Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How can the Boston Matrix be adapted for service-oriented businesses where traditional product lifecycle metrics may not apply?


This article provides a detailed response to: How can the Boston Matrix be adapted for service-oriented businesses where traditional product lifecycle metrics may not apply? For a comprehensive understanding of Boston Matrix, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Boston Matrix best practice resources.

TLDR Adapting the Boston Matrix for service-oriented businesses involves redefining axes to "market potential" and "competitive advantage," and incorporating additional dimensions like Customer Satisfaction, Service Innovation, and Operational Excellence to assess future potential and strategic alignment for sustainable growth.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Strategic Planning mean?
What does Service Demand Growth mean?
What does Customer Relationship Strength mean?
What does Operational Excellence mean?


The Boston Matrix, also known as the Growth-Share Matrix, was developed by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in the 1970s. It has been a staple tool for Strategic Planning, helping businesses to categorize their products or business units into four quadrants—Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, and Dogs—based on market growth and market share. However, its application to service-oriented businesses can be challenging due to the intangible nature of services, the difficulty in measuring market share accurately, and the dynamic nature of service markets. Adapting the Boston Matrix for service-oriented businesses involves redefining the axes and considering additional dimensions relevant to services.

Adapting the Axes for Service-Oriented Businesses

The traditional Boston Matrix uses market growth rate and relative market share as its axes. For service-oriented businesses, these axes can be adapted to better reflect the performance and potential of services. Instead of market growth rate, consider using "market potential" or "service demand growth." This reflects not just the current growth rate but the anticipated demand for the service in the future. For the relative market share axis, "competitive advantage" can be a more relevant measure. This could include factors such as brand strength, customer loyalty, or unique value propositions that are critical in service industries.

For instance, a consulting firm like McKinsey might evaluate its services based on the potential for digital transformation consulting, considering the rapid growth in demand for digitalization across industries. The firm's competitive advantage could be assessed in terms of its proprietary methodologies, the depth of expertise, and its global network, which provide a unique value that competitors may not match.

Moreover, incorporating customer satisfaction or net promoter scores (NPS) as a supplementary dimension can provide insights into service quality and customer loyalty, which are crucial for the sustainability of service businesses. These measures can help in identifying services that, while they may not currently have a high market share or growth, have the potential to become "Stars" or "Cash Cows" due to their strong customer base.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Incorporating Additional Dimensions

Service-oriented businesses thrive on customer relationships and the quality of service delivery, which are not directly captured by the traditional Boston Matrix. Therefore, adding dimensions such as "Service Innovation" and "Customer Relationship Strength" can offer a more nuanced view. Service Innovation reflects the business's ability to continuously improve and adapt its service offerings to meet changing market needs. Customer Relationship Strength assesses the depth and quality of the business's relationships with its customers, which can be a significant competitive advantage.

For example, a technology services company like Accenture might assess its offerings not just on traditional metrics but also on its ability to innovate in areas like artificial intelligence and cloud services. Accenture's longstanding relationships with key clients and its reputation for delivering high-quality, innovative solutions could be evaluated as part of its Customer Relationship Strength, highlighting services that may be poised for growth.

Another dimension that can be particularly relevant for service-oriented businesses is "Operational Excellence." This reflects the efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery, which can significantly impact profitability and customer satisfaction. Operational Excellence can be a critical factor in moving a service from a "Question Mark" to a "Star" or "Cash Cow" by improving margins and customer experiences.

Real-World Examples and Application

Consider the case of a global financial services firm evaluating its portfolio of services. The firm might adapt the Boston Matrix by assessing services like wealth management and investment banking not just on market growth and share but also on competitive advantage, which in this context could include regulatory compliance, expertise in specific markets, and the strength of client relationships. By adding dimensions like Service Innovation, the firm can identify areas where investing in technology or new service models could transform a "Question Mark" into a "Star."

Another example is a healthcare service provider analyzing its range of services. Traditional metrics might show certain services as "Dogs" due to low market growth. However, by assessing these services on dimensions like Customer Relationship Strength and Operational Excellence, the provider might uncover opportunities to reposition or innovate these services, turning them into niche offerings that serve specific patient needs exceptionally well.

In conclusion, while the Boston Matrix provides a valuable framework for portfolio analysis, its adaptation for service-oriented businesses requires a rethinking of its axes and the inclusion of additional dimensions. By doing so, businesses can gain a more comprehensive understanding of their service offerings, identifying not just current performance but also future potential based on factors like innovation, customer relationships, and operational efficiency. This adapted approach enables service-oriented businesses to make more informed strategic decisions, aligning their resources with the services that offer the greatest potential for sustainable growth and profitability.

Best Practices in Boston Matrix

Here are best practices relevant to Boston Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Boston Matrix materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Boston Matrix

Boston Matrix Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Boston Matrix, take a look at these case studies.

BCG Matrix Analysis for Semiconductor Firm

Scenario: A semiconductor company operating globally is facing challenges in allocating resources efficiently across its diverse product portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Content Strategy Overhaul in Education Media

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the education media sector, specializing in the development and distribution of digital learning materials.

Read Full Case Study

E-commerce Portfolio Rationalization for Online Retailer

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the e-commerce sector, managing a diverse portfolio of products across multiple categories.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Analysis for Specialty Chemicals Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in focus operates within the specialty chemicals sector, facing a pivotal moment in its strategic planning.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Portfolio Analysis for Retail Chain in Competitive Sector

Scenario: The organization is a retail chain operating in a highly competitive consumer market, with a diverse portfolio of products ranging from high-turnover items to niche, specialty goods.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand Portfolio Optimization in the High-End Fashion Sector

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with portfolio optimization amidst shifting consumer trends and market volatility.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

What role does artificial intelligence play in optimizing the Growth-Share Matrix for predictive analytics and market trend forecasting?
AI transforms the Growth-Share Matrix into a dynamic tool for Strategic Planning, enabling precise market trend forecasting and optimized decision-making for sustainable growth. [Read full explanation]
How does the Growth-Share Matrix align with agile methodologies in product development and management?
The Growth-Share Matrix and Agile methodologies complement each other in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, Market Responsiveness, Innovation, Performance Management, and Operational Excellence, enhancing decision-making in product development and management. [Read full explanation]
Can the Growth-Share Matrix be integrated with customer lifetime value (CLV) models to enhance strategic decision-making?
Integrating the Growth-Share Matrix with Customer Lifetime Value models provides a comprehensive, customer-centric approach to Strategic Planning, optimizing resource allocation and long-term profitability. [Read full explanation]
How can the Growth-Share Matrix be adapted for digital businesses, especially those operating on platform models?
Adapting the Growth-Share Matrix for digital platforms involves incorporating Network Effects, Data Monetization Potential, and Scalability, with examples like Spotify and Netflix illustrating the transition through quadrants via data utilization and customer-centric innovation. [Read full explanation]
What are the implications of digital currency and blockchain technology on the strategic categorizations within the BCG Matrix?
Digital currency and blockchain technology significantly impact Strategic Planning and Portfolio Management, necessitating dynamic adjustments in the BCG Matrix categorizations to reflect shifts in market growth and share. [Read full explanation]
How can the BCG Growth-Share Matrix be used to evaluate and prioritize investments in emerging technologies?
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix is a Strategic Planning tool that helps companies prioritize investments in emerging technologies by classifying them into Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, and Dogs based on market growth and share. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Boston Matrix Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.