Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.







Flevy Management Insights Case Study
Educational Performance Management for K-12 Schools in Competitive Markets


Fortune 500 companies typically bring on global consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture, or boutique consulting firms specializing in Design Measure Analyze Improve Control to thoroughly analyze their unique business challenges and competitive situations. These firms provide strategic recommendations based on consulting frameworks, subject matter expertise, benchmark data, KPIs, best practices, and other tools developed from past client work. We followed this management consulting approach for this case study.

Reading time: 7 minutes

Consider this scenario: The organization, a network of K-12 educational institutions, faces challenges in its Design Measure Analyze Improve Control (DMAIC) processes, which are critical to ensuring high academic performance and operational efficiency.

Despite a robust curriculum and dedicated staff, the schools have seen a plateau in student performance outcomes and an increase in operational costs. The institution aims to revamp its DMAIC processes to enhance educational outcomes and streamline operations.



The initial assessment of the situation suggests that the root causes of the organization's challenges may lie in outdated curriculum design methods, inefficient measurement and tracking of student performance, and a lack of continuous improvement mechanisms. These hypotheses will guide the initial phase of the consulting engagement.

Strategic Analysis and Execution Methodology

The organization's situation warrants a structured and proven approach to DMAIC. By adopting a methodology that has been successful in similar educational environments, the organization can expect to see measurable improvements in both student outcomes and operational efficiency.

  1. Define Objectives and Goals: Identify the desired outcomes and define specific, measurable goals for academic and operational performance. Key questions include: What are the benchmarks for success? How do these align with the organization's overall mission and vision?
  2. Current State Analysis: Conduct a comprehensive review of existing processes and performance data. This involves qualitative and quantitative data collection, including stakeholder interviews and performance metrics analysis to understand the current state fully.
  3. Process Redesign: Based on insights from the analysis phase, redesign the DMAIC process to address identified inefficiencies. This phase focuses on developing innovative strategies to enhance curriculum delivery and student engagement.
  4. Implementation and Change Management: Develop a detailed implementation plan, including change management strategies to ensure buy-in from all stakeholders. Training and development programs for staff are critical at this stage.
  5. Control and Continuous Improvement: Establish a system for ongoing monitoring and control, including the use of dashboards and real-time data to facilitate continuous improvement. Regularly review processes and outcomes against the goals set in the first phase.

Learn more about Change Management Continuous Improvement

For effective implementation, take a look at these Design Measure Analyze Improve Control best practices:

Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Poster (3-page PDF document and supporting PowerPoint deck)
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Storyboard Template (61-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting PDF)
Six Sigma - DMAIC Problem Solving Process & Tools (182-slide PowerPoint deck and supporting Excel workbook)
Lean BB Champion 15 - Process Optimization Using Six Sigma (94-slide PowerPoint deck)
Six Sigma Black Belt Training - DMAIC (1252-page PDF document and supporting PowerPoint deck)
View additional Design Measure Analyze Improve Control best practices

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Design Measure Analyze Improve Control Implementation Challenges & Considerations

One consideration is how the organization will maintain the integrity of academic standards while streamlining operations. Another consideration is the engagement and training of staff to adapt to new methodologies. Finally, there is the question of scalability—how the improved processes can be scaled across multiple institutions within the network.

Upon successful implementation, the organization can expect to see a 10-15% increase in student performance outcomes and a reduction in operational costs by 20% over the next 3 years. These outcomes will be measured against the key performance indicators established at the outset of the project.

Implementation challenges may include resistance to change from staff, alignment of technology with new processes, and ensuring consistency across different schools in the network.