Check out our FREE Resources page – Download complimentary business frameworks, PowerPoint templates, whitepapers, and more.







Flevy Management Insights Q&A
Can the Boston Matrix be effectively applied in non-profit organizations, and if so, how?


This article provides a detailed response to: Can the Boston Matrix be effectively applied in non-profit organizations, and if so, how? For a comprehensive understanding of Boston Matrix, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Boston Matrix best practice resources.

TLDR The Boston Matrix can be adapted for non-profit organizations to evaluate programs based on potential impact and effectiveness, aiding in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, and Impact Maximization.

Reading time: 4 minutes


The Boston Matrix, also known as the Growth-Share Matrix, is a tool traditionally used in the business sector to help organizations analyze their product portfolio based on growth opportunities and market share. However, its principles can be effectively adapted for use in non-profit organizations (NPOs) to evaluate programs, initiatives, or services. This adaptation requires a shift in perspective from profit orientation to mission fulfillment and impact maximization.

Adapting the Boston Matrix for Non-Profit Organizations

In the context of a non-profit organization, the Boston Matrix can be reimagined to classify programs or services into four categories: Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, and Dogs. Here, 'Market Growth' can be interpreted as the potential for impact or the demand for the service, while 'Market Share' can be seen as the non-profit's effectiveness or reach in delivering that service. This adaptation allows NPOs to strategically allocate resources and prioritize initiatives that further their mission the most effectively.

For instance, 'Stars' could represent innovative programs that address urgent needs and have the potential to significantly advance the organization's mission. These initiatives may require substantial investment but promise high rewards in terms of impact. 'Cash Cows' are established programs that have consistently demonstrated success and efficiency, providing a stable foundation of support for the organization's other activities. 'Question Marks' require careful consideration; they have potential but need strategic adjustments to become more effective. Lastly, 'Dogs' might be programs that no longer align with the organization's strategic direction or fail to achieve desired outcomes, suggesting a need for divestment or restructuring.

Actionable insights for NPOs include conducting regular reviews of their program portfolio using this adapted matrix, engaging stakeholders in strategic discussions about the future direction of each program, and making informed decisions about where to invest or divest resources. This strategic approach ensures that non-profits can maximize their impact even with limited resources.

Learn more about Boston Matrix

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Real-World Application and Examples

Consider the case of a global health non-profit organization that applied the adapted Boston Matrix to its portfolio of initiatives. By evaluating their programs through this lens, they identified a community health program operating in several under-resourced countries as a 'Star'. It was addressing a critical need with high impact but required more resources to expand its reach. On the other hand, a long-standing education program was categorized as a 'Cash Cow', providing steady impact with minimal investment, supporting the organization's broader goals.

Another example is a local non-profit focused on environmental conservation, which used the matrix to realize that its urban tree planting initiative, though well-intentioned, was a 'Dog'. The program's impact was minimal compared to its cost, and it overlapped with government services. This insight allowed the organization to reallocate resources towards a 'Question Mark' program focused on sustainable agriculture, which, with strategic adjustments, had the potential to become a 'Star' by significantly contributing to the non-profit's mission of environmental conservation.

These examples illustrate how the Boston Matrix, when adapted for non-profit use, can facilitate Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, and Impact Maximization. By focusing on the potential for impact rather than financial return, non-profits can use this tool to navigate the complexities of managing a diverse program portfolio in a way that aligns with their mission and maximizes their effectiveness.

Learn more about Strategic Planning

Strategic Considerations for Implementation

Implementing the adapted Boston Matrix in a non-profit context requires a deep understanding of the organization's mission, strategic goals, and the external environment in which it operates. Non-profits should consider factors such as changing societal needs, funding landscapes, and partnership opportunities when evaluating their programs. This strategic analysis should be an ongoing process, with regular reviews to adapt to new challenges and opportunities.

Moreover, engaging a wide range of stakeholders in the evaluation process can provide valuable insights and foster a sense of ownership and alignment with the organization's strategic direction. This includes staff, volunteers, beneficiaries, donors, and community partners. Their perspectives can enrich the analysis and ensure that decisions about programs are made with a comprehensive understanding of their potential impact.

Finally, it's essential for non-profits to communicate the outcomes of this analysis and the resulting strategic decisions transparently to all stakeholders. This transparency builds trust and ensures continued support for the organization's mission. By thoughtfully adapting and applying the Boston Matrix, non-profit organizations can enhance their Strategic Planning processes, making more informed decisions that lead to greater impact and mission fulfillment.

Learn more about Strategic Analysis

Best Practices in Boston Matrix

Here are best practices relevant to Boston Matrix from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Boston Matrix materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Boston Matrix

Boston Matrix Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Boston Matrix, take a look at these case studies.

E-commerce Portfolio Rationalization for Online Retailer

Scenario: The organization in question operates within the e-commerce sector, managing a diverse portfolio of products across multiple categories.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Analysis for Semiconductor Firm

Scenario: A semiconductor company operating globally is facing challenges in allocating resources efficiently across its diverse product portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Strategic Portfolio Analysis for Retail Chain in Competitive Sector

Scenario: The organization is a retail chain operating in a highly competitive consumer market, with a diverse portfolio of products ranging from high-turnover items to niche, specialty goods.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Evaluation for Agritech Firm in Competitive Landscape

Scenario: An Agritech firm operating within a highly competitive sector is seeking to evaluate its product portfolio to better allocate resources and drive focused growth.

Read Full Case Study

Luxury Brand Portfolio Optimization in the High-End Fashion Sector

Scenario: A luxury fashion house is grappling with portfolio optimization amidst shifting consumer trends and market volatility.

Read Full Case Study

BCG Matrix Analysis for Specialty Chemicals Manufacturer

Scenario: The organization in focus operates within the specialty chemicals sector, facing a pivotal moment in its strategic planning.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How does the Growth-Share Matrix align with agile methodologies in product development and management?
The Growth-Share Matrix and Agile methodologies complement each other in Strategic Planning, Resource Allocation, Market Responsiveness, Innovation, Performance Management, and Operational Excellence, enhancing decision-making in product development and management. [Read full explanation]
What role does artificial intelligence play in optimizing the Growth-Share Matrix for predictive analytics and market trend forecasting?
AI transforms the Growth-Share Matrix into a dynamic tool for Strategic Planning, enabling precise market trend forecasting and optimized decision-making for sustainable growth. [Read full explanation]
How can the BCG Growth-Share Matrix be used to evaluate and prioritize investments in emerging technologies?
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix is a Strategic Planning tool that helps companies prioritize investments in emerging technologies by classifying them into Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, and Dogs based on market growth and share. [Read full explanation]
How can the Growth-Share Matrix be adapted for digital businesses, especially those operating on platform models?
Adapting the Growth-Share Matrix for digital platforms involves incorporating Network Effects, Data Monetization Potential, and Scalability, with examples like Spotify and Netflix illustrating the transition through quadrants via data utilization and customer-centric innovation. [Read full explanation]
What impact do sustainability and environmental considerations have on the strategic positioning of business units in the BCG Matrix?
Sustainability reshapes BCG Matrix strategic positioning, enhancing Cash Cows' efficiency, driving Stars' growth, and offering differentiation or divestment for Question Marks and Dogs. [Read full explanation]
Can the Growth-Share Matrix be integrated with customer lifetime value (CLV) models to enhance strategic decision-making?
Integrating the Growth-Share Matrix with Customer Lifetime Value models provides a comprehensive, customer-centric approach to Strategic Planning, optimizing resource allocation and long-term profitability. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Boston Matrix Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.