Decision Making Models: Thinking, Seeing, Doing (PowerPoint PPTX Slide Deck)

DESCRIPTION

This product (Decision Making Models: Thinking, Seeing, Doing) is a 22-slide PPT PowerPoint presentation slide deck (PPTX), which you can download immediately upon purchase.

How do people make decisions? Do they always follow a rational linear process to come to a conclusion?

Studies have suggested that the traditional Decision Making model—commonly known as the Rational Decision Making Model—does not explain the whole ambit of Decision Making.

This presentation discusses 3 Decision Making Models that, experts suggest, are used by people to reach quality decisions.

1. Thinking First
2. Seeing First
3. Doing First

The latter 2 models need to supplement the 1st in order, for people in general and managers in particular, to improve the quality of Decision Making.

The slide deck also includes some slide templates for you to use in your own business presentations.

This presentation delves into the intricacies of the Thinking First model, which is grounded in rational decision-making. It outlines a linear, iterative process that is logical and methodical. The model is particularly effective in structured environments like production processes, where decisions are made through a series of well-defined steps. However, it also acknowledges the limitations of this approach, highlighting that real-life decision-making is often more chaotic and less linear.

The Seeing First model emphasizes the importance of visualization and insight in decision-making. This approach is ideal for situations requiring creative solutions and innovation. It involves a process of conceptualization, followed by an "Ah-ha" moment of illumination, often occurring after a period of rest or disengagement from the problem. This model is particularly useful in scenarios where multiple elements need to be integrated into a cohesive solution, and where communication and commitment are crucial.

The Doing First model focuses on action-oriented decision-making, where practical experimentation and trial-and-error are key. This approach is beneficial in unique, complex situations where traditional analysis may not be feasible. It involves diving headfirst into the problem, learning from the outcomes, and iterating based on experience. This model is effective in dynamic environments where quick, adaptive responses are necessary to navigate uncharted territories.

Source: Best Practices in Decision Making PowerPoint Slides: Decision Making Models: Thinking, Seeing, Doing PowerPoint (PPTX) Presentation Slide Deck, LearnPPT Consulting

PPT SLIDE DEEP DIVES

Comparative Analysis of Decision-Making Models

This PPT slide presents a comparative analysis of 3 distinct decision-making models, drawing parallels with the realms of science, art, and craft. Each model is categorized under a specific approach: "Thinking first," "Seeing first," and "Doing first."

The "Thinking first" model emphasizes qualities associated with science. It highlights aspects such as planning, programming, and the verbal articulation of ideas, with a strong focus on facts. This model caters to individuals who prioritize logical reasoning and structured analysis in their decision-making processes.

In contrast, the "Seeing first" model aligns with the qualities of art. It underscores the importance of visioning and imagining, as well as the visual representation of ideas. This approach appeals to those who value creativity and conceptual thinking, suggesting that visual and imaginative elements play a critical role in their decision-making.

The "Doing first" model relates to craft, focusing on experiential learning and the visceral aspects of decision-making. It encourages venturing into practical applications and learning through action, which resonates with individuals who prioritize hands-on experiences and real-world engagement.

The slide also includes a summary statement indicating that individuals gravitate toward different models based on their preferences. Those inclined toward "Thinking" are more fact-oriented, "Seeing" individuals appreciate ideas, and "Doing" types value experiences. This insight can guide organizations in understanding diverse decision-making styles among their teams, potentially leading to more effective collaboration and strategy formulation. Recognizing these differences can enhance overall decision quality and organizational performance.

Contrasting Approaches to Human Decision-Making

This PPT slide presents insights into human decision-making, contrasting 2 distinct approaches. The first insight, titled "Cropping Precedes Zeroing In," suggests that decision-making starts with a broad exploration phase. This phase involves searching and discovering various options, leading to a sharp insight that helps crystallize ideas into a structured format. The visual representation illustrates this process as a pathway that narrows down from multiple points to a focused conclusion, indicating a systematic approach to decision-making.

The second insight, "Choices Looking for Problems," introduces an alternative perspective. This theory posits that decision-making can be more chaotic, where a collection of choices actively seeks out problems to address. The accompanying graphic depicts a less linear path, emphasizing the randomness and fluidity of this approach. It suggests that decisions may emerge from a series of choices rather than a structured insight process.

The slide highlights the opposing nature of these 2 viewpoints. One approach is iterative and structured, while the other is more anarchic and exploratory. This dichotomy can inform how organizations approach decision-making strategies. Understanding these perspectives allows leaders to tailor their decision-making processes based on the context and desired outcomes. The insights encourage executives to reflect on their own decision-making styles and consider how they might integrate elements from both approaches to enhance effectiveness.

Structured Approach to Rational Decision Making

This PPT slide presents an overview of the Thinking First Model, which is recognized as the Rational Decision Making Model. It emphasizes a structured, linear approach to decision-making that is both iterative and logical. The model is characterized by its reliance on verbal communication and factual information, appealing to those who prefer a scientific basis for their decisions.

The slide outlines the process of the Thinking Model, particularly in group settings. It indicates that discussions can commence easily, regardless of participants' backgrounds. Comments are systematically recorded using lists and bullet points, promoting clarity. Notably, the model minimizes time spent on problem definition, focusing instead on swift analysis and resolution. This efficiency is crucial in environments where timely decision-making is essential.

An example provided illustrates the model's application in a practical scenario, such as establishing a new production plant. It highlights the repetitive nature of the decision-making process, where discussions may circle back to new opportunities and insights before reaching a final decision.

The slide also delineates ideal circumstances for the model's effectiveness. It notes that the model thrives when the matter at hand is well-defined, the data is reliable, and the situation is structured. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of discipline in maintaining focus throughout the decision-making process.

Overall, the Thinking First Model offers a clear framework for organizations seeking a rational approach to decision-making. Its structured methodology can enhance clarity and efficiency, making it a valuable tool for executives aiming to navigate complex decisions.

Sequential Steps in Rational Decision Making Process

This PPT slide outlines the Rational Decision Making Model, also referred to as "Thinking First," which consists of 4 sequential steps: Decline, Diagnose, Design, and Decide. This model is presented as a linear and clearly defined process, emphasizing its iterative nature.

The first step, Decline, involves identifying the problem that needs to be addressed. This is crucial as it sets the foundation for the subsequent steps. Following this, the Diagnose phase requires a thorough examination of the causes behind the identified problem. This step is essential for understanding the context and implications of the issue at hand.

Next is the Design phase, where potential solutions are developed. This step is about creativity and strategic thinking, as it involves generating various options that could address the problem effectively. Finally, the Decide step entails selecting the most appropriate solution from the options designed in the previous phase. This decision-making process is critical, as it determines the course of action to be taken.

The slide also includes a note that highlights the importance of each step, reinforcing that the definition of the problem is always the first step, followed by a diagnosis of its cause. The linearity of the process suggests that each step must be completed in order, ensuring a structured approach to decision-making. The concluding remark emphasizes that a rational approach to decision-making is often an exception rather than the norm, suggesting that many organizations may struggle with this structured methodology. This insight can be valuable for potential customers looking to enhance their decision-making frameworks.

Framework for Creative Problem-Solving Stages

This PPT slide presents the "Seeing First Model," a framework designed to facilitate creative problem-solving. It outlines 4 distinct stages that experts have identified as essential in the creative discovery process: Preparation, Incubation, Illumination, and Verification.

Preparation involves gathering deep knowledge about the problem at hand. This foundational step is critical, as it sets the stage for the subsequent phases. The Incubation stage allows the unconscious mind to process the information gathered, often leading to insights that surface after a period of reflection. This period is characterized by a lack of active engagement with the problem, which can sometimes yield unexpected breakthroughs.

The Illumination phase is described as the "Ah-ha moment," where a solution becomes clear, often after a period of rest or sleep. This stage highlights the importance of allowing the mind to operate freely, as rational thinking may inhibit creative thought. Finally, Verification involves organizing and articulating the solution logically, ensuring it can be communicated effectively and validated.

The slide also emphasizes ideal circumstances for applying the Seeing First Model. It suggests that the model is most effective when numerous elements are pooled together to create a solution, when there is a steadfast commitment to the solution, and when communication transcends boundaries. These factors are crucial for fostering an environment conducive to creativity and innovation.

Overall, this slide serves as a concise overview of a structured approach to creative problem-solving, providing valuable insights for leaders looking to enhance their decision-making processes.