This article provides a detailed response to: Can SMED principles be applied to the software development lifecycle or other non-manufacturing processes? For a comprehensive understanding of SMED, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to SMED best practice resources.
TLDR SMED principles, originally from manufacturing, can enhance efficiency, reduce transition times, and improve productivity in software development and non-manufacturing processes through standardization and separating internal from external activities.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview Applying SMED Principles to Software Development SMED in Non-Manufacturing Processes Conclusion Best Practices in SMED SMED Case Studies Related Questions
All Recommended Topics
Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.
SMED, or Single-Minute Exchange of Dies, is a system for dramatically reducing the time it takes to complete equipment changeovers. The essence of SMED is to convert as many changeover steps as possible to "external" (performed while the equipment is running), and to simplify and streamline the remaining steps. This concept, originating in the manufacturing sector, specifically in automotive manufacturing under the guidance of Shigeo Shingo, has broader applications beyond its initial scope. When we look at the principles of SMED, it becomes evident that they can be effectively applied to the software development lifecycle (SDLC) and other non-manufacturing processes to enhance efficiency, reduce turnaround times, and improve overall productivity.
In the context of software development, changeovers can be likened to the transitions between different stages of the development lifecycle, such as from requirements gathering to design, from design to coding, or from development to testing. These transitions often involve significant setup times and adjustments, much like the changeovers in manufacturing. By applying SMED principles, software development teams can reduce these transition times, leading to faster delivery cycles and more responsive development processes.
For instance, one actionable insight is to identify and separate "external" setup activities (those that can be done in advance or in parallel with ongoing work) from "internal" setup activities (those that require the current stage to be completed before they can be started). An example of an external setup activity in software development could be the creation of test environments or the preparation of test data while the development is still in progress. This approach not only shortens the overall development cycle but also improves team utilization and efficiency.
Another aspect of SMED that can be applied to software development is the standardization of setup activities. By creating standardized procedures and checklists for transitions between development stages, organizations can reduce variability and uncertainty, leading to more predictable and shorter development cycles. This approach aligns with Agile methodologies and Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) practices, which emphasize automation and standardization to achieve efficiency and speed.
Outside of software development, SMED principles can be applied to a wide range of non-manufacturing processes in areas such as service delivery, project management, and administrative functions. For example, in project management, the transition between different phases of a project (initiation, planning, execution, and closure) involves various setup activities that can be optimized using SMED principles. By identifying and reducing these transition times, organizations can achieve faster project completion times and more flexible project management.
In administrative functions, processes such as onboarding new employees, setting up new customer accounts, or transitioning between different financial reporting periods often involve significant setup times. Applying SMED principles to these processes can help in identifying activities that can be completed in advance or parallelized, and in simplifying and standardizing the remaining steps. This not only speeds up the processes but also improves the quality and consistency of the outcomes.
Real-world examples of the application of SMED principles in non-manufacturing contexts include a global financial services firm that applied these principles to its software deployment processes, resulting in a 50% reduction in deployment times, and a healthcare provider that used SMED to streamline its patient admission process, significantly reducing waiting times and improving patient satisfaction. These examples demonstrate the versatility and effectiveness of SMED principles across different domains.
While specific, authoritative statistics from consulting or market research firms on the application of SMED principles outside of manufacturing are scarce, the underlying logic of SMED—minimizing transition times, separating internal from external setup activities, and standardizing processes—is universally applicable. The principles of Operational Excellence and Continuous Improvement that underpin SMED are relevant across all sectors and can lead to significant efficiency gains and performance improvements.
In conclusion, the application of SMED principles to the software development lifecycle and other non-manufacturing processes represents a powerful strategy for organizations seeking to enhance their agility and responsiveness. By focusing on reducing transition times, standardizing processes, and separating internal from external activities, businesses can achieve significant improvements in efficiency and productivity, regardless of their industry or domain.
Here are best practices relevant to SMED from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our SMED materials here.
Explore all of our best practices in: SMED
For a practical understanding of SMED, take a look at these case studies.
Setup Reduction Enhancement in Maritime Logistics
Scenario: The organization in focus operates within the maritime industry, specifically in logistics and port management, and is grappling with extended setup times for cargo handling equipment.
SMED Process Optimization for High-Tech Electronics Manufacturer
Scenario: A high-tech electronics manufacturer is struggling with significant process inefficiencies within its Single-Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) operations.
Quick Changeover Strategy for Packaging Firm in Health Sector
Scenario: The organization is a prominent player in the health sector packaging market, facing challenges with lengthy changeover times between production runs.
SMED Process Advancement for Cosmetic Manufacturer in Luxury Sector
Scenario: The organization in question operates within the luxury cosmetics industry and is grappling with inefficiencies in its Single-Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) processes.
Quick Changeover Initiative for Education Tech Firm in North America
Scenario: The organization, a leading provider of educational technology solutions in North America, is grappling with extended downtime and inefficiencies during its software update and deployment processes.
Resilience in Supply Chain Strategy for IT Support Services in Transportation
Scenario: An IT support services provider for the transportation sector is facing significant challenges related to setup reduction, impacting its ability to swiftly adapt to market demands and technological advancements.
Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies
Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.
This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.
To cite this article, please use:
Source: "Can SMED principles be applied to the software development lifecycle or other non-manufacturing processes?," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2024
Leverage the Experience of Experts.
Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.
Download Immediately and Use.
Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.
Save Time, Effort, and Money.
Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.
Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more. |