This framework is developed by a team of former McKinsey and Big 4 consultants. The presentation follows the headline-body-bumper slide format used by global consulting firms.
This product (Product Innovation Management) is a 23-slide PPT PowerPoint presentation slide deck (PPT), which you can download immediately upon purchase.
Product Innovation has become everyone's responsibility. But, when everybody owns innovation, nobody owns innovation.
Strategically, Product Innovation now calls for Innovation Management to minimize duplication and confusion. Innovation Management provides clarity and delineation on accountability (authority) versus responsibility (stake) by providing direction and prioritizing investments.
Building an innovation-competent organization required the application of fundamental approaches to achieve evolutionary innovation:
1. Application of Innovation Ambition Matrix as a powerful collaboration framework. This will help our company decide how to analyze different growth initiatives.
2. Objective selection of the Organizational Model (Centralized, Decentralized, or Federated) that best fits our organization and culture.
While not one model fits our organization, an Organizational Model directs our company towards achieving both evolutionary and breakthrough innovations.
Innovation is about being fast, agile, lean, and adaptable. An appropriate model can establish the foundation of our company for a culture of collaboration and innovation success. Proper Product Innovation initiatives can lead to a well-considered organizational choice and successful competitive cultural shift.
This deck also includes slide templates for you to use in your own business presentations.
This presentation dives deep into the intricacies of Innovation Management, offering a comprehensive analysis of three distinct organizational models: Centralized, Decentralized, and Federated. Each model is dissected to reveal its unique advantages and potential pitfalls, providing actionable insights into how they can be leveraged to foster innovation within your organization. The PPT emphasizes the importance of selecting the right model based on your company's specific needs and culture, ensuring that innovation efforts are not only effective, but also sustainable in the long term.
The Innovation Ambition Matrix is another key feature of this deck, serving as a robust framework for categorizing and prioritizing innovation initiatives. By applying the 70-20-10 rule, your organization can strategically allocate resources to core, adjacent, and transformational innovations, driving growth and maintaining a competitive edge. This presentation is an invaluable resource for executives looking to implement a structured approach to innovation, complete with slide templates to facilitate internal presentations and discussions.
This PPT slide outlines the characteristics and implications of a decentralized organizational model for innovation. It emphasizes that in this structure, business units (BUs) are fully responsible for their innovation processes, covering everything from ideation to commercialization. The model is designed to eliminate barriers between units, allowing for seamless collaboration and innovation within each BU.
Key points highlighted include that all innovations occur within individual business units, which fosters a sense of ownership and accountability. There are no hand-offs between units, meaning that the BU leaders manage core, adjacent, and transformational innovations directly. This direct management approach minimizes the risk of lost focus or investment in promising ideas, as leaders are fully engaged in the innovation lifecycle.
The slide also notes that sunk costs and projects deemed "dead-on-arrival" are kept to a minimum, which can enhance overall efficiency. However, it raises a critical concern regarding the potential drawbacks of this model. If BU leaders are primarily incentivized to meet short-term metrics, there’s a risk that mid- to long-term innovation efforts could suffer. This could lead to a culture of risk aversion, where leaders shy away from pursuing longer horizon projects that may not yield immediate results.
Overall, the slide presents a nuanced view of the decentralized model, highlighting both its strengths in fostering innovation and its potential pitfalls if not managed properly. This insight is crucial for organizations considering this approach, as it underscores the need for balanced performance metrics that encourage both short-term success and long-term innovation.
This PPT slide titled "Organizational Model Selection" outlines a strategic framework for assessing a company's environment and culture to determine the most suitable organizational model. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating 3 critical questions that guide this selection process.
Firstly, the slide addresses the level of disruption within the industry. It suggests that a high level of disruption necessitates a centralized or federated model to maintain a competitive edge. The imperative action here is to allocate dedicated resources to navigate long-term challenges effectively.
Secondly, the slide highlights the significance of market demand for co-development opportunities. A notable demand indicates the need for a centralized or federated approach to create a cohesive roadmap for cross-business unit solutions. The focus shifts to commercial solutions that leverage the collective strengths of the organization.
Lastly, the slide examines the collaborative nature of the company’s culture. If the culture is inherently collaborative, a centralized or federated model is appropriate. This model allows for optimal resource allocation without political concerns. Conversely, if collaboration is lacking, a decentralized model may be more suitable to mitigate conflicts and enhance agility.
The slide concludes with a cautionary note about the risks of imposing a centralized model in a silo mentality culture, which can worsen existing divides. Overall, the content provides a structured approach for executives to assess their organizational needs based on industry dynamics, market opportunities, and internal culture, ultimately guiding them toward a more effective operational strategy.
This PPT slide presents 3 organizational models for managing innovation in high-tech product development. It emphasizes that while each model has its merits, none is flawless, and organizations may need to adopt a combination of these structures based on their unique requirements.
The first model is the Centralized Model. Here, innovation responsibilities are concentrated within a dedicated organization. This structure allows for streamlined decision-making and resource allocation, but may limit flexibility and responsiveness to specific business unit needs.
The second model is the Decentralized Model. In this approach, innovation responsibilities are fully distributed across various units. This can foster creativity and responsiveness, as each unit can tailor its innovation efforts to its specific context. However, it may lead to inefficiencies and a lack of coherence in overall strategy.
The third model is the Federated Model, which blends elements of the centralized and decentralized approaches. Key members of the central innovation team are embedded within business units, allowing for collaboration while maintaining a degree of centralized oversight. This model aims to balance the benefits of both previous models,, but it can introduce complexities in governance and alignment.
The slide concludes by asserting that no single model is universally applicable. Organizations must assess their unique culture and needs to determine which model or combination of models best suits their innovation strategy. This flexibility is crucial for fostering effective product innovation in a rapidly changing environment.
This PPT slide presents an overview of 3 organizational models—Centralized, Decentralized, and Federated—each characterized by distinct innovation attributes.
The Centralized Model is outlined first, emphasizing 3 key attributes. It focuses on transformational and disruptive ideas, which suggests a strong inclination towards innovation that can significantly alter market dynamics. The model also features a "protected" innovation budget, indicating a commitment to funding innovative projects without the risk of budgetary constraints. Lastly, it promotes cross-business unit solutions, fostering collaboration across different segments of the organization.
Next, the Decentralized Model is described with 2 primary attributes. It highlights the importance of clear end-to-end ownership and accountability, which helps to mitigate the "Not Invented Here" syndrome—a common barrier to innovation where teams are reluctant to adopt ideas from outside their own unit. The second attribute, ease of commercialization, points to the significance of streamlined processes for transitioning ideas into market-ready products, which includes managing handoffs, setting priorities, and aligning incentives.
Finally, the Federated Model is presented as a hybrid approach. It incorporates attributes from both the Centralized and Decentralized models, aiming to foster collaboration while also avoiding the NIH syndrome. This model encourages the sharing of ideas and resources between business units and the central innovation team, thereby enhancing the overall innovation capability of the organization.
The slide concludes with a note on customization, suggesting that while adapting these models for efficiency is common, care must be taken to ensure that essential attributes are not compromised in the process. This insight is crucial for organizations looking to optimize their innovation strategies without losing their core strengths.
This PPT slide presents a structured overview of a centralized organizational model for innovation management. It emphasizes the role of a dedicated central team responsible for overseeing the entire innovation process, from idea vetting to the launch of new service lines. This model is designed to ensure that innovation efforts receive focused attention and adequate resources, which is crucial for fostering long-term innovation.
Key points highlighted include the advantages of a centralized approach, such as the ability to maintain a "protected" budget and dedicated personnel. This focus can lead to more successful innovation outcomes. However, the slide also addresses potential challenges. The transition of ideas from the central team to Business Units (BUs) can create friction, leading to contention or even failure if not managed properly. This indicates the importance of clear communication and alignment between the central team and BUs.
Another critical aspect discussed is the potential resistance from BUs towards new products or solutions that originate from the central team. There may be a perception that these innovations are not suitable for their existing roadmaps or portfolios, which can hinder collaboration and adoption.
The slide concludes with a strong recommendation for the central team to demonstrate early and sustained commercial success. This is vital to maintain credibility and support for the centralized model. Overall, the content provides valuable insights for organizations considering a centralized approach to innovation management, highlighting both its benefits and the need for careful execution to avoid pitfalls.
This framework is developed by a team of former McKinsey and Big 4 consultants. The presentation follows the headline-body-bumper slide format used by global consulting firms.
For $10.00 more, you can download this document plus 2 more FlevyPro documents. That's just $13 each.
ABOUT FLEVYPRO
This document is part of the FlevyPro Library, a curated knowledge base of documents for our FlevyPro subscribers.
FlevyPro is a subscription service for on-demand business frameworks and analysis tools. FlevyPro subscribers receive access to an exclusive library of curated business documents—business framework primers, presentation templates, Lean Six Sigma tools, and more—among other exclusive benefits.
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
Read Customer Testimonials
"As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value."
– David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
"[Flevy] produces some great work that has been/continues to be of immense help not only to myself, but as I seek to provide professional services to my clients, it gives me a large "tool box" of resources that are critical to provide them with the quality of service and outcomes they are expecting."
– Royston Knowles, Executive with 50+ Years of Board Level Experience
"FlevyPro provides business frameworks from many of the global giants in management consulting that allow you to provide best in class solutions for your clients."
– David Harris, Managing Director at Futures Strategy
"I have found Flevy to be an amazing resource and library of useful presentations for lean sigma, change management and so many other topics. This has reduced the time I need to spend on preparing for my performance consultation. The library is easily accessible and updates are regularly provided. A wealth of great information."
– Cynthia Howard RN, PhD, Executive Coach at Ei Leadership
"As a young consulting firm, requests for input from clients vary and it's sometimes impossible to provide expert solutions across a broad spectrum of requirements. That was before I discovered Flevy.com.
Through subscription to this invaluable site of a plethora of topics that are key and crucial to consulting, I
have been able to exceed expectations and deliver quality advice and solutions to my clients. The quality and expertise of the authors are exemplary and gives me great confidence to use as part of my service offerings.
I highly recommend this company for any consultant wanting to apply international best practice standards in their service offerings.
"
– Nishi Singh, Strategist and MD at NSP Consultants
"I like your product. I'm frequently designing PowerPoint presentations for my company and your product has given me so many great ideas on the use of charts, layouts, tools, and frameworks. I really think the templates are a valuable asset to the job."
– Roberto Fuentes Martinez, Senior Executive Director at Technology Transformation Advisory
"I have used FlevyPro for several business applications. It is a great complement to working with expensive consultants. The quality and effectiveness of the tools are of the highest standards."
– Moritz Bernhoerster, Global Sourcing Director at Fortune 500
"One of the great discoveries that I have made for my business is the Flevy library of training materials.
As a Lean Transformation Expert, I am always making presentations to clients on a variety of topics: Training, Transformation, Total Productive Maintenance, Culture, Coaching, Tools, Leadership Behavior, etc. Flevy
It is well worth the money to purchase these presentations. Sure, I have the knowledge and information to make my point. It is another thing to create a presentation that captures what I want to say. Flevy has saved me countless hours of preparation time that is much better spent with implementation that will actually save money for my clients.
"
– Ed Kemmerling, Senior Lean Transformation Expert at PMG
Save with Bundles
This document is available as part of the following discounted bundle(s):
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.