This framework is developed by a team of former McKinsey and Big 4 consultants. The presentation follows the headline-body-bumper slide format used by global consulting firms.
This product (4 Models of Management) is a 24-slide PPT PowerPoint presentation slide deck (PPTX), which you can download immediately upon purchase.
This framework discusses 4 models of management, defined by how the "Corporate Core" engages and manages the business units.
The Corporate Core is comprised of the CEO, his or her senior management team (e.g. CXO), and a defined set of support functions necessary for the entire organization. The Corporate Core can be categorized along a spectrum of 4 different corporate management models:
1. Holding Company
2. Strategic Management
3. Active Management
4. Operational Involvement
These 4 management models are defined by the way senior management and the Corporate Core engage with the rest of the organization. The type of management model has direct implications on CEO succession, as well as other implications for the leadership team.
This presentation discusses these 4 models of management in-depth. Additional topics discussed include CEO tenure, Value Creation, CEO characteristics, among other topics.
This deck also includes slide templates for you to use in your own business presentations.
The PPT delves into the nuanced differences between insider and outsider CEO tenures, highlighting how internal hires tend to have longer tenures compared to those brought in externally. This insight is critical for organizations considering succession planning and the impact of leadership continuity. The analysis extends to unplanned turnover, where the reasons for CEO exits are dissected, providing valuable data on the stability and challenges within each management model.
The presentation also includes a comprehensive comparison of forced turnover rates across the four models, revealing that demotion is more prevalent in non-holding management structures. This data-driven approach equips executives with the knowledge to anticipate and mitigate potential leadership disruptions. The deck is not just theoretical; it offers actionable templates for immediate application in your strategic planning sessions.
This PPT slide presents an analysis of CEO tenure across 4 distinct management models, highlighting significant variations in the duration of leadership based on the model employed. The data indicates that the median tenure of outgoing CEOs differs markedly, with the "Holding" model showing the longest average tenure at 6.5 years. This suggests that organizations utilizing this model may benefit from stability in leadership, which can be crucial for long-term strategic planning.
In contrast, the "Operational Involvement" model has the shortest median tenure at 4.9 years. This could imply a more dynamic environment where CEOs may face higher turnover due to the demands of operational engagement. The "Strategic Management" and "Active Management" models fall in between, with median tenures of 5.3 and 5.0 years, respectively. The data also reveals that a significant percentage of CEOs in the "Holding" model stay for eight years or more, while a notable portion in the "Operational Involvement" model exits in less than 4 years.
The accompanying percentages provide further insights into the distribution of tenures across these models. For instance, 39% of CEOs in the "Holding" model remain for extended periods, while only 17% in the "Operational Involvement" model do the same. This disparity underscores the impact of management structure on leadership stability. Understanding these dynamics can help organizations make informed decisions regarding CEO succession and the strategic alignment of leadership with business objectives.
This PPT slide presents a comparative analysis of CEO characteristics across 4 distinct management models: Holding, Strategic Management, Active Management, and Operational Involvement. It highlights 3 key metrics related to outgoing and incoming CEOs, providing insights into their experiences and roles.
The first chart focuses on outgoing CEOs with prior public company CEO experience. It reveals that 23.6% of outgoing CEOs in the fourth model possess this experience, significantly higher than the other models, which range from 8.7% to 10.2%. This suggests that the fourth model may favor seasoned leaders with substantial public company backgrounds.
The second chart examines incoming CEOs who also hold the position of chairman. Here, the data shows that 14.1% of incoming CEOs in the fourth model hold both titles, compared to lower percentages in the other models, indicating a trend towards consolidating leadership roles in this model. This could imply a strategic approach to governance that enhances decision-making efficiency.
The third chart illustrates outgoing CEOs transitioning to a chairman role. Notably, 44% of outgoing CEOs from the second model move into this position, with the fourth model following closely at 40%. This trend suggests a strong correlation between management style and the likelihood of retaining a leadership position post-tenure.
Overall, the slide emphasizes the importance of management model selection in shaping CEO profiles and their subsequent roles within the organization. The data suggests that operationally involved and actively managed CEOs are more likely to retain influence, which can be a critical consideration for organizations assessing leadership continuity.
This PPT slide presents a comparative analysis of CEO tenure based on their hiring background—whether they were insiders or outsiders. It highlights a clear distinction in the median tenure of outgoing CEOs, with insiders averaging 6.3 years, while outsiders average significantly less at 4.5 years. This data suggests that CEOs promoted from within the organization tend to have longer tenures compared to those brought in from external sources.
The chart categorizes the tenures into 4 management models: Holding, Strategic Management, Active Management, and Operational Involvement. For insiders, the tenure across these models is relatively consistent, with all models showing values around 5.0 years or higher. The Holding model stands out with the highest tenure at 6.3 years. This indicates that insiders, likely due to their familiarity with the company culture and operations, can navigate their roles more effectively.
In contrast, the tenure of outsider CEOs is noticeably shorter across all models, with the highest being 4.5 years in the Holding model and decreasing to 3.3 years in the Operational Involvement model. The data implies that outsider CEOs face greater challenges in adapting to the existing organizational dynamics, which may contribute to their shorter tenures.
The note at the bottom clarifies that the data excludes interim CEOs and turnover resulting from mergers and acquisitions, focusing solely on permanent appointments. This analysis serves as a valuable insight for organizations considering CEO succession strategies, emphasizing the potential benefits of promoting from within.
This PPT slide presents an overview of the Holding Company management model, characterized by a highly diversified structure and a disengaged management style. It emphasizes that the CEO operates similarly to a hedge fund manager, overseeing a portfolio of investments without delving into the operational intricacies of the subsidiaries. This model is particularly appealing for organizations that prefer to maintain a hands-off approach, allowing second-tier executives to manage day-to-day operations.
The "Management Needs" section succinctly states that the CEO is primarily focused on the outcomes generated by the subsidiaries, rather than the processes that lead to those results. This indicates a preference for high-level performance metrics over granular operational details. The slide also highlights the importance of the Corporate Core, which is responsible for establishing managerial and financial discipline across the organization. This suggests that while the CEO may not be involved in daily operations, there is still a framework in place to ensure accountability and performance.
The "Value Creation Model" section points out that value is created through effective portfolio management, reinforcing the idea that the Holding Company model thrives on strategic oversight rather than operational involvement. The example of Berkshire Hathaway serves to illustrate a successful application of this model, suggesting that potential customers can draw insights from its practices.
Overall, the slide effectively communicates the essence of the Holding Company model, making it clear that this approach is suitable for organizations looking for a streamlined management style that prioritizes results over processes.
This PPT slide presents an overview of 4 distinct management models: Holding Company, Active Management, Strategic Management, and Operational Involvement. Each model is characterized by the level of engagement and oversight that senior management exerts over the organization.
The Holding Company model is described as highly diversified and features a management style that is the most disengaged. This suggests that the company may own various businesses, but does not actively intervene in their operations, allowing each entity to operate independently.
Active Management represents a more integrated approach. Here, the management oversees organizations that are more closely linked, providing guidance primarily on operational issues. This model implies a higher degree of involvement than the Holding Company, focusing on collaboration and support among related businesses.
Strategic Management is positioned as a guiding force within the organization. This model emphasizes the role of senior management in setting strategic direction and performance objectives for a group of related businesses. It indicates a proactive stance in shaping the future of the organization through strategic initiatives.
Operational Involvement is characterized by a high level of engagement from senior management in day-to-day operations. This model reflects a hands-on approach, where management is actively involved in decision-making processes, ensuring that operational goals align with broader strategic objectives.
The slide also notes that organizations can transition between these models, suggesting flexibility in management styles based on evolving business needs. This adaptability can be crucial for companies navigating complex market environments. Understanding these models can help potential customers identify which management approach aligns best with their organizational goals.
This PPT slide presents the Active Management model, emphasizing the role of the Corporate Core in overseeing and advising business units on operational matters. It highlights that this model fosters tighter integration among organizational components, allowing for more direct involvement in decision-making processes. The Corporate Core is positioned as a facilitator of accountability, working closely with business units to ensure alignment on major operational decisions.
Key management needs are outlined, specifically the desire for clarity on how business units will execute their strategies. This indicates a shift towards a more collaborative approach, where the Corporate Core not only sets expectations, but also engages in the development of plans alongside business units. The value creation model is centered on partnership, suggesting that expertise-based services are co-developed to enhance operational effectiveness.
The slide also stresses the importance of defining the rules of engagement between the Corporate Core and business units. Clear communication is essential for establishing when the Corporate Core should be involved in decision-making and when business units can operate independently. This delineation is crucial for maintaining operational efficiency and ensuring that strategic objectives are met.
An example of McKesson is provided, illustrating a real-world application of the Active Management model. This contextualizes the theoretical aspects discussed and offers a practical reference point for potential customers. Overall, the slide serves as a concise overview of how the Active Management model can enhance organizational coherence and operational agility.
This framework is developed by a team of former McKinsey and Big 4 consultants. The presentation follows the headline-body-bumper slide format used by global consulting firms.
For $10.00 more, you can download this document plus 2 more FlevyPro documents. That's just $13 each.
ABOUT FLEVYPRO
This document is part of the FlevyPro Library, a curated knowledge base of documents for our FlevyPro subscribers.
FlevyPro is a subscription service for on-demand business frameworks and analysis tools. FlevyPro subscribers receive access to an exclusive library of curated business documents—business framework primers, presentation templates, Lean Six Sigma tools, and more—among other exclusive benefits.
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.
Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
Read Customer Testimonials
"As a niche strategic consulting firm, Flevy and FlevyPro frameworks and documents are an on-going reference to help us structure our findings and recommendations to our clients as well as improve their clarity, strength, and visual power. For us, it is an invaluable resource to increase our impact and value."
– David Coloma, Consulting Area Manager at Cynertia Consulting
"As an Independent Management Consultant, I find Flevy to add great value as a source of best practices, templates and information on new trends. Flevy has matured and the quality and quantity of the library is excellent. Lastly the price charged is reasonable, creating a win-win value for
the customer, Flevy and the various authors. This is truly a service that benefits the consulting industry and associated clients. Thanks for providing this service.
"
– Jim Schoen, Principal at FRC Group
"Flevy.com has proven to be an invaluable resource library to our Independent Management Consultancy, supporting and enabling us to better serve our enterprise clients.
The value derived from our [FlevyPro] subscription in terms of the business it has helped to gain far exceeds the investment made, making a subscription a no-brainer for any growing consultancy – or in-house strategy team."
– Dean Carlton, Chief Transformation Officer, Global Village Transformations Pty Ltd.
"One of the great discoveries that I have made for my business is the Flevy library of training materials.
As a Lean Transformation Expert, I am always making presentations to clients on a variety of topics: Training, Transformation, Total Productive Maintenance, Culture, Coaching, Tools, Leadership Behavior, etc. Flevy
It is well worth the money to purchase these presentations. Sure, I have the knowledge and information to make my point. It is another thing to create a presentation that captures what I want to say. Flevy has saved me countless hours of preparation time that is much better spent with implementation that will actually save money for my clients.
"
– Ed Kemmerling, Senior Lean Transformation Expert at PMG
"As a small business owner, the resource material available from FlevyPro has proven to be invaluable. The ability to search for material on demand based our project events and client requirements was great for me and proved very beneficial to my clients. Importantly, being able to easily edit and tailor
the material for specific purposes helped us to make presentations, knowledge sharing, and toolkit development, which formed part of the overall program collateral. While FlevyPro contains resource material that any consultancy, project or delivery firm must have, it is an essential part of a small firm or independent consultant's toolbox.
"
– Michael Duff, Managing Director at Change Strategy (UK)
"My FlevyPro subscription provides me with the most popular frameworks and decks in demand in today’s market. They not only augment my existing consulting and coaching offerings and delivery, but also keep me abreast of the latest trends, inspire new products and service offerings for my practice, and educate me
in a fraction of the time and money of other solutions. I strongly recommend FlevyPro to any consultant serious about success.
"
– Bill Branson, Founder at Strategic Business Architects
"Flevy is now a part of my business routine. I visit Flevy at least 3 times each month.
Flevy has become my preferred learning source, because what it provides is practical, current, and useful in this era where the business world is being rewritten.
many challenges and there is the need to make the right decisions in a short time, with so much scattered information, we are fortunate to have Flevy. Flevy investigates, selects, and puts at our disposal the best of the best to help us be successful in our work.
"
– Omar Hernán Montes Parra, CEO at Quantum SFE
"The wide selection of frameworks is very useful to me as an independent consultant. In fact, it rivals what I had at my disposal at Big 4 Consulting firms in terms of efficacy and organization."
– Julia T., Consulting Firm Owner (Former Manager at Deloitte and Capgemini)
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.
Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Curve, and many more.
Click main image to view in full screen.
