Flevy Management Insights Q&A
Can Activity-Based Costing be effectively applied in service industries, and if so, how does its implementation differ from manufacturing sectors?
     Joseph Robinson    |    Activity Based Costing


This article provides a detailed response to: Can Activity-Based Costing be effectively applied in service industries, and if so, how does its implementation differ from manufacturing sectors? For a comprehensive understanding of Activity Based Costing, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Activity Based Costing best practice resources.

TLDR Activity-Based Costing (ABC) can be effectively applied in service industries by focusing on significant activities and adjusting for the intangible nature of services, offering insights into profitability and efficiency.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Activity-Based Costing (ABC) mean?
What does Operational Excellence mean?
What does Cost Allocation mean?


Activity-Based Costing (ABC) is a methodology that assigns costs to products and services based on the resources they consume. This approach provides more accurate cost information, helping organizations make better strategic decisions. While ABC is traditionally associated with manufacturing sectors, its principles can be effectively applied in service industries, albeit with some modifications to accommodate the unique characteristics of services.

Understanding the Application of ABC in Service Industries

In service industries, the direct costs of producing a service are often less visible than in manufacturing. Services are intangible, making it challenging to quantify the exact amount of resources consumed by a specific service. However, this does not diminish the relevance of ABC. In fact, the high proportion of overhead costs in service organizations makes ABC even more critical. By identifying the activities that consume resources and assigning costs based on actual consumption, service organizations can gain insights into the profitability of their services, customer segments, and process efficiency.

Implementing ABC in service industries requires a focus on activities that are significant in terms of cost and operational performance. For example, a consulting firm might consider activities such as project management, client engagement, and research as primary cost drivers. The firm can then allocate costs to these activities based on the time consultants spend on each activity, rather than distributing costs evenly across all projects or services. This approach helps in identifying high-cost activities and provides a basis for improving efficiency and pricing strategies.

Moreover, service organizations must deal with the variability in the demand for their services. This variability can lead to fluctuations in activity levels, affecting the accuracy of cost allocation. To address this challenge, service organizations can use ABC to monitor activity levels and adjust cost allocations accordingly. This dynamic approach to costing ensures that cost information remains relevant and supports effective decision-making.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Differences in Implementation between Service and Manufacturing Sectors

The implementation of ABC in service industries differs from manufacturing sectors in several key aspects. First, the nature of cost drivers in services is more likely to be related to time spent on activities rather than physical inputs. For example, in a manufacturing context, material and labor costs can be directly traced to products. In contrast, in service industries, the cost drivers are often employee hours spent on service delivery, the complexity of the service, or the level of customization required by the client.

Second, the process of identifying and categorizing activities in service organizations can be more complex. Services often involve a high degree of variability and customer interaction, making it challenging to standardize activities and associated costs. Service organizations need to adopt a more flexible approach to defining activities, recognizing that some activities may be unique to specific services or clients. This requires a deeper understanding of the service delivery process and closer collaboration between cost accountants and service delivery teams.

Lastly, the allocation of overhead costs is more critical in service industries due to the intangible nature of their outputs. While manufacturing sectors can allocate overheads based on direct labor hours or machine hours, service organizations may need to use more sophisticated allocation bases, such as the number of service transactions, the complexity of services, or the time required to deliver services. This necessitates a more detailed analysis of overhead activities and their relationship to service delivery.

Real-World Examples and Insights

Several leading organizations have successfully implemented ABC in their service operations, demonstrating its applicability and benefits. For instance, a global financial services firm used ABC to gain a clearer understanding of the costs associated with its diverse range of services. By identifying the most resource-intensive activities, the firm was able to streamline its processes and introduce more competitive pricing models. This strategic approach to costing not only improved profitability but also enhanced customer satisfaction by aligning service offerings more closely with client needs.

Another example comes from the healthcare industry, where a hospital implemented ABC to allocate costs more accurately across its services. The hospital identified key activities such as patient care, diagnostics, and administrative support, and allocated costs based on the actual consumption of resources by each activity. This enabled the hospital to identify inefficiencies in its operations and prioritize improvements in areas with the highest potential for cost savings and quality enhancements.

In conclusion, while the implementation of ABC in service industries presents unique challenges, it offers significant benefits in terms of cost accuracy, process improvement, and strategic decision-making. By adapting ABC to the specific characteristics of services, organizations can overcome these challenges and leverage ABC as a powerful tool for achieving Operational Excellence and Competitive Advantage.

Best Practices in Activity Based Costing

Here are best practices relevant to Activity Based Costing from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Activity Based Costing materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Activity Based Costing

Activity Based Costing Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Activity Based Costing, take a look at these case studies.

Activity Based Costing Enhancement in Luxury Goods Sector

Scenario: A luxury fashion firm is grappling with opaque and inflated operational costs stemming from an outdated costing model.

Read Full Case Study

Activity Based Costing Enhancement for Media Firm

Scenario: A multinational media firm is facing challenges in accurately allocating costs to specific activities and products, leading to distorted product profitability analysis.

Read Full Case Study

Activity Based Costing Refinement for Ecommerce Apparel Retailer

Scenario: An established ecommerce apparel retailer is grappling with the challenge of accurately attributing costs to specific products and customer segments.

Read Full Case Study

Activity Based Costing Enhancement for Agritech Firm

Scenario: The organization is a leader in the agritech space, facing challenges in accurately allocating costs to specific activities in their diverse operations.

Read Full Case Study

Activity Based Costing Initiative for Aerospace Manufacturer in High-Tech Sector

Scenario: A leading aerospace component manufacturer is facing challenges in accurately allocating costs to specific activities and products.

Read Full Case Study

Robotics Start-up Growth Strategy in Healthcare Automation

Scenario: A cutting-edge robotics start-up specializing in healthcare automation is struggling to apply activity based costing effectively, leading to unclear cost allocations and profitability analysis.

Read Full Case Study




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

  •  
    "The wide selection of frameworks is very useful to me as an independent consultant. In fact, it rivals what I had at my disposal at Big 4 Consulting firms in terms of efficacy and organization."

    – Julia T., Consulting Firm Owner (Former Manager at Deloitte and Capgemini)
  •  
    "Flevy is now a part of my business routine. I visit Flevy at least 3 times each month.

    Flevy has become my preferred learning source, because what it provides is practical, current, and useful in this era where the business world is being rewritten.

    In today's environment where there are so "

    – Omar HernĂ¡n Montes Parra, CEO at Quantum SFE
  •  
    "[Flevy] produces some great work that has been/continues to be of immense help not only to myself, but as I seek to provide professional services to my clients, it give me a large "tool box" of resources that are critical to provide them with the quality of service and outcomes they are expecting."

    – Royston Knowles, Executive with 50+ Years of Board Level Experience
  •  
    "As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."

    – Michael Evans, Managing Director at Newport LLC
  •  
    "I like your product. I'm frequently designing PowerPoint presentations for my company and your product has given me so many great ideas on the use of charts, layouts, tools, and frameworks. I really think the templates are a valuable asset to the job."

    – Roberto Fuentes Martinez, Senior Executive Director at Technology Transformation Advisory
  •  
    "Flevy.com has proven to be an invaluable resource library to our Independent Management Consultancy, supporting and enabling us to better serve our enterprise clients.

    The value derived from our [FlevyPro] subscription in terms of the business it has helped to gain far exceeds the investment made, making a subscription a no-brainer for any growing consultancy – or in-house strategy team."

    – Dean Carlton, Chief Transformation Officer, Global Village Transformations Pty Ltd.
  •  
    "I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact "

    – Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality
  •  
    "I am extremely grateful for the proactiveness and eagerness to help and I would gladly recommend the Flevy team if you are looking for data and toolkits to help you work through business solutions."

    – Trevor Booth, Partner, Fast Forward Consulting



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.