Flevy Management Insights Q&A

What is the impact of generative AI on the Build vs. Buy decision-making process for content creation?

     Joseph Robinson    |    Build vs. Buy


This article provides a detailed response to: What is the impact of generative AI on the Build vs. Buy decision-making process for content creation? For a comprehensive understanding of Build vs. Buy, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Build vs. Buy best practice resources.

TLDR Generative AI shifts the Build vs. Buy decision in content creation towards in-house production, offering cost-effective, customized content aligned with strategic goals, but requires significant investment in technology, talent, and robust Risk Management practices.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they relate to this question.

What does Build vs. Buy Decision-Making mean?
What does Operational Excellence mean?
What does Risk Management mean?
What does Data Governance mean?


Generative AI is revolutionizing the way organizations approach the Build vs. Buy decision-making process for content creation. This technology's impact is profound, offering both opportunities and challenges that C-level executives must navigate to maintain competitive advantage and drive innovation. Understanding the nuances of this impact is critical for strategic planning and operational excellence.

Strategic Implications of Generative AI on Content Creation

Generative AI technologies, such as GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) and DALL-E, have shifted the landscape of content creation from a labor-intensive process to one where ideas can be rapidly prototyped and produced. This shift has significant implications for the Build vs. Buy decision. Traditionally, organizations might have leaned towards buying content externally due to the high costs and time associated with internal content creation. However, with generative AI, the balance tips towards building content in-house, as these technologies can produce high-quality, customized content at a fraction of the cost and time.

Moreover, the strategic advantage of owning the content creation process has become more pronounced. By leveraging generative AI, organizations can ensure that their content is not only unique but also deeply aligned with their brand values and strategic goals. This alignment is crucial in today's digital landscape, where content plays a pivotal role in customer engagement and brand differentiation. The ability to rapidly produce and iterate on content can significantly enhance an organization's agility and responsiveness to market trends.

However, the decision to build content in-house using generative AI is not without its challenges. It requires a substantial upfront investment in technology and talent, as well as ongoing costs related to training and model fine-tuning. Organizations must carefully assess their strategic priorities and resource capabilities before embarking on this path. The decision should be guided by a thorough cost-benefit analysis, considering not only the immediate financial implications but also the long-term strategic value of enhanced content capabilities.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Operational Excellence and Risk Management

From an operational perspective, integrating generative AI into the content creation process demands a high level of expertise in AI and machine learning, as well as robust data governance practices. The quality and effectiveness of AI-generated content are directly tied to the quality of the data and models used. Therefore, organizations must invest in building or acquiring the necessary technical expertise and establish strong data management practices. This includes ensuring data privacy and security, particularly when using sensitive or proprietary information to train AI models.

Risk management also becomes a critical consideration. Generative AI can sometimes produce unpredictable or biased content, posing reputational risks. Organizations must implement rigorous quality control and oversight mechanisms to mitigate these risks. This includes setting clear guidelines for AI-generated content and closely monitoring output for adherence to these guidelines. Additionally, organizations should be transparent with their stakeholders about the use of AI in content creation, addressing any ethical concerns proactively.

The operational challenges of integrating generative AI into content creation processes should not be underestimated. They require a strategic approach to technology adoption, focusing on building internal capabilities and establishing partnerships with AI technology providers. This approach enables organizations to leverage the full potential of generative AI while managing the associated risks effectively.

Real-World Examples and Market Trends

Several leading organizations have already begun to harness the power of generative AI for content creation. For instance, The New York Times has experimented with AI to generate articles and content summaries. This not only demonstrates the potential for efficiency gains but also highlights the evolving role of AI in augmenting human creativity and productivity.

Market research firms, including Gartner and Forrester, have identified generative AI as a key technology trend that will shape the future of content creation. Gartner's 2021 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies highlighted generative AI as one of the technologies entering the "Peak of Inflated Expectations," indicating its growing influence on strategic technology planning and investment.

In conclusion, the impact of generative AI on the Build vs. Buy decision-making process for content creation is multifaceted, affecting strategic, operational, and risk management considerations. Organizations that successfully navigate these challenges and leverage generative AI can gain a significant competitive advantage through enhanced content capabilities. However, this requires a thoughtful approach to technology adoption, focusing on building internal expertise, managing data effectively, and ensuring ethical and responsible use of AI.

Best Practices in Build vs. Buy

Here are best practices relevant to Build vs. Buy from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Build vs. Buy materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Build vs. Buy

Build vs. Buy Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Build vs. Buy, take a look at these case studies.

Defense Procurement Strategy for Aerospace Components

Scenario: The organization is a major player in the aerospace defense sector, grappling with the decision to make or buy critical components.

Read Full Case Study

Build vs. Buy Decision Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturer

Scenario: A semiconductor firm in the highly competitive technology sector is grappling with the strategic decision of building in-house capabilities versus buying or licensing from external sources.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Infrastructure Outsourcing Strategy

Scenario: The organization is a regional telecom operator facing increased pressure to modernize its infrastructure while managing costs.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand E-commerce Platform Decision

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with the decision to develop an in-house e-commerce platform or to leverage an existing third-party solution.

Read Full Case Study

Make or Buy Decision Analysis for Luxury Goods Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in question is a high-end luxury goods manufacturer facing challenges in deciding whether to make components in-house or outsource to third-party vendors.

Read Full Case Study

Sustainability Strategy for Boutique Hotel Chain in Eco-Tourism Niche

Scenario: A boutique hotel chain in the eco-tourism sector is navigating the strategic challenge of a "build vs.

Read Full Case Study


Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How should companies approach the make-or-buy decision in highly regulated industries differently?
In highly regulated industries, companies must adopt a comprehensive approach to the make-or-buy decision, considering Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, and long-term implications for sustainable success. [Read full explanation]
What is a make or buy analysis?
A make or buy analysis is a strategic framework for deciding whether to produce a product in-house or purchase it from an external supplier, considering cost, quality, and risk. [Read full explanation]
What are the key indicators that suggest a company should pivot from a "Buy" to a "Build" strategy, or vice versa, in response to market changes?
Discover when to pivot from a Buy to a Build strategy (or vice versa) by evaluating Cost, Time to Market, Core Competencies, and Strategic Fit for competitive advantage. [Read full explanation]
What role does corporate social responsibility (CSR) play in the Build vs. Buy decision-making process?
Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into Strategic Planning and Operational Excellence influences the Build vs. Buy decision, enhancing brand reputation, sustainability, and market competitiveness. [Read full explanation]
How can companies effectively measure and compare the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options?
Organizations can evaluate the innovation potential of Build vs. Buy options by conducting Skills and Capabilities Assessments, Financial Analyses, and Risk Assessments, employing Decision Matrices and Scenario Planning to align with Strategic Planning and Innovation Strategy. [Read full explanation]
What impact do global supply chain disruptions have on the make-or-buy decision-making process?
Global supply chain disruptions significantly impact the make-or-buy decision-making process, emphasizing Risk Management, Strategic Alignment, Operational Excellence, and the need for agility, resilience, and innovation in sourcing strategies. [Read full explanation]

 
Joseph Robinson, New York

Operational Excellence, Management Consulting

This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.

To cite this article, please use:

Source: "What is the impact of generative AI on the Build vs. Buy decision-making process for content creation?," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2025




Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials

 
"As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."

– Michael Evans, Managing Director at Newport LLC
 
"FlevyPro provides business frameworks from many of the global giants in management consulting that allow you to provide best in class solutions for your clients."

– David Harris, Managing Director at Futures Strategy
 
"As a consultant requiring up to date and professional material that will be of value and use to my clients, I find Flevy a very reliable resource.

The variety and quality of material available through Flevy offers a very useful and commanding source for information. Using Flevy saves me time, enhances my expertise and ends up being a good decision."

– Dennis Gershowitz, Principal at DG Associates
 
"Flevy is our 'go to' resource for management material, at an affordable cost. The Flevy library is comprehensive and the content deep, and typically provides a great foundation for us to further develop and tailor our own service offer."

– Chris McCann, Founder at Resilient.World
 
"As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value."

– David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
 
"I have used Flevy services for a number of years and have never, ever been disappointed. As a matter of fact, David and his team continue, time after time, to impress me with their willingness to assist and in the real sense of the word. I have concluded in fact "

– Roberto Pelliccia, Senior Executive in International Hospitality
 
"I am extremely grateful for the proactiveness and eagerness to help and I would gladly recommend the Flevy team if you are looking for data and toolkits to help you work through business solutions."

– Trevor Booth, Partner, Fast Forward Consulting
 
"As an Independent Management Consultant, I find Flevy to add great value as a source of best practices, templates and information on new trends. Flevy has matured and the quality and quantity of the library is excellent. Lastly the price charged is reasonable, creating a win-win value for "

– Jim Schoen, Principal at FRC Group



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.