TLDR The organization faced a critical decision on whether to build or acquire a proprietary platform to optimize its service delivery amidst rising client demand for tailored solutions. The chosen approach led to a 15% reduction in time-to-market and a 25% increase in client acquisition and retention, highlighting the importance of aligning technology initiatives with Strategic Goals and user engagement.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Background 2. Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology 3. Build vs. Buy Implementation Challenges & Considerations 4. Build vs. Buy KPIs 5. Implementation Insights 6. Build vs. Buy Deliverables 7. Build vs. Buy Best Practices 8. Alignment with Long-Term Strategic Goals 9. Assessment of Organizational Capabilities 10. Measuring Success and ROI 11. Managing Change and User Adoption 12. Build vs. Buy Case Studies 13. Additional Resources 14. Key Findings and Results
Consider this scenario: The organization, a global professional services provider specializing in digital transformation solutions, faces a pivotal decision in its growth trajectory—whether to build a proprietary platform to deliver its services or to acquire an existing platform.
As the market for digital services becomes increasingly competitive, the organization must consider the long-term implications of this Build vs. Buy decision on its operational efficiency, market positioning, and innovation capabilities. With a recent uptick in client demand for bespoke solutions, the organization recognizes the urgency in optimizing its service delivery model to maintain its industry leadership.
Given the organization's aspiration to enhance its service delivery capabilities, two hypotheses emerge. First, that the current technology stack may be insufficient to meet the scaling demands of customized service offerings. Second, that the organization's in-house development capabilities might not align with the rapid innovation cycles required to stay competitive in the digital services market.
This organization can benefit from a proven five-phase methodology, enhancing its decision-making process and ensuring a holistic evaluation of the Build vs. Buy scenario. This structured approach is known for yielding comprehensive insights and actionable strategies.
For effective implementation, take a look at these Build vs. Buy best practices:
The selection between building a proprietary solution or acquiring an existing platform requires a nuanced understanding of the organization's strategic direction and the agility of its operational model. Executives may query the adaptability of the selected option to future technology shifts. The chosen path must allow for scalable growth and seamless integration with the organization's existing ecosystem.
Post-implementation, the organization should expect to see a more streamlined service delivery process, enhanced competitive advantage through either bespoke technology or rapid go-to-market capability, and a stronger alignment between technology strategy and business objectives. Ideally, these outcomes should be quantifiable, such as a 20% reduction in time-to-market for new services.
Potential challenges include aligning the acquired or built technology with the organization's existing workflows, ensuring user adoption, and maintaining the solution's relevance amidst rapid technological advancements.
KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.
For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.
Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard
Throughout the implementation, it is crucial to maintain a clear communication channel with all stakeholders to ensure alignment and manage expectations. A McKinsey study revealed that 70% of complex, large-scale change programs don't reach their stated goals, commonly due to employee resistance and lack of management support. Mitigating these factors is essential for successful technology adoption.
Explore more Build vs. Buy deliverables
To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Build vs. Buy. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Build vs. Buy subject matter experts.
Ensuring the Build vs. Buy decision aligns with the organization's long-term strategic goals is imperative. A study by BCG highlights that technology acquisitions that are closely aligned with a company’s core business are 40% more likely to succeed. This underscores the importance of a strategic fit over opportunistic technology investments. When considering an acquisition, leaders must evaluate how the new technology will integrate with and support the core business strategy, including future scalability and adaptability to market changes.
Furthermore, when building a solution, the focus should be on creating a flexible and modular architecture that can evolve with the organization's strategic vision. The technology stack should be designed to accommodate future innovations, whether they are developed in-house or integrated from external sources. This foresight will prevent technological obsolescence and ensure that the investment delivers value over the long term.
Understanding the organization's capabilities to either build or integrate an acquired technology is crucial. According to McKinsey, 50% of the success in software projects is determined by organizational factors, such as culture and the ability to attract and retain talent. An honest assessment of the organization's internal capabilities, culture, and existing technology infrastructure is necessary to determine whether it can successfully integrate a new acquisition or build a robust solution from scratch.
This assessment should extend beyond the current state and consider the organization's ability to grow and evolve its capabilities. For instance, if the decision is to build, does the organization have or can it develop the necessary technical expertise? If the decision is to buy, does the company have the capacity to absorb the new technology and manage potential cultural clashes?
Determining the success of a Build vs. Buy decision can be complex, and executives often seek clarity on the ROI. Gartner reports that by 2022, 70% of organizations will rigorously track technology investments over time to correlate the impact on business outcomes. A thorough ROI analysis should include not only the direct costs and benefits but also account for indirect factors such as customer satisfaction, employee productivity, and contribution to innovation. The metrics chosen should reflect both the immediate financial impact and the strategic value of the investment.
The organization should establish a timeline for ROI realization and monitor the performance continuously. If the decision was to buy, it's essential to track how the acquired technology contributes to new revenue streams or enhances existing ones. In the case of building, the focus should be on the value generated through differentiation and the ability to respond swiftly to market demands.
Change management and user adoption are critical components of any technology strategy's success. Deloitte highlights that organizations with excellent change management programs meet or exceed objectives 96% of the time, compared to 62% for those with poor change management. Executives should prioritize change management strategies that address resistance, foster executive alignment, and encourage user adoption from the outset of the technology project.
These strategies may include comprehensive training programs, a robust internal communications plan, and engagement initiatives to involve users in the process. The goal is to create a sense of ownership and excitement around the new technology, whether it is built or bought, to ensure that it is embraced and effectively utilized across the organization.
Here are additional case studies related to Build vs. Buy.
Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components
Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.
Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy
Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.
Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision
Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.
Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer
Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.
Make or Buy Decision Analysis for a Global Electronics Manufacturer
Scenario: A global electronics manufacturer is grappling with escalating operational costs and supply chain complexities.
Global Supply Chain Optimization Strategy for Industrial Metals Distributor
Scenario: An established industrial metals distributor is facing a critical "make or buy" decision to improve its global supply chain efficiency.
Here are additional best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace.
Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:
The initiative has yielded significant successes, particularly in streamlining service delivery and enhancing the organization's competitive advantage through bespoke technology. The reduction in time-to-market by 15% and the increase in client acquisition and retention by 25% demonstrate the effectiveness of the chosen approach. However, the user adoption rate, while improved by 30%, still presents an opportunity for further enhancement. This indicates that while the initiative has been successful in many aspects, there is room for improvement in ensuring seamless integration and utilization of the new technology.
Alternative strategies could have involved more extensive change management initiatives to address user resistance and foster greater executive alignment. Additionally, a more in-depth assessment of organizational capabilities and cultural readiness could have provided insights into potential challenges in user adoption, allowing for proactive mitigation measures.
Looking ahead, it is recommended to conduct a comprehensive review of the current user adoption strategies and consider additional measures to further enhance adoption rates. This could involve targeted training programs, user feedback mechanisms, and ongoing engagement initiatives to embed the new technology into the organization's workflows effectively. Additionally, a thorough assessment of organizational capabilities and cultural readiness should be conducted to identify any potential barriers to successful technology adoption and integration, allowing for proactive mitigation measures to be implemented.
The development of this case study was overseen by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.
To cite this article, please use:
Source: Maritime Fleet Procurement Strategy for Shipping Corporation, Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2025
Leverage the Experience of Experts.
Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.
Download Immediately and Use.
Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.
Save Time, Effort, and Money.
Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.
Agile Procurement Strategy for Healthcare Equipment Distributor
Scenario: A leading healthcare equipment distributor is at a crossroads, facing the strategic challenge of deciding on a make or buy decision for their logistics operations.
Sustainability Strategy for Boutique Hotel Chain in Eco-Tourism Niche
Scenario: A boutique hotel chain in the eco-tourism sector is navigating the strategic challenge of a "build vs.
Maritime Fleet Procurement Strategy for Shipping Corporation
Scenario: A global shipping company with a diverse fleet is facing challenges in deciding whether to make critical ship components in-house or to buy from external suppliers.
Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Agritech Firm in Precision Farming
Scenario: An Agritech firm specializing in precision farming technologies is grappling with the Make or Buy dilemma.
Electronics Sector Make-or-Buy Decision Analysis
Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized electronics manufacturer specializing in consumer audio equipment.
Strategic Make-or-Buy Decision Analysis for Metals Industry Leader
Scenario: A multinational firm in the metals industry faces critical Make-or-Buy decisions amidst fluctuating commodity prices and increasing global competition.
Sustainable Growth Strategy for Offshore Wind Energy Firm
Scenario: An established offshore wind energy company is at a crossroads, facing the strategic dilemma of make or buy to accelerate its growth and maintain competitiveness.
Telecom Infrastructure Modernization Initiative
Scenario: The organization in question operates within the telecom industry, facing the strategic decision of modernizing its telecommunications infrastructure.
Ecommerce Platform Modernization for Specialty Retailer
Scenario: The organization in question operates within the ecommerce space, focusing on a specialized segment of retail products.
Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Professional Services Firm
Scenario: A professional services firm is grappling with increasing operational expenses and competitive pressures in the market.
Strategic Acquisition Plan for a Fintech in the Digital Payments Sector
Scenario: A leading fintech company specializing in digital payments is at a strategic crossroads, deliberating a make-or-buy decision to accelerate its product development and market penetration.
E-commerce Platform Modernization Initiative
Scenario: A mid-sized e-commerce firm specializing in bespoke home goods is facing a strategic decision in the evolution of its online platform.
![]() |
Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more. |