Flevy Management Insights Q&A
What are the best practices for maintaining and updating the Business Case financial model throughout the project management process?


This article provides a detailed response to: What are the best practices for maintaining and updating the Business Case financial model throughout the project management process? For a comprehensive understanding of Capital Budgeting Business Case, we also include relevant case studies for further reading and links to Capital Budgeting Business Case best practice resources.

TLDR Best practices for maintaining the Business Case financial model include regular review and update cycles, adapting to external changes, and engaging stakeholders to ensure financial viability and strategic alignment.

Reading time: 5 minutes

Before we begin, let's review some important management concepts, as they related to this question.

What does Regular Review and Update Cycles mean?
What does Adapting to Changes in External Factors mean?
What does Stakeholder Engagement and Communication mean?


Maintaining and updating the Business Case financial model throughout the project management process is crucial for ensuring that the project remains aligned with its initial objectives and continues to be viable from a financial perspective. This involves regular reviews and adjustments based on actual project progress and external factors that may impact the project's financials. Here are some best practices for effectively managing this process.

Regular Review and Update Cycles

Setting up regular review and update cycles is essential for keeping the Business Case financial model relevant and accurate. These cycles should be planned at strategic points throughout the project lifecycle, such as at the end of major project phases or milestones. During these reviews, project managers and financial analysts should compare the actual project outcomes with the forecasts in the Business Case. This includes reviewing expenditures, revenues, and any other financial metrics that are critical to the project's success. It's important to not only look at variances but also to understand the reasons behind them. This could involve analyzing changes in market conditions, project scope, or operational efficiencies that were not anticipated in the original Business Case.

For example, a report by McKinsey highlighted the importance of dynamic reallocation of resources as projects evolve. The firm pointed out that companies that actively shift resources between business units and projects can achieve up to a 30% higher return on investment than those that do not. Applying this principle to the Business Case financial model means regularly reassessing the allocation of financial resources based on the project's current needs and performance.

Additionally, incorporating feedback from these review cycles into the financial model ensures that it remains a living document. This feedback loop allows for the adjustment of forecasts and assumptions to reflect the project's current reality, thereby improving the accuracy of future financial projections.

Are you familiar with Flevy? We are you shortcut to immediate value.
Flevy provides business best practices—the same as those produced by top-tier consulting firms and used by Fortune 100 companies. Our best practice business frameworks, financial models, and templates are of the same caliber as those produced by top-tier management consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, and Accenture. Most were developed by seasoned executives and consultants with 20+ years of experience.

Trusted by over 10,000+ Client Organizations
Since 2012, we have provided best practices to over 10,000 businesses and organizations of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to the Fortune 100, in over 130 countries.
AT&T GE Cisco Intel IBM Coke Dell Toyota HP Nike Samsung Microsoft Astrazeneca JP Morgan KPMG Walgreens Walmart 3M Kaiser Oracle SAP Google E&Y Volvo Bosch Merck Fedex Shell Amgen Eli Lilly Roche AIG Abbott Amazon PwC T-Mobile Broadcom Bayer Pearson Titleist ConEd Pfizer NTT Data Schwab

Adapting to Changes in External Factors

External factors such as economic conditions, regulatory changes, and market dynamics can significantly impact a project's financial model. Best practices involve not only monitoring these factors but also incorporating their potential impacts into the Business Case updates. This proactive approach allows project managers to anticipate changes rather than react to them, enabling more strategic decision-making. For instance, if new regulations increase the cost of certain materials, the financial model should be adjusted to reflect these higher costs and their impact on the project's overall budget and profitability.

Accenture's research on agile project management emphasizes the value of flexibility and responsiveness to change. By adopting an agile mindset towards the Business Case financial model, project teams can more effectively adapt to external changes. This might involve creating scenarios or sensitivity analyses to understand how different external conditions could affect the project's financials, allowing for more informed decision-making.

Real-world examples of adapting to external changes include the rapid shifts many businesses had to make during the COVID-19 pandemic. Companies that quickly reassessed their projects' financial models and adjusted their strategies accordingly were better positioned to navigate the uncertainties. This often involved revising revenue forecasts, cost estimates, and even project scopes to align with the new business environment.

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication

Engaging stakeholders in the process of maintaining and updating the Business Case financial model is critical for ensuring alignment and support throughout the project lifecycle. This includes not only the project team but also sponsors, executives, and other key stakeholders who have a vested interest in the project's success. Regular communication of updates, challenges, and changes to the financial model helps build trust and fosters a collaborative environment.

Deloitte's insights on stakeholder engagement highlight the importance of transparency and inclusivity in project management. By involving stakeholders in the review process and considering their feedback, project managers can ensure that the financial model accurately reflects the project's strategic objectives and the expectations of all parties involved. This also helps in identifying potential risks and opportunities that may not have been evident without stakeholder input.

For example, in large infrastructure projects, stakeholder engagement is often a key factor in identifying financial risks related to environmental and community impacts. By incorporating these considerations into the Business Case financial model, project teams can develop more comprehensive risk management strategies and avoid potential setbacks.

Maintaining and updating the Business Case financial model throughout the project management process requires a structured approach that includes regular review cycles, adaptability to external changes, and active stakeholder engagement. By following these best practices, project managers can ensure that their projects remain financially viable and aligned with strategic objectives, even as conditions change.

Best Practices in Capital Budgeting Business Case

Here are best practices relevant to Capital Budgeting Business Case from the Flevy Marketplace. View all our Capital Budgeting Business Case materials here.

Did you know?
The average daily rate of a McKinsey consultant is $6,625 (not including expenses). The average price of a Flevy document is $65.

Explore all of our best practices in: Capital Budgeting Business Case

Capital Budgeting Business Case Case Studies

For a practical understanding of Capital Budgeting Business Case, take a look at these case studies.

Capital Budgeting Framework for a Hospitality Group in Competitive Market

Scenario: A multinational hospitality company is facing challenges in allocating its capital resources effectively across its global portfolio.

Read Full Case Study

Esports Infrastructure Expansion Assessment

Scenario: The organization is a rising name in the esports industry, looking to strategically allocate its capital to expand operations.

Read Full Case Study

Capital Budgeting Strategy for Maritime Industry Leader

Scenario: The organization is a prominent player in the maritime sector, grappling with allocating capital effectively amidst volatile market conditions.

Read Full Case Study

Overhaul of Capital Budgeting Process for a Growing Medical Devices Firm

Scenario: A high-growth medical devices company is wrestling with an overly complex and ineffective capital budgeting process.

Read Full Case Study

Ecommerce Platform Scalability for D2C Health Supplements

Scenario: A Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) health supplements company in the competitive North American market is struggling to create effective business cases for its new product lines and market expansion strategies.

Read Full Case Study

Capital Allocation Framework for Semiconductor Firm in High-Tech Sector

Scenario: A semiconductor company operating in the high-tech sector is grappling with the challenge of effectively allocating capital to sustain innovation and growth while managing the cyclical nature of the industry.

Read Full Case Study

Explore all Flevy Management Case Studies

Related Questions

Here are our additional questions you may be interested in.

How can executives effectively balance the quantitative and qualitative aspects of capital budgeting decisions?
Executives can balance capital budgeting by integrating Quantitative Analysis with Qualitative Insights, emphasizing NPV and IRR while considering Strategic Alignment, Innovation, and Stakeholder Engagement for long-term value creation. [Read full explanation]
How should companies adjust their capital budgeting processes to better manage and mitigate risks associated with cyber security threats?
Companies should integrate Cyber Security into Strategic Planning, allocate appropriate resources, and adopt a Risk-based Approach in their Capital Budgeting processes to mitigate cyber threats. [Read full explanation]
In what ways can the integration of AI and machine learning into Business Case development improve decision-making accuracy?
Integrating AI and ML into Business Case development enhances decision-making accuracy, efficiency, and strategic insight, improving Strategic Planning, Operational Excellence, and Risk Management. [Read full explanation]
How can executives ensure alignment between capital budgeting decisions and long-term strategic goals in a rapidly changing business environment?
Ensure capital budgeting aligns with Strategic Goals through integrated Strategic Planning, leveraging Advanced Analytics, Scenario Planning, and adopting flexible budgeting approaches for long-term success. [Read full explanation]
How can the integration of ESG factors into Business Case Development be optimized to balance short-term costs with long-term sustainability goals?
Optimize ESG integration in Business Case Development by aligning with Strategic Objectives, leveraging Competitive Advantage, and adopting best practices for long-term Sustainability and Profitability. [Read full explanation]
What role does corporate culture play in the effectiveness of capital budgeting processes and decision-making?
Corporate culture significantly influences capital budgeting effectiveness by shaping decision-making, risk assessment, and investment prioritization, aligning them with strategic goals for improved organizational performance. [Read full explanation]

Source: Executive Q&A: Capital Budgeting Business Case Questions, Flevy Management Insights, 2024


Flevy is the world's largest knowledge base of best practices.


Leverage the Experience of Experts.

Find documents of the same caliber as those used by top-tier consulting firms, like McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, Accenture.

Download Immediately and Use.

Our PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and Word documents are completely customizable, including rebrandable.

Save Time, Effort, and Money.

Save yourself and your employees countless hours. Use that time to work on more value-added and fulfilling activities.




Read Customer Testimonials



Download our FREE Strategy & Transformation Framework Templates

Download our free compilation of 50+ Strategy & Transformation slides and templates. Frameworks include McKinsey 7-S Strategy Model, Balanced Scorecard, Disruptive Innovation, BCG Experience Curve, and many more.