Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How should we evaluate the strategic implications of a make or buy decision?


This article provides a detailed response to: How should we evaluate the strategic implications of a make or buy decision? For a comprehensive understanding of Decision Making, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Decision Making best practice resources.

TLDR Evaluate make or buy decisions by aligning with Strategic Objectives, conducting comprehensive Cost Analysis, assessing Risks, and analyzing Capabilities and Market conditions.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Make or Buy Decision mean?
What does Cost-Benefit Analysis mean?
What does Strategic Alignment mean?
What does Risk Assessment mean?


Understanding the strategic implications of a make or buy decision is critical for C-level executives navigating the complexities of modern markets. This decision not only impacts the organization's operational effectiveness but also its long-term strategic positioning. At its core, the question of what is a make or buy decision revolves around whether an organization should produce a component, product, or service in-house (make) or purchase it from an external supplier (buy). This decision-making process requires a comprehensive analysis that goes beyond simple cost comparisons, encompassing a wide range of strategic, operational, and financial factors.

The first step in evaluating the strategic implications of this decision is to employ a robust framework that considers cost, quality, control, capacity, and innovation. Consulting giants like McKinsey and BCG emphasize the importance of aligning the decision with the organization's overall strategy. For instance, if an organization's strategic focus is on innovation and market differentiation, the decision to make or buy should support this by ensuring that key components or services are controlled and developed internally to maintain a competitive edge in innovation. Conversely, if operational efficiency and cost leadership are paramount, buying might offer the best route to achieving scale and reducing costs without compromising quality.

Moreover, the make or buy decision should be supported by a detailed cost-benefit analysis, considering not only the direct costs associated with each option but also indirect costs such as the opportunity cost of not focusing on core competencies. This analysis should be dynamic, reflecting changes in market conditions, supplier landscapes, and internal capabilities. For example, the rise of global supply chains has made the buy option more attractive for many components and services, thanks to lower costs and higher quality available from suppliers around the world. However, this comes with increased risk management considerations, particularly in terms of supply chain resilience and geopolitical risks, which have been highlighted by recent global disruptions.

Another critical factor in the make or buy decision is the impact on innovation and competitive positioning. Organizations must consider how each option affects their ability to innovate and respond to market changes. This is particularly relevant in fast-moving sectors where technological advancements can quickly render products or services obsolete. Here, maintaining control over key technologies or capabilities through making might be crucial to staying ahead. However, partnering with or buying from external innovators can also provide a shortcut to new technologies and capabilities, provided that intellectual property rights and strategic interests are adequately protected.

Framework for Decision Making

To systematically approach the make or buy decision, executives should use a structured framework or template that guides the evaluation process. This framework should include the following elements:

  • Strategic alignment: Ensuring the decision supports the overall strategic objectives of the organization.
  • Cost analysis: A comprehensive comparison of all costs associated with making or buying, including hidden and indirect costs.
  • Risk assessment: Identifying and evaluating risks related to supply chain, quality control, intellectual property, and market dynamics.
  • Capability and capacity analysis: Assessing whether the organization has or can develop the necessary capabilities and capacity to make, or if buying offers a better solution.
  • Market and supplier analysis: Evaluating the market for the product or service, including potential suppliers, their capabilities, and reliability.

This framework not only aids in making a more informed decision but also helps in documenting the rationale behind the choice, which is essential for aligning stakeholders and implementing the decision effectively.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Real-World Examples

Several leading organizations have faced make or buy decisions with significant strategic implications. For instance, a major technology company decided to produce its own chips in-house to better control the performance and integration of its devices, reflecting a strategic move towards greater innovation control and product differentiation. On the other hand, an automotive manufacturer might choose to buy certain components from specialized suppliers to leverage cost efficiencies and focus its internal resources on core competencies such as design and customer experience.

These examples illustrate that there is no one-size-fits-all answer to the make or buy decision. The right choice depends on a complex interplay of strategic, operational, and financial factors unique to each organization. By employing a comprehensive framework and considering the broader strategic implications, executives can navigate this decision with greater confidence, ensuring that their choice aligns with long-term strategic objectives and market positioning.

In conclusion, the make or buy decision is a critical strategic choice that requires careful consideration of a wide range of factors. By employing a robust framework and aligning the decision with the organization's overall strategy, executives can make informed choices that support their strategic objectives and enhance their competitive positioning in the market.

Best Practices in Decision Making

Here are best practices relevant to Decision Making from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Decision Making materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Decision Making

Decision Making Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Decision Making, take a look at these case studies.

Maritime Fleet Decision Analysis for Global Shipping Leader

Scenario: The organization in question operates a large maritime fleet and is grappling with strategic decision-making inefficiencies that are affecting its competitive advantage in the global shipping industry.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Decision-Making Framework for a Semiconductor Firm

Scenario: The organization is a leader in the semiconductor industry, facing critical Decision Making challenges due to rapidly evolving market conditions and technological advancements.

Read Full Case Study

E-commerce Strategic Decision-Making Framework for Retail Security

Scenario: A mid-sized e-commerce platform specializing in retail security solutions is facing challenges in strategic decision-making.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Decision Analysis for Competitive Edge in Digital Services

Scenario: The organization in focus operates within the telecom industry, specifically in the digital services segment.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Decision Making Framework for Luxury Retail in Competitive Market

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the luxury retail sector and is grappling with strategic decision-making challenges amidst a fiercely competitive landscape.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Decision-Making Framework for a Professional Services Firm

Scenario: A professional services firm specializing in financial advisory has been facing challenges in adapting to the rapidly evolving market dynamics and regulatory environment.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

What role does emotional intelligence play in enhancing decision-making skills among executives?
Emotional Intelligence (EI) significantly enhances executive decision-making in Strategic Planning, Risk Management, and Leadership by fostering resilience, innovation, and successful organizational outcomes, as evidenced by companies like Google and Microsoft. [Read full explanation]
What strategies can leaders employ to balance speed and accuracy in decision-making?
Leaders can balance decision-making speed and accuracy by adopting Agile frameworks, utilizing data and analytics, and empowering decentralized decision-making, as demonstrated by Spotify, Amazon, and Zara. [Read full explanation]
How can executives ensure decision-making processes are adaptable to sudden market changes?
Executives can ensure decision-making adaptability to market changes by embedding Agility in Organizational Culture, leveraging Data and Analytics, and implementing Scenario Planning and Stress Testing. [Read full explanation]
How can executives mitigate biases in strategic decision-making processes?
Executives can improve Strategic Decision-Making outcomes by understanding and identifying biases, promoting Diversity and Inclusion, and implementing Structured Decision-Making processes, supported by empirical evidence and real-world success stories. [Read full explanation]
In what ways can Decision Analysis be applied to crisis management and emergency response strategies within an organization?
Decision Analysis aids in Crisis Management and Emergency Response by enabling structured decision-making under uncertainty, facilitating proactive planning, continuous improvement, and effective communication, demonstrated by real-world examples like Fukushima and airline responses to COVID-19. [Read full explanation]
How can leaders effectively communicate and implement decisions in a globally distributed team?
Leaders can effectively communicate and implement decisions in globally distributed teams by embracing Cultural Diversity, leveraging Technology for seamless communication, and ensuring Clarity and Consistency in decision-making to drive organizational objectives. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Decision Making Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.