This framework is developed by a team of former McKinsey and Big 4 consultants. The presentation follows the headline-body-bumper slide format used by global consulting firms.
This product (University Partnership Canvas [UPC]) is a 25-slide PPT PowerPoint presentation slide deck (PPTX), which you can download immediately upon purchase.
Partnerships among corporations and universities are important drivers of the Innovation economy. Collaboration among universities and industry is to a greater extent seen as a means to improve Innovation via knowledge exchange.
Numerous organizations are moving their focus in university and Innovation ecosystem interaction, from incremental problem-solving to long-term improvement and meticulous contact with new startups.
This framework talks about 6 critical questions that researchers have come up with. The answers to these questions help assess the viability of and improvement in the university-industry partnership.
We also explore the University Partnership Canvas (UPC), a tool that can methodically aid managers evaluate their present approaches and detect discrepancies between their business goals and come up with pragmatic remedies to overcome them. It consists of 6 elements corresponding to the 6 key questions.
The slide deck also includes some slide templates for you to use in your own business presentations.
The University Partnership Canvas (UPC) is designed to help organizations systematically evaluate and enhance their collaborations with academic institutions. By addressing six pivotal questions, the UPC framework ensures that partnerships are aligned with strategic business objectives and can adapt to evolving industry needs. This tool is essential for managers aiming to optimize their engagement strategies and foster innovation through academic collaboration.
The PPT provides a comprehensive overview of various partnership models, from class projects to research initiatives, and highlights the benefits of strategic alliances, such as access to human capital, educational opportunities, and intellectual property creation. The UPC framework also includes practical templates to assist in the evaluation and management of these partnerships, making it an indispensable resource for any organization looking to leverage academic collaborations for long-term success.
This PPT slide outlines the various advantages of forming strategic partnerships between universities and industries, categorizing these benefits into 6 core areas. Each area is represented visually with icons and brief descriptions, making the information easily digestible for decision-makers.
The first benefit highlighted is the "Provision of Human Capital." This emphasizes how partnerships can create a pipeline of talent through internships and job openings, which is crucial for industries seeking fresh skills and perspectives.
Next, "Educational Opportunities" are presented, indicating that such collaborations can enhance learning experiences for students. This includes access to new tools and methodologies, which can be beneficial for both students and university faculty.
The third point, "Financial Openings," suggests that partnerships can lead to new funding avenues. This is particularly relevant as public funding sources decline, making private partnerships a vital strategy for financial sustainability and innovation.
"Operational Benefits" follow, pointing out that these collaborations can streamline processes and enhance responsiveness. This agility allows companies to adapt more quickly than they could independently, fostering innovation across various disciplines.
The fifth benefit, "Reputational Gains," highlights how partnerships can elevate the standing of both universities and industries. By collaborating on initiatives, both parties can gain visibility and credibility, leading to new opportunities for publications and recognition.
Lastly, "Intellectual Property (IP) Creation" underscores the potential for generating new ideas and innovations. Partnerships can serve as testing grounds for concepts, leveraging expertise from both sectors to drive advancements.
Overall, the slide effectively communicates the multifaceted advantages of university-industry partnerships, appealing to executives considering such collaborations for strategic growth.
This PPT slide outlines key design considerations for establishing effective partnerships between universities and companies. It emphasizes that these collaborations should be approached as organizational design challenges that necessitate clear objectives and defined roles. The content is structured around eight critical factors that need to be addressed to optimize the partnership's effectiveness.
The first point, "Clear Delineation of Outcome," stresses the importance of having specific, measurable goals for the partnership. This clarity helps all parties understand what success looks like. Next, "Relevance to Curriculum" indicates that the partnership should align with educational objectives, ensuring that the collaboration benefits both the university's academic framework and the company's needs.
"Decision on Scale of Collaboration" suggests that organizations must determine the extent of their engagement, whether it’s a small project or a large, multi-faceted initiative. The "Time Period of Collaboration" highlights the necessity of defining the duration of the partnership, which can affect commitment and resource allocation.
The slide continues with additional considerations such as "Location/Environment," which may influence the partnership's dynamics, and "Type of Content," indicating the nature of the knowledge or resources exchanged. The "Ownership Structure of Intellectual Property" is crucial, as it addresses how innovations and findings will be shared or owned post-collaboration. Finally, "Partnership Management" underscores the need for effective oversight to ensure that the partnership remains productive and aligned with its goals.
These insights provide a framework for companies considering university collaborations, emphasizing the importance of strategic planning and management to achieve desired outcomes.
This PPT slide outlines the evolving nature of university-industry partnerships, emphasizing a shift from merely addressing specific problems to engaging in strategic collaborations that tackle broader challenges. This transition reflects a recognition that universities can contribute significantly to complex, exploratory projects rather than just serving as extended resources for predefined issues.
The content introduces a framework derived from a four-year research project aimed at enhancing the management of these partnerships. It presents 6 critical questions that organizations should consider when selecting university partners. These questions focus on understanding the business objectives driving the partnerships, identifying key focus areas, and ensuring alignment with those objectives.
The slide also highlights the importance of establishing criteria for selecting principal university partners and the types of partnership arrangements that best fit the organization's goals. Additionally, it addresses the necessary human resources, processes, and organizational structures that support these partnerships. The final question pertains to performance indicators that can effectively measure the success of these collaborations.
The insights suggest that companies are increasingly selective about their university partners, prioritizing those with expertise relevant to their strategic needs. There is also a trend towards implementing comprehensive master research agreements to streamline partnership processes, enhance negotiation capabilities, and foster collaboration among university faculties. This structured approach aims to maximize the benefits derived from university partnerships, ultimately driving innovation and growth.
This PPT slide presents an overview of the University Partnership Canvas (UPC), which is structured around 6 critical questions aimed at enhancing university-industry partnerships. This framework is designed for both enterprises and universities, facilitating more effective relationships and fostering a productive ecosystem.
The first question addresses the business objectives that drive the need for university partnerships. Understanding these objectives is crucial for aligning partnership strategies with organizational goals. The second question focuses on the main areas of concentration within these partnerships and emphasizes the importance of a selection process that ensures alignment with the identified business objectives.
The third question delves into the criteria used to select principal university partners, highlighting the significance of a systematic approach to partner selection. The fourth question examines the types of partnership arrangements that best align with the established focus areas and business objectives, which is essential for maximizing the effectiveness of these collaborations.
The fifth question explores the human resources, processes, and organizational structures that support university partnerships. This aspect is vital for ensuring that partnerships are not only formed, but also sustained effectively over time. Lastly, the sixth question identifies key performance indicators that are particularly useful for evaluating the success of university partnerships.
The slide underscores that these questions are interconnected, suggesting that thoughtful responses can lead to partnerships with greater strategic depth and effectiveness. The UPC serves as a visual tool to help managers systematically address these questions, ultimately guiding organizations toward a more strategic perspective on their partnerships.
This PPT slide discusses the nature of past partnerships between universities and companies, highlighting their ad hoc nature. These collaborations typically arise when a company encounters a specific problem and reaches out to a university contact to find a solution. This approach often lacks a structured framework, leading to several common traits.
Firstly, partnerships are formed based on personal networks rather than a strategic selection process. This reliance on individual relationships can limit the overall effectiveness of the collaboration. The selection of university partners often hinges on familiarity with individual researchers, which may not reflect the broader capabilities of the institution.
The slide notes that these ad hoc arrangements can be likened to an "extended workbench," where potential benefits of a more formalized partnership are overlooked. The scope of these collaborations is often narrow, focusing on specific projects without a centralized organizational structure. This can lead to inefficiencies, as each project is treated in isolation, resulting in increased workloads for legal departments and potential delays.
From the university's perspective, these setups provide funding opportunities for individual researchers, but may not foster broader institutional engagement. The slide concludes by indicating that while large corporations and top universities have historically engaged in these minor collaborations, there is now a shift towards more strategic programs that can better leverage resources and expertise. This insight suggests a need for a more cohesive approach to partnerships that maximizes the benefits for both parties.
This PPT slide presents a structured framework for evaluating university partnerships through a set of 6 critical questions, categorized into 3 distinct groups. This approach is designed to enhance the effectiveness of collaborations between universities and companies, ensuring that both parties derive tangible benefits from their engagement.
The first 2 questions focus on the strategic business goals that university partnerships should fulfill. This is crucial as it sets the foundation for what the company aims to achieve through collaboration. Understanding these goals helps in aligning the partnership's objectives with the company's broader strategic vision.
The next 2 questions delve into the specifics of the partnership dynamics, addressing the "who" and "how." This part is essential for clarifying roles and responsibilities, which can often be a source of confusion in collaborative efforts. By defining these elements, organizations can streamline their interactions and improve the overall efficiency of the partnership.
The final 2 questions emphasize the importance of establishing the right people, processes, and evaluation tools. This ensures that both the university and the business are actively engaged in monitoring the partnership's performance and making necessary adjustments. The focus here is on creating a sustainable framework that supports continuous improvement and value generation for both parties.
Overall, the slide encapsulates a methodical approach to forming and managing university partnerships, highlighting the importance of strategic alignment, clear roles, and effective evaluation mechanisms. This framework can serve as a valuable guide for organizations looking to optimize their collaborative efforts with academic institutions.
This framework is developed by a team of former McKinsey and Big 4 consultants. The presentation follows the headline-body-bumper slide format used by global consulting firms.
For $10.00 more, you can download this document plus 2 more FlevyPro documents. That's just $13 each.
ABOUT FLEVYPRO
This document is part of the FlevyPro Library, a curated knowledge base of documents for our FlevyPro subscribers.
FlevyPro is a subscription service for on-demand business frameworks and analysis tools. FlevyPro subscribers receive access to an exclusive library of curated business documents—business framework primers, presentation templates, Lean Six Sigma tools, and more—among other exclusive benefits.
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.
Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
Read Customer Testimonials
"As a young consulting firm, requests for input from clients vary and it's sometimes impossible to provide expert solutions across a broad spectrum of requirements. That was before I discovered Flevy.com.
Through subscription to this invaluable site of a plethora of topics that are key and crucial to consulting, I
have been able to exceed expectations and deliver quality advice and solutions to my clients. The quality and expertise of the authors are exemplary and gives me great confidence to use as part of my service offerings.
I highly recommend this company for any consultant wanting to apply international best practice standards in their service offerings.
"
– Nishi Singh, Strategist and MD at NSP Consultants
"[Flevy] produces some great work that has been/continues to be of immense help not only to myself, but as I seek to provide professional services to my clients, it gives me a large "tool box" of resources that are critical to provide them with the quality of service and outcomes they are expecting."
– Royston Knowles, Executive with 50+ Years of Board Level Experience
"As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value."
– David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
"I am extremely grateful for the proactiveness and eagerness to help and I would gladly recommend the Flevy team if you are looking for data and toolkits to help you work through business solutions."
– Trevor Booth, Partner, Fast Forward Consulting
"As a consulting firm, we had been creating subject matter training materials for our people and found the excellent materials on Flevy, which saved us 100's of hours of re-creating what already exists on the Flevy materials we purchased."
– Michael Evans, Managing Director at Newport LLC
"Flevy.com has proven to be an invaluable resource library to our Independent Management Consultancy, supporting and enabling us to better serve our enterprise clients.
The value derived from our [FlevyPro] subscription in terms of the business it has helped to gain far exceeds the investment made, making a subscription a no-brainer for any growing consultancy – or in-house strategy team."
– Dean Carlton, Chief Transformation Officer, Global Village Transformations Pty Ltd.
"One of the great discoveries that I have made for my business is the Flevy library of training materials.
As a Lean Transformation Expert, I am always making presentations to clients on a variety of topics: Training, Transformation, Total Productive Maintenance, Culture, Coaching, Tools, Leadership Behavior, etc. Flevy
It is well worth the money to purchase these presentations. Sure, I have the knowledge and information to make my point. It is another thing to create a presentation that captures what I want to say. Flevy has saved me countless hours of preparation time that is much better spent with implementation that will actually save money for my clients.
"
– Ed Kemmerling, Senior Lean Transformation Expert at PMG
"I have used FlevyPro for several business applications. It is a great complement to working with expensive consultants. The quality and effectiveness of the tools are of the highest standards."
– Moritz Bernhoerster, Global Sourcing Director at Fortune 500
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.