Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How to write an effective problem statement?


This article provides a detailed response to: How to write an effective problem statement? For a comprehensive understanding of Design Thinking, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Design Thinking best practice resources.

TLDR An effective problem statement clearly articulates the issue, desired outcomes, and stakeholder impact, guiding Strategic Planning and decision-making.

Reading time: 6 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Effective Problem Statement mean?
What does Stakeholder Analysis mean?
What does Framework Utilization mean?


Defining a problem statement is a critical first step in the strategic planning process, serving as the cornerstone for driving organizational change, innovation, and operational excellence. An effective problem statement articulates the issue at hand in a clear, concise, and actionable manner, setting the stage for solution ideation and implementation. This task, while seemingly straightforward, requires a deep understanding of the organization's current state, its strategic objectives, and the external environment it operates within. In the realm of consulting, where precision and clarity are paramount, crafting a well-defined problem statement is both an art and a science.

A well-crafted problem statement serves as a north star, guiding the strategic direction and decision-making processes within an organization. It should succinctly describe the gap between the current state and the desired future state, without prescribing a specific solution. This clarity ensures that all stakeholders are aligned and focused on addressing the core issue, rather than getting sidetracked by symptoms or peripheral challenges. Consulting firms like McKinsey and BCG emphasize the importance of framing the problem statement in a way that it encapsulates the essence of the challenge, thereby enabling a structured and focused approach to strategy development and execution.

However, defining a problem statement is not without its challenges. Organizations often struggle to distill complex, multifaceted issues into a concise statement that captures the essence of the problem. It requires a nuanced understanding of the organization's internal dynamics, market forces, and the competitive environment. Moreover, it demands the ability to abstract away from the specifics to identify the underlying issues that are impeding progress. This is where frameworks and templates provided by consulting firms can be invaluable, offering a structured approach to problem definition that leverages industry best practices and insights.

Key Components of an Effective Problem Statement

At its core, an effective problem statement should include several key components that collectively provide a clear and comprehensive overview of the issue at hand. Firstly, it should articulate the current state of affairs, highlighting the specific issue or gap that needs to be addressed. This involves a detailed analysis of the internal and external factors contributing to the problem, supported by relevant data and insights. Consulting firms often utilize frameworks such as SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis or the Five Forces model to systematically evaluate these factors.

Secondly, the problem statement should delineate the desired future state, outlining the organization's objectives and the outcomes it aims to achieve through problem resolution. This forward-looking perspective is essential for setting clear, measurable goals that guide the strategic planning and implementation process. Consulting methodologies emphasize the importance of aligning the problem statement with the organization's overall strategic objectives, ensuring that the issue is addressed in a way that supports long-term success.

Finally, the problem statement should identify the stakeholders impacted by the issue and the potential consequences if the problem remains unresolved. This includes considering the implications for customers, employees, shareholders, and other key stakeholders. Understanding the broader impact of the problem helps to prioritize it within the organization's strategic agenda and mobilizes support for addressing it. Consulting firms often highlight the role of stakeholder analysis in this process, providing a framework for assessing the needs and expectations of different groups and ensuring their considerations are integrated into the problem-solving approach.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Utilizing Frameworks and Templates

Frameworks and templates play a crucial role in the process of defining a problem statement, offering a structured approach that facilitates clarity and comprehensiveness. Consulting firms have developed a variety of tools and methodologies designed to guide organizations through this process. For instance, the "Problem Definition Framework" is a popular tool that helps break down the problem into its constituent parts, enabling a more systematic analysis and articulation of the issue.

These frameworks typically involve a series of steps or questions that prompt the organization to consider various aspects of the problem, from its symptoms and causes to its impact and potential solutions. This structured approach ensures that all relevant factors are considered and that the problem statement captures the complexity of the issue without becoming unwieldy or overly detailed. Templates, on the other hand, provide a standardized format for documenting the problem statement, ensuring consistency and clarity across different projects and initiatives.

While frameworks and templates can be extremely helpful, it's important to remember that they should be adapted to fit the specific context and needs of the organization. Consulting firms often emphasize the need for customization, encouraging organizations to modify these tools as necessary to accurately reflect their unique challenges and strategic objectives. This flexibility is key to developing a problem statement that is not only clear and concise but also relevant and actionable.

Real-World Examples

In practice, the power of an effectively defined problem statement is evident across various industries and organizational contexts. For example, a global retail chain leveraged a structured problem statement to address declining sales in several key markets. By clearly articulating the issue—identifying the specific markets affected, the magnitude of the sales decline, and the potential impact on overall business performance—the organization was able to mobilize resources and focus its efforts on developing targeted strategies to rejuvenate sales.

Similarly, a technology company facing challenges with product innovation used a well-defined problem statement to realign its R&D efforts. The problem statement highlighted the gap between the current product offerings and the evolving needs of the market, as well as the implications for the company's competitive position. This clarity enabled the organization to prioritize innovation initiatives that directly addressed the identified gaps, leading to the development of new products that significantly improved its market standing.

These examples illustrate the critical role of a clear, concise, and actionable problem statement in driving strategic change and achieving operational excellence. By articulating the issue in a way that aligns with the organization's strategic objectives and resonates with key stakeholders, organizations can ensure a focused and effective approach to problem-solving. Whether leveraging consulting frameworks and templates or drawing on internal expertise, the goal remains the same: to define the problem statement in a way that sets the stage for successful resolution and long-term success.

Best Practices in Design Thinking

Here are best practices relevant to Design Thinking from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Design Thinking materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Design Thinking

Design Thinking Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Design Thinking, take a look at these case studies.

Global Market Penetration Strategy for Luxury Cosmetics Brand

Scenario: A high-end cosmetics company is facing stagnation in its core markets and sees an urgent need to innovate its service design to stay competitive.

Read Full Case Study

Design Thinking Transformation for a Global Financial Services Firm

Scenario: A multinational financial services firm is grappling with stagnant growth, high customer churn, and decreased market share.

Read Full Case Study

Service Design Transformation for a Global Financial Services Firm

Scenario: A global financial services firm is struggling with customer experience issues, resulting in low customer satisfaction scores and high customer churn rates.

Read Full Case Study

Digital Transformation Strategy for Mid-Sized Furniture Retailer

Scenario: A mid-sized furniture retailer, leveraging design thinking to revamp its customer experience, faces a 20% decline in in-store sales and a slow e-commerce growth rate of just 5% annually amidst a highly competitive landscape.

Read Full Case Study

Design Thinking Revamp for Semiconductor Firm in Competitive Market

Scenario: The organization at the center of this study is a semiconductor manufacturer grappling with integrating Design Thinking into its product development cycle.

Read Full Case Study

Organizational Agility Strategy for Boutique Consulting Firms

Scenario: A boutique consulting firm specializing in digital transformation is struggling to adapt its traditional, hierarchical structure to the fast-paced demands of the industry, despite understanding the importance of design thinking.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How can companies ensure alignment between Service Design strategies and overall business objectives?
Organizations achieve alignment between Service Design strategies and business objectives through comprehensive Strategic Planning, cross-functional collaboration, leadership commitment, and a customer-centric approach, driving Operational Excellence and innovation. [Read full explanation]
What metrics should executives use to measure the success of Service Design initiatives?
Executives should measure Service Design success using Customer Satisfaction (NPS, CSAT, CES), Operational Efficiency (turnaround time, error rates, cost per transaction), and Employee Engagement (satisfaction scores, turnover rates) metrics for comprehensive insights and continuous improvement. [Read full explanation]
How are emerging technologies like virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) being utilized in the prototyping phase of Design Thinking?
VR and AR are revolutionizing Design Thinking's prototyping phase by enhancing Creativity and Collaboration, accelerating the Design Process, and reducing Costs, leading to innovative, user-centered products. [Read full explanation]
What impact does the rise of remote work have on collaborative aspects of Design Thinking?
The shift to remote work impacts Design Thinking by introducing challenges in collaboration and empathy but also offers opportunities for greater diversity and innovation, requiring strategic adaptation in tools, processes, and culture. [Read full explanation]
How can Service Design contribute to a company's competitive advantage in a saturated market?
Service Design enhances competitive advantage in saturated markets by focusing on Customer Needs, leveraging Technology for innovative service delivery, and achieving Operational Excellence. [Read full explanation]
How can companies ensure that Design Thinking does not become just another buzzword but a true driver of organizational change?
To transform Design Thinking from a buzzword into a driver of change, companies must embed it into their culture, secure leadership commitment, align it with Strategic Objectives, and foster continuous learning and adaptation. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Design Thinking Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.