This article provides a detailed response to: What Is Stratification in the 7 QC Tools? [Quality Control Guide + Examples] For a comprehensive understanding of Quality Management, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Quality Management best practice resources.
TLDR Stratification in the 7 QC tools is a quality control technique that separates data into distinct categories or layers (strata) based on specific characteristics such as machines, operators, materials, time periods, or production lines. This stratification process reveals hidden patterns, identifies variation sources, and pinpoints root causes by comparing quality metrics across different strata. Stratification is one of the 7 basic quality tools used in Six Sigma and continuous improvement.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview Implementing Stratification in Quality Management Real-World Applications and Success Stories Best Practices in Quality Management Quality Management Case Studies Related Questions
All Recommended Topics
Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they relate to this question.
Stratification in the 7 QC tools is a fundamental quality control technique that involves dividing data into meaningful categories or layers (called strata) to identify patterns, isolate variation sources, and discover root causes of quality problems. Understanding what stratification is in the 7 QC tools context is essential for quality managers, process engineers, and continuous improvement professionals applying Six Sigma, Total Quality Management, or Lean methodologies. Stratification enables data-driven problem-solving by revealing differences between groups that remain hidden in aggregated data—for example, discovering that defects concentrate on specific machines, shifts, or material batches rather than being randomly distributed across all production.
The 7 quality tools (also called 7 QC tools or 7 basic quality tools) include: Check Sheets, Histograms, Pareto Charts, Cause-and-Effect Diagrams, Scatter Diagrams, Control Charts, and Stratification. Among these tools, stratification serves as both a standalone analysis technique and an enhancement method for the other 6 tools. Stratification in quality control works by systematically separating data based on predetermined factors such as: equipment or machines (identifying if specific equipment produces more defects), operators or shifts (determining if certain workers or time periods correlate with quality variations), raw materials or suppliers (isolating material-related quality issues), production methods or processes (comparing quality across different procedures), time periods (detecting temporal patterns in defect rates), or product types or specifications (analyzing quality differences across product lines). Quality professionals use stratification to answer the critical question: "Is this quality problem universal, or does it concentrate in specific conditions?"
Implementing stratification in 7 QC tools with examples demonstrates its practical power. Consider a manufacturing scenario with increasing defect rates: aggregate data shows 5% defects, which seems acceptable. However, stratification by production line reveals Line A has 2% defects, Line B has 3% defects, and Line C has 12% defects—the problem is concentrated, not systemic. Further stratification of Line C by shift shows day shift has 8% defects while night shift has 18% defects. This stratification analysis directs improvement efforts to Line C's night shift rather than wasting resources on company-wide interventions. The stratification QC tool typically follows a 5-step process: (1) identify relevant stratification factors based on process knowledge and suspected causes, (2) collect data systematically with stratification categories recorded, (3) organize data into defined strata, (4) analyze differences between strata using appropriate statistical methods, (5) investigate significant differences to determine root causes. Leading quality management experts emphasize that effective stratification requires domain knowledge to select meaningful stratification factors—stratifying by irrelevant factors wastes analytical effort without yielding actionable insights. Common mistakes include: using too many stratification factors simultaneously (creating small sample sizes per stratum), selecting arbitrary factors unrelated to process mechanics, failing to validate that observed differences are statistically significant, and stopping analysis after identifying differences without investigating underlying causes.
Implementing Stratification in Quality Management
For stratification to be effective, it must be implemented systematically. The first step is to clearly define the objectives of the stratification analysis. What specific quality issues are you trying to address? This clarity will guide the selection of relevant strata and ensure that the analysis yields meaningful insights. Next, organizations must gather and prepare their data for stratification. This involves ensuring data accuracy and completeness, which may require cross-departmental collaboration to achieve.
Once the data is ready, the actual process of stratification can begin. This involves using the 7 QC tools, which include check sheets, Pareto charts, and cause-and-effect diagrams, among others, to categorize and analyze the data. Each tool has its strengths, and selecting the right tool depends on the specific nature of the data and the objectives of the analysis. For example, Pareto charts are particularly useful for identifying the most significant factors contributing to a problem, following the 80/20 rule.
After stratification and analysis, the findings must be communicated effectively to all stakeholders. This is where C-level executives play a crucial role. They must ensure that the insights gained from the stratification process are translated into actionable strategies. This might involve reallocating resources, adjusting production schedules, or implementing new quality control measures. The key is to act decisively, based on the evidence presented by the stratification analysis.
Real-World Applications and Success Stories
Several leading organizations have successfully applied stratification to enhance their quality management processes. For instance, a global automotive manufacturer used stratification to identify specific defects occurring predominantly in vehicles produced during certain shifts. This insight enabled targeted interventions, significantly reducing defect rates and improving overall product quality. Similarly, a multinational consumer goods company applied stratification to analyze customer feedback, leading to product improvements that boosted customer satisfaction and loyalty.
These examples underscore the practical value of stratification. However, it's important to note that successful implementation requires a commitment to data-driven decision-making and a willingness to act on the insights generated. Organizations that excel in this area treat stratification not just as a tool but as a strategic framework that informs their approach to quality management.
In conclusion, stratification within the 7 QC tools offers a powerful means of enhancing quality management processes. By enabling detailed analysis and targeted interventions, it helps organizations address specific quality issues effectively. When implemented correctly, stratification can lead to significant improvements in product quality, customer satisfaction, and operational efficiency. For C-level executives looking to drive their organizations toward operational excellence, understanding and applying the principles of stratification is essential.
Best Practices in Quality Management
Here are best practices relevant to Quality Management from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Quality Management materials here.
Explore all of our best practices in: Quality Management
Quality Management Case Studies
For a practical understanding of Quality Management, take a look at these case studies.
Operational Excellence Strategy for Global Logistics Firm
Scenario: A leading global logistics firm is struggling with integrating quality management into its expansive operational network.
Quality Management Efficiency Improvement for a Global Pharmaceutical Company
Scenario: A global pharmaceutical company was witnessing a significant increase in quality-related incidents, product recalls, and regulatory fines due to a lack of streamlined Quality Management processes.
Quality Management & Assurance Improvement for a Global Pharmaceutical Firm
Scenario: A multinational pharmaceutical company is grappling with escalating costs and operational inefficiencies in its Quality Management & Assurance department.
Quality Management System Overhaul for Aerospace Defense Contractor
Scenario: The organization in question operates within the aerospace defense sector and has been grappling with escalating defect rates in its manufacturing processes.
Aerospace Quality Management Enhancement Initiative
Scenario: The organization is a mid-sized aerospace components manufacturer facing significant quality control challenges.
Quality Management System Overhaul for Construction Materials Supplier
Scenario: The company in focus operates within the construction materials sector, grappling with subpar quality control that has led to increased customer complaints and product returns.
Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies
Related Questions
Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.
Operational Excellence, Management Consulting
This Q&A article was reviewed by Joseph Robinson. Joseph is the VP of Strategy at Flevy with expertise in Corporate Strategy and Operational Excellence. Prior to Flevy, Joseph worked at the Boston Consulting Group. He also has an MBA from MIT Sloan.
It is licensed under CC BY 4.0. You're free to share and adapt with attribution. To cite this article, please use:
Source: "What Is Stratification in the 7 QC Tools? [Quality Control Guide + Examples]," Flevy Management Insights, Joseph Robinson, 2026
Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.
Leverage the Experience of Experts.
Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.
Download Immediately and Use.
Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.
Save Time, Effort, and Money.
Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.
