Comparative Analysis of Global Corporate Governance Systems


This PPT slide, part of the 27-slide Corporate Governance: Guide for SMEs PowerPoint presentation, presents a comparative analysis of corporate governance systems across different regions, highlighting their distinct characteristics. It categorizes governance structures into four systems: Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Latin, and Japan. Each system is evaluated based on several criteria, including the countries involved, the concept of the firm, the board system, salient stakeholders, and performance-based compensation.

The Anglo-Saxon model, which includes countries like the USA, UK, Canada, and Australia, is characterized by a shareholder-owned concept of the firm. It employs a one-tier board system that combines executive and non-executive directors. Shareholders are identified as the primary stakeholders, and performance-based compensation is notably high.

In contrast, the Germanic system encompasses countries such as Germany, Switzerland, and the Nordic nations. This model features a two-tier board system, separating supervisory and executive roles. Here, institutional stakeholders play a significant role, and performance-based compensation is generally low.

The Latin model, covering countries like France, Italy, and Spain, presents an optional board structure, with a focus on financial holdings and families as salient stakeholders. Performance-based compensation in this model is moderate.

Lastly, the Japanese system is unique, featuring a board of directors and various representative offices. Stakeholders include city banks and other financial institutions, with performance-based compensation also low.

This slide effectively illustrates the diversity in corporate governance approaches, emphasizing how regional characteristics shape governance practices. Understanding these differences is crucial for executives looking to navigate international business environments.



This slide is part of the Corporate Governance: Guide for SMEs PowerPoint presentation.

MBB/Big 4 style presentation that helps identify good corporate governance practices that may fit a company, focusing primarily on the Anglo-Saxon unitary board model

Download the Full Presentation


EXPLORE MORE SLIDES FROM THIS PRESENTATION


EXPLORE MORE PRESENTATIONS ON

Governance

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab



Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Organization, Change, & Culture, Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ slides and templates on Organizational Design, Change Management, and Corporate Culture. Methodologies include ADKAR, Burke-Litwin Change Model, McKinsey 7-S, Competing Values Framework, etc.