Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
How is the shift towards remote work environments affecting the overhead cost allocation in product costing models?


This article provides a detailed response to: How is the shift towards remote work environments affecting the overhead cost allocation in product costing models? For a comprehensive understanding of Product Costing, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Product Costing best practice resources.

TLDR The shift to remote work has necessitated adjustments in overhead cost allocation within product costing models, emphasizing technology and remote work-related expenses, requiring dynamic financial management and Strategic Planning.

Reading time: 4 minutes


The shift towards remote work environments has significantly impacted how organizations approach and allocate overhead costs in product costing models. This transformation, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has not only altered the landscape of the workforce but also prompted a reevaluation of cost structures and financial strategies within organizations.

Changes in Overhead Cost Structures

The transition to remote work has led to a noticeable shift in the overhead cost structures of organizations. Traditionally, overhead costs were heavily influenced by physical office spaces—rent, utilities, maintenance, and office supplies, which directly impacted product costing models. However, with the shift to remote work, there's a reduction in the necessity for large office spaces, leading to decreased rent and utility costs. This change requires a recalibration of the overhead cost allocation in product costing models to more accurately reflect the current cost structures. Organizations must now consider the costs associated with remote work, such as technology infrastructure, cybersecurity measures, and remote work allowances for employees. These changes necessitate a more dynamic approach to allocating overhead costs, ensuring that product costing models remain accurate and reflective of the organization's operational expenses.

Moreover, the shift towards remote work environments has prompted organizations to invest heavily in digital transformation initiatives to support a dispersed workforce. This includes expenditures on cloud computing services, collaboration tools, and enhanced IT support. While these costs do contribute to overhead, they are fundamentally different from traditional office-related expenses and must be allocated differently within product costing models. The challenge for organizations is to develop a methodology that can accurately distribute these digital infrastructure costs across products in a way that reflects their actual consumption and benefit derived from these resources.

Organizations are also reevaluating employee-related overhead costs. Remote work has altered expenses related to employee welfare, training, and development. For instance, travel and expenses budgets have been reduced, while allocations for online training and home office setups have increased. These changes in cost structures require organizations to adapt their overhead allocation methods in their product costing models to ensure they accurately reflect the current operating environment. This adaptation is critical for maintaining the integrity of cost information, which is foundational for strategic planning, pricing strategies, and profitability analysis.

Learn more about Digital Transformation Strategic Planning Remote Work Product Costing

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Implications for Financial Management and Strategic Planning

The shift in overhead cost allocation has profound implications for financial management and strategic planning within organizations. Accurate product costing is vital for pricing decisions, profitability analysis, and strategic planning. As overhead costs evolve with the shift to remote work, organizations must ensure their costing models are updated to maintain the accuracy of cost information. This requires a continuous review and adjustment of cost allocation bases and rates to reflect the changing nature of overhead costs in a remote work environment.

From a strategic planning perspective, the shift towards remote work and its impact on overhead costs presents both challenges and opportunities. Organizations have the opportunity to optimize their cost structures by leveraging the efficiencies and cost savings associated with remote work. However, this requires a strategic approach to reallocating saved costs towards areas that can generate competitive advantage, such as digital transformation, innovation, and talent development. The ability to accurately allocate overhead costs in product costing models is crucial for identifying and capitalizing on these strategic opportunities.

Furthermore, the transparency and accuracy of cost information are essential for effective decision-making. Organizations must ensure their financial reporting reflects the true cost of operations in a remote work environment. This involves not only adjusting overhead allocations in product costing models but also communicating these changes to stakeholders. Accurate and transparent cost information supports better decision-making, risk management, and performance management across the organization.

Learn more about Performance Management Risk Management Competitive Advantage Financial Management

Real-World Examples and Best Practices

Several leading organizations have publicly shared their experiences and strategies in adapting to the shift towards remote work. For example, tech giants like Google and Twitter have made significant adjustments to their operational models and cost structures in response to the pandemic and the subsequent shift to remote work. These companies have reevaluated their office space needs, resulting in downsizing or restructuring their physical office footprints, which directly impacts their overhead costs. They have also invested in technology and infrastructure to support remote work, reflecting a shift in their overhead cost allocation towards digital resources.

Best practices emerging from these adaptations include the development of flexible overhead allocation models that can quickly adjust to changes in the operating environment. Organizations are adopting activity-based costing (ABC) models to more accurately allocate overhead costs in a remote work context. ABC models provide a more granular view of cost drivers and activities, allowing organizations to allocate costs based on actual consumption and utilization of resources. This approach supports more accurate product costing, informed pricing decisions, and strategic resource allocation.

In conclusion, the shift towards remote work environments has necessitated a reevaluation and adjustment of overhead cost allocation in product costing models. Organizations must adapt their financial management practices and strategic planning to reflect the changing cost structures associated with remote work. By doing so, they can ensure the accuracy of cost information, optimize their cost structures, and leverage strategic opportunities presented by the new work environment. Adopting flexible and dynamic costing models, such as activity-based costing, can support organizations in these efforts, enabling them to remain competitive and resilient in the face of change.

Best Practices in Product Costing

Here are best practices relevant to Product Costing from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Product Costing materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Product Costing

Product Costing Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Product Costing, take a look at these case studies.

Cost Reduction and Optimization Project for a Leading Manufacturing Firm

Scenario: A global manufacturing firm with a multimillion-dollar operation has been grappling with its skyrocketing production costs due to several factors, including raw material costs, labor costs, and operational inefficiencies.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Accounting Refinement for Biotech Firm in Life Sciences

Scenario: The organization, a mid-sized biotech company specializing in regenerative medicine, has been grappling with the intricacies of Cost Accounting amidst a rapidly evolving industry.

Read Full Case Study

Product Costing Strategy for D2C Electronics Firm in North America

Scenario: A North American direct-to-consumer electronics firm is grappling with escalating production costs that are eroding their market competitiveness.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Reduction Strategy for Defense Contractor in Competitive Market

Scenario: A mid-sized defense contractor is grappling with escalating product costs, threatening its position in a highly competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Telecom Expense Management for European Mobile Carrier

Scenario: The organization is a prominent mobile telecommunications service provider in the European market, grappling with soaring operational costs amidst fierce competition and market saturation.

Read Full Case Study

Cost Analysis Revamp for D2C Cosmetic Brand in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: A direct-to-consumer (D2C) cosmetic brand faces the challenge of inflated operational costs in a highly competitive market.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

What role does product costing play in sustainability and environmental impact assessments?
Product costing is pivotal in sustainability and environmental impact assessments, enabling businesses to financially quantify production processes and materials, thereby identifying opportunities for waste reduction, resource optimization, and minimizing environmental footprint while maintaining profitability. [Read full explanation]
How can companies effectively allocate indirect costs to maintain transparency and accountability in cost analysis?
Effectively allocating indirect costs involves understanding their nature, employing strategic methods like Activity-Based Costing, leveraging technology for accuracy, and maintaining transparency and regular updates to ensure equitable distribution and enhance decision-making and financial reporting. [Read full explanation]
How can companies leverage data analytics and machine learning to enhance product costing models?
Data Analytics and Machine Learning enhance Product Costing Models by providing deeper insights into cost drivers, enabling dynamic pricing, and improving profitability through predictive analytics and operational optimizations. [Read full explanation]
How can companies ensure transparency and compliance in their cost accounting practices amid increasing regulatory scrutiny?
Companies can ensure transparency and compliance in cost accounting by understanding regulatory landscapes, implementing robust internal controls, and fostering a culture of transparency and accountability. [Read full explanation]
What strategies can be employed to ensure cost management practices are adaptable to global market volatility?
To adapt cost management practices to global market volatility, businesses should implement Agile Cost Structures, enhance Forecasting and Planning capabilities, and foster a Culture of Continuous Improvement, supported by Operational Excellence, Risk Management, and Performance Management. [Read full explanation]
How is the rise of artificial intelligence expected to transform cost analysis practices in the near future?
The integration of Artificial Intelligence in cost analysis is revolutionizing accuracy, efficiency, and strategic insight, enhancing Data Collection, Predictive Analytics, and Strategic Decision-Making for long-term competitiveness. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Product Costing Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.