Want FREE Templates on Organization, Change, & Culture? Download our FREE compilation of 50+ slides. This is an exclusive promotion being run on LinkedIn.

Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Model-Based Systems Engineering for High-Performance Automotive Firm

There are countless scenarios that require Model-Based Systems Engineering. Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Model-Based Systems Engineering to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. Let us analyze the following scenario.

Reading time: 9 minutes

Consider this scenario: The organization is a high-performance automotive company specializing in electric vehicles, facing challenges integrating Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) into its product development lifecycle.

Despite a robust market presence and innovative products, the organization's MBSE processes are not delivering the expected value, leading to delayed product releases, overruns in budget, and compromised product quality. The organization is seeking to overcome these obstacles to maintain its competitive edge and meet the rapidly evolving demands of the automotive industry.

Given the organization's struggle to fully leverage MBSE, an initial hypothesis is that there may be a misalignment between the systems engineering processes and the overarching product development strategy. Another hypothesis could consider that the current MBSE tools and methodologies are not effectively integrated or adopted across the organization, creating silos and inefficiencies. Lastly, the skills gap or resistance to change among the engineering teams could be contributing to the underutilization of MBSE practices.


The methodology to address these challenges involves a phased approach:

  1. Assessment and Alignment: Initial assessment of the current MBSE practices, tools, and alignment with strategic objectives. Key questions include how MBSE is currently implemented, its integration with other processes, and the strategic goals it is intended to support. The phase involves stakeholder interviews, process mapping, and gap analysis to identify misalignments and inefficiencies.
  2. Tool and Process Optimization: Based on the assessment, we optimize tools and processes to better align with the organization's product development strategy. This phase focuses on selecting the right MBSE tools, improving workflows, and defining clear process guidelines to enhance collaboration and efficiency.
  3. Capability Building: Develop and implement a training program to upskill the engineering team in MBSE best practices. This phase addresses the potential skills gap and resistance to change by fostering a culture of continuous learning and adaptation.
  4. Implementation and Change Management: Roll out the optimized MBSE practices and tools across the organization, supported by a robust change management strategy to ensure adoption and minimize disruption. This phase includes regular check-ins, feedback loops, and adjustments as needed.
  5. Performance Evaluation: Establish metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the new MBSE approach and make iterative improvements. This phase involves setting up KPIs, monitoring progress, and refining processes to ensure continuous improvement and alignment with business goals.

CEOs may question the return on investment from optimizing MBSE, the time frame for seeing tangible improvements, and how to sustain the changes. It is important to demonstrate that a well-integrated MBSE approach can lead to a 20-30% reduction in time-to-market and a similar percentage in cost savings due to increased efficiency and fewer errors. The full benefits can typically be observed within one to two product development cycles. To sustain changes, a governance structure, along with continuous monitoring and training, is essential.

Expected business outcomes include accelerated product development cycles, reduced costs associated with rework and delays, and improved product quality and compliance. These outcomes contribute to maintaining the organization's competitive edge and market leadership.

Potential implementation challenges include resistance to change among staff, integration complexities with existing systems, and the need for ongoing support and training to ensure effective adoption of new MBSE practices.

Learn more about Change Management Continuous Improvement Process Mapping

For effective implementation, take a look at these Model-Based Systems Engineering best practices:

Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) (179-slide PowerPoint deck)
Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) (33-slide PowerPoint deck)
View additional Model-Based Systems Engineering best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Implementation KPIs

KPIS are crucial throughout the implementation process. They provide quantifiable checkpoints to validate the alignment of operational activities with our strategic goals, ensuring that execution is not just activity-driven, but results-oriented. Further, these KPIs act as early indicators of progress or deviation, enabling agile decision-making and course correction if needed.

If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.
     – Lord Kelvin

  • Time-to-Market Reduction: To measure the efficiency gains in product development.
  • Cost Savings: To quantify the financial impact of optimized MBSE processes.
  • Product Quality Metrics: To assess improvements in the quality and compliance of the final products.

For more KPIs, take a look at the Flevy KPI Library, one of the most comprehensive databases of KPIs available. Having a centralized library of KPIs saves you significant time and effort in researching and developing metrics, allowing you to focus more on analysis, implementation of strategies, and other more value-added activities.

Learn more about Flevy KPI Library KPI Management Performance Management Balanced Scorecard


  • MBSE Maturity Assessment Report (PDF)
  • Optimized Process Framework (PowerPoint)
  • Change Management Plan (MS Word)
  • MBSE Training Toolkit (PDF)
  • Performance Dashboard (Excel)

Explore more Model-Based Systems Engineering deliverables

Case Studies

  • A leading aerospace company implemented a similar MBSE optimization project, resulting in a 25% decrease in engineering defects and a 15% faster time-to-market for new products.
  • An international defense contractor adopted an MBSE transformation, leading to a 30% improvement in cross-functional collaboration and a 20% reduction in project costs.

Explore additional related case studies

Additional Executive Insights

Strategic Planning and MBSE Integration: Integrating MBSE with Strategic Planning ensures that systems engineering efforts are directly contributing to the organization's strategic objectives. This alignment is crucial for maximizing the impact of MBSE on the organization's product innovation and market responsiveness.

Digital Transformation and Tool Selection: As part of the organization's Digital Transformation journey, selecting and implementing the right MBSE tools is a critical factor. These tools should not only be state-of-the-art but also compatible with the organization's existing technology ecosystem.

Leadership and Culture Change: Leadership plays a pivotal role in driving the successful adoption of MBSE. It is the leadership's responsibility to foster a culture that is receptive to change and committed to continuous improvement.

Learn more about Digital Transformation Strategic Planning

Model-Based Systems Engineering Best Practices

To improve the effectiveness of implementation, we can leverage best practice documents in Model-Based Systems Engineering. These resources below were developed by management consulting firms and Model-Based Systems Engineering subject matter experts.

Optimizing MBSE Tool Integration

One concern executives often have is how to ensure that MBSE tools are not only state-of-the-art, but also well-integrated into the existing technology ecosystem. Achieving seamless integration requires a thorough understanding of the organization's current IT infrastructure and the technical capabilities of available MBSE tools. The process begins with a comprehensive audit of the existing systems and a subsequent mapping of how new tools will fit into this framework.

For instance, a study by McKinsey on digital transformation emphasizes the importance of tool compatibility and integration in achieving operational efficiency. To address this, the organization can adopt middleware solutions that facilitate communication between disparate systems or consider a more unified MBSE suite that minimizes compatibility issues. Additionally, the organization should plan for adequate IT support and potentially invest in custom integrations where off-the-shelf solutions are insufficient.

It is also critical to involve IT teams from the start of the MBSE tool selection process. This ensures that the selected tools are not only compatible with existing systems but also scalable and adaptable to future technological advancements. As such, the organization can avoid the pitfall of investing in tools that become obsolete or require costly overhauls shortly after implementation.

Addressing the Skills Gap

Another area of concern for executives is the potential skills gap within their engineering teams. This gap can lead to underutilization of MBSE practices and can be a significant barrier to successful implementation. To combat this, the organization should establish a robust training program tailored to the needs of its employees. According to a PwC report on workforce upskilling, organizations that invest in comprehensive training and development programs are more likely to retain top talent and improve overall productivity.

The training program should be multifaceted, offering basic education on MBSE principles for newcomers, as well as advanced modules for experienced staff. The use of real-world case studies and hands-on workshops can also enhance learning outcomes. Furthermore, the organization might consider establishing a mentorship system where more experienced employees guide their less experienced counterparts through the nuances of MBSE.

Moreover, the organization must recognize that learning is an ongoing process. As such, they should implement a continuous learning platform that allows engineers to stay updated with the latest MBSE trends and techniques. This could include subscriptions to industry journals, access to online courses, and attendance at relevant conferences.

Change Management and Stakeholder Buy-In

Change management is a critical factor in the successful implementation of MBSE. Resistance to change is a common challenge, and it can manifest in various forms, from passive resistance to outright opposition. To mitigate this, the organization should develop a comprehensive change management strategy that includes clear communication, stakeholder engagement, and visible leadership support.

Communication should be transparent and ongoing, outlining the benefits of MBSE, the reasons for the change, and the expected outcomes. Engaging stakeholders early and often can help to identify potential resistors and address their concerns proactively. According to a study by Deloitte, involving stakeholders in the planning and implementation phases significantly increases the likelihood of project success.

Leadership must also be actively involved in the change process, demonstrating their commitment to MBSE and setting the tone for the rest of the organization. Leaders should be visible champions of the change, providing support and resources needed to facilitate the transition. Additionally, recognizing and rewarding early adopters can help to build momentum and encourage widespread adoption.

Sustaining MBSE Improvements Over Time

Finally, executives are rightly focused on how to sustain improvements over time. The initial implementation of MBSE practices may yield positive results, but maintaining these gains requires a long-term strategy. This involves establishing governance structures, such as a dedicated MBSE steering committee or center of excellence, to oversee ongoing MBSE activities and ensure they remain aligned with strategic goals.

Continuous monitoring is also key. Performance dashboards should be used to track KPIs related to MBSE effectiveness, such as time-to-market, cost savings, and product quality. These metrics will provide insight into areas where the MBSE process is working well and where there may be room for further improvement. According to a Gartner report, organizations that regularly review and adjust their processes in response to performance metrics are more likely to sustain improvements over time.

In addition, the organization should cultivate a culture of continuous improvement, where feedback is actively sought and used to refine MBSE processes. Employees should be encouraged to share their experiences and suggest enhancements. Regular training updates and refreshers can also ensure that the workforce remains skilled in the latest MBSE methodologies.

By addressing these areas—tool integration, skills gap, change management, and long-term sustainability—executives can feel confident that their investment in MBSE will deliver lasting benefits for the organization.

Learn more about Center of Excellence

Additional Resources Relevant to Model-Based Systems Engineering

Here are additional best practices relevant to Model-Based Systems Engineering from the Flevy Marketplace.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Key Findings and Results

Here is a summary of the key results of this case study:

  • Accelerated product development cycles by 25%, significantly surpassing the initial 20-30% improvement target.
  • Achieved a 20% reduction in costs associated with rework and delays through optimized MBSE processes.
  • Improved product quality metrics by 15%, leading to higher customer satisfaction and reduced compliance issues.
  • Successfully integrated state-of-the-art MBSE tools with existing technology ecosystems, enhancing operational efficiency.
  • Addressed the engineering team's skills gap, resulting in a 30% increase in the utilization of MBSE practices.
  • Implemented a robust change management strategy, achieving a 90% adoption rate of new MBSE practices across the organization.

The initiative to optimize Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) processes within the organization has been a resounding success. The key results demonstrate significant improvements in product development speed, cost efficiency, and product quality. The successful integration of MBSE tools and the high adoption rate among the engineering teams indicate effective change management and tool selection strategies. However, the initiative's success was not without challenges, including overcoming resistance to change and addressing the skills gap. Alternative strategies, such as more aggressive early engagement with resistant stakeholders or a phased training approach for different skill levels, might have further enhanced outcomes. Nonetheless, the results achieved are a testament to the well-structured and executed strategy.

For next steps, it is recommended to focus on sustaining and building upon these improvements. Establishing a governance structure, such as an MBSE center of excellence, would ensure continuous alignment of MBSE practices with strategic goals. Regularly updating the training program to include emerging MBSE trends and technologies will address the ongoing need for skills development. Finally, continuous monitoring and refining of MBSE processes based on performance metrics will ensure that the organization remains at the forefront of MBSE practice, maintaining its competitive edge in the high-performance automotive industry.

Source: Model-Based Systems Engineering for High-Performance Automotive Firm, Flevy Management Insights, 2024

Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.

Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.

Read Customer Testimonials

Additional Flevy Management Insights

Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.