Flevy Management Insights Case Study

Case Study: Enterprise Architecture Overhaul for Maritime Shipping Leader

     David Tang    |    TOGAF


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in TOGAF to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, templates, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

TLDR A leading maritime shipping company faced challenges in aligning its Information Systems with business goals due to an outdated enterprise architecture, hindering its ability to respond to market demands. The implementation of the TOGAF framework successfully improved IT and business strategy alignment, resulting in cost savings, increased agility, and enhanced operational efficiency.

Reading time: 8 minutes

Consider this scenario: A leading maritime shipping company is struggling to align its Information Systems with business goals due to an outdated and fragmented enterprise architecture.

The organization has been unable to respond effectively to market demands and regulatory changes. With competition intensifying, the company seeks to adopt TOGAF to standardize and streamline its enterprise architecture for enhanced agility and efficiency.



The initial assessment of the maritime shipping company's challenges suggests that the core issues may stem from an ad hoc approach to technology deployment and a lack of coherent enterprise architecture governance. Another hypothesis is that there might be insufficient alignment between the business strategy and the technology infrastructure, leading to inefficiencies and missed opportunities. Lastly, the company's rapid expansion may have outpaced the development of its IT systems, resulting in a patchwork of solutions that hinder rather than enable business operations.

Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology

Adopting a structured TOGAF methodology can bring clarity and direction to the organization's enterprise architecture initiatives. This best practice framework helps organizations design, plan, implement, and manage an enterprise information architecture that is agile and aligned with business goals.

  1. Architecture Vision: Identify the strategic intent, assess the current state, and define the target state of enterprise architecture. Key activities include stakeholder analysis, business scenario development, and risk assessment.
  2. Business Architecture: Map out the business strategy, governance, organization, and key business processes. This phase focuses on understanding the business drivers, objectives, and metrics that will shape the architecture development.
  3. Information Systems Architectures: Develop detailed blueprints for data and application architecture. Key questions include identifying the necessary data to drive business processes and the applications needed to manage that data.
  4. Technology Architecture: Define the technology infrastructure required to support the applications and data. This involves analyzing current technological trends and determining the right mix of hardware, software, and networking solutions.
  5. Implementation Governance: Establish a robust governance framework to ensure that the enterprise architecture is implemented effectively and continues to evolve with the business needs.

This TOGAF process is typically followed by leading management consulting firms to ensure a comprehensive and disciplined approach to enterprise architecture.

For effective implementation, take a look at these TOGAF frameworks, toolkits, & templates:

ArchiMate (30-slide PowerPoint deck)
TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework) (33-slide PowerPoint deck)
TOGAF 9.1 Training Practitioner Level (460-slide PowerPoint deck)
TOGAF 9.1 Training Foundation Level (286-slide PowerPoint deck)
TOGAF - Implementation Toolkit (Excel workbook and supporting ZIP)
View additional TOGAF documents

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides professional business documents—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our business frameworks, templates, and toolkits are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided business templates to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

TOGAF Implementation Challenges & Considerations

Executives might be concerned about the integration of existing systems with the new architecture. It is critical to plan for a phased integration that minimizes disruption to ongoing operations. Another consideration is the change management aspect—ensuring that the organization's culture and staff are prepared for and supportive of the changes.

Upon successful implementation of the TOGAF methodology, the company can expect improved alignment between IT and business strategies, leading to more efficient operations and better decision-making capabilities. The standardization of processes and technologies can result in cost savings and increased agility, enabling the organization to respond more quickly to market changes.

Implementation challenges may include resistance to change from within the organization and the complexity of migrating from legacy systems to a standardized enterprise architecture. Addressing these issues early with clear communication and executive support is essential for a smooth transition.

TOGAF KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.


Measurement is the first step that leads to control and eventually to improvement.
     – H. James Harrington

For more KPIs, you can explore the KPI Depot, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about KPI Depot KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard

Implementation Insights

During the TOGAF implementation, it became clear that executive sponsorship is crucial for driving the enterprise architecture initiative forward. According to McKinsey, companies with strong leadership are 1.5 times more likely to report success in their architecture efforts. Another insight was the importance of establishing a cross-functional team to bridge the gap between IT and business units, ensuring that the architecture truly supports business objectives.

TOGAF Deliverables

  • Enterprise Architecture Roadmap (PowerPoint)
  • Architecture Principles Document (Word)
  • Stakeholder Communication Plan (PowerPoint)
  • Technology Standards Catalog (Excel)
  • Implementation and Migration Plan (Word)

Explore more TOGAF deliverables

TOGAF Templates

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage the TOGAF templates below that were developed by management consulting firms and TOGAF subject matter experts.

Integrating TOGAF with Existing Business Processes

Ensuring that TOGAF complements and enhances existing business processes rather than disrupting them is a critical concern. The framework's adaptability allows it to be tailored to the organization's unique processes. It is essential to conduct a thorough analysis of current workflows to identify areas where TOGAF can integrate seamlessly and bring immediate value. A study by Gartner revealed that organizations that effectively align their enterprise architecture with business processes see a 30% improvement in strategic outcomes.

Moreover, the organization must prioritize areas that will benefit most from TOGAF's structured approach, such as data management or application development. By focusing on these high-impact areas, the company can achieve quick wins that build momentum and support for the broader enterprise architecture initiative.

Ensuring Stakeholder Buy-In and Change Management

Stakeholder buy-in is essential for the successful implementation of TOGAF. It starts with clear communication of the benefits and changes that TOGAF will bring. Leaders must articulate the vision and the strategic importance of a standardized enterprise architecture. According to a BCG report, effective change management and communication strategies can increase the success rate of enterprise architecture initiatives by up to 80%.

Engaging stakeholders early and often through workshops, training sessions, and regular updates can foster a sense of ownership and reduce resistance. Change management efforts should focus on highlighting the personal and departmental benefits of the new enterprise architecture, ensuring that all stakeholders understand the value it brings to their specific roles within the company.

TOGAF's Impact on IT Governance and Decision-Making

The implementation of TOGAF significantly enhances IT governance by establishing clear policies, processes, and accountability. It provides a transparent framework for decision-making, ensuring that IT investments align with business objectives. Research by Deloitte indicates that organizations with mature enterprise architecture practices report a 40% higher ROI on IT investments. TOGAF's emphasis on governance ensures that decisions are made with a full understanding of their strategic implications.

Additionally, TOGAF fosters a collaborative environment where business and IT leaders work together to define the future state of the enterprise architecture. This collaboration ensures that IT initiatives are not only technically sound but also strategically relevant, leading to more informed and effective decision-making.

Addressing the Complexity of Legacy Systems During TOGAF Implementation

Legacy systems pose a significant challenge to any enterprise architecture overhaul. TOGAF provides a systematic approach to dealing with legacy systems through its Architecture Development Method (ADM). The ADM enables organizations to assess the current state of their IT landscape and identify legacy components that are critical for business operations. A study by Accenture shows that a methodical approach to legacy system modernization can reduce IT costs by up to 25% while improving agility.

The key is to develop a transition plan that minimizes disruption and risk. This may involve incremental changes, where legacy systems are gradually replaced or integrated with new solutions. Throughout this process, it is important to maintain a clear focus on the end-state architecture to ensure that interim solutions do not become permanent fixtures that could detract from the overall objectives.

TOGAF Case Studies

Here are additional case studies related to TOGAF.

Enterprise Architecture for Energy Industry: TOGAF Case Study

Scenario:

A mid-sized renewable energy provider faced challenges aligning its enterprise architecture and information systems with evolving market demands and regulatory requirements.

Read Full Case Study

Enterprise Architecture Restructuring for Retail Conglomerate in Digital Commerce

Scenario: A multinational retail firm is grappling with the intricacies of integrating TOGAF into their expanding digital commerce operations.

Read Full Case Study

Enterprise Architecture Overhaul in Semiconductors

Scenario: A semiconductor firm is grappling with outdated and inefficient Enterprise Architecture.

Read Full Case Study

Enterprise Architecture Strategy for Biotech Firm in Precision Medicine

Scenario: The organization is a biotech company specializing in precision medicine, grappling with the challenges of scaling its operations globally.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Modernization for Competitive Edge in Digital Economy

Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized telecom service provider facing challenges in adapting its enterprise architecture to meet the demands of the rapidly evolving digital economy.

Read Full Case Study

Enterprise Architecture Redesign for a Leading Ecommerce Retailer

Scenario: The organization, a prominent player in the ecommerce sector, is grappling with an outdated and fragmented enterprise architecture that impedes its ability to scale effectively and integrate new technologies.

Read Full Case Study


Explore additional related case studies

Additional Resources Relevant to TOGAF

Here are additional frameworks, presentations, and templates relevant to TOGAF from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Improved alignment between IT and business strategies, leading to more efficient operations.
  • Standardization of processes and technologies resulted in cost savings and increased organizational agility.
  • Reduced time to market for new IT solutions, enhancing the company's competitive edge.
  • Architecture Compliance Rate improved, indicating higher adherence to the defined enterprise architecture.
  • Cost Savings from IT Rationalization quantified, demonstrating financial benefits from streamlined IT assets.
  • Stakeholder buy-in and engagement increased through effective communication and change management strategies.
  • IT governance enhanced with clear policies, processes, and accountability established.

The implementation of the TOGAF framework within the maritime shipping company has been largely successful, evidenced by the key results summarized above. The improved alignment between IT and business strategies has led to more efficient operations, directly addressing the core issues initially identified. The standardization of processes and technologies not only resulted in cost savings but also significantly increased the organization's agility, enabling a quicker response to market changes. The reduction in time to market for new IT solutions and the improved Architecture Compliance Rate are particularly noteworthy, as they demonstrate the tangible benefits of the TOGAF implementation. However, the challenge of integrating legacy systems and overcoming resistance to change within the organization were significant hurdles. Alternative strategies, such as more focused and incremental legacy system integration or a more aggressive change management approach, might have enhanced outcomes by reducing disruptions and accelerating the realization of benefits.

Based on the analysis and results, the recommended next steps include a continued focus on integrating legacy systems with the new architecture through a phased and incremental approach to minimize disruption. Additionally, reinforcing change management efforts to further reduce resistance within the organization will be crucial. It is also recommended to conduct a follow-up assessment to measure the long-term impact of the TOGAF implementation on IT governance and decision-making. This assessment should focus on ROI from IT investments and further opportunities for cost savings and efficiency improvements. Finally, exploring advanced technologies and innovative solutions that align with the established enterprise architecture will ensure the company remains competitive and agile in the rapidly evolving maritime shipping industry.


 
David Tang, New York

Strategy & Operations, Digital Transformation, Management Consulting

The development of this case study was overseen by David Tang. David is the CEO and Founder of Flevy. Prior to Flevy, David worked as a management consultant for 8 years, where he served clients in North America, EMEA, and APAC. He graduated from Cornell with a BS in Electrical Engineering and MEng in Management.

This case study is licensed under CC BY 4.0. You're free to share and adapt with attribution. To cite this article, please use:

Source: TOGAF Alignment for Life Sciences R&D Firm, Flevy Management Insights, David Tang, 2026


Flevy is the world's largest marketplace of business templates & consulting frameworks.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.

People illustrations by Storyset.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"I have found Flevy to be an amazing resource and library of useful presentations for lean sigma, change management and so many other topics. This has reduced the time I need to spend on preparing for my performance consultation. The library is easily accessible and updates are regularly provided. A wealth of great information."

– Cynthia Howard RN, PhD, Executive Coach at Ei Leadership
 
"Last Sunday morning, I was diligently working on an important presentation for a client and found myself in need of additional content and suitable templates for various types of graphics. Flevy.com proved to be a treasure trove for both content and design at a reasonable price, considering the time I "

– M. E., Chief Commercial Officer, International Logistics Service Provider
 
"As an Independent Management Consultant, I find Flevy to add great value as a source of best practices, templates and information on new trends. Flevy has matured and the quality and quantity of the library is excellent. Lastly the price charged is reasonable, creating a win-win value for "

– Jim Schoen, Principal at FRC Group
 
"I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact "

– Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality
 
"Flevy is our 'go to' resource for management material, at an affordable cost. The Flevy library is comprehensive and the content deep, and typically provides a great foundation for us to further develop and tailor our own service offer."

– Chris McCann, Founder at Resilient.World
 
"As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value."

– David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
 
"The wide selection of frameworks is very useful to me as an independent consultant. In fact, it rivals what I had at my disposal at Big 4 Consulting firms in terms of efficacy and organization."

– Julia T., Consulting Firm Owner (Former Manager at Deloitte and Capgemini)
 
"I have used FlevyPro for several business applications. It is a great complement to working with expensive consultants. The quality and effectiveness of the tools are of the highest standards."

– Moritz Bernhoerster, Global Sourcing Director at Fortune 500




Additional Flevy Management Insights

TQM Case Study: Total Quality Management Improvement in Luxury Hotels

Scenario: A luxury hotel chain is struggling to maintain consistent service and operational quality across properties, especially after expanding its portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Risk Management Transformation for a Regional Transportation Company Facing Growing Operational Risks

Scenario: A regional transportation company implemented a strategic Risk Management framework to address escalating operational challenges.

Read Full Case Study

Operational Excellence in Hospitality: Boutique Hotels Case Study

Scenario:

A boutique hotel chain in the leisure and hospitality sector is facing challenges in achieving operational excellence in hospitality, hindered by a 20% increase in operational costs and a 15% decrease in guest satisfaction scores.

Read Full Case Study

Financial Ratio Analysis Benchmarks Case Study: Telecom Sector

Scenario:

A telecom service provider operating in the highly competitive North American market faces margin pressures and investor scrutiny despite consistent revenue growth.

Read Full Case Study

PESTEL Analysis for Luxury Brand Expansion in Emerging Asian Markets

Scenario: A high end luxury goods manufacturer is pursuing expansion in Asia, attracted by a fast growing affluent consumer base but constrained by meaningful market entry complexity.

Read Full Case Study

ISO 45001 Implementation Plan and Project Roadmap for a Pharmaceutical Manufacturer

Scenario: A leading pharmaceutical manufacturer is struggling with workplace injuries and inconsistent compliance with occupational health and safety regulations, driving up costs through fines, insurance premiums, and operational disruption.

Read Full Case Study

Master Data Management Case Study: Luxury Retail Transformation

Scenario:

The luxury retail organization faced challenges with siloed and inconsistent data across its global brand portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Cosmetics Pricing Strategy Case Study: Improving Margins While Protecting Brand Image

Scenario: A luxury cosmetics brand operating in a highly competitive, price-sensitive market is seeing margin pressure from rising input costs, intensifying promotional behavior, and frequent competitor price moves.

Read Full Case Study

Total Quality Management Case Study: Regional Hospital Healthcare Industry

Scenario:

A regional hospital in the healthcare industry faced a 12% increase in patient wait times and a 9% decrease in patient satisfaction scores.

Read Full Case Study

Core Competencies Analysis Case Study: Rapidly Growing Tech Company

Scenario:

A rapidly growing technology company is struggling to maintain its competitive position due to unclear core competencies.

Read Full Case Study

Mergers & Acquisitions Strategy for Semiconductor Firm in High-Tech Sector

Scenario: A firm in the semiconductor industry is grappling with the challenges posed by rapid consolidation and technological evolution in the market.

Read Full Case Study

Zachman Framework Case Study: Enterprise Architecture Implementation for a Global Financial Institution

Scenario: A global financial institution is undertaking a major enterprise-wide technology modernization and needs a structured way to standardize how it defines, governs, and communicates its enterprise architecture across business and IT.

Read Full Case Study

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.