|
flevyblog
The Flevy Blog covers Business Strategies, Business Theories, & Business Stories.
|
Editor's Note: Take a look at our featured best practice, Hybrid Working: Improving Productivity and Performance (78-slide PowerPoint presentation). Hybrid working is a flexible work model that combines remote work with in-person office work. It allows employees to work from anywhere, while also maintaining some form of regular office attendance. Hybrid working is becoming increasingly important in today's work environment as it provides a [read more]
* * * *
Hybrid work has moved from emergency response to permanent reality. Yet three years into widespread adoption, many organizations still treat it as modified office work rather than a fundamentally different operating model. The result is fractured cultures, inconsistent experiences, and employees feeling neither fully remote nor fully connected.
The challenge isn’t logistics – scheduling systems and video platforms are solved problems. The challenge is belonging. How do you create genuine connection when your team exists across locations, time zones, and work patterns? How do you build culture that transcends physical proximity?
Organizations succeeding in hybrid environments recognize they’re not managing flexibility – they’re designing distributed experiences that foster inclusion, collaboration, and shared purpose regardless of where people work.
Belonging – the feeling of being valued, accepted, and integral to a group – drives engagement, performance, and retention. In traditional office environments, belonging develops through proximity: casual conversations, shared experiences, visible contribution, and informal relationship building.
Hybrid work disrupts these mechanisms. Remote employees miss spontaneous interactions. Office-based workers develop stronger networks. Part-time office attendance creates in-groups and out-groups. Without intentional design, organizations drift toward two-tier cultures where location determines experience quality.
Research consistently shows remote and hybrid employees report lower belonging than office-based colleagues. They feel less informed, less connected to culture, and less confident their contributions are recognized. These aren’t trivial concerns – belonging directly predicts performance, innovation, and retention.
The belonging gap represents the central challenge of hybrid work. Technology enables distributed work, but technology alone cannot create connection. Organizations must deliberately architect experiences that foster belonging across physical and digital environments.
Traditional workplace culture relied on ambient awareness – seeing colleagues, overhearing conversations, reading body language, and picking up organizational knowledge through osmosis. Hybrid work eliminates ambient connection, requiring intentional design to replace what proximity provided automatically.
The phrase sounds contradictory, but it captures the necessity. Organizations cannot rely on serendipitous connection in hybrid environments. They must create structured opportunities for informal interaction – virtual coffee chats, team rituals, interest-based communities, and deliberate social time.
Leading companies schedule “connection time” as rigorously as project meetings. They create digital spaces for non-work conversation. They design team events that prioritize relationship building over agenda completion. This intentionality feels artificial initially but becomes a cultural norm over time.
When teams are distributed, information asymmetry creates belonging barriers. Office-based employees hear news first, understand context better, and feel more connected to decision-making. Remote employees work with information delay and lack contextual richness.
Radical transparency counters this. Documenting decisions publicly, sharing meeting notes widely, recording important conversations, and communicating proactively ensures everyone accesses the same information regardless of location. This transparency builds trust and reinforces that all team members are equally informed participants.
Real-time collaboration privileges those in the same time zones and work patterns. Asynchronous approaches – detailed documentation, recorded updates, threaded discussions – enable contribution regardless of schedule. This shift requires cultural change from valuing responsiveness to valuing thoughtfulness.
Organizations embracing asynchronous work often discover improved decision quality. Written communication forces clarity. Time for reflection produces better thinking. Inclusive of different work styles and cognitive preferences, asynchronous approaches can strengthen outcomes while building belonging through genuine inclusion.
Hybrid work demands evolved leadership capability. Managing distributed teams requires different skills than managing co-located ones. Leaders must be intentional about visibility, communication, and relationship building in ways office proximity previously made automatic.
Effective hybrid leaders create presence through consistent, personal communication. Regular one-to-ones, team check-ins, and informal touchpoints build connection. These interactions must be camera-on, focused, and personal – not transactional task management.
Leaders should vary communication channels – video for connection, messaging for quick questions, email for documentation – matching medium to purpose. Over-communication becomes a virtue in hybrid environments. What feels redundant to leaders often represents minimum viable information for distributed teams.
Remote employees face visibility bias – leaders unconsciously favor those they see physically. Countering this requires deliberate effort. Leaders must ensure remote contributions are publicly recognized, remote voices are actively solicited in meetings, and promotion decisions reflect output rather than office presence.
Some organizations implement “default remote” meeting practices where everyone joins from individual devices regardless of location. This levels the playing field, ensuring remote participants have equal audio-visual presence and can contribute without competing for attention with in-room groups.
Leaders – like scarletabbott – set cultural tone through behavior. When leaders maintain rigid office schedules while offering flexibility to teams, hypocrisy undermines policy. Leaders must visibly embrace flexible work – working remotely, respecting boundaries, and demonstrating that flexibility doesn’t compromise performance.
This modelling is particularly important for combating “flexibility stigma” – the unspoken penalty employees fear for using flexible options. When senior leaders work flexibly without apology, they legitimize flexibility throughout the organization.
The most successful hybrid organizations don’t optimize for office-work-from-home balance. They design “office-optional” environments where either mode enables full contribution, connection, and career progression.
Rather than mandating attendance days, leading organizations clarify when physical presence creates value. Collaborative work, team building, creative sessions, and client engagement benefit from in-person interaction. Focused work, individual tasks, and asynchronous collaboration often happen more effectively remotely.
This purpose-driven approach trusts employees to judge when office presence serves their work. It positions the office as a tool rather than a requirement, focusing on outcomes rather than inputs.
Creating equitable hybrid experience requires investment. High-quality video conferencing in all meeting spaces. Digital collaboration platforms that actually work. Robust documentation systems. Training on distributed work practices. These investments signal organizational commitment to making hybrid work successful, not merely tolerated.
Many organizations under-invest in remote experience while maintaining expensive offices, creating de facto pressure for office attendance through resource allocation. Truly hybrid organizations invest proportionally in both physical and digital infrastructure.
Successful hybrid cultures establish clear rhythms – team days, company gatherings, quarterly planning sessions – that provide structure and predictability. Regular in-person moments become anchors for culture building while respecting that day-to-day work can happen anywhere.
These rituals should be meaningful, not performative. All-hands meetings via video can be more inclusive than poorly managed in-person gatherings. Physical events should justify the coordination cost by creating genuine connections impossible to achieve virtually.
Traditional productivity metrics often fail in hybrid environments. Presence, hours worked, and activity levels measure inputs, not outcomes. Hybrid work requires evolved measurement focusing on impact, connection, and equity.
Regular pulse surveys should track belonging across work locations. Are remote employees experiencing equal inclusion? Do hybrid workers feel connected to culture? Are there systematic differences in engagement by work pattern? These metrics reveal whether hybrid policies translate to equitable experiences.
Importantly, organizations should disaggregate data by location and work pattern, identifying and addressing disparities rather than accepting averages that mask inequality.
Hybrid environments necessitate outcome-based performance management. What did teams accomplish? What value was created? How did work advance strategic objectives? These questions matter more than activity tracking or time monitoring.
The shift to output-based assessment often improves performance management quality. It forces clarity about expectations, focuses on meaningful contribution, and reduces bias introduced by visibility and proximity.
Collaboration patterns reveal cultural health. Are cross-functional connections maintained? Are silos forming? Are remote employees integrated into information networks or isolated? Tools measuring communication patterns can identify concerning trends before they become cultural problems.
Technology can enhance or undermine hybrid belonging depending on how it’s deployed. The most effective organizations view technology as an experience enabler, not an efficiency tool.
Multiple disconnected platforms create friction. Employees shouldn’t need seven tools to find information, communicate with colleagues, and complete work. Unified digital workplaces – where tools integrate and information flows seamlessly – reduce cognitive load and enable focus on work rather than navigation.
Technology decisions should prioritize user experience over feature lists. Does this tool actually help people work better? Is it intuitive? Does it create connection or complicate it? Involving employees in selection processes ensures tools serve real needs rather than vendor promises.
Distributed teams develop new communication norms – emoji reactions signaling agreement, video-on expectations, response time conventions. Organizations should make these norms explicit rather than leaving them to individual interpretation. Clear digital etiquette reduces misunderstanding and builds inclusive communication culture.
Short-term hybrid accommodations differ fundamentally from sustainable hybrid culture. The former treats distributed work as an exception; the latter embeds it as an operating principle.
Sustainable hybrid culture requires ongoing commitment. Regular reassessment of what’s working. Continuous investment in capability and infrastructure. Leadership accountability for creating equitable experiences. Employee voice in shaping policies and practices.
Organizations viewing hybrid work as a temporary or transitional struggle with half-measures. Those recognizing it as permanent evolution invest in building genuine distributed capability. The difference shows in engagement, retention, and performance outcomes.
The future of work isn’t hybrid or remote or office-based – it’s employee-centric. Organizations that enable people to work in ways that serve both individual and organizational needs will attract and retain top talent. Those clinging to proximity-based models will find themselves competing with disadvantage.
Building belonging in distributed teams requires intention, investment, and leadership commitment. It demands rethinking culture, connection, and communication for distributed reality. The organizations succeeding aren’t those with best return-to-office policies – they’re those designing experiences where location becomes irrelevant to belonging, contribution, and success.
Hybrid work represents an opportunity to build more inclusive, flexible, and performance-focused cultures. The question isn’t whether to embrace distributed work – it’s whether to do it strategically or surrender competitive advantage to those who do.
Hybrid work refers to a flexible model where employees split their time between working remotely and on-site. It’s no longer a temporary pandemic fix but a long-term shift in how organizations balance flexibility, collaboration, and productivity.
When teams are distributed, casual interactions and spontaneous collaboration naturally decrease. Without intentional connection-building, remote workers can feel unseen or less valued, leading to isolation and reduced engagement.
Leaders need to communicate consistently, recognize contributions publicly, and ensure equal access to opportunities. Scheduling regular check-ins, hybrid-friendly social events, and transparent decision-making all strengthen connection across locations.
Technology is the bridge — but it must be human-first. The best tools support inclusion by giving everyone equal voice, visibility, and access. Platforms for collaboration, asynchronous updates, and virtual recognition can keep culture cohesive without overwhelming staff.
Physical offices should become intentional gathering spaces — designed for collaboration, creativity, and connection rather than daily desk work. Comfortable lounges, flexible meeting zones, and inclusive layouts make in-person time more meaningful.
Treating it as a logistical challenge rather than a cultural one. Hybrid success isn’t about Wi-Fi and scheduling — it’s about trust, inclusion, and redefining how belonging works in a world without walls.
You can download in-depth presentations on Hybrid Work and 100s of management topics from the FlevyPro Library. FlevyPro is trusted and utilized by 1000s of management consultants and corporate executives.
For even more best practices available on Flevy, have a look at our top 100 lists:
These best practices are of the same as those leveraged by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, and Accenture. Improve the growth and efficiency of your organization by utilizing these best practice frameworks, templates, and tools. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with over 20+ years of experience.
