularity can fluctuate with updates, new releases, or shifts in player preferences. A static analysis would fail to capture these nuances. Therefore, an effective approach would involve setting shorter review cycles and integrating real-time data analytics to ensure the portfolio remains aligned with market trends and opportunities for growth.

Learn more about Market Analysis Data Analytics

Stakeholder Engagement and Change Management

Implementing strategic recommendations based on the Boston Matrix requires careful stakeholder management. Key individuals and groups within the organization may have emotional attachments to certain assets or be resistant to change due to fear of the unknown. It is crucial to engage stakeholders early in the process, clearly communicating the rationale behind portfolio restructuring and the expected benefits. This approach fosters a sense of ownership and can alleviate resistance.

Change management best practices suggest that transparent communication, aligned incentives, and involvement in decision-making can significantly increase the success rate of strategic initiatives. A study by McKinsey & Company found that projects where change management was effectively integrated had a success rate of 79%, compared to just 34% for projects without it. Therefore, the implementation plan must include a comprehensive change management strategy that addresses potential concerns, provides training and support where needed, and establishes feedback mechanisms to monitor sentiment and address issues as they arise.

In esports, where teams and players often have a strong following, it is also important to consider the impact of portfolio changes on the fan base. Engaging with fans and communicating the strategic vision can help maintain brand loyalty and community support during the transition.

Learn more about Change Management Stakeholder Management Best Practices

Measuring the Impact of Strategic Portfolio Realignment

After the implementation of a strategic portfolio realignment, it is essential to measure the impact to ensure that the intended benefits are realized. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) must be established prior to execution, with clear definitions and targets. For the esports industry, financial KPIs such as ROI and profitability margins are critical, but so are industry-specific metrics like audience growth, engagement rates, and sponsorship value.

For instance, audience growth can be measured by the increase in unique viewers or followers across various platforms, which is a direct indicator of the market reach and potential for monetization. Engagement rates, such as average watch time and interaction rates on social media, provide insights into the depth of the relationship between the brand and its audience. Sponsorship value, which can be tracked through the number and quality of sponsorship deals, reflects the commercial attractiveness of the esports organization's assets.

According to Deloitte's "2021 Technology, Media & Telecommunications Predictions," the global esports market is expected to broaden its revenue streams, with media rights and sponsorships projected to grow by 44%. This underscores the importance of aligning KPIs with industry trends to capture the full value of strategic portfolio decisions. Regularly reviewing these KPIs will guide continuous improvement and inform future strategic moves, ensuring that the esports organization remains agile and competitive in a rapidly evolving market.

Learn more about Continuous Improvement Agile Key Performance Indicators

Additional Resources Relevant to Boston Matrix

Here are additional best practices relevant to Boston Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Implemented a dynamic Boston Matrix, leading to a 15% increase in ROI by reallocating resources to 'Star' and 'Question Mark' assets.
  • Enhanced market share growth by 20% through focused investments in esports titles with high fan engagement and social media buzz.
  • Achieved cost savings of 12% from divesting underperforming 'Dog' assets, reallocating funds to more promising opportunities.
  • Improved audience growth and engagement rates by 25%, leveraging real-time data analytics for strategic decision-making.
  • Secured 30% more valuable sponsorship deals by aligning portfolio with industry trends and increasing commercial attractiveness.
  • Established shorter review cycles for the portfolio, ensuring agility and responsiveness to the fast-paced esports market.

The strategic realignment of the esports firm's portfolio, guided by a customized Boston Matrix, has proven to be highly successful. The significant increase in ROI, market share growth, and cost savings from divestitures directly reflect the effectiveness of the strategic segmentation and resource allocation strategy. The enhanced audience growth and engagement rates, along with more valuable sponsorship deals, underscore the importance of aligning the portfolio with industry trends and leveraging real-time data analytics. The adoption of shorter review cycles has ensured that the firm remains agile and responsive to market changes, a critical factor in the volatile esports industry. However, the success could have been further amplified by an even more aggressive investment in emerging 'Star' assets and by fostering deeper community engagement to build brand loyalty and fan base resilience.

For next steps, it is recommended to continue refining the strategic portfolio management process, with a focus on identifying and nurturing emerging 'Star' assets. This includes investing in talent development and leveraging digital platforms for deeper fan engagement. Additionally, exploring new revenue streams, such as exclusive content offerings or innovative sponsorship models, could further enhance profitability and market positioning. Regularly revisiting the portfolio's strategic alignment with market trends and fan interests will be crucial for sustaining growth and competitiveness in the rapidly evolving esports landscape.

Source: Portfolio Management in Esports Industry, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials




Additional Flevy Management Insights

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.