Download Target Operating Model Templates, Frameworks, & Toolkits

What Is Target Operating Model?

Target Operating Model outlines how an organization delivers value through its processes, technology, and structure. A well-defined model aligns resources with strategic goals, driving efficiency and agility. Without it, organizations risk misalignment and wasted potential.

A Target Operating Model (TOM) is the blueprint that defines how an organization will operate to deliver on its strategy. It specifies the future state across structure, processes, technology, governance, and people. It answers the question that strategy documents leave open: not what the organization wants to achieve, but how it will actually get there.

The stakes of getting this right are significant. McKinsey research indicates that even high-performing companies have a 30% gap between their strategy's full potential and what is actually delivered, and that gap is largely attributable to shortcomings in the operating model. A well-designed TOM closes that gap by connecting strategic intent to the operational mechanics that determine day-to-day execution.

Components of a Target Operating Model

A TOM typically covers 6 dimensions: processes (how work flows), organization and governance (who decides what), technology and data (what systems enable the work), people and capabilities (what skills and roles are required), performance metrics (how success is measured), and culture (what behaviors are expected and reinforced).

The most common mistake in TOM design is treating these dimensions independently. Organizations redesign their process flows without adjusting governance, or deploy new technology without redefining the roles and skills needed to use it. The result is an operating model where the components conflict with each other. McKinsey's 2025 research on operating model redesigns found that success rates have improved to 63%, up from just 21% a decade ago. The difference is that leaders are now treating operating model design as a system rather than a set of isolated structural changes.

One practical framework for TOM design is the POLISM model: Processes, Organization, Locations, Information, Suppliers, and Management systems. It provides a structured checklist that ensures no critical dimension is overlooked. The Operating Model Canvas is another widely used approach that maps capabilities, value streams, and organizational structure in a single visual format.

Designing a Fit-for-Purpose TOM

A key principle in TOM design is "fit-for-purpose" rather than "best-in-class." The right operating model is not the one that copies the most admired company in the industry. It is the one that best supports the organization's specific strategy, competitive position, and operational context.

The design process should start with capability mapping. Identify the capabilities required to execute the strategy. Assess the current maturity of each capability. Define the target maturity. Then design the processes, people, technology, and governance needed to close the gap. This approach anchors the TOM in what the organization needs to do well, rather than in org chart rearrangements that may or may not create value.

Differentiating capabilities deserve the most attention. These are the capabilities that directly drive competitive positioning and should receive disproportionate investment in the TOM. Support capabilities (HR operations, facilities management, general IT) should be designed for efficiency and reliability. Trying to make every capability "world-class" dilutes focus and burns resources.

Managing the Transition from Current to Target State

The gap between the current operating model and the TOM is where transformation happens. It is also where most transformations fail. McKinsey research shows that 70% of business transformations fail to achieve their intended objectives, and the root causes are consistently organizational rather than technical: unclear targets, poor incentive alignment, under-resourced execution, and insufficient attention to culture change.

Managing the transition requires robust Change Management and Project Management governance. The transition should be sequenced into waves, rather than attempted as a single "big bang." High-impact, lower-risk areas go first. Each wave delivers measurable results that build organizational confidence for the next phase.

Risk Management is integral to TOM transitions. People risks include resistance to change and loss of key staff during the transition period. Process risks include business disruption as teams learn new ways of working. Technology risks include integration failures and data migration issues. The organizations that navigate transitions well anticipate these risks explicitly and build mitigation plans into the program timeline.

Keeping the TOM Current

A TOM is not a one-time deliverable. It is a living document that should evolve as the organization's strategy, competitive environment, and technology landscape change. Organizations that design a TOM, implement it, and then archive the document will find their operating model drifting out of alignment with strategy within 18 to 24 months.

The governance mechanism for keeping the TOM current is a regular review cadence, typically annual, where the executive team assesses whether the current operating model still supports the strategic direction. This review should examine whether the assumptions behind the original TOM design still hold, whether new capabilities are needed, and whether the performance metrics indicate that the operating model is delivering as intended.

Flevy's Target Operating Model frameworks and templates are designed for this ongoing cycle. They provide the structured formats for capability assessments, gap analyses, transition planning, and performance tracking that make TOM design a repeatable discipline, rather than a one-time consulting engagement.